EN FR
EN FR
QUACS - 2025

2025Activity‌​‌ reportProject-TeamQUACS

RNSR:​​ 202124178U

Creation of‌​‌ the Project-Team: 2021 December​​ 01

Each year, Inria​​​‌ research teams publish an‌ Activity Report presenting their‌​‌ work and results over​​ the reporting period. These​​​‌ reports follow a common‌ structure, with some optional‌​‌ sections depending on the​​ specific team. They typically​​​‌ begin by outlining the‌ overall objectives and research‌​‌ programme, including the main​​​‌ research themes, goals, and​ methodological approaches. They also​‌ describe the application domains​​ targeted by the team,​​​‌ highlighting the scientific or​ societal contexts in which​‌ their work is situated.​​

The reports then present​​​‌ the highlights of the​ year, covering major scientific​‌ achievements, software developments, or​​ teaching contributions. When relevant,​​​‌ they include sections on​ software, platforms, and open​‌ data, detailing the tools​​ developed and how they​​​‌ are shared. A substantial​ part is dedicated to​‌ new results, where scientific​​ contributions are described in​​​‌ detail, often with subsections​ specifying participants and associated​‌ keywords.

Finally, the Activity​​ Report addresses funding, contracts,​​​‌ partnerships, and collaborations at​ various levels, from industrial​‌ agreements to international cooperations.​​ It also covers dissemination​​​‌ and teaching activities, such​ as participation in scientific​‌ events, outreach, and supervision.​​ The document concludes with​​​‌ a presentation of scientific​ production, including major publications​‌ and those produced during​​ the year.

Keywords

Computer​​​‌ Science and Digital Science​

  • A1.1.4. High performance computing​‌
  • A2.1.1. Semantics of programming​​ languages
  • A2.1.6. Concurrent programming​​​‌
  • A2.1.7. Distributed programming
  • A2.1.11.​ Proof languages
  • A2.1.13. Quantum​‌ programming languages
  • A2.2.1. Static​​ analysis
  • A4.2. Correcting codes​​​‌
  • A4.2.1. Quantum error correction​
  • A4.5. Formal method for​‌ verification, reliability, certification
  • A4.5.1.​​ Static analysis
  • A4.5.3. Program​​​‌ proof
  • A6.5. Mathematical modeling​ for physical sciences
  • A7.1.4.​‌ Quantum algorithms
  • A7.2.3. Interactive​​ Theorem Proving
  • A7.3.1. Computational​​​‌ models and calculability
  • A8.​ Mathematics of computing
  • A8.6.​‌ Information theory
  • A8.7. Graph​​ theory
  • A8.13. Quantum computing​​​‌
  • A8.13.1. qubit
  • A8.13.3. Continuous​ variable quantum computing
  • A8.13.4.​‌ Measurement based quantum computing​​
  • A8.13.5. Photonic quantum computing​​​‌
  • A8.13.9. Hybrid quantum computing​
  • A8.13.10. ZX calculus

1 Team members, visitors,​ external collaborators

Research Scientists​‌

  • Pablo Arrighi [Team​​ leader, Inria,​​​‌ Senior Researcher, HDR​]
  • Pablo Arnault [​‌INRIA, Researcher]​​
  • Marc De Visme [​​​‌INRIA, Researcher]​
  • James Hefford [INRIA​‌, Starting Research Position​​, from Oct 2025​​​‌]
  • Renaud Vilmart [​INRIA, ISFP]​‌
  • Vladimir Zamdzhiev [INRIA​​, ISFP]

Faculty​​​‌ Members

  • Marc Baboulin [​Université Paris Saclay,​‌ Professor, HDR]​​
  • Benoît Valiron [CENTRALE​​​‌, Associate Professor,​ HDR]

Post-Doctoral Fellows​‌

  • Alexandre Clement [INRIA​​, Post-Doctoral Fellow]​​​‌
  • Cole Comfort [INRIA​, Post-Doctoral Fellow]​‌
  • James Hefford [INRIA​​, Post-Doctoral Fellow,​​​‌ until Sep 2025]​
  • Marco John Lewis [​‌INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow​​]
  • Mario Alberto Machado​​​‌ Da Silva [INRIA​, Post-Doctoral Fellow,​‌ from Nov 2025]​​
  • Nesta J Judah Van​​​‌ Der Schaaf [INRIA​, Post-Doctoral Fellow]​‌

PhD Students

  • Dogukan Bakircioglu​​ [INRIA]
  • Marin​​​‌ Costes [ENS PARIS-SACLAY​]
  • Kinnari Dave [​‌INRIA Nancy]
  • Antoine​​ Guilmin-Crépon [ENS Paris​​​‌ Saclay, from Sep​ 2025]
  • Nicolas Heurtel​‌ [Quandela, CIFRE​​, until Jun 2025​​​‌]
  • Seonghun Jung [​Université Paris Saclay,​‌ from Sep 2025]​​
  • Océane Koska [Eviden​​​‌]
  • Julien Lamiroy [​Université Paris Saclay]​‌
  • Thea Li [INRIA​​]
  • Aymane Maaitat [​​Université Paris Saclay,​​​‌ from Sep 2025]‌
  • Octave Mestoudjian [LMF‌​‌]
  • Jérome Ricciardi [​​CEA]
  • Adham Zekri​​​‌ [INRIA]

Technical‌ Staff

  • Gaurang Agrawal [‌​‌INRIA, Engineer,​​ from Dec 2025]​​​‌
  • Michel Nicolis [INRIA‌, Engineer, until‌​‌ Oct 2025]
  • Brice​​ Pointal [Inria Startup​​​‌ Studio, Engineer,‌ until Sep 2025]‌​‌

Interns and Apprentices

  • Andrea​​ Caseidi [Université Paris​​​‌ Saclay, Intern,‌ from Sep 2025]‌​‌
  • Julien Chevaillier [INRIA​​, Intern, from​​​‌ May 2025 until Jul‌ 2025]
  • Karim El‌​‌ Houdaigui [INRIA,​​ Intern, from Apr​​​‌ 2025 until Aug 2025‌]
  • Antoine Guilmin-Crépon [‌​‌ENS Paris Saclay,​​ Intern, from Mar​​​‌ 2025 until Aug 2025‌]
  • Nathan Houyet [‌​‌LMF, Intern,​​ from Mar 2025 until​​​‌ May 2025]
  • Julien‌ Joachim [Université Paris‌​‌ Saclay, Intern,​​ from Mar 2025 until​​​‌ Jul 2025]
  • Hadrien‌ Kerkhof [INRIA,‌​‌ Intern, from Apr​​ 2025 until Jul 2025​​​‌]
  • Sem Saada Khelkhal‌ [INRIA, Intern‌​‌, from Jul 2025​​]
  • Leqi Liu [​​​‌INRIA, Intern,‌ from Apr 2025 until‌​‌ Aug 2025]
  • Aymane​​ Maaitat [INRIA,​​​‌ Intern, from Apr‌ 2025 until Jun 2025‌​‌]
  • Vincent Nguyen [​​Université Paris Saclay,​​​‌ Intern, from May‌ 2025 until Oct 2025‌​‌]
  • Simon Renard [​​Université Paris Saclay,​​​‌ Intern, from Apr‌ 2025 until Sep 2025‌​‌]
  • Rayan Trabelsi [​​INRIA, Intern,​​​‌ from Jun 2025 until‌ Aug 2025]

Administrative‌​‌ Assistant

  • Joyce Soares Brito​​ [INRIA]

2​​​‌ Overall objectives

Quantum information‌ processing is one of‌​‌ the rising forces of​​ the information era. Encoding​​​‌ information within quantum systems‌ and manipulating them promises‌​‌ to lead to great​​ advantages, with three main​​​‌ application domains: quantum cryptography,‌ quantum simulation, and quantum‌​‌ algorithmics. To understand its​​ strengths and limits, we​​​‌ take a transversal stance‌ and seek to capture‌​‌ which resources are granted​​ to us by nature,​​​‌ at the fundamental level,‌ for the sake of‌​‌ computing (e.g. quantum and​​ spatial parallelism). We do​​​‌ so by abstracting away‌ physics’ ability to compute,‌​‌ into formal models of​​ quantum computation (e.g. quantum​​​‌ automata and graph rewriting‌ models). We then verbalize‌​‌ its main structures as​​ quantum programming languages (e.g.​​​‌ quantum lambda-calculus, process algebra).‌ Actually, the process goes‌​‌ both ways, when developments​​ in quantum programming languages​​​‌ lead to the discovery‌ of new structures which‌​‌ may or may not​​ be compilable into formal​​​‌ models of quantum computation,‌ raising the sometimes fascinating‌​‌ question of the physicality​​ of these resources.

3​​​‌ Research program

Quantum computing‌ has emerged as one‌​‌ of the novel forces​​ of the digital era.​​​‌ Encoding and manipulating information‌ within quantum systems suggests‌​‌ major advantages, with three​​ principal application domains: quantum​​​‌ cryptography, quantum simulation of‌ physical systems, and quantum‌​‌ algorithms.

Our work takes​​ a cross-disciplinary approach, aiming​​​‌ to understand the fundamental‌ resources that nature offers‌​‌ for computation — such​​​‌ as quantum parallelism and​ spatial parallelism. We abstract​‌ the computational capabilities of​​ physics into formal models​​​‌ of quantum computation (e.g.,​ quantum automata, graph-rewriting models)​‌ and express these core​​ structures through quantum programming​​​‌ languages (e.g. quantum lambda​ calculi, process algebras).

The​‌ process is bidirectional: advances​​ in quantum programming languages​​​‌ can reveal new computational​ structures, which may or​‌ may not be implementable​​ within existing models. This​​​‌ raises the fascinating question​ of the physical realizability​‌ of such resources.

Our​​ research is organized around​​​‌ four main axes:

  • Digital​ quantum simulation
    A major​‌ breakthrough in this area​​ is the development of​​​‌ the first quantum cellular​ automaton capable of modeling​‌ real particles — electrons​​ and photons — in​​​‌ 3+1 dimensions. This model​ is built on a​‌ discrete formulation of a​​ fundamental symmetry in physics—gauge​​​‌ symmetry—analogous to fault tolerance​ in computer science. This​‌ approach opens the door​​ to inherently discrete formulations​​​‌ of quantum field theories,​ which are otherwise known​‌ for their lack of​​ rigorous definition.
  • Semantics
    We​​​‌ employ tools such as​ categorical/mathematical semantics and realizability​‌ to study and design​​ quantum programming languages. One​​​‌ notable contribution is a​ type system that characterizes​‌ unitarity for a vectorial​​ lambda calculus — addressing​​​‌ a long-standing open problem:​ giving a “quantum” meaning​‌ to superpositions of potentially​​ arbitrary lambda terms, in​​​‌ a compositional way. Realizability​ provides a powerful framework​‌ for defining types as​​ sets of programs satisfying​​​‌ specific properties.
  • Graphical languages​ and rewriting
    We study​‌ here ways to graphically​​ but formally represent quantum​​​‌ data and computations, with​ often a focus on​‌ capturing the semantical equivalence​​ through equational theories. These​​​‌ graphical languages include existing​ ones, such as circuits​‌ or ZX-like diagrams —​​ in which we either​​​‌ extend with a new​ feature, or for which​‌ we study fragments —​​ or new ones, such​​​‌ as one that accommodates​ both the tensor product​‌ and the direct sum.​​ A major breakthrough in​​​‌ this domain is the​ first complete equational theory​‌ for quantum circuits —​​ the most widely used​​​‌ graphical formalism for describing​ quantum computations. This theory​‌ consists of a set​​ of equations proven to​​​‌ be both sound and​ complete: two circuits represent​‌ the same quantum operation​​ if and only if​​​‌ one can be transformed​ into the other using​‌ these equations.
  • Programming for​​ quantum computation
    If we​​​‌ want that quantum computing​ can address real-world applications​‌ then we need to​​ have programming models in​​​‌ order to facilitate the​ integration of hybrid quantum-classical​‌ computing into HPC environments.​​ This implies to extend​​​‌ standard C++ to enable​ dynamic interaction between classical​‌ and quantum resources. On​​ top of the quantum-HPC​​​‌ hybridation aspects, this research​ focus includes everything constituting​‌ tools for the quantum​​ programmer: libraries, synthesis techniques,​​​‌ classical simulation of quantum​ algorithms, etc.

All four​‌ research areas draw on​​ a set of shared​​​‌ mathematical principles:

  • Linearity
    Quantum​ data cannot be duplicated​‌ without loss of information,​​ imposing strict constraints on​​​‌ possible manipulations. Understanding how​ this linearity manifests in​‌ models of quantum computation​​ is a recurring theme​​ across our work.
  • Spatiality​​​‌
    Since quantum computation is‌ implemented directly on physical‌​‌ systems (e.g. atoms and​​ photons), spatial distribution —​​​‌ whether for parallelization or‌ due to physical constraints‌​‌ — is an inherent​​ consideration.
  • Causality
    When time​​​‌ is added to the‌ spatial dimension, the causal‌​‌ structure of computations becomes​​ crucial: which operations depend​​​‌ on others, and which‌ can be performed independently.‌​‌ Causality, like spatiality, is​​ examined both for computational​​​‌ optimization and for alignment‌ with physical laws.

4‌​‌ Application domains

4.1 Digital​​ quantum simulation

Feynman’s invention​​​‌ of Quantum Computing really‌ came out of a‌​‌ frustration: that of seeing​​ classical computers take such​​​‌ a long time to‌ simulate quantum systems. His‌​‌ intuition was that “quantum​​ computers”' would do a​​​‌ better job at simulating‌ quantum systems. There is‌​‌ not the slightest doubt​​ indeed that quantum simulation​​​‌ will have major outcomes‌ for society. Thinking about‌​‌ it, most of the​​ objects that surround us​​​‌ (cars, computers, furniture…) are‌ designed on computers, thanks‌​‌ to the fact that​​ we can prototype and​​​‌ simulate them on classical‌ computers. That is, up‌​‌ to a certain scale.​​ Below that we are​​​‌ left in the dark‌ as quantum effects come‌​‌ into play, yielding an​​ exponential blow up of​​​‌ the cost or simulation.‌ For now. But, the‌​‌ day we will have​​ good quantum computers and​​​‌ good quantum simulation algorithms‌ to run upon them,‌​‌ we will be able​​ to simulate these particles,​​​‌ atoms, molecules and the‌ way they interact. Consequently‌​‌ we will be able​​ to design specific-purpose molecules,​​​‌ materials, nanotechnologies, with applications‌ in chemistry, biochemistry, electronics,‌​‌ mechanics. At QuaCS we​​ focus on the bottom​​​‌ layer: the quantum-simulation algorithms‌ for fundamental particles. After‌​‌ all, to be able​​ to efficiently simulate fundamental​​​‌ interactions is to be‌ able to simulate virtually‌​‌ everything, from first principles.​​ An added bonus of​​​‌ this strand of research‌ is that usually when‌​‌ we express some physics​​ as a quantum algorithm,​​​‌ it becomes way simpler,‌ more explanatory.

Quantum simulation‌​‌ comes in two flavours:​​ continuous-time quantum simulation, which​​​‌ is very physicky and‌ consists of ad hoc‌​‌ emulation of one Hamiltonian​​ by another, and discrete-time​​​‌ quantum simulation, which is‌ much closer to quantum‌​‌ algorithmic: this is where​​ we stand. In particular,​​​‌ we focus on the‌ provision of a quantum-circuit‌​‌ description of the dynamics​​ of fundamental particles. Moreover,​​​‌ when we design these‌ quantum simulation schemes, our‌​‌ focus is on retaining​​ the symmetries of the​​​‌ simulated model. This is‌ both a matter of‌​‌ efficiency and correctness. For​​ instance, our discretizations have​​​‌ a maximum speed of‌ propagation of the information,‌​‌ which coincides with the​​ speed of light in​​​‌ the simulated system, as‌ a first step towards‌​‌ retaining Lorentz symmetry. Similarly,​​ our discretizations exhibit the​​​‌ gauge symmetries that motivate‌ the different fundamental particles.‌​‌ The long term goal​​ of this program is​​​‌ to provide a satisfactory‌ quantum-circuit descriptions of the‌​‌ whole standard model of​​ particle physics.

4.2 Semantics​​​‌

In the research program‌ on Semantics, the QuaCS‌​‌ team is working on​​​‌ developing mathematical methods and​ tools that formulate the​‌ precise meaning and behavior​​ of (quantum) systems, processes,​​​‌ type systems and programming​ languages, other formal languages​‌ and computational models. This​​ includes, but is not​​​‌ limited, to the following:​

  • Operational semantics: a mathematically​‌ precise description of the​​ dynamics of quantum programs​​​‌ and other computational models​ (e.g., the small-step semantics​‌ of quantum lambda calculi,​​ token-machine semantics of quantum​​​‌ diagrammatic calculi).
  • Mathematical and​ denotational semantics: a mathematical​‌ interpretation of a quantum​​ programming language, process theory,​​​‌ diagrammatic calculus, etc., which​ is always expected to​‌ be sound and often​​ expected to be adequate​​​‌ or complete.

This line​ of research is focused​‌ on identifying fundamental connections​​ between the static specification​​​‌ (e.g. syntax) of quantum​ languages, their dynamic behavior​‌ (e.g. operational semantics) and​​ their mathematical interpretation (e.g.​​​‌ denotational semantics) with the​ intention of developing each​‌ of these components further.​​

This line of research​​​‌ can reveal interesting connections​ between mathematical structures, computational​‌ models, type systems and​​ other formal languages. Ideally,​​​‌ one endpoint of such​ a connection can be​‌ used to influence the​​ design and development of​​​‌ the other endpoint, because​ these connections can allow​‌ us to improve our​​ understanding of the different​​​‌ aspects of the (quantum)​ systems and computational models​‌ under consideration.

For instance,​​ monads in category theory​​​‌ were the inspiration for​ introducing monads in programming​‌ languages. Another example includes​​ categorical quantum mechanics which​​​‌ lead to the development​ of the ZX-calculus along​‌ with other useful tools,​​ such as PyZX/QuiZX, which​​​‌ may be used for​ optimisation of quantum circuits​‌ and classical simulation of​​ quantum processes.

4.3 Graphical​​​‌ languages and rewriting

One​ of the main features​‌ of graphical languages is​​ that they can be​​​‌ made abstract enough to​ remove unnecessary clutter and​‌ ease reasoning on quantum​​ operators. This has several​​​‌ consequences : They are​ rather intuitive to work​‌ with, while at the​​ same time being completely​​​‌ formal. They can provide​ an intermediate representation of​‌ quantum programs, with enough​​ abstraction to reason about​​​‌ and modify the program​ during compilation. The most​‌ illustrative example of such​​ modification is circuit optimisation,​​​‌ where the goal is​ to reduce the number​‌ of "expensive" quantum gates​​ in the circuit, which​​​‌ can be achieved by​ turning the circuit into​‌ a ZX-diagram, then using​​ its equational theory to​​​‌ perform the reduction. Together​ with the simplification heuristic,​‌ it is possible to​​ exploit this "uncluttering" effect​​​‌ to perform more efficient​ classical simulation of quantum​‌ programs. It can be​​ exploited to perform automated​​​‌ verification of quantum programs.​

The QuaCS team is​‌ involved in the development​​ and study of graphical​​​‌ calculi such as quanctum​ circuits, ZX-, ZW-, ZH-calculi,​‌ but also languages for​​ linear optics, such as​​​‌ the LOv-calculus. These languages​ are supposed to represent​‌ particular features of quantum​​ computing, and hence are​​​‌ designed with a particular​ semantics in mind. A​‌ question of interest in​​ the field is that​​​‌ of completeness with respect​ to that semantics :​‌ the ability to graphically​​ turn any two equivalent​​ diagrams into one another,​​​‌ making it possible to‌ entirely reason within the‌​‌ language. The team is​​ interested in the structure​​​‌ quantum operators have, that‌ can be exhibited by‌​‌ the graphical approach, and​​ depending on the model​​​‌ of computation at hand.‌ It then becomes possible‌​‌ to study the links​​ between the graphical languages,​​​‌ and hence, between the‌ different models of computation.‌​‌ Recently, some focus has​​ been put in the​​​‌ use of graphical languages‌ for the study of‌​‌ indefinite causal orders, a​​ extension to the usual​​​‌ quantum computation model, where‌ not only data is‌​‌ quantum, but also the​​ control flow of the​​​‌ program, which is allowed‌ by the theory but‌​‌ still not well understood.​​

4.4 Programming for quantum​​​‌ computation

The hybrid quantum-classical‌ algorithms that have been‌​‌ developed in the team​​ concern more specifically the​​​‌ solution of linear systems,‌ which is a key‌​‌ function for most scientific​​ and data science applications.​​​‌ For example we have‌ developed a new mixed-precision‌​‌ solver that combines the​​ Quantum Singular Value Transformation​​​‌ with iterative improvement to‌ produce accurate linear system‌​‌ solutions. Furthermore, if we​​ want that quantum computing​​​‌ can address real-world applications‌ then we need to‌​‌ have programming models in​​ order to facilitate the​​​‌ integration of hybrid quantum-classical‌ computing into HPC environments.‌​‌ This implies to extend​​ standard C++ to enable​​​‌ dynamic interaction between classical‌ and quantum resources. On‌​‌ top of the quantum-HPC​​ hybridation aspects, this research​​​‌ focus includes everything constituting‌ tools for the quantum‌​‌ programmer: libraries, synthesis techniques,​​ classical simulation of quantum​​​‌ algorithms, etc.

The current‌ research targets projects with‌​‌ industrial partners: AQED with​​ C12, AeroQat with Alice&Bob​​​‌ and Thales, and a‌ PhD thesis funded by‌​‌ AID (in collaboration with​​ Thales and the laboratory​​​‌ SONDRA). All of these‌ projects are related to‌​‌ compiling, optimizing and analyzing​​ quantum algorithms for the​​​‌ context of numerical computation:‌ not only linear systems,‌​‌ but also differential equations,​​ and matrix inversion and​​​‌ manipulation for radar applications.‌ The team has also‌​‌ a more theoretical approach​​ to quantum programming languages.​​​‌ In particular, one of‌ the current topic of‌​‌ research is concerned with​​ the unification of quantum​​​‌ and classical computation in‌ a single programming framework.‌​‌ If a long-term goal​​ could be the programming​​​‌ of hybrid quantum computation,‌ the near-term goal is‌​‌ the understanding of the​​ capabilities of a model​​​‌ supporting superposition of executions,‌ and how this can‌​‌ be used to expand​​ our understanding of the​​​‌ possibilities offered by quantum‌ computation.

5 New results‌​‌

5.1 Quantum Linear Algebra​​ Solver

Participant: Marc Baboulin​​​‌.

10 We address‌ the problem of solving‌​‌ a system of linear​​ equations via the Quantum​​​‌ Singular Value Transformation (QSVT).‌ One drawback of the‌​‌ QSVT algorithm is that​​ it requires huge quantum​​​‌ resources if we want‌ to achieve an acceptable‌​‌ accuracy. To reduce the​​ quantum cost, we propose​​​‌ a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm‌ that improves the accuracy‌​‌ and reduces the cost​​ of the QSVT by​​​‌ adding iterative refinement in‌ mixed-precision A first quantum‌​‌ solution is computed using​​​‌ the QSVT, in low​ precision, and then refined​‌ in higher precision until​​ we get a satisfactory​​​‌ accuracy. For this solver,​ we present an error​‌ and complexity analysis, and​​ first experiments using the​​​‌ quantum software stack myQLM.​

5.2 Tensor Computations

Participant:​‌ Marc Baboulin.

27​​ We present a new​​​‌ mixed precision algorithm to​ compute low-rank matrix and​‌ tensor approximations, a fundamental​​ task in numerous applications​​​‌ in scientific computing and​ data analysis. Our algorithm​‌ is reminiscent of the​​ iterative refinement framework for​​​‌ linear systems: we first​ compute a low-rank approximation​‌ in low precision and​​ then refine its accuracy​​​‌ by iteratively updating it.​ We carry out an​‌ error analysis of our​​ algorithm which proves that​​​‌ we can reach a​ high accuracy while performing​‌ most of the operations​​ in low precision. We​​​‌ measure the computational cost​ of the algorithm, which​‌ depends on the numerical​​ rank of the input​​​‌ (matrix or tensor) as​ well as the speed​‌ ratio between low and​​ high precision arithmetic. We​​​‌ identify two situations where​ our method has a​‌ strong potential: when the​​ hardware provides fast low​​​‌ precision matrix multiply–accumulate units,​ and when the numerical​‌ rank of the input​​ is small at low​​​‌ accuracy levels. We confirm​ experimentally the potential of​‌ our algorithm for computing​​ various low-rank matrix and​​​‌ tensor decompositions such as​ SVD, QR, Tucker, hierarchical​‌ Tucker, and tensor-train.

5.3​​ Quantum Petri Nets

Participant:​​​‌ Marc de Visme.​

28 One of the​‌ main limitation of the​​ model of quantum event​​​‌ structures is the fact​ that even finite systems​‌ can have an infinite​​ representation. This is because​​​‌ event structures are by​ nature an unfolded model.​‌ In the same way​​ that one can unfold​​​‌ a finite automta into​ an infinite tree, one​‌ can unfold a finite​​ Petri Net into an​​​‌ infinite event structure. As​ such, formalising a quantum​‌ version of the Petri​​ Nets is a natural​​​‌ extension of the event​ structure work. Interestingly, the​‌ folded nature of Petri​​ Nets forced us toward​​​‌ a much more local​ approach to representing quantum​‌ computation compared to the​​ one used in quantum​​​‌ event structures, yielding a​ model which is in​‌ many ways simpler than​​ the unfolded model.

5.4​​​‌ Operator Spaces, Linear Logic​ and the Heisenberg-Schrödinger Duality​‌ of Quantum Theory

Participant:​​ Vladimir Zamdzhiev.

12​​​‌ We show that the​ category OS of operator​‌ spaces, with complete contractions​​ as morphisms, is locally​​​‌ countably presentable and a​ model of Intuitionistic Linear​‌ Logic in the sense​​ of Lafont. We then​​​‌ describe a model of​ Classical Linear Logic, based​‌ on OS, whose duality​​ is compatible with the​​​‌ Heisenberg-Schrödinger duality of quantum​ theory. We also show​‌ that OS provides a​​ good setting for studying​​​‌ pure state and mixed​ state quantum information, the​‌ interaction between the two,​​ and even higher-order quantum​​​‌ maps such as the​ quantum switch. Joint work​‌ with Bert Lindenhovius (Johannes​​ Kepler Universität).

5.5 Quantum​​​‌ Coherence Spaces Revisited: A​ von Neumann (Co)Algebraic Approach​‌

Participants: Thea Li,​​ Vladimir Zamdzhiev.

11​​ We describe a categorical​​​‌ model of MALL (Multiplicative‌ Additive Linear Logic) inspired‌​‌ by the Heisenberg-Schrödinger duality​​ of finite-dimensional quantum theory.​​​‌ Proofs of formulas with‌ positive logical polarity correspond‌​‌ to CPTP (completely positive​​ trace-preserving) maps in our​​​‌ model, i.e. the quantum‌ operations in the Schrödinger‌​‌ picture, whereas proofs of​​ formulas with negative logical​​​‌ polarity correspond to CPU‌ (completely positive unital) maps,‌​‌ i.e. the quantum operations​​ in the Heisenberg picture.​​​‌ The mathematical development is‌ based on noncommutative geometry‌​‌ and finite-dimensional von Neumann​​ (co)algebras, which can be​​​‌ defined as special kinds‌ of (co)monoid objects internal‌​‌ to the category of​​ finite-dimensional operator spaces.

5.6​​​‌ Combining Quantum and Classical‌ Control

Participants: Kinnari Dave‌​‌, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.​​

820 The two​​​‌ main notions of control‌ in quantum programming languages‌​‌ are often referred to​​ as “quantum” control and​​​‌ “classical” control. With the‌ latter, the control flow‌​‌ is based on classical​​ information, potentially resulting from​​​‌ a quantum measurement, and‌ this paradigm is well-suited‌​‌ to mixed state quantum​​ computation. Whereas with quantum​​​‌ control, we are primarily‌ focused on pure quantum‌​‌ computation and there the​​ “control” is based on​​​‌ superposition. The two paradigms‌ have not mixed well‌​‌ traditionally and they are​​ almost always treated separately.​​​‌ In this work, we‌ show that the paradigms‌​‌ may be combined within​​ the same system. The​​​‌ key ingredients for achieving‌ this are: (1) syntactically:‌​‌ a modality for incorporating​​ pure quantum types into​​​‌ a mixed state quantum‌ type system; (2) operationally:‌​‌ an adaptation of the​​ notion of “quantum configuration”​​​‌ from quantum lambda-calculi, where‌ the quantum data is‌​‌ replaced with pure quantum​​ primitives; (3) denotationally: suitable​​​‌ (sub)categories of Hilbert spaces,‌ for pure computation and‌​‌ von Neumann algebras, for​​ mixed state computation in​​​‌ the Heisenberg picture of‌ quantum mechanics. Joint work‌​‌ with Louis Lemonnier (University​​ of Edinburgh) and Romain​​​‌ Péchoux (Mocqua team).

5.7‌ IMALL with a Mixed-State‌​‌ Modality: A Logical Approach​​ to Quantum Computation

Participants:​​​‌ Kinnari Dave, Vladimir‌ Zamdzhiev.

7 We‌​‌ introduce a proof language​​ for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Additive​​​‌ Linear Logic (IMALL), extended‌ with a modality B‌​‌ to capture mixed-state quantum​​ computation. The language supports​​​‌ algebraic constructs such as‌ linear combinations, and embeds‌​‌ pure quantum computations within​​ a mixed-state framework via​​​‌ B, interpreted categorically‌ as a functor from‌​‌ a category of Hilbert​​ Spaces to a category​​​‌ of finite-dimensional C*-algebras. Measurement‌ arises as a definable‌​‌ term, not as a​​ constant, and the system​​​‌ avoids the use of‌ quantum configurations, which are‌​‌ part of the theory​​ of the quantum lambda​​​‌ calculus. Cut-elimination is defined‌ via a composite reduction‌​‌ relation, and shown to​​ be sound with respect​​​‌ to the denotational interpretation.‌ We prove that any‌​‌ linear map on ℂ​​2n can be​​​‌ represented within the system,‌ and illustrate this expressiveness‌​‌ with examples such as​​ quantum teleportation and the​​​‌ quantum switch. Joint work‌ with Alejandro Díaz-Caro (Mocqua).‌​‌

5.8 Resource-Efficient Synthesis of​​ Sparse Quantum States

Participants:​​​‌ Sunheang Ty, Renaud‌ Vilmart.

25 Preparing‌​‌ a quantum circuit that​​​‌ implements a given sparse​ state is an important​‌ building block that is​​ necessary for many different​​​‌ quantum algorithms. In the​ context of fault-tolerant quantum​‌ computing, the so-called non-Clifford​​ gates are much more​​​‌ expensive to perform than​ the Clifford ones. We​‌ hence provide an algorithm​​ for synthesizing sparse quantum​​​‌ states with a special​ care for quantum resources.​‌ The circuit depth, ancilla​​ count, and crucially non-Clifford​​​‌ count of the circuit​ produced by the algorithm​‌ are all linear in​​ the sparsity. We conjecture​​​‌ that the non-Clifford count​ complexity is tight, and​‌ show a weakened version​​ of this claim. The​​​‌ first key component of​ the algorithm is the​‌ synthesis of a generalized​​ W-state. We provide a​​​‌ tree-based circuit construction approach,​ and the relationship between​‌ the tree's structure and​​ the circuit's complexity. The​​​‌ second key component is​ a classical reversible circuit​‌ implementing a permutation that​​ maps the basis states​​​‌ of the W-state to​ those of the sparse​‌ quantum state. We reduce​​ this problem to the​​​‌ diagonalization of a binary​ matrix, using a specific​‌ set of elementary matrix​​ operations corresponding to the​​​‌ classical reversible gates. We​ then solve this problem​‌ using a new version​​ of Gauss-Jordan elimination, that​​​‌ minimizes the circuit complexities​ including circuit depth using​‌ parallel elimination steps.

5.9​​ Numerical Experiments Using Block-Diagonalization​​​‌ Technique for Solving Poisson’s​ Equation

Participants: Sunheang Ty​‌, Renaud Vilmart.​​

14 This work presents​​​‌ numerical experiments aimed at​ verifying solutions of Poisson’s​‌ equation using two existing​​ methodologies. First, block-diagonalization is​​​‌ employed to block-encode the​ matrix derived from Poisson’s​‌ equation through the finite​​ difference method (FDM), significantly​​​‌ improving computational complexity from​ N to log(N), where​‌ N is the matrix​​ size. Second, the Quantum​​​‌ Singular Value Transformation (QSVT)​ algorithm is applied to​‌ invert the matrix. However,​​ while block-diagonalization improves the​​​‌ complexity in N, QSVT​ introduces a bottleneck due​‌ to its linear dependency​​ on the condition number​​​‌ κ, which grows exponentially​ with N, posing challenges​‌ for large-scale problems. As​​ far as we know,​​​‌ this is the first​ numerical experiments solving problems​‌ with matrix size N​​ = 1024 and condition​​​‌ number κ = 500000;​ the largest matrix size​‌ and condition number from​​ existing works are 16​​​‌ and < 100, respectively.​

5.10 The Many-Worlds Calculus​‌

Participants: Kostia Chardonnet,​​ Marc de Visme,​​​‌ Benoît Valiron, Renaud​ Vilmart.

6 In​‌ this paper, we explore​​ the interaction between two​​​‌ monoidal structures: a multiplicative​ one, for the encoding​‌ of pairing, and an​​ additive one, for the​​​‌ encoding of choice. We​ propose a colored PROP​‌ to model computation in​​ this framework, where the​​​‌ choice is parameterized by​ an algebraic side effect:​‌ the model can support​​ regular tests, probabilistic and​​​‌ non-deterministic branching, as well​ as quantum branching, i.e.​‌ superposition. The graphical language​​ comes equipped with a​​​‌ denotational semantics based on​ linear applications, and an​‌ equational theory. We prove​​ the language to be​​​‌ universal, and the equational​ theory to be complete​‌ with respect to this​​ semantics.

5.11 The Tensor-Plus​​ Calculus

Participants: Kostia Chardonnet​​​‌, Marc de Visme‌, Benoît Valiron,‌​‌ Renaud Vilmart.

19​​ We propose a graphical​​​‌ language that accommodates two‌ monoidal structures: a multiplicative‌​‌ one for pairing and​​ an additional one for​​​‌ branching. In this colored‌ PROP, whether wires in‌​‌ parallel are linked through​​ the multiplicative structure or​​​‌ the additive structure is‌ implicit and determined contextually‌​‌ rather than explicitly through​​ tapes, world annotations, or​​​‌ other techniques, as is‌ usually the case in‌​‌ the literature. The diagrams​​ are used as parameter​​​‌ elements of a commutative‌ semiring, whose choice is‌​‌ determined by the kind​​ of computation we want​​​‌ to model, such as‌ non-deterministic, probabilistic, or quantum.‌​‌ Given such a semiring,​​ we provide a categorical​​​‌ semantics of diagrams and‌ show the language as‌​‌ universal for it. We​​ also provide an equational​​​‌ theory to identify diagrams‌ that share the same‌​‌ semantics and show that​​ the theory is sound​​​‌ and complete and captures‌ semantical equivalence. In categorical‌​‌ terms, we design an​​ internal language for semiadditive​​​‌ categories (C,+,0) with a‌ symmetric monoidal structure (C,x,1)‌​‌ distributive over it, and​​ such that the homset​​​‌ C(1,1) is isomorphic to‌ a given commutative semiring,‌​‌ e.g., the semiring of​​ non-negative real numbers for​​​‌ the probabilistic case.

5.12‌ The Decohered ZX-calculus

Participant:‌​‌ Renaud Vilmart.

The​​ discard ZX-calculus is known​​​‌ to be complete and‌ universal for mixed-state quantum‌​‌ mechanics, allowing for both​​ quantum and classical processes.​​​‌ However, if the quantum‌ aspects of ZX-calculus have‌​‌ been explored in depth,​​ little work has been​​​‌ done on the classical‌ side. In this paper,‌​‌ we investigate a fragment​​ of discard ZX-calculus obtained​​​‌ by decohering the usual‌ generators of ZX-calculus. We‌​‌ show that this calculus​​ is universal and complete​​​‌ for affinely supported probability‌ distributions over 𝔽2‌​‌n . To do​​ so, we exhibit a​​​‌ normal form, mixing ideas‌ from the graphical linear‌​‌ algebra program and diagrammatic​​ Fourier transforms. Our results​​​‌ both clarify how to‌ handle hybrid classical-quantum processes‌​‌ in the discard ZX-calculus​​ and pave the way​​​‌ to the picturing of‌ more general random variables‌​‌ and probabilistic processes.

5.13​​ Minimality in Finite-Dimensional ZW-Calculi​​​‌

Participants: Marc de Visme‌, Renaud Vilmart.‌​‌

16 The ZW-calculus is​​ a graphical language capable​​​‌ of representing 2-dimensional quantum‌ systems (qubit) through its‌​‌ diagrams, and manipulating them​​ through its equational theory.​​​‌ We extend the formalism‌ to accommodate finite dimensional‌​‌ Hilbert spaces beyond qubit​​ systems. First we define​​​‌ a qudit version of‌ the language, where all‌​‌ systems have the same​​ arbitrary finite dimension d,​​​‌ and show that the‌ provided equational theory is‌​‌ both complete - i.e.​​ semantical equivalence is entirely​​​‌ captured by the equations‌ - and minimal -‌​‌ i.e. none of the​​ equations are consequences of​​​‌ the others. We then‌ extend the graphical language‌​‌ further to allow for​​ mixed-dimensional systems. We again​​​‌ show the completeness and‌ minimality of the provided‌​‌ equational theory.

5.14 Causal​​ Decompositions of 1D Quantum​​​‌ Cellular Automata

Participants: Pablo‌ Arrighi, Octave Mestoudjian‌​‌.

23 Understanding quantum​​​‌ theory's causal structure stands​ out as a major​‌ matter, since it radically​​ departs from classical notions​​​‌ of causality. We present​ advances in the research​‌ program of causal decompositions,​​ which investigates the existence​​​‌ of an equivalence between​ the causal and the​‌ compositional structures of unitary​​ channels. Our results concern​​​‌ one-dimensional Quantum Cellular Automata​ (1D QCAs), i.e. unitary​‌ channels over a line​​ of N quantum systems​​​‌ (with or without periodic​ boundary conditions) that feature​‌ a causality radius r:​​ a given input cannot​​​‌ causally influence outputs at​ a distance more than​‌ r. We prove that,​​ they admit a causal​​​‌ decompositions: a unitary channel​ is a 1D QCA​‌ if and only if​​ it can be decomposed​​​‌ into a unitary routed​ circuit of nearest-neighbour interactions,​‌ in which its causal​​ structure is compositionally obvious.​​​‌

5.15 On Quantum Superpositions​ of Graphs, No-Signalling and​‌ Covariance

Participant: Pablo Arrighi​​.

26 We provide​​​‌ a mathematically and conceptually​ robust notion of quantum​‌ superpositions of graphs. We​​ argue that, crucially, quantum​​​‌ superpositions of graphs require​ node names for their​‌ correct alignment, which we​​ demonstrate through a no-signalling​​​‌ argument. Nevertheless, node names​ are a fiducial construct,​‌ serving a similar purpose​​ to the labelling of​​​‌ points through a choice​ of coordinates in continuous​‌ space. Graph renamings are​​ understood as a change​​​‌ of coordinates on the​ graph and correspond to​‌ a natively discrete analogue​​ of diffeomorphisms. We postulate​​​‌ renaming invariance as a​ symmetry principle in discrete​‌ topology of similar weight​​ to diffeomorphism invariance in​​​‌ the continuous. We show​ how to impose renaming​‌ invariance at the level​​ of quantum superpositions of​​​‌ graphs.

5.16 A Large-Scale​ Distributed Framework for Quantum​‌ Irregular Dynamics Simulations

Participant:​​ Pablo Arrighi.

15​​​‌ In traditional quantum computing,​ e.g. in the quantum​‌ circuit model, the size​​ of the data structure​​​‌ describing basis elements is​ well known, because the​‌ dimensionality is fixed. General​​ quantum systems, however, exhibit​​​‌ basis elements of variable​ size, and state spaces​‌ having dynamically unbounded, possibly​​ infinite dimensionality, e.g. for​​​‌ quantum Turing machines or​ quantum field theories. When​‌ seeking to simulate them​​ classically, this imposes an​​​‌ irregularity on both the​ memory representation of basis​‌ elements and the sparsity​​ of the quantum transformations​​​‌ they undergo. Moreover, the​ high dimensionality of these​‌ problems often makes them​​ memory intensive, potentially requiring​​​‌ truncation methods during the​ simulation. One prototypical example​‌ of this would be​​ quantum causal graph dynamics​​​‌ (QCGD), which feature superpositions​ of colored graphs of​‌ different shapes and sizes,​​ driven by the application​​​‌ of local quantum transformations.​ Numerical observations show that​‌ their reversible counterparts typically​​ grow in size; understanding​​​‌ how this is affected​ in the quantum regime​‌ is an arduous computational​​ challenge requiring a particular​​​‌ HPC expertise. In this​ work, we address this​‌ challenge by developing a​​ computational framework for a​​​‌ scalable simulation of such​ general irregular quantum systems​‌ in distributed-memory parallel environments.​​ We lay out the​​​‌ computational challenges arising from​ the nature of such​‌ simulations and then propose​​ effective parallelization, load balancing,​​ memory management, and parallel​​​‌ sampling strategies to accelerate‌ them. We report parallel‌​‌ scalability and accuracy results​​ for up to 1548​​​‌ MPI processes on a‌ parallel cluster using our‌​‌ framework for the QCGD​​ simulation.

5.17 A Curry-Howard​​​‌ Correspondence for Linear, Reversible‌ Computation

Participant: Benoît Valiron‌​‌.

5 In this​​ paper, we present a​​​‌ linear and reversible programming‌ language with inductives types‌​‌ and recursion. The semantics​​ of the languages is​​​‌ based on pattern-matching; we‌ show how ensuring syntactical‌​‌ exhaustivity and non-overlapping of​​ clauses is enough to​​​‌ ensure reversibility. The language‌ allows to represent any‌​‌ Primitive Recursive Function. We​​ then give a Curry-Howard​​​‌ correspondence with the logic‌ μMALL: linear logic extended‌​‌ with least fixed points​​ allowing inductive statements. The​​​‌ critical part of our‌ work is to show‌​‌ how primitive recursion yields​​ circular proofs that satisfy​​​‌ μMALL validity criterion and‌ how the language simulates‌​‌ the cut-elimination procedure of​​ μMALL.

5.18 A Rewriting​​​‌ Theory for Quantum Lambda-Calculus‌

Participant: Benoît Valiron.‌​‌

9 Quantum lambda calculus​​ has been studied mainly​​​‌ as an idealized programming‌ language - the evaluation‌​‌ essentially corresponds to a​​ deterministic abstract machine. Very​​​‌ little work has been‌ done to develop a‌​‌ rewriting theory for quantum​​ lambda calculus. Recent advances​​​‌ in the theory of‌ probabilistic rewriting give us‌​‌ a way to tackle​​ this task with tools​​​‌ unavailable a decade ago.‌ Our primary focus are‌​‌ standardization and normalization results.​​

5.19 Some Results on​​​‌ Causal Modalities in General‌ Spacetimes

Participant: Marco Lewis‌​‌.

29 Causality is​​ one of the fundamental​​​‌ structures of spacetimes, it‌ determines the possible behaviour‌​‌ and propagation of physical​​ information through different relations.​​​‌ Causal structure can be‌ analysed through the various‌​‌ modal logics it induces.​​ The modal logics for​​​‌ the standard chronological and‌ causal relations of the‌​‌ archetypal Minkowski spacetime have​​ been classified. However only​​​‌ partial results have been‌ achieved for the irreflexive‌​‌ variant of the causal​​ relation, also known as​​​‌ the after relation. Our‌ work continues this analysis‌​‌ towards arbitrary spacetimes. By​​ utilizing the definition of​​​‌ the causal relations through‌ causal paths, we can‌​‌ lift known results about​​ the modal logics of​​​‌ Minkowski spacetime to general‌ spacetimes. In particular, for‌​‌ the after relation, we​​ show that a previously​​​‌ studied formula within the‌ logics of Minkowski spacetime‌​‌ holds in arbitrary spacetimes.​​ We introduce a related​​​‌ modal formula that demonstrates‌ that the logic of‌​‌ two-dimensional spacetimes are more​​ expressive than higher dimensional​​​‌ ones. Lastly, we study‌ the interrelation between the‌​‌ logical properties and physical​​ properties along the causal​​​‌ ladder, a classification of‌ causal structures according to‌​‌ a hierarchy of physically​​ relevant properties.

5.20 Canonical​​​‌ Quantization of the Complex‌ Scalar Field without Making‌​‌ Use of its Real​​ and Imaginary Parts

Participant:​​​‌ Pablo Arnault.

17‌ We proceed to the‌​‌ canonical quantization of the​​ complex scalar field without​​​‌ making use of its‌ real and imaginary parts.‌​‌ Our motivation is to​​ formally connect, as tightly​​​‌ as possible, the quantum-field‌ notions of particle and‌​‌ antiparticle—most prominently represented, formally,​​​‌ by creation and annihilation​ operators—to the initial classical​‌ field theory—whose main formal​​ object is the field​​​‌ amplitude at a given​ spacetime point. Our point​‌ of view is that​​ doing this via the​​​‌ use of the real​ and imaginary parts of​‌ the field is not​​ satisfying. The derivation demands​​​‌ to consider, just before​ quantization, the field and​‌ its complex conjugate as​​ independent fields, which yields​​​‌ a system of two​ copies of independent complex​‌ scalar fields. One then​​ proceeds to quantization with​​​‌ these two copies, which​ leads to the introduction​‌ of two families of​​ creation and annihilation operators,​​​‌ corresponding to particles on​ the one hand, and​‌ antiparticles on the other​​ hand. One realizes that​​​‌ having two such families​ is the only hope​‌ for being able to​​ "invert" the definitions of​​​‌ the creation and annihilation​ in terms of the​‌ Fourier quantized fields, so​​ as to obtain an​​​‌ expression of the direct-space​ fields in terms of​‌ these creation and annihilation​​ operators, because the real-field​​​‌ condition used in the​ case of a real​‌ scalar field does not​​ hold for a complex​​​‌ scalar field. This hope​ is then met by​‌ introducing the complex-conjugate constraint​​ at the quantum level,​​​‌ that is, that the​ second independent field copy​‌ is actually the complex​​ conjugate of the first.​​​‌ All standard results are​ then recovered in a​‌ rigorous and purely deductive​​ way. While we reckon​​​‌ our derivation exists in​ the literature, we have​‌ not found it.

6​​ Bilateral contracts and grants​​​‌ with industry

6.1 Quandela​

Participants: Benoît Valiron,​‌ Pablo Arrighi, Nicolas​​ Heurtel.

In the​​​‌ context of a PhD​ funded by CIFRE, QuaCS​‌ and Quandela are building​​ a collaboration on the​​​‌ study of quantum linear​ optics. The approach is​‌ both theoretical –with the​​ development of a formal​​​‌ language for reasoning on​ optical circuits, and practical,​‌ targeted towards simulation.

6.2​​ Eviden

Participants: Marc Baboulin​​​‌, Océane Koska.​

The collaboration with Eviden​‌ (Cyril Allouche's group) is​​ related to Marc Baboulin's​​​‌ research on the convergence​ between Quantum Computing and​‌ HPC. It consists mainly​​ in designing hybrid quantum-classical​​​‌ algorithms that could accelerate​ existing HPC applications in​‌ scientific computing, data analytics​​ and optimization. For instance​​​‌ we are currently working​ on linear algebra solvers​‌ that leverage the capabilities​​ of quantum and classical​​​‌ processors to compute accurate​ solutions. We also work​‌ on hybrid programming models​​ that enable to concretely​​​‌ implement these algorithms in​ existing HPC codes.

7​‌ Partnerships and cooperations

7.1​​ International initiatives

7.1.1 Participation​​​‌ in other International Programs​

QISS (John Templeton grant)​‌

Participants: Pablo Arnault,​​ Pablo Arrighi, Marc​​​‌ Baboulin, Marc de​ Visme, Benoît Valiron​‌, Renaud Vilmart,​​ Matt Wilson, Vladimir​​​‌ Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:
    The​ Quantum Information Structure of​‌ Spacetime
  • Partner Institutions:
    • Institute​​ for Quantum Optics and​​​‌ Quantum Information, Vienna
    • Rotman​ Institute for Philosophy, Western​‌ University
    • Center for Theoretical​​ Physics, Aix-Marseille University
    • Quantum​​​‌ Group and Clarendon Laboratory,​ University of Oxford
    • Perimeter​‌ Institute
    • University of Paris-Saclay,​​ Quantum Computation Structures group​​
    • Quantum Information and Computation​​​‌ Initiative, HKU
    • Okinawa Institute‌ of Science and Technology‌​‌
    • University of California Santa​​ Barbara, Physics dpt
    • Center​​​‌ for Quantum Information and‌ Communication, Brussels
    • Quantum Information‌​‌ Laboratory, Rome La Sapienza​​ University
    • Penn State University,​​​‌ Institute for Gravitation and‌ the Cosmos
    • Center for‌​‌ Mathematical Sciences, UNAM
    • Bard​​ College, New York
    • ETH​​​‌ Zürich
    • The University of‌ Melbourne
    • Royal Holloway, University‌​‌ of London
    • Universität Bonn​​
  • Date:
    2023-2026
  • Additionnal info:​​​‌
    QISS aims to found‌ the physics of quantum‌​‌ spacetime on an information​​ theoretical basis, bring within​​​‌ reach empirical access to‌ quantum gravity phenomenology leveraging‌​‌ rapidly advancing quantum technologies,​​ and promote interactions between​​​‌ physicists and philosophers. The‌ broader scope of the‌​‌ consortium is to establish​​ a long term research​​​‌ program that brings together‌ the represented communities, towards‌​‌ the common goal of​​ unravelling the Quantum Information​​​‌ Structure of Gravity.

7.2‌ International research visitors

7.2.1‌​‌ Visits of international scientists​​

Other international visits to​​​‌ the team
Ofek Bengyat‌
  • Status
    (PhD)
  • Institution of‌​‌ origin:
    IQOQI, U. of​​ Vienna
  • Country:
    Austria
  • Dates:​​​‌
    11 March – 13‌ March
  • Context of the‌​‌ visit:
    Seminar
  • Mobility program/type​​ of mobility:
    QISS node-to-node​​​‌ visit
Balázs FREI
  • Status‌
    PhD
  • Institution of origin:‌​‌
    Imperial College London
  • Country:​​
    UK
  • Dates:
    16 February​​​‌ – 31 May
  • Context‌ of the visit:
    collaboration‌​‌ with Zamdzhiev
  • Mobility program/type​​ of mobility:
    research stay​​​‌

7.2.2 Visits to international‌ teams

Research stays abroad‌​‌
Pablo Arrighi
  • Visited institution:​​
    Universidad de la Republica​​​‌ and Universidad de Montevideo‌
  • Country:
    Uruguay
  • Dates:
    14‌​‌ March – 31 March​​
  • Context of the visit:​​​‌
    QCOMICAL
  • Mobility program/type of‌ mobility:
    Seminars and collaboration.‌​‌
Pablo Arrighi
  • Visited institution:​​
    Universidad de los Andes,​​​‌ Bogota
  • Country:
    Colombie
  • Dates:‌
    13 October – 14‌​‌ November
  • Context of the​​ visit:
    Collaboration.
  • Mobility program/type​​​‌ of mobility:
    Collaboration.
Benoit‌ Valiron
  • Visited institution:
    Universidad‌​‌ de la Republica, Uruguay​​
  • Country:
    Uruguay
  • Dates:
    21​​​‌ juin - 6 juillet‌ 2025
  • Context of the‌​‌ visit:
    Collaboration.
  • Mobility program/type​​ of mobility:
    Visit in​​​‌ the context of the‌ QCOMICAL project.

7.3 European‌​‌ initiatives

7.3.1 Horizon Europe​​

QCOMICAL

Participants: Pablo Arnault​​​‌, Pablo Arrighi,‌ Marc Baboulin, Marc‌​‌ de Visme, Benoît​​ Valiron, Renaud Vilmart​​​‌, Matt Wilson,‌ Vladimir Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:‌​‌
    Quantum Computing and its​​ Calcul
  • Partner Institutions:
    • CENTRALESUPELEC,​​​‌ France
    • UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, France‌
    • Inria, France
    • UNIVERSITE PARIS‌​‌ CITE, France
    • UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE​​ ALPES, France
    • UNIVERSITE D'AIX​​​‌ MARSEILLE, France
    • UNIVERSITE PARIS-EST,‌ France
    • QUANDELA, France
    • UNIVERSITA‌​‌ DI PISA, Italy
    • Universita'​​ degli Studi di Urbino​​​‌ Carlo Bo, Italy
    • UNIVERSITA‌ DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI,‌​‌ Italy
    • UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS​​ AIRES, Argentina
    • UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL​​​‌ DE QUILMES, Argentina
    • UNIVERSIDAD‌ DE LA REPUBLICA, Uruguay‌​‌
  • Date:
    2024-2028
  • Additionnal info:​​
    QCOMICAL aims at designing​​​‌ and studying quantum programming‌ languages, their types, the‌​‌ corresponding logic through the​​ Curry-Howard correspondence, and other​​​‌ foundations of quantum programming‌ languages.

7.4 National initiatives‌​‌

BPI-AeroQat

Participants: Pablo Arnault​​, Pablo Arrighi,​​​‌ Marc Baboulin, Marc‌ de Visme, Benoît‌​‌ Valiron, Renaud Vilmart​​, Matt Wilson,​​​‌ Vladimir Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:‌
    Quantum Algorithms for Next‌​‌ Generation Aerospace Equipment
  • Partner​​​‌ Institutions:
    • INRIA, France
    • Alice​ & Bob, France
    • Thales,​‌ France
  • Date:
    2024-2027
  • Additionnal​​ info:
    BPI-AeroQat aims at​​​‌ developing fault tolerant quantum​ computer, in line with​‌ the French government’s recommendations​​ to assess accurately what​​​‌ ressources will be needed,​ and therefore a timeline​‌ of when quantum computers​​ able to optimize the​​​‌ design of airborne equipments​ will be available.
EPiQ​‌ (PEPR Quantique)

Participants: Pablo​​ Arnault, Pablo Arrighi​​​‌, Marc Baboulin,​ Marc de Visme,​‌ Benoît Valiron, Renaud​​ Vilmart, Matt Wilson​​​‌, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.​

  • Title:
    Etude de la​‌ pile quantique : Algorithmes,​​ modèles de calcul et​​​‌ simulation pour l’informatique quantique​
  • Partner Institutions:
    • INRIA, France​‌
    • CNRS, France
    • CEA, France​​
  • Date:
    2022-2027
  • Additionnal info:​​​‌
    EPiQ aims at (1)​ Understanding the advantages and​‌ limits of quan- tum​​ computing via both quantum​​​‌ complexity research and the​ discovery and enhancement of​‌ algo- rithms (2) Defining​​ the framework for quantum​​​‌ computation using high-level languages,​ compari- son of computational​‌ models as well as​​ using their relations for​​​‌ program optimization (3) Develop​ simulation tools to anticipate​‌ the performances of algorithms​​ on noisy quantum machines.​​​‌
EQIP (Inria challenge project)​

Participants: Pablo Arnault,​‌ Pablo Arrighi, Marc​​ Baboulin, Marc de​​​‌ Visme, Benoît Valiron​, Renaud Vilmart,​‌ Matt Wilson, Vladimir​​ Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:
    Engineering​​​‌ for Quantum Information Processors​
  • Partner Institution:
    • INRIA, France​‌
  • Date:
    2021-2024
  • Additionnal info:​​
    The long-term objective of​​​‌ this line of work​ is to build a​‌ large universal quantum computer​​ and the main scientific​​​‌ challenges today are to​ identify potential approaches for​‌ scaling up the small​​ quantum processors consisting of​​​‌ a few tens of​ qubits already available, to​‌ anticipate how to program​​ these new machines, and​​​‌ to understand what new​ capabilities will become accessible​‌ once quantum computing becomes​​ available.
TaQC (ANR)

Participants:​​​‌ Pablo Arnault, Pablo​ Arrighi, Marc Baboulin​‌, Marc de Visme​​, Benoît Valiron,​​​‌ Renaud Vilmart, Matt​ Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev​‌.

  • Title:
    Taming Quantum​​ Causality
  • Partner Institutions:
    • UPSaclay​​​‌ - LMF Université Paris-Saclay​ - Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles​‌
    • Inria Centre de Recherche​​ Inria de Lyon -​​​‌ AT-LYS
    • NEEL Institut Néel​
    • LARSIM Commissariat à l'énergie​‌ atomique et aux énergies​​ alternatives
  • Date:
    2023-2027
  • Additionnal​​​‌ info:

    Quantum technologies provide​ advantages by exploiting non-classical​‌ resources, such as superposition​​ or entanglement. Recently, it​​​‌ has been realized that​ one can obtain new​‌ advantages by exploiting causal​​ structures that are inherently​​​‌ quantum. This quantum "causal​ indefiniteness" constitutes a novel​‌ resource and opens new​​ perspectives in quantum information.​​​‌ Despite foundational progress and​ several experimental realizations, the​‌ concrete implications for quantum​​ computing nevertheless remain poorly​​​‌ understood so far. In​ this project we will​‌ work to bridge this​​ gap and to develop​​​‌ quantum causality as a​ new non-classical resource on​‌ par with superposition and​​ entanglement.

    To achieve this,​​​‌ we will develop three​ directions. (1) Firstly, we​‌ will develop a Generalised​​ Probabilistic Theories approach to​​​‌ understand causal indefiniteness within​ a larger class of​‌ models. This will help​​ clarify which causally indefinite​​ process are physical and​​​‌ what precise role is‌ played by genuinely nonclassical‌​‌ resources such as superposition​​ and entanglement. (2) Secondly,​​​‌ we will go beyond‌ the standard example of‌​‌ the "quantum switch" to​​ study more concrete models​​​‌ of causally indefinite computation.‌ In doing so, we‌​‌ will systematically explore the​​ possible applications of causal​​​‌ indefiniteness and unveil the‌ potential of causally indefinite‌​‌ computations. (3) Finally, we​​ will use ZX-Calculus to​​​‌ harness the capabilities of‌ causal indefiniteness at the‌​‌ compilation level. Using ZX-Calculus​​ as a springboard towards​​​‌ programming causally indefinite computations‌ will help us optimize‌​‌ the use of this​​ new resource.

    Together, these​​​‌ goals work towards our‌ ultimate objective of finding‌​‌ the right arguments in​​ the right language to​​​‌ give causal indefiniteness a‌ unique place among the‌​‌ leading conceptual and empirical​​ paradigms of quantum information.​​​‌

HQI (National Quantum Plan‌ project)

Participants: Pablo Arnault‌​‌, Pablo Arrighi,​​ Marc Baboulin, Marc​​​‌ de Visme, Benoît‌ Valiron, Renaud Vilmart‌​‌, Matt Wilson,​​ Vladimir Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:​​​‌
    Hybrid HPC-Quantum platform and‌ a research program
  • Partner‌​‌ Institutions:
    • INRIA, France
    • CNRS,​​ France
    • CEA, France
    • GENCI,​​​‌ France
    • France Universités, France‌
    • ANR, France
    • PIA4, France‌​‌
    • France Relance, France
  • Date:​​
    2022-2027
  • Additionnal info:
    HQI​​​‌ is an integrated ini-‌ tiative. It combines a‌​‌ hybrid computing platform that​​ couples several quantum processors​​​‌ with GENCI’s Joliot-Curie supercomputer‌ hosted at TGCC (CEA),‌​‌ and an academic and​​ industrial research program with​​​‌ user enablement
QuantPhy (ANR-CPJ)‌

Participants: Pablo Arnault,‌​‌ Pablo Arrighi, Marc​​ Baboulin, Marc de​​​‌ Visme, Benoît Valiron‌, Renaud Vilmart,‌​‌ Matt Wilson, Vladimir​​ Zamdzhiev.

  • Title:
    Hybrid​​​‌ HPC-Quantum platform and a‌ research program
  • Partner Institutions:‌​‌
    • Université Paris-Saclay, France
  • Date:​​
    2023-2028
  • Additionnal info:
    This​​​‌ is the 200KEUR endowment‌ around the Junior Professor‌​‌ Chair at Université Paris-Saclay​​ that has been attributed​​​‌ to the group. We‌ have recruited Esteban Castro-Ruiz‌​‌ as a the chair​​ holder, but he left​​​‌ after a year for‌ a Junior Group leader‌​‌ position at U. of​​ Vienna. The position will​​​‌ be filled by Thomas‌ Galley in 2026.
Q-LOOP‌​‌

Participants: Renaud Vilmart,​​ Benoît Valiron.

  • Title:​​​‌
    Q-LOOP
  • Partner Institutions:
    • INRIA‌
    • CNRS
    • CEA
    • Siemens
    • Alice&Bob‌​‌
    • C12
    • Quandela
    • Siquance
    • Silent​​ Waves
    • ST
    • UGA
    • STM​​​‌
  • Date:
    2024-2030
  • Additionnal info:‌
    The Q-Loop project aims‌​‌ to identify ways of​​ scaling up solid-state qubit​​​‌ control and readout chains.‌ The ability to address‌​‌ a large number of​​ qubits is necessary for​​​‌ the advent of fault-tolerant‌ quantum computing (FTQC) in‌​‌ order to open up​​ its use to many​​​‌ application areas. Q-Loop draws‌ on integration approaches already‌​‌ implemented in industrial-scale microelectronics,​​ adapting them to the​​​‌ context and constraints of‌ quantum computing, particularly operation‌​‌ at cryogenic temperatures.

7.5​​ Regional initiatives

AQEDP

Participants:​​​‌ Renaud Vilmart, Marc‌ Baboulin.

  • Title:
    Algorithmes‌​‌ Quantiques appliqués aux Equations​​ aux Dérivées Partielles
  • Partner​​​‌ Institutions:
    • INRIA
    • IRT SystemX‌
    • C12
  • Date:
    2025-2028
  • Additionnal‌​‌ info:
    The objective of​​ this project is to​​​‌ develop and explore various‌ methods for effectively solving‌​‌ mechanical problems, whether linear​​​‌ or non-linear, by combining​ quantum algorithms with traditional​‌ numerical methods used for​​ solving partial differential equations​​​‌ (PDEs).

8 Dissemination

8.1​ Promoting scientific activities

8.1.1​‌ Scientific events: organisation

Member​​ of the organizing committees​​​‌
  • Vladimir Zamdzhiev for PLanQC'26.​
  • Renaud Vilmart for Journées​‌ Informatiques Quantique (JIQ) 2025.​​

8.1.2 Scientific events: selection​​​‌

Chair of conference program​ committees
  • Vladimir Zamdzhiev for​‌ PLanQC'26.
Member of the​​ conference program committees
  • Renaud​​​‌ Vilmart for QPL 2025.​
  • Pablo Arrighi for QPL​‌ 2025, Quantum simulation and​​ quantum walks (QSQW) 2025.​​​‌
  • Benoît Valiron for PLanQC'25,​ PLDI 2025, LICS 2026,​‌ RC 2025, IWQC 2025.​​
Reviewer
  • Marc de Visme​​​‌ for LICS, FoSSaCS.
  • Vladimir​ Zamdzhiev for LICS, FoSSaCS,​‌ ESOP.
  • Renaud Vilmart for​​ FoSSaCS, ESOP, QPL, MFCS,​​​‌ NACO, ICTAC, QCE.
  • Pablo​ Arrighi for QPL, QSQW.​‌
  • Benoît Valiron for PLanQC,​​ PLDI, LICS, RC, IWQC,​​​‌ ARITH, POPL.

8.1.3 Journal​

Member of the editorial​‌ boards
  • Pablo Arrighi for​​ TCS.
  • Benoît Valiron for​​​‌ LMCS.
  • Marc Baboulin for​ Parallel Computing.
Reviewer -​‌ reviewing activities
  • Marc de​​ Visme for Discrete Event​​​‌ Dynamic Systems (DEDS).
  • Vladimir​ Zamdzhiev for Logical Methods​‌ in Computer Science (LMCS).​​
  • Renaud Vilmart for Quantum,​​​‌ PRX.
  • Pablo Arrighi for​ Quantum, PRL.
  • Pablo Arnault​‌ for Quantum, PRL.

8.1.4​​ Invited talks

  • Vladimir Zamdzhiev.​​​‌ CATNIP (Categories Networking Project).​ University of Edinburgh. October​‌ 2025.
  • Pablo Arrighi. Quantum​​ cellular automata : structure​​​‌ and quantum simulation of​ QED, invited talk at​‌ XIV Conference on Quantum​​ Foundations, Buenos Aires, November​​​‌ 2025.
  • Benoît Valiron. Tutorial​ on Quantum Programming Languages​‌ for the QCOMICAL school​​ in Nancy, November 2025.​​​‌
  • Benoît Valiron. Tutorial on​ Quantum Programming languages with​‌ classical control at the​​ MAQI summer school in​​​‌ Orsay, June 2025.
  • Benoît​ Valiron. Tutorial on Quantum​‌ Programming Language at QUEST-IS,​​ Palaiseau, December 2025.
  • Marc​​​‌ Vaboulin. Tutorial on Quantum​ Algorithms for High-Performance Computing​‌ at the MAQI summer​​ school, Orsay, June 2025.​​​‌
  • Marc Baboulin. Invited talk​ at SouthWestX Summit, Saarbrucken,​‌ July 2025.
  • Marc Baboulin.​​ Invited talk at ASQ3​​​‌ workshop, Paris, September 2025.​
  • Marc Baboulin. Invited talk​‌ at Workshop on Approximate​​ Computing, Paris, October 2025.​​​‌
  • Marc Baboulin. Invited talk​ at NumerIQ, Jacques Louis​‌ Lions Lab, December 2025.​​

8.1.5 Leadership within the​​​‌ scientific community

  • Renaud Vilmart​ is a co-supervisor of​‌ GT IQ (groupe de​​ travail Informatique Quantique).
  • Pablo​​​‌ Arrighi, Marc Baboulin and​ Benoît Valiron are members​‌ of the Quantum center​​ of Saclay's executive committee.​​​‌
  • Pablo Arrighi is a​ member of the Center​‌ for Quantum Spacetime's board.​​
  • Pablo Arrighi is a​​​‌ member of the Bureau​ du Comité des Équipes​‌ Projet.
  • Benoît Valiron and​​ Vladimir Zamdzhiev are members​​​‌ of IFIP Working Group​ on Foundations of Quantum​‌ Computation.
  • Marc Baboulin is​​ head of the GT​​​‌ Quantum Computing (GDR C4P)​ at CNRS.
  • Marc Baboulin​‌ is co-head of WP​​ "numerical libraries" in the​​​‌ french Exascale project (Numpex).​

8.1.6 Scientific expertise

  • Pablo​‌ Arrighi refered grants for​​ Institut Courtois (Canada), ARIS​​​‌ (Slovenia), and SNSF (Switzerland).​

8.1.7 Research administration

  • Renaud​‌ Vilmart is member of​​ the scientific council of​​​‌ Inria Saclay.
  • Marc de​ Visme is member of​‌ the Conseil Scientifique of​​ the LMF.

8.2 Teaching​​ - Supervision - Juries​​​‌ - Educational and pedagogical‌ outreach

8.2.1 Teaching administration‌​‌

  • Renaud Vilmart and Pablo​​ Arnault are organizers of​​​‌ the master internships of‌ the Master QDCS (M1‌​‌ and M2).
  • Benoît Valiron​​ is an organizer of​​​‌ the master QMI (M2).‌

8.2.2 Teaching courses

Participant:‌​‌ Renaud Vilmart.

  • Elements​​ of computer science for​​​‌ quantum technologies. Arteq, ENS‌ Paris-Saclay.
  • ZX-Calculus. Master 2‌​‌ QDCS.
  • Introduction to functional​​ programming. L2 UFR sciences.​​​‌
  • Advanced functional programming. L3‌ UFR sciences.

Participant: Vladimir‌​‌ Zamdzhiev.

  • Introduction to​​ Categories. MPRI.
  • Initiation to​​​‌ Research. MPRI.

Participant: Pablo‌ Arnault.

  • Foundations for‌​‌ Quantum Information. M1 QDCS.​​

Participant: Marc de Visme​​​‌.

  • Elements of computer‌ science for quantum technologies.‌​‌ Arteq, ENS Paris-Saclay.

Participant:​​ Matthew Wilson.

Approximately​​​‌ 160 hours of teaching‌ accross graduate and undergraduate‌​‌ computer science, including; Information​​ systems, algorithms, advanced algorithms,​​​‌ coding project supervision, artificial‌ intelligence.

Participant: Benoît Valiron‌​‌.

Professor of Computer​​ Science at CentraleSupélec. On​​​‌ top of my mandatory‌ 192 hours of (computer‌​‌ science) teaching in the​​ School engineering curriculum, I​​​‌ give two introductory courses‌ in quantum algorithms and‌​‌ programming in the QDCS​​ Master and in the​​​‌ ArteQ program.

Participant: Marc‌ Baboulin.

Professor of‌​‌ Computer Science at Université​​ Paris-Saclay/ Polytech Paris-Saclay (quantum​​​‌ computing, high-performance computing, numerical‌ algorithms).

8.2.3 Supervision

The‌​‌ following PhD theses are​​ supervised by the team:​​​‌

  • Benoît Valiron , Marc‌ de Visme and Renaud‌​‌ Vilmart : Antoine Guilmin​​ on graphical languages for​​​‌ infinite dimension quantum programming.‌
  • Benoît Valiron , Vladimir‌​‌ Zamdzhiev : Thea Li​​ on Quantum Coherence Spaces.​​​‌
  • Vladimir Zamdzhiev : Kinnari‌ Dave on Combining classical‌​‌ and quantum control: A​​ logical, syntactic and semantic​​​‌ perspective.
  • Benoît Valiron and‌ Renaud Vilmart : Julien‌​‌ Lamiroy on Logical Interpretation​​ of indefinite causal orders.​​​‌
  • Benoît Valiron and Renaud‌ Vilmart : Adham Zekri‌​‌ on Compilation of the​​ HHL algorithm on cat​​​‌ qubits.
  • Pablo Arrighi and‌ Pablo Arnault : Dogukan‌​‌ Bakircioglu on Quantum simulation​​ of quantum field theories.​​​‌
  • Pablo Arrighi and Pablo‌ Arnault : Aymane Maaitat‌​‌ on Feynman path integrals​​ and quantum automata.
  • Pablo​​​‌ Arrighi : Seonghun Jung‌ on Causal decompositions of‌​‌ quantum processes.
  • Pablo Arrighi​​ and Matt Wilson :​​​‌ Octave Mestoudjian on Generalised‌ subsystems for quantum theory.‌​‌
  • Pablo Arrighi Marin Costes​​ on Quantum networks theory.​​​‌
  • Benoît Valiron and Pablo‌ Arrighi Nicolas Heurtel on‌​‌ Measurement-based quantum computing for​​ photonics at Quandela (CIFRE).​​​‌
  • Benoit Valiron Jérome Ricciardi‌ on verification of quantum‌​‌ circuit equivalence. Co-supervision with​​ CEA-LIST/LSL.
  • Benoit Valiron Alexis​​​‌ Roux on quantum computation‌ for radar applications. Co-supervision‌​‌ with SONDRA laboratory.
  • Marc​​ Baboulin Océane Koska on​​​‌ quantum algorithms for HPC.‌
  • Marc Baboulin and Renaud‌​‌ Vilmart Sunheang Ty on​​ Quantum methods for solving​​​‌ PDEs.
  • Marc Baboulin Simon‌ Renard on quantum-classical HPC‌​‌ worksflows. Co-supervision with Inria​​ Rennes.

8.2.4 Juries

  • Vladimir​​​‌ Zamdzhiev : President of‌ internship jury at ENS‌​‌ Paris-Saclay.
  • Renaud Vilmart :​​ Expert member of Matthew​​​‌ Sutcliffe's PhD defense (Oxford).‌
  • Pablo Arrighi : Expert‌​‌ member of Julien Zylberman's​​ PhD defense (Sorbonne U.).​​​‌ Referee member of Marco‌ Túlio Quintino's HDR defense‌​‌ (Sorbonne Université).
  • Benoît Valiron​​​‌ : Reviewer and head​ of jury for Marío​‌ Silva's PhD thesis (Nancy).​​ Expert member for Andreas​​​‌ Fyrillas' PhD thesis (Paris-Saclay).​

8.3 Popularization

Pablo Arrighi​‌ 's previous result on​​ the Arrow of Time​​​‌ (cf. last year's report)​ inspired two popular science​‌ papers:

8.3.1 Productions​ (articles, videos, podcasts, serious​‌ games, ...)

  • Marc Baboulin​​ : Interview in Who's​​​‌ Who France on the​ future of quantum computing,​‌ June 2025.
  • Marc Baboulin​​ : Interview in Journal​​​‌ du Net on "Bridging​ quantum computing and HPC",​‌ August 2025.

8.3.2 Participation​​ in Live events

  • Pablo​​​‌ Arrighi Informatique quantique :​ premier contact, BPI Université,​‌ Inria-Academy, Webinar with 1000​​ participants registered, June 2025.​​​‌
  • Benoit Valiron Calcul quantique​ du point de vue​‌ de l'informatique, Café Science​​ CentraleSupélec. Hybrid presentation, 150​​​‌ participants total, June 2025.​
  • Marc Baboulin : QAP​‌ Computing startup project presented​​ at VivaTech 2025, June​​​‌ 2025.

9 Scientific production​

9.1 Major publications

9.2 Publications​‌ of the year

International​​ journals

International peer-reviewed​‌ conferences

  • 7 inproceedingsK.​​Kinnari Dave, A.​​​‌Alejandro Díaz-Caro and V.​Vladimir Zamdzhiev. IMALL​‌ with a Mixed-State Modality:​​ A Logical Approach to​​​‌ Quantum Computation.Lecture​ Notes in Computer Science​‌APLAS 2025 - 23rd​​ Asian Symposium on Programming​​​‌ Languages and Systems16201​Programming Languages and Systems​‌Bengaluru, IndiaSpringerOctober​​ 2025, 131-160HAL​​​‌DOIback to text​
  • 8 inproceedingsK.Kinnari​‌ Dave, L.Louis​​ Lemonnier, R.Romain​​ Péchoux and V.Vladimir​​​‌ Zamdzhiev. Combining quantum‌ and classical control: syntax,‌​‌ semantics and adequacy.​​Foundations of Software Science​​​‌ and Computation Structures28th International‌ Conference, FoSSaCS 2025, Held‌​‌ as Part of the​​ International Joint Conferences on​​​‌ Theory and Practice of‌ Software, ETAPS 2025FoSSaCS‌​‌ 2025 - 28th International​​ Conference on Foundations of​​​‌ Software Science and Computation‌ Structures15691Lecture Notes‌​‌ in Computer ScienceHamilton,​​ CanadaSpringer Nature Switzerland​​​‌May 2025, 155-175‌HALDOIback to‌​‌ text
  • 9 inproceedingsC.​​Claudia Faggian, G.​​​‌Gaetan Lopez and B.‌Benoît Valiron. A‌​‌ Rewriting Theory for Quantum​​ λ-Calculus.CSL 2025​​​‌ - 33rd EACSL Annual‌ Conference on Computer Science‌​‌ Logic326Amsterdam, Netherlands​​Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum​​​‌ für Informatik2025,‌ 47:1--47:22HALDOIback‌​‌ to text
  • 10 inproceedings​​O.Océane Koska,​​​‌ M.Marc Baboulin and‌ A.Arnaud Gazda.‌​‌ A mixed-precision quantum-classical algorithm​​ for solving linear systems​​​‌.2025 IEEE International‌ Parallel and Distributed Processing‌​‌ Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)IPDPS​​ 2025 - 39th IEEE​​​‌ International Parallel and Distributed‌ Processing Symposium WorkshopsMilan,‌​‌ ItalyIEEEAugust 2025​​, 501-508HALDOI​​​‌back to text
  • 11‌ inproceedingsT.Thea Li‌​‌ and V.Vladimir Zamdzhiev​​. Quantum Coherence Spaces​​​‌ Revisited: A von Neumann‌ (Co)Algebraic Approach.FOSSACS‌​‌ 2026 - International Conference​​ on Foundations of Software​​​‌ Science and Computational Structures‌Turin (Italie), ItalyApril‌​‌ 2026HALback to​​ text
  • 12 inproceedingsB.​​​‌Bert Lindenhovius and V.‌Vladimir Zamdzhiev. Operator‌​‌ Spaces, Linear Logic and​​ the Heisenberg-Schrödinger Duality of​​​‌ Quantum Theory.Proceedings‌ of the 40th Annual‌​‌ ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic​​ in Computer Science (LICS)​​​‌LICS 2025 - 40th‌ Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on‌​‌ Logic in Computer Science​​Singapore, SingaporeJune 2025​​​‌HALback to text‌

Conferences without proceedings

Reports &​​ preprints

9.3 Cited publications​​​‌

  • 26 unpublishedP.Pablo​ Arrighi, M.Marios​‌ Christodoulou and A.Amélia​​ Durbec. On quantum​​​‌ superpositions of graphs, no-signalling​ and covariance.November​‌ 2020, working paper​​ or preprintHALback​​​‌ to text
  • 27 article​M.Marc Baboulin,​‌ O.Oguz Kaya,​​ T.Theo Mary and​​​‌ M.Matthieu Robeyns.​ Mixed precision iterative refinement​‌ for low-rank matrix and​​ tensor approximations.SIAM​​​‌ Journal on Scientific Computing​4752025,​‌ A2906-A2935HALDOIback​​ to text
  • 28 unpublished​​​‌J. S.Julien Saan​ Joachim, M.Marc​‌ de Visme, S.​​Stefan Haar and G.​​​‌Glynn Winskel. Quantum​ Petri Nets with Event​‌ Structure semantics.August​​ 2025, working paper​​​‌ or preprintHALDOI​back to text
  • 29​‌ miscM.Marco Lewis​​ and N.Nesta van​​​‌ der Schaaf. Some​ Results on Causal Modalities​‌ in General Spacetimes.​​2026, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14029​​​‌back to text