EN FR
EN FR


Bibliography

Major publications by the team in recent years
  • 1P. Maurice, V. Padois, Y. Measson, P. Bidaud.

    Human-oriented design of collaborative robots, in: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2017, vol. 57, pp. 88–102.
  • 2T. Moulières-Seban, D. Bitonneau, J.-M. Salotti, J.-F. Thibault, B. Claverie.

    Human factors issues for the Design of a Cobotic System, in: Advances in human factors in robots and unmanned systems, Springer, 2017, pp. 375–385.
  • 3C. Viegas, D. Daney, M. Tavakoli, A. T. De Almeida.

    Performance analysis and design of parallel kinematic machines using interval analysis, in: Mechanism and Machine Theory, September 2017, vol. 115, pp. 218–236. [ DOI : 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.05.003 ]

    https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01669173
Publications of the year

Articles in International Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • 4P. Maurice, V. Padois, Y. Measson, P. Bidaud.

    Assessing and improving human movements using sensitivity analysis and digital human simulation, in: International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 32, no 6, pp. 546-558. [ DOI : 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1599432 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01221647
  • 5C. Mazon, C. Fage, C. Consel, A. Amestoy, I. Hesling, M. Bouvard, K. Etchegoyhen, H. Sauzéon.

    Cognitive Mediators of School-Related Socio- Adaptive Behaviors in ASD and Intellectual Disability Pre-and Adolescents: A Pilot-Study in French Special Education Classrooms, in: Brain Sciences, 2019, vol. 9. [ DOI : 10.3390/brainsci9120334 ]

    https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02374929
  • 6J. K. Pickard, J. A. Carretero, J.-P. Merlet.

    Appropriate analysis of the four-bar linkage, in: Mechanism and Machine Theory, September 2019, vol. 139, pp. 237-250. [ DOI : 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.04.013 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02127752
  • 7G. Pugach, A. Pitti, O. Tolochko, P. Gaussier.

    Brain-Inspired Coding of Robot Body Schema Through Visuo-Motor Integration of Touched Events, in: Frontiers in Neurorobotics, March 2019, vol. 13. [ DOI : 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00005 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02073946
  • 8N. Rezzoug, X. Wang, V. Hernandez, P. Gorce.

    Maximal isometric force exertion predicted by the force feasible set formalism: application to handbraking, in: Ergonomics, January 2019, vol. 62, no 12, pp. 1551-1562. [ DOI : 10.1080/00140139.2019.1660418 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02383108
  • 9J.-M. Salotti, B. Prebot, I. Cinelli.

    Situation awareness issues during outdoor activity, in: Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2019, vol. 21, pp. 2484 - 2491.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02162303

Articles in National Peer-Reviewed Journals

  • 10C. Dubois, D. Séminel, J.-M. Salotti, N. Simonazzi.

    Le chatbot : un outil de la relation aux clients, in: Hermès, La Revue- Cognition, communication, politique, October 2019, vol. 2, no 84.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02393120

International Conferences with Proceedings

  • 11J. K. Pickard, J. A. Carretero.

    Appropriate Synthesis of a Crank Rocker Linkage, in: 15th IFToMM World Congress, Krakow, Poland, June 2019.

    https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02081322
  • 12B. Prebot, C. Cavel, L. Calice, M. Mahaut, A. Leduque, J.-M. Salotti.

    Team performance analysis of a collaborative spatial orientation mission in mars analogue environment, in: 70th International Astronautical Congress, Washington, United States, October 2019, 7 p.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02393385
  • 13B. Prebot, J.-M. Salotti, C. Vennin, B. Claverie.

    Shared Spatial Situation Awareness as a Team Performance Indicator in Collaborative Spatial Orientation Task, in: AHFE 2019 International Conference on Affective and Pleasurable Design, Washington, United States, S. Fukuda (editor), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, 2019, vol. 956, pp. 106-115. [ DOI : 10.1007/978-3-030-20037-4_10 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02393226
  • 14J.-M. Salotti.

    Parametric equation for the settlement of mars, in: 70th International Astronautical Congress, Washington, United States, IAC-19,A5,2,7,x49674, October 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02393247

Conferences without Proceedings

  • 15L. Joseph, V. Padois, G. Morel.

    Online minimization of the projected mass of a robot for safe workspace sharing with a human, in: Workshop on "Human movement science for physical human-robot collaboration" at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Montreal, Canada, May 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02333065
  • 16J. K. Pickard, N. Rezzoug, P. Gorce, D. Daney.

    Redundancy Tubes: Modelling Individual and Group Range-of-Motions Along a Path, in: 44ème Congrès de la Société de Biomécanique, Poitiers, France, October 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02367664
  • 17J.-M. Salotti.

    Minimum number of settlers for survival on another planet, in: 11th IAA Symposium on the Future of Space Exploration Moon, Mars and Beyond: Becoming an Interplanetary Civilization, Torino, Italy, France, June 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02162270
  • 18J.-M. Salotti, E. Suhir.

    Degraded situation awareness risk assessment in the aerospace domain, in: IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace, Torino, Italy, June 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02162283
  • 19N. Simonazzi, J.-M. Salotti, C. Dubois, D. Séminel.

    Emotion detection through smartphone from users’interaction: proposal for experimental protocol., in: 54ème Congrès International de la Société d'Ergonomie de Langue Française, Tours, France, September 2019.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02393182

Scientific Books (or Scientific Book chapters)

  • 20H. Sauzéon, L. Dupuy, C. Fage, C. Mazon.

    Assistances numériques pour la cognition quotidienne à tous les âges de la vie, in: Handicap et Recherches : Regards pluridisciplinaires, CNRS Editions, May 2019.

    https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02375456

Other Publications

References in notes
  • 24J. Bernon, E. Escriva, J. M. Schweitzer.

    Agir sur la prévention durable des TMS, Anact, 2011.
  • 25R. Brooks.

    The Robots Are Here, MIT Technology Review, 2004.
  • 26P. Douillet.

    Agir sur Prévenir les risques psychosociaux, Anact, 2013.
  • 27M. R. Endsley.

    Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1990, vol. 34, no 1, pp. 41–45.
  • 28M. Endsley, D. G. Jones.

    Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design, Taylor & Francis, London, 2012.
  • 29D. P. Ferris.

    The exoskeletons are here, in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2009, vol. 6, no 1.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-17
  • 30D. P. Ferris, G. S. Sawicki, M. A. Daley.

    A physiologist's perspective on robotic exoskeletons for human locomotion, in: International journal of Humanoid Robotics, September 2007, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 507–528.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219843607001138
  • 31S. Haddadin, E. Croft.

    Physical Human-Robot Interaction, in: Handbook of Robotics, B. Siciliano, O. Khatib (editors), Springer Verlag, 2016, pp. 1835–1874.
  • 32S. Hignett, L. McAtamney.

    Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), in: Applied Ergonomics, April 2000, vol. 31, no 2, pp. 201–205. [ DOI : 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687099000393
  • 33J. Jacquier-Bret, P. Gorce, G. Motti Lilian, N. Vigouroux.

    Biomechanical analysis of upper limb during the use of touch screen: motion strategies identification, in: Ergonomics, March 2017, vol. 60, no 3, pp. 358–365.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1175671
  • 34H. Jaeger.

    Using Conceptors to Manage Neural Long-Term Memories for Temporal Patterns, in: Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2017, vol. 18, no 13, pp. 1-43.

    http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/15-449.html
  • 35L. Joseph, V. Padois, G. Morel.

    Towards X-ray medical imaging with robots in the open: safety without compromising performances, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Brisbane, Australia, May 2018, pp. 6604–6610. [ DOI : 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460794 ]

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01614508/en
  • 36O. Karhu, P. Kansi, I. Kuorinka.

    Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis, in: Applied Ergonomics, December 1977, vol. 8, no 4, pp. 199–201. [ DOI : 10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003687077901648
  • 37D. Kee, W. Karwowski.

    LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time, in: Applied Ergonomics, August 2001, vol. 32, no 4, pp. 357–366. [ DOI : 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00006-0 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687001000060
  • 38X. Lamy.

    Conception d'une Interface de Pilotage d'un Cobot, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, March 2011.
  • 39M. Liu, Y. Tan, V. Padois.

    Generalized hierarchical control, in: Autonomous Robots, 2016, vol. 40, no 1, pp. 17–31.
  • 40S. E. Mathiassen.

    Diversity and variation in biomechanical exposure: What is it, and why would we like to know?, in: Applied Ergonomics, 2006, vol. 37, no 4, pp. 419-427, Special Issue: Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics. [ DOI : 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.006 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687006000482
  • 41P. Maurice.

    Virtual ergonomics for the design of collaborative robots, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, June 2015.
  • 42L. McAtamney, E. N. Corlett.

    RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, in: Applied ergonomics, 1993, vol. 24, no 2, pp. 91–99.
  • 43A. Meguenani, V. Padois, J. Da Silva, A. Hoarau, P. Bidaud.

    Energy-based control for safe Human-robot physical interactions, in: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics - The 2016 International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, D. Kulic, G. Venture, Y. Nakamura, O. Khatib (editors), Springer International Publishing AG, 2017. [ DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-50115-4_70 ]

    http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01398790/en
  • 44J. -P. Merlet, D. Daney.

    , Appropriate Design of Parallel ManipulatorsL. Wang, J. Xi (editors), Springer London, London, 2008, pp. 1–25.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-147-3_1
  • 45T. Moulières-Seban, D. Bitonneau, J.-M. Salotti, J.-F. Thibault, B. Claverie.

    Human Factors Issues for the Design of a Cobotic System, in: Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, P. Savage-Knepshield, J. Chen (editors), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 375–385.
  • 46T. Moulières-Seban.

    Conception de systèmes cobotiques industriels : approche cognitique : application à la production pyrotechnique au sein d'Ariane Group, Université de Bordeaux, November 2017.

    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01670146
  • 47B. Mutlu, N. Roy, S. Sabanovic.

    Cognitive Human-Robot Interactions, in: Handbook of Robotics, B. Siciliano, O. Khatib (editors), Springer Verlag, 2016, pp. 1907–1934.
  • 48D. Oetomo, D. Daney, J. Merlet.

    Design Strategy of Serial Manipulators With Certified Constraint Satisfaction, in: IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Feb 2009, vol. 25, no 1, pp. 1-11.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.2006867
  • 49A. Panchea.

    Inverse optimal control for redundant systems of biological motion, Orléans, December 2015.

    http://www.theses.fr/2015ORLE2050
  • 50R. Parasuraman, T. B. Sheridan, C. D. Wickens.

    A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation, in: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, May 2000, vol. 30, no 3, pp. 286–297.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354
  • 51L. Peternel, T. Petrič, E. Oztop, J. Babič.

    Teaching Robots to Cooperate with Humans in Dynamic Manipulation Tasks Based on Multi-modal Human-in-the-loop Approach, in: Autonomous Robots, January 2014, vol. 36, no 1-2, pp. 123–136.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9361-0
  • 52L. Peternel, N. Tsagarakis, D. Caldwell, A. Ajoudani.

    Robot adaptation to human physical fatigue in human–robot co-manipulation, in: Autonomous Robots, June 2018, vol. 42, no 5, pp. 1011–1021.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-017-9678-1
  • 53J. Rasmussen.

    Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, in: IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1983, no 3, pp. 257–266.
  • 54J. Reason.

    Too little and too late: a commentary on accident and incident reporting systems, in: Near miss reporting as a safety tool, Elsevier, 1991, pp. 9–26.
  • 55J. Salotti, E. Ferreri, O. Ly, D. Daney.

    Classification des Systèmes Cobotiques, in: Ingénierie cognitique, 2018, vol. 1, no 1.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.21494/ISTE.OP.2018.0268
  • 56J. Salotti.

    Bayesian Network for the Prediction of Situation Awareness Errors, in: International Journal on Human Factors Modeling and Simulation, January 2018, vol. Special Issue on: Quantifying Human Factors Towards Analytical Human-in-the-Loop.
  • 57J. Savin, M. Gilles, C. Gaudez, V. Padois, P. Bidaud.

    Movement Variability and Digital Human Models: Development of a Demonstrator Taking the Effects of Muscular Fatigue into Account, in: Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation, Cham, V. G. Duffy (editor), Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 169–179.
  • 58J. Scholtz.

    Theory and Evaluation of Human Robot Interactions, in: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
  • 59T. B. Sheridan.

    Human–Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges, in: Human Factors, June 2016, vol. 58, no 4, pp. 525–532.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364
  • 60M. Sonne, D. L. Villalta, D. M. Andrews.

    Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: ROSA - Rapid Office Strain Assessment, in: Applied Ergonomics, January 2012, vol. 43, no 1, pp. 98–108. [ DOI : 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.008 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687011000433
  • 61D. Srinivasan, S. E. Mathiassen.

    Motor variability in occupational health and performance, in: Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, vol. 27, no 10, pp. 979-993. [ DOI : 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.007 ]

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003312001817
  • 62S. Walther, T. Guhl.

    Classification of physical human-robot interaction scenarios to identify relevant requirements, in: Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Robotics, June 2014, pp. 1–8.
  • 63J. R. Wilson, S. Sharples.

    Evaluation of Human Work, Fourth Edition, CRC Press, April 2015, Google-Books-ID: uXB3CAAAQBAJ.
  • 64H. A. Yanco, J. Drury.

    Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, October 2004, vol. 3, pp. 2841–2846.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400763