Keywords
 A6.2.6. Optimization
 A7.1.3. Graph algorithms
 A8.1. Discrete mathematics, combinatorics
 A8.2. Optimization
 A8.2.1. Operations research
 A8.7. Graph theory
 A9.7. AI algorithmics
 B3.1. Sustainable development
 B3.1.1. Resource management
 B4.2. Nuclear Energy Production
 B4.4. Energy delivery
 B6.5. Information systems
 B7. Transport and logistics
 B9.5.2. Mathematics
1 Team members, visitors, external collaborators
Research Scientists
 Gael Guillot [Univ de Bordeaux, Researcher, until Jan 2021]
 Ruslan Sadykov [Inria, Researcher, HDR]
Faculty Members
 François Clautiaux [Team leader, Univ de Bordeaux, Professor, HDR]
 Boris Detienne [Univ de Bordeaux, Associate Professor]
 Aurelien Froger [Univ de Bordeaux, Associate Professor]
 Arnaud Pecher [Univ de Bordeaux, Professor, HDR]
 Pierre Pesneau [Univ de Bordeaux, Associate Professor]
PostDoctoral Fellow
 Eduardo Queiroga [Inria, from Nov 2021]
PhD Students
 Komlanvi Parfait Ametana [Univ de Bordeaux, from Oct 2021]
 Isaac Balster [Inria]
 Xavier Blanchot [Réseau de transport d'électricité, CIFRE]
 Mickael Gaury [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School]
 Mellila Kechir [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School]
 Daniiil Khachai [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School]
 Johan Leveque [La Poste, CIFRE]
 Orlando Rivera Letelier [Universidad Adolfo Ibanez  Santiago Chili, until Jun 2021]
Interns and Apprentices
 Komlanvi Parfait Ametana [Inria, from Mar 2021 until Aug 2021]
 Nicolas Guillemin [Inria, from Mar 2021 until Aug 2021]
Administrative Assistant
 Joelle Rodrigues [Inria]
External Collaborators
 Artur Alves Pessoa [Universidade Federal Fluminense  Niteroi Brazil]
 Ayse Nur Arslan [INSA Rennes]
 Imen Ben Mohamed [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School, until Sep 2021]
 Philippe Depouilly [CNRS]
 Laurent Facq [CNRS]
 Cédric Joncour [Univ du Havre]
 Walid Klibi [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School]
 Philippe Meurdesoif [Univ de Bordeaux]
 Gautier Stauffer [Ecole de Commerce KEDGE Business School, HDR]
2 Overall objectives
Reformulation techniques in Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), Polyhedral approaches (cut generation), Robust Optimization, Approximation Algorithms, Extended formulations, Lagrangian Relaxation (Column Generation) based algorithms, Dantzig and Benders Decomposition, Primal Heuristics, Graph Theory, Constraint Programming.
Quantitative modeling is routinely used in both industry and administration to design and operate transportation, distribution, or production systems. Optimization concerns every stage of the decisionmaking process: long term investment budgeting and activity planning, tactical management of scarce resources, or the control of daytoday operations. In many optimization problems that arise in decision support applications the most important decisions (control variables) are discrete in nature: such as on/off decision to buy, to invest, to hire, to send a vehicle, to allocate resources, to decide on precedence in operation planning, or to install a connection in network design. Such combinatorial optimization problems can be modeled as linear or nonlinear programs with integer decision variables and extra variables to deal with continuous adjustments. The most widely used modeling tool consists in defining the feasible decision set using linear inequalities with a mix of integer and continuous variables, socalled Mixed Integer Programs (MIP), which already allow a fair description of reality and are also wellsuited for global optimization. The solution of such models is essentially based on enumeration techniques and is notoriously difficult given the huge size of the solution space.
Commercial solvers have made significant progress but remain quickly overwhelmed beyond a certain problem size. A key to further progress is the development of better problem formulations that provide strong continuous approximations and hence help to prune the enumerative solution scheme. Effective solution schemes are a complex blend of techniques: cutting planes to better approximate the convex hull of feasible (integer) solutions, extended reformulations (combinatorial relations can be formulated better with extra variables), constraint programming to actively reduce the solution domain through logical implications along variable fixing based on reduced cost, Lagrangian decomposition methods to produce powerful relaxations, and Bender's decomposition to project the formulation, reducing the problem to the important decision variables, and to implement multilevel programming that models a hierarchy of decision levels or recourse decision in the case of data adjustment, primal heuristics and metaheuristics (greedy, local improvement, or randomized partial search procedures) to produce good candidates at all stage of the solution process, and branchandbound or dynamic programming enumeration schemes to find a global optimum, with specific strong strategies for the selection on the sequence of fixings. The real challenge is to integrate the most efficient methods in one global system so as to prune what is essentially an enumeration based solution technique. The progress are measured in terms of the large scale of input data that can now be solved, the integration of many decision levels into planning models, and not least, the account taken for random (or dynamically adjusted) data by way of modeling expectation (stochastic approaches) or worstcase behavior (robust approaches).
Building on complementary expertise, our team's overall goals are threefold:

$\left(i\right)$ Methodologies:
To design tight formulations for specific combinatorial optimization problems and generic models, relying on delayed cut and column generation, decomposition, extended formulations and projection tools for linear and nonlinear mixed integer programming models. To develop generic methods based on such strong formulations by handling their large scale dynamically. To generalize algorithmic features that have proven efficient in enhancing performance of exact optimization approaches. To develop approximation schemes with proven optimality gap and low computational complexity. More broadly, to contribute to theoretical and methodological developments of exact and approximate approaches in combinatorial optimization, while extending the scope of applications and their scale.

$\left(ii\right)$ Problem solving:
To demonstrate the strength of cooperation between complementary exact mathematical optimization techniques, dynamic programming, robust and stochastic optimization, constraint programming, combinatorial algorithms and graph theory, by developing “efficient” algorithms for specific mathematical models. To tackle largescale reallife applications, providing provably good approximate solutions by combining exact, approximate, and heuristic methods.

$\left(iii\right)$ Software platform & Transfer:
To provide prototypes of modelers and solvers based on generic software tools that build on our research developments, writing code that serves as the proofofconcept of the genericity and efficiency of our approaches, while transferring our research findings to internal and external users.
3 Research program
3.1 Introduction
Keywords: integer programming, graph theory, decomposition approaches, polyhedral approaches,quadratic programming approaches, constraint programming..
Combinatorial optimization is the field of discrete optimization problems. In many applications, the most important decisions (control variables) are binary (on/off decisions) or integer (indivisible quantities). Extra variables can represent continuous adjustments or amounts. This results in models known as mixed integer programs (MIP), where the relationships between variables and input parameters are expressed as linear constraints and the goal is defined as a linear objective function. MIPs are notoriously difficult to solve: good quality estimations of the optimal value (bounds) are required to prune enumerationbased globaloptimization algorithms whose complexity is exponential. In the standard approach to solving an MIP is socalled branchandbound algorithm : $\left(i\right)$ one solves the linear programming (LP) relaxation using the simplex method; $\left(ii\right)$ if the LP solution is not integer, one adds a disjunctive constraint on a factional component (rounding it up or down) that defines two subproblems; $\left(iii\right)$ one applies this procedure recursively, thus defining a binary enumeration tree that can be pruned by comparing the local LP bound to the best known integer solution. Commercial MIP solvers are essentially based on branchandbound (such IBMCPLEX, FICOXpressmp, or GUROBI). They have made tremendous progress over the last decade (with a speedup by a factor of 60). But extending their capabilities remains a continuous challenge; given the combinatorial explosion inherent to enumerative solution techniques, they remain quickly overwhelmed beyond a certain problem size or complexity.
Progress can be expected from the development of tighter formulations. Central to our field is the characterization of polyhedra defining or approximating the solution set and combinatorial algorithms to identify “efficiently” a minimum cost solution or separate an unfeasible point. With properly chosen formulations, exact optimization tools can be competitive with other methods (such as metaheuristics) in constructing good approximate solutions within limited computational time, and of course has the important advantage of being able to provide a performance guarantee through the relaxation bounds. Decomposition techniques are implicitly leading to better problem formulation as well, while constraint propagation are tools from artificial intelligence to further improve formulation through intensive preprocessing. A new trend is robust optimization where recent progress have been made: the aim is to produce optimized solutions that remain of good quality even if the problem data has stochastic variations. In all cases, the study of specific models and challenging industrial applications is quite relevant because developments made into a specific context can become generic tools over time and see their way into commercial software.
Our project brings together researchers with expertise in mathematical programming (polyhedral approaches, decomposition and reformulation techniques in mixed integer programing, robust and stochastic programming, and dynamic programming), graph theory (characterization of graph properties, combinatorial algorithms) and constraint programming in the aim of producing better quality formulations and developing new methods to exploit these formulations. These new results are then applied to find high quality solutions for practical combinatorial problems such as routing, network design, planning, scheduling, cutting and packing problems, High Performance and Cloud Computing.
3.2 Polyhedral approaches for MIP
Adding valid inequalities to the polyhedral description of an MIP allows one to improve the resulting LP bound and hence to better prune the enumeration tree. In a cutting plane procedure, one attempt to identify valid inequalities that are violated by the LP solution of the current formulation and adds them to the formulation. This can be done at each node of the branchandbound tree giving rise to a socalled branchandcut algorithm45. The goal is to reduce the resolution of an integer program to that of a linear program by deriving a linear description of the convex hull of the feasible solutions. Polyhedral theory tells us that if $X$ is a mixed integer program: $X=P\cap {\mathbb{Z}}^{n}\times {\mathbb{R}}^{p}$ where $P=\{x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n+p}:Ax\le b\}$ with matrix $(A,b)\in {\mathbb{Q}}^{m\times (n+p+1)}$, then $conv\left(X\right)$ is a polyhedron that can be described in terms of linear constraints, i.e. it writes as $conv\left(X\right)=\{x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n+p}:C\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}x\le d\}$ for some matrix $(C,d)\in {\mathbb{Q}}^{{m}^{\text{'}}\times (n+p+1)}$ although the dimension ${m}^{\text{'}}$ is typically quite large. A fundamental result in this field is the equivalence of complexity between solving the combinatorial optimization problem $min\{cx:x\in X\}$ and solving the separation problem over the associated polyhedron $conv\left(X\right)$: if $\tilde{x}\notin conv\left(X\right)$, find a linear inequality $\pi \phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}x\ge {\pi}_{0}$ satisfied by all points in $conv\left(X\right)$ but violated by $\tilde{x}$. Hence, for NPhard problems, one can not hope to get a compact description of $conv\left(X\right)$ nor a polynomial time exact separation routine. Polyhedral studies focus on identifying some of the inequalities that are involved in the polyhedral description of $conv\left(X\right)$ and derive efficient separation procedures (cutting plane generation). Only a subset of the inequalities $C\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}x\le d$ can offer a good approximation, that combined with a branchandbound enumeration techniques permits to solve the problem. Using cutting plane algorithm at each node of the branchandbound tree, gives rise to the algorithm called branchandcut.
3.3 Decompositionandreformulationapproaches
An hierarchical approach to tackle complex combinatorial problems consists in considering separately different substructures (subproblems). If one is able to implement relatively efficient optimization on the substructures, this can be exploited to reformulate the global problem as a selection of specific subproblem solutions that together form a global solution. If the subproblems correspond to subset of constraints in the MIP formulation, this leads to DantzigWolfe decomposition. If it corresponds to isolating a subset of decision variables, this leads to Bender's decomposition. Both lead to extended formulations of the problem with either a huge number of variables or constraints. DantzigWolfe approach requires specific algorithmic approaches to generate subproblem solutions and associated global decision variables dynamically in the course of the optimization. This procedure is known as column generation, while its combination with branchandbound enumeration is called branchandprice. Alternatively, in Bender's approach, when dealing with exponentially many constraints in the reformulation, the cutting plane procedures that we defined in the previous section are wellsuited tools. When optimization on a substructure is (relatively) easy, there often exists a tight reformulation of this substructure typically in an extended variable space. This gives rise powerful reformulation of the global problem, although it might be impractical given its size (typically pseudopolynomial). It can be possible to project (part of) the extended formulation in a smaller dimensional space if not the original variable space to bring polyhedral insight (cuts derived through polyhedral studies can often be recovered through such projections).
3.4 Integration of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Integer Programming
When one deals with combinatorial problems with a large number of integer variables, or tightly constrained problems, mixed integer programming (MIP) alone may not be able to find solutions in a reasonable amount of time. In this case, techniques from artificial intelligence can be used to improve these methods. In particular, we use variable fixing techniques, primal heuristics and constraint programming.
Primal heuristics are useful to find feasible solutions in a small amount of time. We focus on heuristics that are either based on integer programming (rounding, diving, relaxation induced neighborhood search, feasibility pump), or that are used inside our exact methods (heuristics for separation or pricing subproblem, heuristic constraint propagation, ...). Such methods are likely to produce good quality solutions only if the integer programming formulation is of top quality, i.e., if its LP relaxation provides a good approximation of the IP solution.
In the same line, variable fixing techniques, that are essential in reducing the size of large scale problems, rely on good quality approximations: either tight formulations or tight relaxation solvers (as a dynamic program combined with state space relaxation). Then if the dual bound derives when the variable is fixed to one exceeds the incubent solution value, the variable can be fixed to zero and hence removed from the problem. The process can be apply sequentially by refining the degree of relaxation.
Constraint Programming (CP) focuses on iteratively reducing the variable domains (sets of feasible values) by applying logical and problemspecific operators. The latter propagates on selected variables the restrictions that are implied by the other variable domains through the relations between variables that are defined by the constraints of the problem. Combined with enumeration, it gives rise to exact optimization algorithms. A CP approach is particularly effective for tightly constrained problems, feasibility problems and minmax problems. Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), on the other hand, is known to be effective for loosely constrained problems and for problems with an objective function defined as the weighted sum of variables. Many problems belong to the intersection of these two classes. For such problems, it is reasonable to use algorithms that exploit complementary strengths of Constraint Programming and Mixed Integer Programming.
3.5 Robust Optimization
Decision makers are usually facing several sources of uncertainty, such as the variability in time or estimation errors. A simplistic way to handle these uncertainties is to overestimate the unknown parameters. However, this results in overconservatism and a significant waste in resource consumption. A better approach is to account for the uncertainty directly into the decision aid model by considering mixed integer programs that involve uncertain parameters. Stochastic optimization account for the expected realization of random data and optimize an expected value representing the average situation. Robust optimization on the other hand entails protecting against the worstcase behavior of unknown data. There is an analogy to game theory where one considers an oblivious adversary choosing the realization that harms the solution the most. A full worst case protection against uncertainty is too conservative and induces very high overcost. Instead, the realization of random data are bound to belong to a restricted feasibility set, the socalled uncertainty set. Stochastic and robust optimization rely on very large scale programs where probabilistic scenarios are enumerated. There is hope of a tractable solution for realistic size problems, provided one develops very efficient adhoc algorithms. The techniques for dynamically handling variables and constraints (columnandrow generation and Bender's projection tools) that are at the core of our team methodological work are specially wellsuited to this context.
3.6 Polyhedral Combinatorics and Graph Theory
Many fundamental combinatorial optimization problems can be modeled as the search for a specific structure in a graph. For example, ensuring connectivity in a network amounts to building a tree that spans all the nodes. Inquiring about its resistance to failure amounts to searching for a minimum cardinality cut that partitions the graph. Selecting disjoint pairs of objects is represented by a socalled matching. Disjunctive choices can be modeled by edges in a socalled conflict graph where one searches for stable sets – a set of nodes that are not incident to one another. Polyhedral combinatorics is the study of combinatorial algorithms involving polyhedral considerations. Not only it leads to efficient algorithms, but also, conversely, efficient algorithms often imply polyhedral characterizations and related minmax relations. Developments of polyhedral properties of a fundamental problem will typically provide us with more interesting inequalities well suited for a branchandcut algorithm to more general problems. Furthermore, one can use the fundamental problems as new building bricks to decompose the more general problem at hand. For problem that let themselves easily be formulated in a graph setting, the graph theory and in particular graph decomposition theorem might help.
4 Application domains
4.1 Network Design and Routing Problems
We are actively working on problems arising in network topology design, implementing a survivability condition of the form “at least two paths link each pair of terminals”. We have extended polyhedral approaches to problem variants with bounded length requirements and rerouting restrictions 43. Associated to network design is the question of traffic routing in the network: one needs to check that the network capacity suffices to carry the demand for traffic. The assignment of traffic also implies the installation of specific hardware at transient or terminal nodes.
To accommodate the increase of traffic in telecommunication networks, today's optical networks use grooming and wavelength division multiplexing technologies. Packing multiple requests together in the same optical stream requires to convert the signal in the electrical domain at each aggregation of disaggregation of traffic at an origin, a destination or a bifurcation node. Traffic grooming and routing decisions along with wavelength assignments must be optimized to reduce optoelectronics system installation cost. We developed and compared several decomposition approaches 59 to deal with backbone optical network with relatively few nodes (around 20) but thousands of requests for which traditional multicommodity network flow approaches are completely overwhelmed. We also studied the impact of imposing a restriction on the number of optical hops in any request route. We also developed a branchandcut approach to a problem that consists in placing sensors on the links of a network for a minimum cost 46.
The DialaRide Problem is a variant of the pickup and delivery problem with time windows, where the user inconvenience must be taken into account. In 52, ride time and customer waiting time are modeled through both constraints and an associated penalty in the objective function. We develop a column generation approach, dynamically generating feasible vehicle routes. Handling ride time constraints explicitly in the pricing problem solver requires specific developments. Our dynamic programming approach for pricing problem makes use of a heuristic dominance rule and a heuristic enumeration procedure, which in turns implies that our overall branchandprice procedure is a heuristic. However, in practice our heuristic solutions are experimentally very close to exact solutions and our approach is numerically competitive in terms of computation times.
In 49, 50, we consider the problem of covering an urban area with sectors under additional constraints. We adapt the aggregation method to our column generation algorithm and focus on the problem of disaggregating the dual solution returned by the aggregated master problem.
We studied several time dependent formulations for the unit demand vehicle routing problem 34, 35. We gave new bounding flow inequalities for a single commodity flow formulation of the problem. We described their impact by projecting them on some other sets of variables, such as variables issued of the Picard and Queyranne formulation or the natural set of design variables. Some inequalities obtained by projection are facet defining for the polytope associated with the problem. We are now running more numerical experiments in order to validate in practice the efficiency of our theoretical results.
We considered the multicommodity transportation problem. Applications of this problem arise in, for example, rail freight service design, "less than truckload" trucking, where goods should be delivered between different locations in a transportation network using various kinds of vehicles of large capacity. A particularity here is that, to be profitable, transportation of goods should be consolidated. This means that goods are not delivered directly from the origin to the destination, but transferred from one vehicle to another in intermediate locations. We proposed an original Mixed Integer Programming formulation for this problem which is suitable for resolution by a BranchandPrice algorithm and intelligent primal heuristics based on it.
For the problem of routing freight railcars, we proposed two algorithmes based on the column generation approach. These algorithmes have been tested on a set of reallife instances coming from a real Russian freight transportation company. Our algorithms have been faster on these instances than the current solution approach being used by the company.
4.2 Packing and Covering Problems
Realopt team has a strong experience on exact methods for cutting and packing problems. These problems occur in logistics (loading trucks), industry (wood or steel cutting), computer science (parallel processor scheduling).
We developed a branchandprice algorithm for the Bin Packing Problem with Conflicts which improves on other approaches available in the literature 57. The algorithm uses our methodological advances like the generic branching rule for the branchandprice and the column based heuristic. One of the ingredients which contributes to the success of our method are fast algorithms we developed for solving the subproblem which is the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts. Two variants of the subproblem have been considered: with interval and arbitrary conflict graphs.
We also developed a branchandprice algorithm for a variant of the binpacking problem where the items are fragile. In 27 we studied empirically different branching schemes and different algorithms for solving the subproblems.
We studied a variant of the knapsack problem encountered in inventory routing problem: we faced a multipleclass integer knapsack problem with setups 47 (items are partitioned into classes whose use implies a setup cost and associated capacity consumption). We showed the extent to which classical results for the knapsack problem can be generalized to this variant with setups and we developed a specialized branchandbound algorithm.
We studied the orthogonal knapsack problem, with the help of graph theory. Fekete and Schepers proposed to model multidimensional orthogonal placement problems by using an efficient representation of all geometrically symmetric solutions by a so called packing class involving one interval graph for each dimension. Though Fekete & Schepers' framework is very efficient, we have however identified several weaknesses in their algorithms: the most obvious one is that they do not take advantage of the different possibilities to represent interval graphs. We propose to represent these graphs by matrices with consecutive ones on each row. We proposed a branchandbound algorithm for the 2D knapsack problem that uses our 2D packing feasibility check. We are currently developing exact optimization tools for glasscutting problems in a collaboration with SaintGobain 30. This 2D3stageGuillotine cut problems are very hard to solve given the scale of the instance we have to deal with. Moreover one has to issue cutting patterns that avoid the defaults that are present in the glass sheet that are used as raw material. There are extra sequencing constraints regarding the production that make the problem even more complex.
We have also organized a European challenge on packing with society Renault. This challenge was about loading trucks under practical constraints.
4.3 Planning, Scheduling, and Logistic Problems
Inventory routing problems combine the optimization of product deliveries (or pickups) with inventory control at customer sites. We considered an industrial application where one must construct the planning of single product pickups over time; each site accumulates stock at a deterministic rate; the stock is emptied on each visit. We have developed a branchandprice algorithm where periodic plans are generated for vehicles by solving a multiple choice knapsack subproblem, and the global planning of customer visits is coordinated by the master program 48. We previously developed approximate solutions to a related problem combining vehicle routing and planning over a fixed time horizon (solving instances involving up to 6000 pickups and deliveries to plan over a twenty day time horizon with specific requirements on the frequency of visits to customers 44.
Together with our partner company GAPSO from the associate team SAMBA, we worked on the equipment routing task scheduling problem 51 arising during port operations. In this problem, a set of tasks needs to be performed using equipments of different types with the objective to maximize the weighted sum of performed tasks.
We participated to the project on an airborne radar scheduling. For this problem, we developed fast heuristics 42 and exact algorithms 29. A substantial research has been done on machine scheduling problems. A new compact MIP formulation was proposed for a large class of these problems 28. An exact decomposition algorithm was developed for the NPhard maximizing the weighted number of late jobs problem on a single machine 53. A dominant class of schedules for malleable parallel jobs was discovered in the NPhard problem to minimize the total weighted completion time 55. We proved that a special case of the scheduling problem at cross docking terminals to minimize the storage cost is polynomially solvable 56, 54.
Another application area in which we have successfully developed MIP approaches is in the area of tactical production and supply chain planning. In 26, we proposed a simple heuristic for challenging multiechelon problems that makes effective use of a standard MIP solver. 25 contains a detailed investigation of what makes solving the MIP formulations of such problems challenging; it provides a survey of the known methods for strengthening formulations for these applications, and it also pinpoints the specific substructure that seems to cause the bottleneck in solving these models. Finally, the results of 31 provide demonstrably stronger formulations for some problem classes than any previously proposed. We are now working on planning phytosanitary treatments in vineries.
We have been developing robust optimization models and methods to deal with a number of applications like the above in which uncertainty is involved. In 40, 39, we analyzed fundamental MIP models that incorporate uncertainty and we have exploited the structure of the stochastic formulation of the problems in order to derive algorithms and strong formulations for these and related problems. These results appear to be the first of their kind for structured stochastic MIP models. In addition, we have engaged in successful research to apply concepts such as these to health care logistics 32. We considered train timetabling problems and their reoptimization after a perturbation in the network 60, 58. The question of formulation is central. Models of the literature are not satisfactory: continuous time formulations have poor quality due to the presence of discrete decision (resequencing or rerouting); arc flow in timespace graph blowup in size (they can only handle a single line timetabling problem). We have developed a discrete time formulation that strikes a compromise between these two previous models. Based on various time and network aggregation strategies, we develop a 2stage approach, solving the contiguous time model having fixed the precedence based on a solution to the discrete time model.
Currently, we are conducting investigations on a realworld planning problem in the domain of energy production, in the context of a collaboration with EDF 37, 36, 38. The problem consists in scheduling maintenance periods of nuclear power plants as well as production levels of both nuclear and conventional power plants in order to meet a power demand, so as to minimize the total production cost. For this application, we used a DantzigWolfe reformulation which allows us to solve realistic instances of the deterministic version of the problem 41. In practice, the input data comprises a number of uncertain parameters. We deal with a scenariobased stochastic demand with help of a Benders decomposition method. We are working on Multistage Robust Optimization approaches to take into account other uncertain parameters like the duration of each maintenance period, in a dynamic optimization framework. The main challenge addressed in this work is the joint management of different reformulations and solving techniques coming from the deterministic (DantzigWolfe decomposition, due to the large scale nature of the problem), stochastic (Benders decomposition, due to the number of demand scenarios) and robust (reformulations based on duality and/or column and/or row generation due to maintenance extension scenarios) components of the problem 33.
5 Social and environmental responsibility
5.1 Footprint of research activities
Our research involves a large amount of computational experiments.
5.2 Impact of research results
The objective of our research is to reduce the quantity of energy/material used to realize some large projects, including energy production and distribution, chemical treatments, and distribution of goods.
6 Highlights of the year
Imen BEN MOHAMED has received the second prize for the best PhD thesis in transportation and logistics in France (edition 2021). (https://perso.isima.fr/ lacomme/GT2L/)
Boris Detienne has defended his Habilitation thesis 18.
This was the last year of RealOpt project. Our new Inria team EDGE will start in 2022.
7 New software and platforms
7.1 New software
7.1.1 BaPCod

Name:
A generic BranchAndPriceAndCut Code

Keywords:
Column Generation, BranchandPrice, BranchandCut, Mixed Integer Programming, Mathematical Optimization, Benders Decomposition, DantzigWolfe Decomposition, Extended Formulation

Functional Description:
BaPCod is a prototype code that solves Mixed Integer Programs (MIP) by application of reformulation and decomposition techniques. The reformulated problem is solved using a branchandpriceandcut (column generation) algorithms, Benders approaches, network flow and dynamic programming algorithms. These methods can be combined in several hybrid algorithms to produce exact or approximate solutions (primal solutions with a bound on the deviation to the optimum).

Release Contributions:
First public version of the software. The source code has been cleaned up.

News of the Year:
First public release.
 URL:
 Publication:

Contact:
Ruslan Sadykov

Participants:
Artur Alves Pessoa, Boris Detienne, Eduardo Uchoa Barboza, Franck Labat, François Clautiaux, Francois Vanderbeck, Halil Sen, Issam Tahiri, Michael Poss, Pierre Pesneau, Romain Leguay, Ruslan Sadykov

Partners:
Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, IPB, Universidade Federal Fluminense
7.1.2 VRPSolver

Name:
VRPSolver

Keywords:
Column Generation, Vehicle routing, Numerical solver

Scientific Description:
Major advances were recently obtained in the exact solution of Vehicle Routing Problems (VRPs). Sophisticated BranchCutandPrice (BCP) algorithms for some of the most classical VRP variants now solve many instances with up to a few hundreds of customers. However , adapting and reimplementing those successful algorithms for other variants can be a very demanding task. This work proposes a BCP solver for a generic model that encompasses a wide class of VRPs. It incorporates the key elements found in the best recent VRP algorithms: ngpath relaxation, rank1 cuts with limited memory, and route enumeration, all generalized through the new concept of "packing set". This concept is also used to derive a new branch rule based on accumulated resource consumption and to generalize the Ryan and Foster branch rule. Extensive experiments on several variants show that the generic solver has an excellent overall performance, in many problems being better than the best existing specific algorithms. Even some nonVRPs, like bin packing, vector packing and generalized assignment, can be modeled and effectively solved.

Functional Description:
This solver allows one to model and solve to optimality many combinatorial optimization problems, belonging to the class of vehicle routing, scheduling, packing and network design problems. The problem is formulated using variables, linear objective function, linear and integrality constraints, definition of graphs, resources, and mapping between graph arcs and variables. A complex BranchCutandPrice algorithm is used to solve the model. A new concept of elementarity and packing sets is used to pass an additional information to the solver, so that several stateoftheart BranchCutandPrice components can be used to improve radically the efficiency of the solver. The interface of the solver is implemented in Julia using JuMP package. To simplify the installation and usage, the solver is distributed as a docker image. The solver can be used only for academic purposes.

Release Contributions:
Version 0.4.1 brings new features as well as correction of some bugs

News of the Year:
New version is released
 URL:
 Publication:

Contact:
Ruslan Sadykov

Participants:
Ruslan Sadykov, Eduardo Uchoa Barboza, Artur Alves Pessoa, Eduardo Queiroga, Teobaldo Bulhões, Laurent Facq

Partners:
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Universidade Federal da Paraiba
8 New results
8.1 Algorithms for optimization under uncertainty
In 21, we introduce a new exact algorithm to solve twostage stochastic linear programs. Based on the multicut Benders reformulation of such problems, with one subproblem for each scenario, this method relies on a partition of the subproblems into batches. By detecting as soon as possible the nonoptimality of a firststage candidate, it solves only a small proportion of the subproblems at most iterations. We also propose a general framework to stabilize our algorithm, and show its finite convergence and exact behavior. We report an extensive computational study on largescale instances of stochastic optimization literature that shows the efficiency of the proposed algorithm compared to six alternative algorithms from the literature (monocut and multicut implementation of the Benders decomposition algorithm with and without an inout stabilization approach, a monocut implementation of a level bundle method, IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.10 builtin Benders decomposition). We also obtain significant additional computational time savings using the primal stabilization schemes.
We have studied a class of twostage robust binary optimization problems with objective uncertainty where recourse decisions are restricted to be mixedbinary 1. For these problems, we present a deterministic equivalent formulation through the convexification of the recourse feasible region. We then explore this formulation under the lens of a relaxation, showing that the specific relaxation we propose can be solved using the branchandprice algorithm. We present conditions under which this relaxation is exact, and describe alternative exact solution methods when this is not the case. Despite the twostage nature of the problem, we provide NPcompleteness results based on our reformulations. Finally, we present various applications in which the methodology we propose can be applied. We compare our exact methodology to those approximate methods recently proposed in the literature under the name Kadaptability. Our computational results show that our methodology is able to produce better solutions in less computational time compared to the Kadaptability approach, as well as to solve bigger instances than those previously managed in the literature.
We further extend this work in 22, where we address general problems in which all constraints (including those linking the first and the second stages) are defined by convex functions and involve mixedinteger variables, thus extending the existing literature to a much wider class of problems. We show how these problems can be reformulated using Fenchel duality, allowing to derive an enumerative exact algorithm, for which we prove $\u03f5$convergence in a finite number of operations. An implementation of the resulting algorithm, embedding a column generation scheme, is then computationally evaluated on two different problems, using instances that are derived starting from the existing literature. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach providing results on the practical solution of this class of problems.
8.2 Arcflow models
Network flow formulations are among the most successful tools to solve optimization problems. Such formulations correspond to determining an optimal flow in a network. One particular class of network flow formulations is the arc flow, where variables represent flows on individual arcs of the network. For hard problems, polynomialsized arcflow models typically provide weak linear relaxations and may have too much symmetry to be efficient in practice. Instead, arc flow models with a pseudopolynomial size usually provide strong relaxations and are efficient in practice. The interest in pseudopolynomial arcflow formulations has grown considerably in the last twenty years, in which they have been used to solve many open instances of hard problems. A remarkable advantage of pseudopolynomial arcflow models is the possibility to solve practicalsized instances directly by a Mixed Integer Linear Programming solver, avoiding the implementation of complex methods based on column generation.
In 8, we present theoretical foundations of pseudopolynomial arcflow formulations, by showing a relation between their network and Dynamic Programming (DP). This relation allows a better understanding of the strength of these formulations, through a link with models obtained by DantzigWolfe decomposition. The relation with DP also allows a new perspective to relate statespace relaxation methods for DP with arcflow models. We also present a dual point of view to contrast the linear relaxation of arcflow models with that of models based on paths and cycles. To conclude, we review the main solution methods and applications of arcflow models based on DP in several domains such as cutting, packing, scheduling, and routing.
8.3 Machine scheduling problems
In 23, we study the prizecollecting job sequencing problem with one common and multiple secondary resources. In this problem, a set of jobs is given, each with a profit, multiple time windows for its execution, and a duration during which it requires the main resource. Each job also requires one of the secondary resources before, during, and after its use of the main resource. The goal is to select and schedule the subset of jobs that maximize the total profit. The problem has application in particle therapy scheduling and in preruntime scheduling of avionic systems among others. We present a new mixed integer linear programming formulation of the problem and a branchcutandprice algorithm as exact solution methods. We also introduce a heuristic algorithm to tackle larger instances. Extensive numerical experiments show that our exact algorithms can solve to optimality literature instances with up to 500 jobs for a particular dataset and up to 250 jobs for another dataset with different characteristics. Our heuristic builds highquality solutions in a small computational time. It computes new bestknown solutions for most of the larger instances.
8.4 Vehicle routing problems
The Shortest Path Problem with Resource Constraints (SPPRC) arises as a subproblem in stateoftheart BranchCutandPrice algorithms for vehicle routing problems, including the BCP solver described just above. In 5, we propose a variant of the bidirectional label correcting algorithm in which the labels are stored and extended according to the socalled bucket graph. Such organization of labels helps to decrease significantly the number of dominance checks and the running time of the algorithm. We also show how the forward/backward route symmetry can be exploited and how to eliminate arcs from the bucket graph using reduced costs. The proposed algorithm can be especially beneficial for vehicle routing instances with large vehicle capacity and/or with time window constraints. Computational experiments were performed on instances from the distance constrained vehicle routing problem, including multidepot and sitedependent variants, on the vehicle routing problem with time windows, and on the "nightmare" instances of the heterogeneous fleet vehicle routing problem. Significant improvements over the best algorithms in the literature were achieved and many instances could be solved for the first time. The proposed algorithm is the central part of the generic solver for vehicle routing and related problems proposed in 4. This solver is based on BaPCod library 24 which is being developed in the team.
In 3, we examine the robust counterpart of the classical Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP). We consider two types of uncertainty sets for the customer demands: the classical budget polytope introduced by Bertsimas and Sim (2003), and a partitioned budget polytope proposed by Gounaris et al. (2013). We show that using the setpartitioning formulation it is possible to reformulate our problem as a deterministic heterogeneous vehicle routing problem. Thus, many stateoftheart techniques for exactly solving deterministic VRPs can be applied for the robust counterpart, and a modern branchandcutandprice algorithm can be adapted to our setting by keeping the number of pricing subproblems strictly polynomial. More importantly, we introduce new techniques to significantly improve the efficiency of the algorithm. We present analytical conditions under which a pricing subproblem is infeasible. This result is general and can be applied to other combinatorial optimization problems with knapsack uncertainty. We also introduce robust capacity cuts which are provably stronger than the ones known in the literature. Finally, a fast iterated local search algorithm is proposed to obtain heuristic solutions for the problem. Using our branchandcutandprice algorithm incorporating existing and new techniques, we are able to solve to optimality all but one open instances from the literature.
In 14, we propose a partial optimization metaheuristic under special intensification conditions (POPMUSIC) for the classical capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP). The proposed approach uses a branchcutandprice algorithm as a powerful heuristic to solve subproblems whose dimensions are typically between 25 and 200 customers. The whole algorithm can be seen as the application of local search over very large neighborhoods, starting from a single initial solution. The main computational experiments were carried out on instances having between 302 and 1000 customers. Using initial solutions generated by some of the best available metaheuristics for the problem, POPMUSIC was able to obtain consistently better solutions for long runs of up to 32 hours. In a final experiment, starting from the best known solutions available in CVRP library (CVRPLIB), POPMUSIC was able to find new best solutions for several instances, including some very large ones.
8.5 Cutting and packing problems
In 15, we introduce and motivate a variant of the bin packing problem where bins are assigned to time slots, and minimum and maximum lags are required between some pairs of items. We suggest two integer programming formulations for the problem: a compact one, and a stronger formulation with an exponential number of variables and constraints. We propose a branchcutandprice approach which exploits the latter formulation. For this purpose, we devise separation algorithms based on a mathematical characterization of feasible assignments for two important special cases of the problem. Computational experiments are reported for instances inspired from a realcase application of chemical treatment planning in vineyards, as well as for literature instances for special cases of the problem. The experimental results show the efficiency of our branchcutandprice approach, as it outperforms the compact formulation of newly proposed instances, and is able to obtain improved lower and upper bounds for literature instances.
In 13, we propose branchcutandprice algorithms for the classic bin packing problem and also for the following related problems: vector packing, variable sized bin packing and variable sized bin packing with optional items. The algorithms are defined as models for VRPSolver, a generic solver for vehicle routing problems. In that way, a simple parameterization enables the use of several branchcutandprice advanced elements: automatic stabilization by smoothing, limitedmemory rank1 cuts, enumeration, hierarchical strong branching and limited discrepancy search diving heuristics. As an original theoretical contribution, we prove that the branching over accumulated resource consumption, that does not increase the difficulty of the pricing subproblem, is sufficient for those bin packing models. Extensive computational results on instances from the literature show that the VRPSolver models have a performance that is very robust over all those problems, being often superior to the existing exact algorithms on the hardest instances. Several instances could be solved to optimality for the first time.
We have developed an approach to solve the temporal knapsack problem (TKP) based on a very large size dynamic programming formulation 7. In this generalization of the classical knapsack problem, selected items enter and leave the knapsack at fixed dates. We solve the TKP with a dynamic program of exponential size, which is solved using a method called Successive Sublimation Dynamic Programming (SSDP). This method starts by relaxing a set of constraints from the initial problem, and iteratively reintroduces them when needed. We show that a direct application of SSDP to the temporal knapsack problem does not lead to an effective method, and that several improvements are needed to compete with the best results from the literature.
8.6 Network Design Problems
More than ever, data networks have demonstrated their central role in the world economy, but also in the wellbeing of humanity that needs fast and reliable networks. In parallel, with the emergence of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and Software Defined Networking (SDN), efficient network algorithms considered too hard to be put in practice in the past now have a second chance to be considered again. In this context, as new networks will be deployed and current ones get significant upgrades, it is thus time to rethink the network dimensioning problem with protection against failures. In 17, we consider a pathbased protection scheme with the global rerouting strategy in which, for each failure situation, there may be a new routing of all the demands. Our optimization task is to minimize the needed amount of bandwidth. After discussing the hardness of the problem, we develop two scalable mathematical models that we handle using both Column Generation and Benders Decomposition techniques. Through extensive simulations on realworld IP network topologies and on randomly generated instances, we show the effectiveness of our methods: they lead to savings of 40 to 48% of the bandwidth to be installed in a network to protect against failures compared to traditional schemes. Finally, our implementation in OpenDaylight demonstrates the feasibility of the approach. Its evaluation with Mininet shows that our solution provides subsecond recovery times, but the way it is implemented may greatly impact the amount of signaling traffic exchanged. In our evaluations, the recovery phase requires only a few tens of milliseconds for the fastest implementation, compared to a few hundreds of milliseconds for the slowest one.
8.7 Energy
Optimizing nuclear unit outages is of significant economic importance for the French electricity company EDF, as these outages induce a substitute production by other more expensive means to fulfill electricity demand. This problem is quite challenging given the specific operating constraints of nuclear units, the stochasticity of both the demand and nonnuclear units availability, and the scale of the instances. To tackle these difficulties we use a combined decomposition approach in 10. The operating constraints of the nuclear units are built into a DantzigWolfe pricing subproblem whose solutions define the columns of a demand covering formulation. The scenarios of demand and nonnuclear units availability are handled in a Benders decomposition. Our approach is shown to scale up to the reallife instances of the French nuclear fleet.
8.8 Sustainable agriculture
In 20, we investigate the robust planning and scheduling of activities in agriculture and in particular the application of phytosanitary treatments. The crops are subject to many diseases that may arise during different time windows of the planning horizon. In response, a phytosanitary treatment can be applied to protect against a subset of these diseases. However, the effective duration of some treatments is uncertain, it depends on the type of treatment applied as well as on the weather conditions. In this study we introduce a penalty function based approach to handle this uncertainty without being overly conservative akin to light robustness approach proposed in the literature. We discuss different forms for this penalty function and elaborate on solution methodologies for the resulting models. We test the effectiveness of our approach with realisticallysized instances, which correspond to a typical vineyard in Bordeaux area, and present a numerical analysis of different optimization models and solution methods.
Our work in 15 cited above also finds its practical application in the context of application of phytosanitary treatments.
9 Bilateral contracts and grants with industry
9.1 Bilateral contracts with industry
We have a contract with RTE to develop strategies inspired from stochastic gradient methods to speedup Benders' decomposition. The PhD thesis of Xavier Blanchot is part of this contract.
9.2 Bilateral grants with industry
Our joint project with Atoptima startup "Solution methods for the inventory routing problem: application to waste collection in the urban environment" has been supported in 2020 by Nouvelle Aquitaine region (appel à projet "Recherche et Enseignement Supérieur"). The project is financing one half of a PhD thesis.
We received the funding for a one year postdoctoral position from the PGMO fundation, for a joint project with EDF. This project aims at improving robustness and stability of power plants planning given the uncertainty associated with production fleet availability (nuclear outage durations, nuclear availability, growth of renewable sources, imponderable events such as the Covid19 crisis...).
10 Partnerships and cooperations
10.1 National initiatives
ANR DESIDE

Title:
DESIDE

Duration:
January 2021  December 2023 (4 years)

Coordinator:
F. Clautiaux (Université Bordeaux, Inria BSO)

Partners:
 KEDGE (France)
 Sobolev Institute (Russia)

Summary:
The main objective of this proposal is to provide new mathematical models and optimization approaches for design of spatiotemporal networks in stochastic and dynamic environment . Optimization approaches and mathematical modelling will concern strategic, tactical and operational levels. More specifically, such combinatorial NPhard problems as Facility Location and Vehicle Routing problems will be considered jointly through optimizing the following decisions: (1) optimum number of facilities, (2) optimal facility location, (3) optimal relocation of facilities according to dynamic evolving parameters, (4) allocation of clusters to each facility, over the time period where the information about spatiotemporal parameters is incomplete or inexact, (5) various formulations of routing problems among the facilities of the network will be considered under different optimality criteria.
10.2 Regional initiatives
ESR 2020

Title:
Solution approaches for the Inventory Routing Problem

Duration:
November 2020  October 2023 (3 years)

Coordinator:
R. Sadykov (Inria BSO)

Partners:
Atoptima startup

Summary:
The recent progress made in solving vehicle routing problems allows us to tackle more complex variants such as the planning of routes over a multiperiod horizon combined with the management of inventory levels at the customer sites. This problem, known in the literature as the Inventory Routing Problem (IRP), is not yet within the reach of exact mathematical optimization methods. It combines three levels of decisions to be made for each period: (i) which customer to serve, (ii) how much to deliver or pick up, (iii) which routes to use. It becomes even more complex with the arrival of multilevel and multimodal logistics solutions: intermediate depots are delivered via large trucks, while the last mile is delivered via light and nonpolluting vehicles from these intermediate depots. Finally, it is necessary to be able not only to optimize a tactical schedule, but also to be able to reoptimize this schedule in real time in the light of the hazards of the solution's deployment. The real applications for this optimization model are multiple throughout the urban logistics sector: whether it is in the collection of recycled waste, the delivery of gas stations, the collection of milk in farms, or in maintenance problems with a prescribed time between two services, as well as sales representatives found with this same type of characteristics. It is important to focus on producing new optimization approaches capable of handling this level of complexity by advancing the stateoftheart.
11 Dissemination
11.1 Promoting scientific activities
11.1.1 Scientific events: organisation
Member of the organizing committees
François Clautiaux has been a member of the organizing committee of Dataquitaine, a local scientific event gathering researchers, students, and companies in relation with data science, AI, and operations research.
11.1.2 Scientific events: selection
Member of the conference program committees
François Clautiaux has been a member of the scientific committee of ROADEF 2021 (Mulhouse).
11.1.3 Journal
Member of the editorial boards
François Clautiaux is a member of the editorial board of OJMO (Open Journal on Mathematical Optimization)
Ruslan Sadykov is an associate editor of the EURO Journal on Computational Optimization.
Reviewer  reviewing activities
François Clautiaux has been reviewer for Math. Prog. Computing, Informs Journal on Computing, European Journal of Operational Research, and Computers and Operations Research.
Aurélien Froger has been reviewer for European Journal of Operational Research, EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, INFORMS Journal on Computing, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging technologies, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, and Transportation Science.
Ruslan Sadykov has been reviewer for the following international journals: Computers and Operations Research, IISE Transactions, Ad Hoc Networks, International Journal of Productions Research, INFORMS Journal on Computing, Expert Systems With Applications, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, European Journal on Operational Research, Omega, Journal of Scheduling, and Transportation Science.
Pierre Pesneau has been reviewer for European Journal of Operational Research, and Discrete Optimization Journal.
11.1.4 Invited talks
François Clautiaux. Irkutsk  Extended network flow formulations, Plenary speaker for MOTOR, Baikal (Russia).
François Clautiaux. Paris  Synergies between Dynamic Programming and Mixed Integer Programming, Invited talk at the joint ROADEF / ORBEL seminar.
Boris Detienne. Paris  A finite epsilonconvergence algorithm for 01 mixedinteger convex twostage robust optimization with objective uncertainty, Invited talk at the Workshop on robust and stochastic optimization methods (ENPC).
Ruslan Sadykov. A generic exact solver for vehicle routing problems ans its applications, Invited talk at the seminar of LIPN (Laboratoire Informatique du Paris Nord).
Ruslan Sadykov. Developing BranchCutandPrice solver for Vehicle Routing and Related Problems, Invited talk at the seminar of Huawei Research Center, Minsk, Belarus (online).
11.1.5 Leadership within the scientific community
François Clautiaux is president of the French operations research society ROADEF.
François Clautiaux is a member of the scientific committee of GDR Recherche Opérationnelle.
11.2 Teaching  Supervision  Juries
11.2.1 Teaching
Boris Detienne is head of the Master Program in Operations Research of the University of Bordeaux.
Pierre Pesneau is head of the Master of Engineering in Mathematical Optimization (CMI OPTIM) of the University of Bordeaux.
François Clautiaux is head of the Master in Applied Mathematics (180 students) of the University of Bordeaux.
Aurélien Froger has organized a oneweek workshop on Optimisation and decision, in the Graduate Research Program NUMERICS, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : François Clautiaux, Projet d'optimisation, L3, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : François Clautiaux, Grands domaines de l'optimisation, L1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : François Clautiaux, Introduction à la programmation en variables entières, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : François Clautiaux, Integer Programming, M2, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : François Clautiaux, Algorithmes pour l'optimisation en nombres entiers, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : François Clautiaux, Programmation linéaire, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master: Boris Detienne, Combinatoire et routage, ENSEIRB INPB
 Licence : Boris Detienne, Optimisation, L2, Université de Bordeaux
 Licence : Boris Detienne, Groupe de travail applicatif, L3, Université de Bordeaux
 Master : Boris Detienne, Optimisation continue, M1, Université de Bordeaux
 Master : Boris Detienne, Integer Programming, M2, Université de Bordeaux
 Master : Boris Detienne, Optimisation dans l'incertain, M2, Université de Bordeaux
 Licence : Aurélien Froger, Optimisation, L2, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : Aurélien Froger, Groupe de travail applicatif, L3, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Aurélien Froger, Programmation linéaire, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Aurélien Froger, Optimisation dans les graphes, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Ruslan Sadykov, Introduction to Constraint Programming, M2, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : Pierre Pesneau, Grands domaines de l'optimisation, L1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : Pierre Pesneau, Programmation pour le calcul scientifique, L2, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Licence : Pierre Pesneau, Recherche Opérationnelle, ENSEIRB INPB, France
 Master : Pierre Pesneau, Algorithmique et Programmation 1, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Pierre Pesneau, Introduction à la programmation en variables entières, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Pierre Pesneau, Programmation linéaire, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Pierre Pesneau, Projet Algorithmes de flot, M1, Université de Bordeaux, France
 Master : Pierre Pesneau, Integer Programming, M2, Université de Bordeaux, France
11.2.2 Supervision
 Orlando Rivera Letelier defended PhD thesis "Applications of Integer Programming and Decomposition to Scheduling Problems: the Strategic Mine Planning Problem and the Bin Packing Problem with Time Lag" 19 on February 26, 2021, under the supervision of Ruslan Sadykov and François Clautiaux.
 François Clautiaux supervises three PhD students: Mellila Kechir, Xavier Blanchot and Parfait Ametana.
 Boris Detienne supervises two PhD students: Parfait Ametana and Mickaël Gaury.
 Aurelien Froger supervises one PhD student: Xavier Blanchot.
 Ruslan Sadykov supervises two PhD students: Isaac Balster and Daniil Khachay.
 Nicolas Guillemin defended master thesis "Branchcutandprice algorithms for vehicle routing and scheduling problems with complex objective functions" in September 2021, under the supervision of Ruslan Sadykov and Aurelien Froger.
 Paul Fleurance defended master thesis "Optimisation des chaines de fonctions de service dans les réseaux télécom" in October 2021, under the supervision of Ruslan Sadykov. The work was done in collaboration with Orange Télécom.
 Laura Codazzi defended master thesis "Charge scheduling for a fleet of electric buses considering VehicletoGrid technologies" in July 2021, under the supervision of Aurélien Froger. The student was from Politecnico di Milano and the work was also supervised by a researcher from this institution.
11.2.3 Juries
François Clautiaux has been in the following PhD committees: Ilia Tarasov (Toulouse), Alexandre Le Jean (Grenoble), Franco Quesada (Paris CNAM), Sébastien Deschamps (Ponts ParisTech).
François Clautiaux is jury member for EDSA: EURO Distinguished Service Award 2021 (awarded by the European Society of Operations Research).
Boris Detienne has been in the PhD committee of Boukhalfa Zahout (Tours).
Ruslan Sadykov has been in the PhD committee of Gabriel Volte (University of Montpellier).
11.3 Popularization
11.3.1 Articles and contents
François Clautiaux has been associated editor for the special issue of Tangente on Operations Research.
François Clautiaux and Pierre Pesneau have published a popularization paper on Integer Linear Programming in Tangente.
Boris Detienne and Ayşe Nur Arslan have published a popularization paper on optimization under uncertainty in Tangente.
11.3.2 Local clusters
François Clautiaux is a member of the board of DOMEX AI/Data Science in Région Nouvelle Aquitaine. This entity aims at developping company activies in AI, data science and operations research in Nouvelle Aquitaine.
12 Scientific production
12.1 Major publications
 1 articleDecompositionbased approaches for a class of twostage robust binary optimization problems.INFORMS Journal on Computing2021
 2 articleIterative aggregation and disaggregation algorithm for pseudopolynomial network flow models with side constraints.European Journal of Operational Research2582017, 467  477
 3 articleBranchandcutandprice for the robust capacitated vehicle routing problem with knapsack uncertainty.Operations Research6932021, 739754
 4 articleA Generic Exact Solver for Vehicle Routing and Related Problems.Mathematical Programming1832020, 483523
 5 articleA Bucket Graph Based Labelling Algorithm for Vehicle Routing.Transportation Science5512021, 428
12.2 Publications of the year
International journals
 6 articleDecompositionbased approaches for a class of twostage robust binary optimization problems.INFORMS Journal on Computing2021
 7 articleAn iterative dynamic programming approach for the temporal knapsack problem.European Journal of Operational Research2932September 2021
 8 articleArc flow formulations based on dynamic programming: Theoretical foundations and applications.European Journal of Operational Research2961January 2022, 321
 9 articleThe electric vehicle routing problem with capacitated charging stations.Transportation Science2021
 10 articleCombining DantzigWolfe and Benders decompositions to solve a largescale nuclear outage planning problem.European Journal of Operational Research2983May 2022, 10671083
 11 articlefrvcpy: An OpenSource Solver for the Fixed Route Vehicle Charging Problem.INFORMS Journal on Computing3342021, 12771283
 12 articleBranchandcutandprice for the robust capacitated vehicle routing problem with knapsack uncertainty.Operations Research6932021, 739754
 13 articleSolving Bin Packing Problems Using VRPSolver Models.SN Operations Research Forum220April 2021
 14 articleA POPMUSIC matheuristic for the capacitated vehicle routing problem.Computers and Operations Research136105475December 2021
 15 articleBin Packing Problem with Time Lags.INFORMS Journal on Computing2022
 16 articleA Bucket Graph Based Labelling Algorithm for Vehicle Routing.Transportation Science5512021, 428
 17 articleDesign of Robust Programmable Networks with Bandwidthoptimal Failure Recovery Scheme.Computer Networks192108043June 2021
Doctoral dissertations and habilitation theses
 18 thesisDecomposition algorithms for deterministic and uncertain integer programs.Ecole doctorale EDMI (ED Mathématiques et Informatique) Université de BordeauxDecember 2021
 19 thesisApplications of Integer Programming and Decomposition to Scheduling Problems: the Strategic Mine Planning Problem and the Bin Packing Problem with Time Lag.University of Bordeaux; Universidad Adolfo IbáñezFebruary 2021
Reports & preprints
 20 miscRobust Strategic Planning of Phytosanitary Treatments in Agriculture.November 2021
 21 miscThe Benders by batch algorithm: design and stabilization of an enhanced algorithm to solve multicut Benders reformulation of twostage stochastic programs.January 2022
 22 miscAdaptive robust optimization with objective uncertainty.October 2021
 23 miscNew exact and heuristic algorithms to solve the prizecollecting job sequencing problem with one common and multiple secondary resources.July 2021
 24 reportBaPCod  a generic branchandprice code.Inria Bordeaux SudOuestNovember 2021
12.3 Cited publications
 25 unpublishedA Computational Analysis of Lower Bounds for Big Bucket Production Planning Problems.2009, URL: http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal00387105/en/
 26 articleA heuristic approach for big bucket multilevel production planning problems.European Journal of Operational Research2009, 396411URL: http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal00387052/en/
 27 articleExact algorithms for the bin packing problem with fragile objects.Discrete Optimization103August 2013, 210223URL: http://hal.inria.fr/hal00909480
 28 articleOn Scheduling a Single Machine to Minimize a Piecewise Linear Objective Function : A Compact MIP Formulation.Naval Research Logistics / Naval Research Logistics An International Journal5662009, 487502URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00387012/en/
 29 articleTime Indexed Formulations for Scheduling Chains on a Single Machine: An Application to Airborne Radars.European Journal of Operational Research2009, URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00339639/en/
 30 techreportPattern based diving heuristics for a twodimensional guillotine cuttingstock problem with leftovers.Université de BordeauxDecember 2017, 130
 31 articleMixing MIR Inequalities with Two Divisible Coefficients.Mathematical Programming, Series A2009, 11URL: http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal00387098/en/
 32 articleOptimal Allocation of Surgery Blocks to Operating Rooms Under Uncertainty.Operations Research2009, 11URL: http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal00386469/en/
 33 inproceedingsExtended formulations for robust maintenance planning at power plants.Gaspard Monge Program for Optimization : Conference on Optimization and Practices in Industry PGMOCOPI14Saclay, FranceOctober 2014
 34 inproceedingsOn TimeDependent Model for Unit Demand Vehicle Routing Problems.International Conference on Network Optimization, INOCSpa, BelgiumInternational Network Optimization Conference (INOC)2007
 35 techreportOn a TimeDependent Model for the Unit Demand Vehicle Routing Problem.112007Centro de Investigacao Operacional da Universidade de Lisboa2007
 36 inproceedingsEfficient formulations for nuclear outages using price and cut, Snowcap project..PGMO Days 2017Saclay, FranceNovember 2017
 37 inproceedingsScheduling nuclear outage with cut and price (Snowcap).Mathematical Optimization in the Decision Support Systems for Efficient and Robust Energy Networks Final ConferenceModena, ItalyMarch 2017
 38 inproceedingsOptimisation des arrêts nucléaires : une amélioration des solutions développées par EDF suite au challenge ROADEF 2010.18ème conférence de la société française de recherche opérationnelle et d'aide à la décision ROADEF 2017Metz, FranceFebruary 2017
 39 articleOn formulations of the stochastic uncapacitated lotsizing problem.Operations Research Letters342006, 241250
 40 articleA branchandcut algorithm for the stochastic uncapacitated lotsizing problem.Mathematical Programming1052006, 5584
 41 inproceedingsExtended Formulation for Maintenance Planning at Power Plants.ROADEF  15ème congrès annuel de la Société française de recherche opérationnelle et d'aide à la décisionSociété française de recherche opérationnelle et d'aide à la décisionBordeaux, FranceFebruary 2014
 42 inproceedingsTiming problem for scheduling an airborne radar.Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Project Management and SchedulingIstanbul, TurkeyApril 2008, 132135
 43 articleThe twoedge connected hopconstrained network design problem: Valid inequalities and branchandcut.Networks4912007, 116133
 44 articleColumn generation based heuristic for tactical planning in multi period vehicle routing.European Journal of Operational Research18332007, 10281041
 45 articleA branchandcut algorithm for the resolution of largescale symmetric traveling salesman problems.SIAM Review3311991, 60100
 46 inproceedingsA BranchandCut algorithm to optimize sensor installation in a network.Graph and Optimization Meeting GOM2008France SaintMaximin2008
 47 articleKnapsack Problems with Setups.European Journal of Operational Research1962009, 909918URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00232782/en/
 48 articleA Column Generation based Tactical Planning Method for Inventory Routing.Operations Research6022012, 382397
 49 inproceedingsAggregation technique applied to a clustering problem.4th International Symposium on Combinatorial Optimization (ISCO 2016)Vietri sul Mare, ItalyMay 2016
 50 inproceedingsAggregation technique applied to a clustering problem for waste collection..ROADEF 2016Compiègne, FranceFebruary 2016
 51 inproceedingsEquipment/Operator task scheduling with BAPCOD.Column Generation 2012Bromont, CanadaJune 2012
 52 inproceedingsA Column Generation Based Heuristic for the DialARide Problem.International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain (ILS)Bordeaux, FranceJune 2016
 53 articleA branchandcheck algorithm for minimizing the sum of the weights of the late jobs on a single machine with release dates.European Journal of Operations Research18932008, 12841304URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.078
 54 techreportA polynomial algorithm for a simple scheduling problem at cross docking terminals.RR7054INRIA2009, URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00412519/en/
 55 inproceedingsOn scheduling malleable jobs to minimise the total weighted completion time.13th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in ManufacturingRussie Moscow2009, URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00339646/en/
 56 articleScheduling incoming and outgoing trucks at cross docking terminals to minimize the storage cost.Annals of Operations Research20112012, 423440
 57 articleBin Packing with conflicts: a generic branchandprice algorithm.INFORMS Journal on Computing2522013, 244255URL: http://hal.inria.fr/inria00539869
 58 inproceedingsA multi scalable model based on a connexity graph representation.11th International Conference on Computer Design and Operation in the Railway and Other Transit Systems COMPRAIL'08Toledo, SpainSeptember 2008
 59 phdthesisRésolution d'un problème de groupage dans le réseaux optiques maillés.Université de MontréalJanuary 2010
 60 inproceedingsRealtime train scheduling at SNCF.1st Workshop on Robust Planning and Rescheduling in RailwaysUtrechtARRIVAL meeting on Robust planning and Rescheduling in RailwaysApril 2007