Section: Application Domains

Adaptive Control

Adaptive control is an important application of the research being done in SequeL . Reinforcement learning (RL) precisely aims at controling the behavior of systems and may be used in situations with more or less information available. Of course, the more information, the better, in which case methods of (approximate) dynamic programming may be used [40] . But, reinforcement learning may also handle situations where the dynamics of the system is unknown, situations where the system is partially observable, and non stationary situations. Indeed, in these cases, the behavior is learned by interacting with the environment and thus naturally adapts to the changes of the environment. Furthermore, the adaptive system may also take advantage of expert knowledge when available.

Clearly, the spectrum of potential applications is very wide: as far as an agent (a human, a robot, a virtual agent) has to take a decision, in particular in cases where he lacks some information to take the decision, this enters the scope of our activities. To exemplify the potential applications, let us cite:

• game softwares: in the 1990's, RL has been the basis of a very successful Backgammon program, TD-Gammon [46] that learned to play at an expert level by basically playing a very large amount of games against itself. Today, various games are studied with RL techniques.

• many optimization problems that are closely related to operation research, but taking into account the uncertainty, and the stochasticity of the environment: see the job-shop scheduling, or the cellular phone frequency allocation problems, resource allocation in general [40]

• we can also foresee that some progress may be made by using RL to design adaptive conversational agents, or system-level as well as application-level operating systems that adapt to their users habits.

  More generally, these ideas fall into what adaptive control may bring to human beings, in making their life simpler, by being embedded in an environment that is made to help them, an idea phrased as “ambient intelligence”.

• The sensor management problem consists in determining the best way to task several sensors when each sensor has many modes and search patterns. In the detection/tracking applications, the tasks assigned to a sensor management system are for instance:

  • detect targets,

  • track the targets in the case of a moving target and/or a smart target (a smart target can change its behavior when it detects that it is under analysis),

  • combine all the detections in order to track each moving target,

  • dynamically allocate the sensors in order to achieve the previous three tasks in an optimal way. The allocation of sensors, and their modes, thus defines the action space of the underlying Markov decision problem.

  In the more general situation, some sensors may be localized at the same place while others are dispatched over a given volume. Tasking a sensor may include, at each moment, such choices as where to point and/or what mode to use. Tasking a group of sensors includes the tasking of each individual sensor but also the choice of collaborating sensors subgroups. Of course, the sensor management problem is related to an objective. In general, sensors must balance complex trade-offs between achieving mission goals such as detecting new targets, tracking existing targets, and identifying existing targets. The word “target” is used here in its most general meaning, and the potential applications are not restricted to military applications. Whatever the underlying application, the sensor management problem consists in choosing at each time an action within the set of available actions.

• sequential decision processes are also very well-known in economy. They may be used as a decision aid tool, to help in the design of social helps, or the implementation of plants (see [44] , [43] for such applications).