<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/2002/04/xhtml-math-svg/xhtml-math-svg.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8"/>
    <title>Project-Team:ATHENA</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="../static/css/raweb.css" type="text/css"/>
    <meta name="description" content="Research Program - Computational diffusion MRI"/>
    <meta name="dc.title" content="Research Program - Computational diffusion MRI"/>
    <meta name="dc.subject" content=""/>
    <meta name="dc.publisher" content="INRIA"/>
    <meta name="dc.date" content="(SCHEME=ISO8601) 2016-01"/>
    <meta name="dc.type" content="Report"/>
    <meta name="dc.language" content="(SCHEME=ISO639-1) en"/>
    <meta name="projet" content="ATHENA"/>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://raweb.inria.fr/rapportsactivite/RA2016/static/MathJax/MathJax.js?config=TeX-MML-AM_CHTML">
      <!--MathJax-->
    </script>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="tdmdiv">
      <div class="logo">
        <a href="http://www.inria.fr">
          <img style="align:bottom; border:none" src="../static/img/icons/logo_INRIA-coul.jpg" alt="Inria"/>
        </a>
      </div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">
        <div class="tdmentete">
          <a href="uid0.html">Project-Team Athena</a>
        </div>
        <span>
          <a href="uid1.html">Members</a>
        </span>
      </div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Overall Objectives<ul><li><a href="./uid3.html">Presentation</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Research Program<ul><li class="tdmActPage"><a href="uid11.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Computational diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid19.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">MEG and EEG</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Application Domains<ul><li><a href="uid24.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Applications of diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid25.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Applications of M/EEG</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">
        <a href="./uid32.html">Highlights of the Year</a>
      </div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">New Software and Platforms<ul><li><a href="uid36.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Coadapt P300 Stimulator</a></li><li><a href="uid41.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">DIPY</a></li><li><a href="uid45.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">The White Matter Query Language</a></li><li><a href="uid49.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">FindSources3D</a></li><li><a href="uid53.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">High Performance Diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid56.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">MedInria</a></li><li><a href="uid61.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">OpenMEEG</a></li><li><a href="uid65.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">OpenVIBE</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">New Results<ul><li><a href="uid71.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Modeling in Diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid76.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Tissue Microstructures features recovery &amp; applications</a></li><li><a href="uid82.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Towards microstructural based tractography</a></li><li><a href="uid87.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Perfusion MRI &amp; PLI</a></li><li><a href="uid93.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Structural Connectivity Network</a></li><li><a href="uid97.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Clinical and Neurocognitive Applications of Diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid100.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">MEEG and Diffusion MRI</a></li><li><a href="uid103.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">MEG, EEG</a></li><li><a href="uid107.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Modeling electrical stimulation</a></li><li><a href="uid109.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Brain-Computer Interfaces</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Bilateral Contracts and Grants with Industry<ul><li><a href="uid118.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Bilateral Grants with Industry</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Partnerships and Cooperations<ul><li><a href="uid124.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Regional Initiatives</a></li><li><a href="uid127.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">National Initiatives</a></li><li><a href="uid148.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">European Initiatives</a></li><li><a href="uid166.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">International Initiatives</a></li><li><a href="uid198.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">International Research Visitors</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">Dissemination<ul><li><a href="uid225.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Promoting Scientific Activities</a></li><li><a href="uid272.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Teaching - Supervision - Juries</a></li><li><a href="uid314.html&#10;&#9;&#9;  ">Popularization</a></li></ul></div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">
        <div>Bibliography</div>
      </div>
      <div class="TdmEntry">
        <ul>
          <li>
            <a id="tdmbibentmajor" href="bibliography.html">Major publications</a>
          </li>
          <li>
            <a id="tdmbibentyear" href="bibliography.html#year">Publications of the year</a>
          </li>
          <li>
            <a id="tdmbibentfoot" href="bibliography.html#References">References in notes</a>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div id="main">
      <div class="mainentete">
        <div id="head_agauche">
          <small><a href="http://www.inria.fr">
	    
	    Inria
	  </a> | <a href="../index.html">
	    
	    Raweb 
	    2016</a> | <a href="http://www.inria.fr/en/teams/athena">Presentation of the Project-Team ATHENA</a> | <a href="http://team.inria.fr/athena/">ATHENA Web Site
	  </a></small>
        </div>
        <div id="head_adroite">
          <table class="qrcode">
            <tr>
              <td>
                <a href="athena.xml">
                  <img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="XML" src="../static/img/icons/xml_motif.png"/>
                </a>
              </td>
              <td>
                <a href="athena.pdf">
                  <img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="PDF" src="IMG/qrcode-athena-pdf.png"/>
                </a>
              </td>
              <td>
                <a href="../athena/athena.epub">
                  <img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="e-pub" src="IMG/qrcode-athena-epub.png"/>
                </a>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>PDF
</td>
              <td>e-Pub
</td>
            </tr>
          </table>
        </div>
      </div>
      <!--FIN du corps du module-->
      <br/>
      <div class="bottomNavigation">
        <div class="tail_aucentre">
          <a href="./uid3.html" accesskey="P"><img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="previous" src="../static/img/icons/previous_motif.jpg"/> Previous | </a>
          <a href="./uid0.html" accesskey="U"><img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="up" src="../static/img/icons/up_motif.jpg"/>  Home</a>
          <a href="./uid19.html" accesskey="N"> | Next <img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="next" src="../static/img/icons/next_motif.jpg"/></a>
        </div>
        <br/>
      </div>
      <div id="textepage">
        <!--DEBUT2 du corps du module-->
        <h2>Section: 
      Research Program</h2>
        <h3 class="titre3">Computational diffusion MRI</h3>
        <p>Diffusion MRI (dMRI) provides a non-invasive way of estimating
in-vivo CNS fiber structures using the average random thermal
movement (diffusion) of water molecules as a probe. It's a recent
field of research with a history of roughly three decades. It was
introduced in the mid 80's by Le Bihan et al
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid0">[90]</a>, Merboldt et al
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid1">[94]</a> and Taylor
et al <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid2">[103]</a>. As of today, it is the unique
non-invasive technique capable of describing the neural connectivity
in vivo by quantifying the anisotropic diffusion of water molecules
in biological tissues.</p>
        <a name="uid12"/>
        <h4 class="titre4">Diffusion Tensor Imaging &amp; High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging</h4>
        <p>In dMRI, the acquisition and reconstruction of the diffusion signal
allows for the reconstruction of the water molecules displacement
probability, known as the Ensemble Average Propagator (EAP)
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid3">[102]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid4">[72]</a>. Historically, the first
model in dMRI is the 2nd order diffusion tensor (DTI)
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid5">[70]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid6">[69]</a> which
assumes the EAP to be Gaussian centered at the origin. DTI has now
proved to be extremely useful to study the normal and pathological
human brain <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid7">[91]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid8">[80]</a>. It
has led to many applications in clinical diagnosis of neurological
diseases and disorder, neurosciences applications in assessing
connectivity of different brain regions, and more recently,
therapeutic applications, primarily in neurosurgical planning. An
important and very successful application of diffusion MRI has been
brain ischemia, following the discovery that water diffusion drops
immediately after the onset of an ischemic event, when brain cells
undergo swelling through cytotoxic edema.</p>
        <p>The increasing clinical importance of diffusion imaging has drived our
interest to develop new processing tools for Diffusion Tensor MRI.
Because of the complexity of the data, this imaging modality raises a
large amount of mathematical and computational challenges. We have
therefore developed original and efficient algorithms relying on
Riemannian geometry, differential geometry, partial differential
equations and front propagation techniques to correctly and
efficiently estimate, regularize, segment and process Diffusion Tensor
MRI (DT-MRI)
(see  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid9">[93]</a> and  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid10">[92]</a>).</p>
        <p>In DTI, the Gaussian assumption over-simplifies the diffusion of water
molecules. While it is adequate for voxels in which there is only a
single fiber orientation (or none), it breaks for voxels in which
there are more complex internal structures and limitates the ability
of the DTI to describe complex, singular and intricate fiber
configurations (U-shape, kissing or crossing fibers). To overcome
this limitation, so-called Diffusion Spectrum Imaging (DSI)
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid11">[107]</a> and High Angular Resolution
Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) methods such as Q-ball imaging
  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid12">[105]</a> and other multi-tensors and compartment models
  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid13">[100]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid14">[101]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid15">[63]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid16">[62]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid17">[98]</a>
were developed to resolve the orientationnality of more complicated
fiber bundle configurations.</p>
        <p>Q-Ball imaging (QBI) has been proven very successful in resolving
multiple intravoxel fiber orientations in MR images, thanks tO its
ability to reconstruct the Orientation Distribution Function (ODF, the
probability of diffusion in a given direction). These tools play a
central role in our work related to the development of a robust and
linear spherical harmonic estimation of the HARDI signal and to our
development of a regularized, fast and robust analytical QBI solution
that outperforms the state-of-the-art ODF numerical technique
developed by Tuch. Those contributions are fundamental and have
already started to impact on the Diffusion MRI, HARDI and Q-Ball
Imaging community  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid18">[79]</a>. They are at the core of
our probabilistic and deterministic tractography algorithms devised to
best exploit the full distribution of the fiber ODF
(see  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid19">[76]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid20">[5]</a>
and  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid21">[77]</a>,<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid22">[6]</a>).</p>
        <a name="uid13"/>
        <h4 class="titre4">Beyond DTI with high order tensors </h4>
        <p>High Order Tensors (HOT) models to estimate the diffusion function
while overcoming the shortcomings of the 2nd order tensor model have
also been recently proposed such as the Generalized Diffusion Tensor
Imaging (G-DTI) model developed by Ozarslan et al 
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid23">[109]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid24">[110]</a> or 4th order
Tensor Model  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid25">[68]</a>. For more details, we
refer the reader to our articles
in  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid26">[81]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid13">[100]</a> where we review
HOT models and to our articles
in  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid10">[92]</a>, co-authored with some of our
close collaborators, where we review recent mathematical models and
computational methods for the processing of Diffusion Magnetic
Resonance Images, including state-of-the-art reconstruction of
diffusion models, cerebral white matter connectivity analysis, and
segmentation techniques. Recently, we started to work on Diffusion
Kurtosis Imaging (DKI), of great interest for the company <span class="smallcap">Olea
Medical </span>. Indeed, DKI is fast gaining popularity in the domain for
characterizing the diffusion propagator or EAP by its deviation from
Gaussianity. Hence it is an important tool in the clinic for
characterizing the white-matter's integrity with biomarkers derived
from the 3D 4th order kurtosis tensor
(KT)  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid27">[84]</a>.</p>
        <p>All these powerful techniques are of utmost importance to acquire a
better understanding of the CNS mechanisms and have helped to
efficiently tackle and solve a number of important and challenging
problems <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid16">[62]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid15">[63]</a>. They have also opened up a landscape of extremely exciting
research fields for medicine and neuroscience. Hence, due to the
complexity of the CNS data and as the magnetic field strength of
scanners increase, as the strength and speed of gradients increase and
as new acquisition techniques
appear <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid28">[4]</a>,
these imaging modalities raise a large amount of mathematical and
computational challenges at the core of the research we develop at
<span class="smallcap">Athena </span>  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid29">[83]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid13">[100]</a>.</p>
        <a name="uid14"/>
        <h4 class="titre4">Improving dMRI acquisitions</h4>
        <p>One of the most important challenges in diffusion imaging is to
improve acquisition schemes and analyse approaches to optimally
acquire and accurately represent diffusion profiles in a clinically
feasible scanning time. Indeed, a very important and open problem in
Diffusion MRI is related to the fact that HARDI scans generally
require many times more diffusion gradient than traditional diffusion
MRI scan times. This comes at the price of longer scans, which can be
problematic for children and people with certain diseases. Patients
are usually unable to tolerate long scans and excessive motion of the
patient during the acquisition process can force a scan to be aborted
or produce useless diffusion MRI images. Recently, we have developed
novel methods for the acquisition and the processing of diffusion
magnetic resonance images, to efficiently provide, with just few
measurements, new insights into the structure and anatomy of the brain
white matter in vivo.</p>
        <p>First, we contributed developing real-time reconstruction algorithm
based on the Kalman filter <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid30">[75]</a>. Then,
and more recently, we started to explore the utility of Compressive
Sensing methods to enable faster acquisition of dMRI data by reducing
the number of measurements, while maintaining a high quality for the
results. Compressed Sensing (CS) is a recent technique which has been
proved to accurately reconstruct sparse signals from undersampled
measurements acquired below the Shannon-Nyquist rate  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid31">[95]</a>.</p>
        <p>We have contributed to the reconstruction of the diffusion signal and
its important features as the orientation distribution function and
the ensemble average propagator, with a special focus on clinical
setting in particular for single and multiple Q-shell
experiments  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid31">[95]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid32">[73]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid33">[74]</a>. Compressive
sensing as well as the parametric reconstruction of the diffusion
signal in a continuous basis of functions such as the Spherical Polar
Fourier basis, have been proved through our recent contributions to be
very useful for deriving simple and analytical closed formulae for
many important dMRI features, which can be estimated via a reduced
number of measurements  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid31">[95]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid32">[73]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid33">[74]</a>.</p>
        <p>We have also contributed to design optimal acquisition schemes for
single and multiple q-shell experiments. In particular, the method
proposed in <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid28">[4]</a> helps generate
sampling schemes with optimal angular coverage for multi-shell
acquisitions. The cost function we proposed is an extension of the
electrostatic repulsion to multi-shell and can be used to create
acquisition schemes with incremental angular distribution, compatible
with prematurely stopped scans. Compared to more commonly used radial
sampling, our method improves the angular resolution, as well as fiber
crossing discrimination. The optimal sampling schemes, freely
available for
download (<a href="http://www.emmanuelcaruyer.com/">http://www.emmanuelcaruyer.com/</a>), have been
selected for use in the HCP (Human Connectome
Project) (<a href="http://humanconnectome.org/documentation/Q1/imaging-protocols.html">http://humanconnectome.org/documentation/Q1/imaging-protocols.html</a>).</p>
        <p>We think that such kind of contributions open new perspectives for
dMRI applications including, for example, tractography where the
improved characterization of the fiber orientations is likely to
greatly and quickly help tracking through regions with and/or without
crossing fibers  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid34">[82]</a></p>
        <a name="uid17"/>
        <h4 class="titre4">dMRI modelling, tissue microstructures features recovery &amp; applications</h4>
        <p>The dMRI signal is highly complex, hence, the mathematical tools
required for processing it have to be commensurate in their
complexity. Overall, these last twenty years have seen an explosion of
intensive scientific research which has vastly improved and literally
changed the face of dMRI. In terms of dMRI models, two trends are
clearly visible today: the parametric approaches which attempt to
build models of the tissue to explain the signal based on
model-parameters such as CHARMED <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid35">[64]</a>, AxCaliber
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid36">[65]</a> and NODDI
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid37">[108]</a> to cite but a few, and the
non-parametric approaches, which attempt to describe the signal in
useful but generic functional bases such as the Spherical Polar
Fourier (SPF) basis
<a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid38">[67]</a>, <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid39">[66]</a>, the
Solid Harmonic (SoH) basis <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid40">[78]</a>, the
Simple Harmonic Oscillator based Reconstruction and Estimation (SHORE)
basis <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid41">[96]</a> and more recent Mean Apparent
Propagator or MAP-MRI basis   <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid42">[97]</a>.</p>
        <p>However, although great improvements have been made in the last twenty
years, major improvements are still required primarily to optimally
acquire dMRI data, better understand the biophysics of the signal
formation, recover invariant and intrinsic microstructure features,
identify bio-physically important bio-markers and improve
tractography. For short, there is still considerable room for
improvement to take dMRI from the benchside to the bedside.</p>
        <p>Therefore, there is still considerable room for improvement when it
comes to the concepts and tools able to efficiently acquire, process
and analyze the complex structure of dMRI data. Develop
ground-breaking tools and models for dMRI is one of the major
objectives we would like to achieve in order to lead to a decisive
advance and breakthrough in this field.</p>
        <p>Then, we propose to investigate the feasibility of using our new
models and methods to measure extremely important biological tissue
microstructure quantities such as axonal radius and density in white
matter. These parameters could indeed provide new insight to better
understand the brain's architecture and more importantly could also
provide new imaging bio-markers to characterize certain
neurodegenerative diseases. This challenging scientific problem, when
solved, will lead to direct measurements of important microstructural
features that will be integrated in our analysis to provide much
greater insight into disease mechanisms, recovery and development.
These new microstructural parameters will open the road to go far
beyond the limitations of the more simple bio-markers derived from DTI
that are clinically used to this date – such as MD and FA which are
known to be extremely sensitive to confounding factors such as partial
volume and axonal dispersion, non-specific and not able to capture any
subtle effects that might be early indicators of diseases  <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid43">[7]</a>.</p>
        <a name="uid18"/>
        <h4 class="titre4">Towards microstructural based tractography</h4>
        <p>In order to go far beyond traditional fiber-tracking techniques, we
believe that first order information, i.e. fiber orientations, has to
be superseeded by second and third order information, such
as microstructure details, to improve tractography. However, many of these
higher order information methods are relatively new or unexplored and
tractography algorithms based on these high order based methods have
to be conceived and designed. In this aim, we propose to work with
multiple-shells to reconstruct the Ensemble Average Propagator (EAP),
which represents the whole 3D diffusion process and use the
possibility it offers to deduce valuable insights on the
microstructural properties of the white matter. Indeed, from a
reconstructed EAP one can compute the angular features of the
diffusion in an diffusion Orientation Distribution Function (ODF),
providing insight in axon orientation, calculate properties of the
entire diffusion in a voxel such as the Mean Squared Diffusivity (MSD)
and Return-To-Origin Probability (RTOP), or come forth with
bio-markers detailing diffusion along a particular white matter bundle
direction such as the Return-to-Axis or Return-to-Plane Probability
(RTAP or RTPP). This opens the way to a ground-breaking computational
and unified framework for tractography based on EAP and microstructure
features <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid44">[8]</a>. Using additional a priori anatomical <a href="./bibliography.html#athena-2016-bid45">[11]</a> and/or functional
information, we could also constrain the tractography algorithm to
start and terminate the streamlines only at valid processing areas of
the brain.</p>
        <p>This development of a computational and unified framework for
tractography, based on EAP, microstructure and a priori anatomical
and/or functional features, will open new perspectives in
tractography, paving the way to a new generation of realistic and
biologically plausible algorithms able to deal with intricate
configurations of white matter fibers and to provide an exquisite and
intrinsic brain connectivity quantification.</p>
      </div>
      <!--FIN du corps du module-->
      <br/>
      <div class="bottomNavigation">
        <div class="tail_aucentre">
          <a href="./uid3.html" accesskey="P"><img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="previous" src="../static/img/icons/previous_motif.jpg"/> Previous | </a>
          <a href="./uid0.html" accesskey="U"><img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="up" src="../static/img/icons/up_motif.jpg"/>  Home</a>
          <a href="./uid19.html" accesskey="N"> | Next <img style="align:bottom; border:none" alt="next" src="../static/img/icons/next_motif.jpg"/></a>
        </div>
        <br/>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>
