2025Activity reportProject-TeamQUACS
RNSR: 202124178U- Research center Inria Saclay Centre at Université Paris-Saclay
- In partnership with:Université Paris-Saclay
- Team name: Quantum Computation Structures
- In collaboration with:Laboratoire de Méthodes Formelles
Creation of the Project-Team: 2021 December 01
Each year, Inria research teams publish an Activity Report presenting their work and results over the reporting period. These reports follow a common structure, with some optional sections depending on the specific team. They typically begin by outlining the overall objectives and research programme, including the main research themes, goals, and methodological approaches. They also describe the application domains targeted by the team, highlighting the scientific or societal contexts in which their work is situated.
The reports then present the highlights of the year, covering major scientific achievements, software developments, or teaching contributions. When relevant, they include sections on software, platforms, and open data, detailing the tools developed and how they are shared. A substantial part is dedicated to new results, where scientific contributions are described in detail, often with subsections specifying participants and associated keywords.
Finally, the Activity Report addresses funding, contracts, partnerships, and collaborations at various levels, from industrial agreements to international cooperations. It also covers dissemination and teaching activities, such as participation in scientific events, outreach, and supervision. The document concludes with a presentation of scientific production, including major publications and those produced during the year.
Keywords
Computer Science and Digital Science
- A1.1.4. High performance computing
- A2.1.1. Semantics of programming languages
- A2.1.6. Concurrent programming
- A2.1.7. Distributed programming
- A2.1.11. Proof languages
- A2.1.13. Quantum programming languages
- A2.2.1. Static analysis
- A4.2. Correcting codes
- A4.2.1. Quantum error correction
- A4.5. Formal method for verification, reliability, certification
- A4.5.1. Static analysis
- A4.5.3. Program proof
- A6.5. Mathematical modeling for physical sciences
- A7.1.4. Quantum algorithms
- A7.2.3. Interactive Theorem Proving
- A7.3.1. Computational models and calculability
- A8. Mathematics of computing
- A8.6. Information theory
- A8.7. Graph theory
- A8.13. Quantum computing
- A8.13.1. qubit
- A8.13.3. Continuous variable quantum computing
- A8.13.4. Measurement based quantum computing
- A8.13.5. Photonic quantum computing
- A8.13.9. Hybrid quantum computing
- A8.13.10. ZX calculus
Other Research Topics and Application Domains
- B5.11. Quantum systems
1 Team members, visitors, external collaborators
Research Scientists
- Pablo Arrighi [Team leader, Inria, Senior Researcher, HDR]
- Pablo Arnault [INRIA, Researcher]
- Marc De Visme [INRIA, Researcher]
- James Hefford [INRIA, Starting Research Position, from Oct 2025]
- Renaud Vilmart [INRIA, ISFP]
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev [INRIA, ISFP]
Faculty Members
- Marc Baboulin [Université Paris Saclay, Professor, HDR]
- Benoît Valiron [CENTRALE, Associate Professor, HDR]
Post-Doctoral Fellows
- Alexandre Clement [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow]
- Cole Comfort [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow]
- James Hefford [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow, until Sep 2025]
- Marco John Lewis [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow]
- Mario Alberto Machado Da Silva [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow, from Nov 2025]
- Nesta J Judah Van Der Schaaf [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow]
PhD Students
- Dogukan Bakircioglu [INRIA]
- Marin Costes [ENS PARIS-SACLAY]
- Kinnari Dave [INRIA Nancy]
- Antoine Guilmin-Crépon [ENS Paris Saclay, from Sep 2025]
- Nicolas Heurtel [Quandela, CIFRE, until Jun 2025]
- Seonghun Jung [Université Paris Saclay, from Sep 2025]
- Océane Koska [Eviden]
- Julien Lamiroy [Université Paris Saclay]
- Thea Li [INRIA]
- Aymane Maaitat [Université Paris Saclay, from Sep 2025]
- Octave Mestoudjian [LMF]
- Jérome Ricciardi [CEA]
- Adham Zekri [INRIA]
Technical Staff
- Gaurang Agrawal [INRIA, Engineer, from Dec 2025]
- Michel Nicolis [INRIA, Engineer, until Oct 2025]
- Brice Pointal [Inria Startup Studio, Engineer, until Sep 2025]
Interns and Apprentices
- Andrea Caseidi [Université Paris Saclay, Intern, from Sep 2025]
- Julien Chevaillier [INRIA, Intern, from May 2025 until Jul 2025]
- Karim El Houdaigui [INRIA, Intern, from Apr 2025 until Aug 2025]
- Antoine Guilmin-Crépon [ENS Paris Saclay, Intern, from Mar 2025 until Aug 2025]
- Nathan Houyet [LMF, Intern, from Mar 2025 until May 2025]
- Julien Joachim [Université Paris Saclay, Intern, from Mar 2025 until Jul 2025]
- Hadrien Kerkhof [INRIA, Intern, from Apr 2025 until Jul 2025]
- Sem Saada Khelkhal [INRIA, Intern, from Jul 2025]
- Leqi Liu [INRIA, Intern, from Apr 2025 until Aug 2025]
- Aymane Maaitat [INRIA, Intern, from Apr 2025 until Jun 2025]
- Vincent Nguyen [Université Paris Saclay, Intern, from May 2025 until Oct 2025]
- Simon Renard [Université Paris Saclay, Intern, from Apr 2025 until Sep 2025]
- Rayan Trabelsi [INRIA, Intern, from Jun 2025 until Aug 2025]
Administrative Assistant
- Joyce Soares Brito [INRIA]
2 Overall objectives
Quantum information processing is one of the rising forces of the information era. Encoding information within quantum systems and manipulating them promises to lead to great advantages, with three main application domains: quantum cryptography, quantum simulation, and quantum algorithmics. To understand its strengths and limits, we take a transversal stance and seek to capture which resources are granted to us by nature, at the fundamental level, for the sake of computing (e.g. quantum and spatial parallelism). We do so by abstracting away physics’ ability to compute, into formal models of quantum computation (e.g. quantum automata and graph rewriting models). We then verbalize its main structures as quantum programming languages (e.g. quantum lambda-calculus, process algebra). Actually, the process goes both ways, when developments in quantum programming languages lead to the discovery of new structures which may or may not be compilable into formal models of quantum computation, raising the sometimes fascinating question of the physicality of these resources.
3 Research program
Quantum computing has emerged as one of the novel forces of the digital era. Encoding and manipulating information within quantum systems suggests major advantages, with three principal application domains: quantum cryptography, quantum simulation of physical systems, and quantum algorithms.
Our work takes a cross-disciplinary approach, aiming to understand the fundamental resources that nature offers for computation — such as quantum parallelism and spatial parallelism. We abstract the computational capabilities of physics into formal models of quantum computation (e.g., quantum automata, graph-rewriting models) and express these core structures through quantum programming languages (e.g. quantum lambda calculi, process algebras).
The process is bidirectional: advances in quantum programming languages can reveal new computational structures, which may or may not be implementable within existing models. This raises the fascinating question of the physical realizability of such resources.
Our research is organized around four main axes:
-
Digital quantum simulation
A major breakthrough in this area is the development of the first quantum cellular automaton capable of modeling real particles — electrons and photons — in 3+1 dimensions. This model is built on a discrete formulation of a fundamental symmetry in physics—gauge symmetry—analogous to fault tolerance in computer science. This approach opens the door to inherently discrete formulations of quantum field theories, which are otherwise known for their lack of rigorous definition.
-
Semantics
We employ tools such as categorical/mathematical semantics and realizability to study and design quantum programming languages. One notable contribution is a type system that characterizes unitarity for a vectorial lambda calculus — addressing a long-standing open problem: giving a “quantum” meaning to superpositions of potentially arbitrary lambda terms, in a compositional way. Realizability provides a powerful framework for defining types as sets of programs satisfying specific properties.
-
Graphical languages and rewriting
We study here ways to graphically but formally represent quantum data and computations, with often a focus on capturing the semantical equivalence through equational theories. These graphical languages include existing ones, such as circuits or ZX-like diagrams — in which we either extend with a new feature, or for which we study fragments — or new ones, such as one that accommodates both the tensor product and the direct sum. A major breakthrough in this domain is the first complete equational theory for quantum circuits — the most widely used graphical formalism for describing quantum computations. This theory consists of a set of equations proven to be both sound and complete: two circuits represent the same quantum operation if and only if one can be transformed into the other using these equations.
-
Programming for quantum computation
If we want that quantum computing can address real-world applications then we need to have programming models in order to facilitate the integration of hybrid quantum-classical computing into HPC environments. This implies to extend standard C++ to enable dynamic interaction between classical and quantum resources. On top of the quantum-HPC hybridation aspects, this research focus includes everything constituting tools for the quantum programmer: libraries, synthesis techniques, classical simulation of quantum algorithms, etc.
All four research areas draw on a set of shared mathematical principles:
-
Linearity
Quantum data cannot be duplicated without loss of information, imposing strict constraints on possible manipulations. Understanding how this linearity manifests in models of quantum computation is a recurring theme across our work.
-
Spatiality
Since quantum computation is implemented directly on physical systems (e.g. atoms and photons), spatial distribution — whether for parallelization or due to physical constraints — is an inherent consideration.
-
Causality
When time is added to the spatial dimension, the causal structure of computations becomes crucial: which operations depend on others, and which can be performed independently. Causality, like spatiality, is examined both for computational optimization and for alignment with physical laws.
4 Application domains
4.1 Digital quantum simulation
Feynman’s invention of Quantum Computing really came out of a frustration: that of seeing classical computers take such a long time to simulate quantum systems. His intuition was that “quantum computers”' would do a better job at simulating quantum systems. There is not the slightest doubt indeed that quantum simulation will have major outcomes for society. Thinking about it, most of the objects that surround us (cars, computers, furniture…) are designed on computers, thanks to the fact that we can prototype and simulate them on classical computers. That is, up to a certain scale. Below that we are left in the dark as quantum effects come into play, yielding an exponential blow up of the cost or simulation. For now. But, the day we will have good quantum computers and good quantum simulation algorithms to run upon them, we will be able to simulate these particles, atoms, molecules and the way they interact. Consequently we will be able to design specific-purpose molecules, materials, nanotechnologies, with applications in chemistry, biochemistry, electronics, mechanics. At QuaCS we focus on the bottom layer: the quantum-simulation algorithms for fundamental particles. After all, to be able to efficiently simulate fundamental interactions is to be able to simulate virtually everything, from first principles. An added bonus of this strand of research is that usually when we express some physics as a quantum algorithm, it becomes way simpler, more explanatory.
Quantum simulation comes in two flavours: continuous-time quantum simulation, which is very physicky and consists of ad hoc emulation of one Hamiltonian by another, and discrete-time quantum simulation, which is much closer to quantum algorithmic: this is where we stand. In particular, we focus on the provision of a quantum-circuit description of the dynamics of fundamental particles. Moreover, when we design these quantum simulation schemes, our focus is on retaining the symmetries of the simulated model. This is both a matter of efficiency and correctness. For instance, our discretizations have a maximum speed of propagation of the information, which coincides with the speed of light in the simulated system, as a first step towards retaining Lorentz symmetry. Similarly, our discretizations exhibit the gauge symmetries that motivate the different fundamental particles. The long term goal of this program is to provide a satisfactory quantum-circuit descriptions of the whole standard model of particle physics.
4.2 Semantics
In the research program on Semantics, the QuaCS team is working on developing mathematical methods and tools that formulate the precise meaning and behavior of (quantum) systems, processes, type systems and programming languages, other formal languages and computational models. This includes, but is not limited, to the following:
- Operational semantics: a mathematically precise description of the dynamics of quantum programs and other computational models (e.g., the small-step semantics of quantum lambda calculi, token-machine semantics of quantum diagrammatic calculi).
- Mathematical and denotational semantics: a mathematical interpretation of a quantum programming language, process theory, diagrammatic calculus, etc., which is always expected to be sound and often expected to be adequate or complete.
This line of research is focused on identifying fundamental connections between the static specification (e.g. syntax) of quantum languages, their dynamic behavior (e.g. operational semantics) and their mathematical interpretation (e.g. denotational semantics) with the intention of developing each of these components further.
This line of research can reveal interesting connections between mathematical structures, computational models, type systems and other formal languages. Ideally, one endpoint of such a connection can be used to influence the design and development of the other endpoint, because these connections can allow us to improve our understanding of the different aspects of the (quantum) systems and computational models under consideration.
For instance, monads in category theory were the inspiration for introducing monads in programming languages. Another example includes categorical quantum mechanics which lead to the development of the ZX-calculus along with other useful tools, such as PyZX/QuiZX, which may be used for optimisation of quantum circuits and classical simulation of quantum processes.
4.3 Graphical languages and rewriting
One of the main features of graphical languages is that they can be made abstract enough to remove unnecessary clutter and ease reasoning on quantum operators. This has several consequences : They are rather intuitive to work with, while at the same time being completely formal. They can provide an intermediate representation of quantum programs, with enough abstraction to reason about and modify the program during compilation. The most illustrative example of such modification is circuit optimisation, where the goal is to reduce the number of "expensive" quantum gates in the circuit, which can be achieved by turning the circuit into a ZX-diagram, then using its equational theory to perform the reduction. Together with the simplification heuristic, it is possible to exploit this "uncluttering" effect to perform more efficient classical simulation of quantum programs. It can be exploited to perform automated verification of quantum programs.
The QuaCS team is involved in the development and study of graphical calculi such as quanctum circuits, ZX-, ZW-, ZH-calculi, but also languages for linear optics, such as the LOv-calculus. These languages are supposed to represent particular features of quantum computing, and hence are designed with a particular semantics in mind. A question of interest in the field is that of completeness with respect to that semantics : the ability to graphically turn any two equivalent diagrams into one another, making it possible to entirely reason within the language. The team is interested in the structure quantum operators have, that can be exhibited by the graphical approach, and depending on the model of computation at hand. It then becomes possible to study the links between the graphical languages, and hence, between the different models of computation. Recently, some focus has been put in the use of graphical languages for the study of indefinite causal orders, a extension to the usual quantum computation model, where not only data is quantum, but also the control flow of the program, which is allowed by the theory but still not well understood.
4.4 Programming for quantum computation
The hybrid quantum-classical algorithms that have been developed in the team concern more specifically the solution of linear systems, which is a key function for most scientific and data science applications. For example we have developed a new mixed-precision solver that combines the Quantum Singular Value Transformation with iterative improvement to produce accurate linear system solutions. Furthermore, if we want that quantum computing can address real-world applications then we need to have programming models in order to facilitate the integration of hybrid quantum-classical computing into HPC environments. This implies to extend standard C++ to enable dynamic interaction between classical and quantum resources. On top of the quantum-HPC hybridation aspects, this research focus includes everything constituting tools for the quantum programmer: libraries, synthesis techniques, classical simulation of quantum algorithms, etc.
The current research targets projects with industrial partners: AQED with C12, AeroQat with Alice&Bob and Thales, and a PhD thesis funded by AID (in collaboration with Thales and the laboratory SONDRA). All of these projects are related to compiling, optimizing and analyzing quantum algorithms for the context of numerical computation: not only linear systems, but also differential equations, and matrix inversion and manipulation for radar applications. The team has also a more theoretical approach to quantum programming languages. In particular, one of the current topic of research is concerned with the unification of quantum and classical computation in a single programming framework. If a long-term goal could be the programming of hybrid quantum computation, the near-term goal is the understanding of the capabilities of a model supporting superposition of executions, and how this can be used to expand our understanding of the possibilities offered by quantum computation.
5 New results
5.1 Quantum Linear Algebra Solver
Participant: Marc Baboulin.
10 We address the problem of solving a system of linear equations via the Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT). One drawback of the QSVT algorithm is that it requires huge quantum resources if we want to achieve an acceptable accuracy. To reduce the quantum cost, we propose a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that improves the accuracy and reduces the cost of the QSVT by adding iterative refinement in mixed-precision A first quantum solution is computed using the QSVT, in low precision, and then refined in higher precision until we get a satisfactory accuracy. For this solver, we present an error and complexity analysis, and first experiments using the quantum software stack myQLM.
5.2 Tensor Computations
Participant: Marc Baboulin.
27 We present a new mixed precision algorithm to compute low-rank matrix and tensor approximations, a fundamental task in numerous applications in scientific computing and data analysis. Our algorithm is reminiscent of the iterative refinement framework for linear systems: we first compute a low-rank approximation in low precision and then refine its accuracy by iteratively updating it. We carry out an error analysis of our algorithm which proves that we can reach a high accuracy while performing most of the operations in low precision. We measure the computational cost of the algorithm, which depends on the numerical rank of the input (matrix or tensor) as well as the speed ratio between low and high precision arithmetic. We identify two situations where our method has a strong potential: when the hardware provides fast low precision matrix multiply–accumulate units, and when the numerical rank of the input is small at low accuracy levels. We confirm experimentally the potential of our algorithm for computing various low-rank matrix and tensor decompositions such as SVD, QR, Tucker, hierarchical Tucker, and tensor-train.
5.3 Quantum Petri Nets
Participant: Marc de Visme.
28 One of the main limitation of the model of quantum event structures is the fact that even finite systems can have an infinite representation. This is because event structures are by nature an unfolded model. In the same way that one can unfold a finite automta into an infinite tree, one can unfold a finite Petri Net into an infinite event structure. As such, formalising a quantum version of the Petri Nets is a natural extension of the event structure work. Interestingly, the folded nature of Petri Nets forced us toward a much more local approach to representing quantum computation compared to the one used in quantum event structures, yielding a model which is in many ways simpler than the unfolded model.
5.4 Operator Spaces, Linear Logic and the Heisenberg-Schrödinger Duality of Quantum Theory
Participant: Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
12 We show that the category OS of operator spaces, with complete contractions as morphisms, is locally countably presentable and a model of Intuitionistic Linear Logic in the sense of Lafont. We then describe a model of Classical Linear Logic, based on OS, whose duality is compatible with the Heisenberg-Schrödinger duality of quantum theory. We also show that OS provides a good setting for studying pure state and mixed state quantum information, the interaction between the two, and even higher-order quantum maps such as the quantum switch. Joint work with Bert Lindenhovius (Johannes Kepler Universität).
5.5 Quantum Coherence Spaces Revisited: A von Neumann (Co)Algebraic Approach
Participants: Thea Li, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
11 We describe a categorical model of MALL (Multiplicative Additive Linear Logic) inspired by the Heisenberg-Schrödinger duality of finite-dimensional quantum theory. Proofs of formulas with positive logical polarity correspond to CPTP (completely positive trace-preserving) maps in our model, i.e. the quantum operations in the Schrödinger picture, whereas proofs of formulas with negative logical polarity correspond to CPU (completely positive unital) maps, i.e. the quantum operations in the Heisenberg picture. The mathematical development is based on noncommutative geometry and finite-dimensional von Neumann (co)algebras, which can be defined as special kinds of (co)monoid objects internal to the category of finite-dimensional operator spaces.
5.6 Combining Quantum and Classical Control
Participants: Kinnari Dave, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
820 The two main notions of control in quantum programming languages are often referred to as “quantum” control and “classical” control. With the latter, the control flow is based on classical information, potentially resulting from a quantum measurement, and this paradigm is well-suited to mixed state quantum computation. Whereas with quantum control, we are primarily focused on pure quantum computation and there the “control” is based on superposition. The two paradigms have not mixed well traditionally and they are almost always treated separately. In this work, we show that the paradigms may be combined within the same system. The key ingredients for achieving this are: (1) syntactically: a modality for incorporating pure quantum types into a mixed state quantum type system; (2) operationally: an adaptation of the notion of “quantum configuration” from quantum lambda-calculi, where the quantum data is replaced with pure quantum primitives; (3) denotationally: suitable (sub)categories of Hilbert spaces, for pure computation and von Neumann algebras, for mixed state computation in the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics. Joint work with Louis Lemonnier (University of Edinburgh) and Romain Péchoux (Mocqua team).
5.7 IMALL with a Mixed-State Modality: A Logical Approach to Quantum Computation
Participants: Kinnari Dave, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
7 We introduce a proof language for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Additive Linear Logic (IMALL), extended with a modality to capture mixed-state quantum computation. The language supports algebraic constructs such as linear combinations, and embeds pure quantum computations within a mixed-state framework via , interpreted categorically as a functor from a category of Hilbert Spaces to a category of finite-dimensional C*-algebras. Measurement arises as a definable term, not as a constant, and the system avoids the use of quantum configurations, which are part of the theory of the quantum lambda calculus. Cut-elimination is defined via a composite reduction relation, and shown to be sound with respect to the denotational interpretation. We prove that any linear map on can be represented within the system, and illustrate this expressiveness with examples such as quantum teleportation and the quantum switch. Joint work with Alejandro Díaz-Caro (Mocqua).
5.8 Resource-Efficient Synthesis of Sparse Quantum States
Participants: Sunheang Ty, Renaud Vilmart.
25 Preparing a quantum circuit that implements a given sparse state is an important building block that is necessary for many different quantum algorithms. In the context of fault-tolerant quantum computing, the so-called non-Clifford gates are much more expensive to perform than the Clifford ones. We hence provide an algorithm for synthesizing sparse quantum states with a special care for quantum resources. The circuit depth, ancilla count, and crucially non-Clifford count of the circuit produced by the algorithm are all linear in the sparsity. We conjecture that the non-Clifford count complexity is tight, and show a weakened version of this claim. The first key component of the algorithm is the synthesis of a generalized W-state. We provide a tree-based circuit construction approach, and the relationship between the tree's structure and the circuit's complexity. The second key component is a classical reversible circuit implementing a permutation that maps the basis states of the W-state to those of the sparse quantum state. We reduce this problem to the diagonalization of a binary matrix, using a specific set of elementary matrix operations corresponding to the classical reversible gates. We then solve this problem using a new version of Gauss-Jordan elimination, that minimizes the circuit complexities including circuit depth using parallel elimination steps.
5.9 Numerical Experiments Using Block-Diagonalization Technique for Solving Poisson’s Equation
Participants: Sunheang Ty, Renaud Vilmart.
14 This work presents numerical experiments aimed at verifying solutions of Poisson’s equation using two existing methodologies. First, block-diagonalization is employed to block-encode the matrix derived from Poisson’s equation through the finite difference method (FDM), significantly improving computational complexity from N to log(N), where N is the matrix size. Second, the Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) algorithm is applied to invert the matrix. However, while block-diagonalization improves the complexity in N, QSVT introduces a bottleneck due to its linear dependency on the condition number κ, which grows exponentially with N, posing challenges for large-scale problems. As far as we know, this is the first numerical experiments solving problems with matrix size N = 1024 and condition number κ = 500000; the largest matrix size and condition number from existing works are 16 and < 100, respectively.
5.10 The Many-Worlds Calculus
Participants: Kostia Chardonnet, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart.
6 In this paper, we explore the interaction between two monoidal structures: a multiplicative one, for the encoding of pairing, and an additive one, for the encoding of choice. We propose a colored PROP to model computation in this framework, where the choice is parameterized by an algebraic side effect: the model can support regular tests, probabilistic and non-deterministic branching, as well as quantum branching, i.e. superposition. The graphical language comes equipped with a denotational semantics based on linear applications, and an equational theory. We prove the language to be universal, and the equational theory to be complete with respect to this semantics.
5.11 The Tensor-Plus Calculus
Participants: Kostia Chardonnet, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart.
19 We propose a graphical language that accommodates two monoidal structures: a multiplicative one for pairing and an additional one for branching. In this colored PROP, whether wires in parallel are linked through the multiplicative structure or the additive structure is implicit and determined contextually rather than explicitly through tapes, world annotations, or other techniques, as is usually the case in the literature. The diagrams are used as parameter elements of a commutative semiring, whose choice is determined by the kind of computation we want to model, such as non-deterministic, probabilistic, or quantum. Given such a semiring, we provide a categorical semantics of diagrams and show the language as universal for it. We also provide an equational theory to identify diagrams that share the same semantics and show that the theory is sound and complete and captures semantical equivalence. In categorical terms, we design an internal language for semiadditive categories (C,+,0) with a symmetric monoidal structure (C,x,1) distributive over it, and such that the homset C(1,1) is isomorphic to a given commutative semiring, e.g., the semiring of non-negative real numbers for the probabilistic case.
5.12 The Decohered ZX-calculus
Participant: Renaud Vilmart.
The discard ZX-calculus is known to be complete and universal for mixed-state quantum mechanics, allowing for both quantum and classical processes. However, if the quantum aspects of ZX-calculus have been explored in depth, little work has been done on the classical side. In this paper, we investigate a fragment of discard ZX-calculus obtained by decohering the usual generators of ZX-calculus. We show that this calculus is universal and complete for affinely supported probability distributions over . To do so, we exhibit a normal form, mixing ideas from the graphical linear algebra program and diagrammatic Fourier transforms. Our results both clarify how to handle hybrid classical-quantum processes in the discard ZX-calculus and pave the way to the picturing of more general random variables and probabilistic processes.
5.13 Minimality in Finite-Dimensional ZW-Calculi
Participants: Marc de Visme, Renaud Vilmart.
16 The ZW-calculus is a graphical language capable of representing 2-dimensional quantum systems (qubit) through its diagrams, and manipulating them through its equational theory. We extend the formalism to accommodate finite dimensional Hilbert spaces beyond qubit systems. First we define a qudit version of the language, where all systems have the same arbitrary finite dimension d, and show that the provided equational theory is both complete - i.e. semantical equivalence is entirely captured by the equations - and minimal - i.e. none of the equations are consequences of the others. We then extend the graphical language further to allow for mixed-dimensional systems. We again show the completeness and minimality of the provided equational theory.
5.14 Causal Decompositions of 1D Quantum Cellular Automata
Participants: Pablo Arrighi, Octave Mestoudjian.
23 Understanding quantum theory's causal structure stands out as a major matter, since it radically departs from classical notions of causality. We present advances in the research program of causal decompositions, which investigates the existence of an equivalence between the causal and the compositional structures of unitary channels. Our results concern one-dimensional Quantum Cellular Automata (1D QCAs), i.e. unitary channels over a line of N quantum systems (with or without periodic boundary conditions) that feature a causality radius r: a given input cannot causally influence outputs at a distance more than r. We prove that, they admit a causal decompositions: a unitary channel is a 1D QCA if and only if it can be decomposed into a unitary routed circuit of nearest-neighbour interactions, in which its causal structure is compositionally obvious.
5.15 On Quantum Superpositions of Graphs, No-Signalling and Covariance
Participant: Pablo Arrighi.
26 We provide a mathematically and conceptually robust notion of quantum superpositions of graphs. We argue that, crucially, quantum superpositions of graphs require node names for their correct alignment, which we demonstrate through a no-signalling argument. Nevertheless, node names are a fiducial construct, serving a similar purpose to the labelling of points through a choice of coordinates in continuous space. Graph renamings are understood as a change of coordinates on the graph and correspond to a natively discrete analogue of diffeomorphisms. We postulate renaming invariance as a symmetry principle in discrete topology of similar weight to diffeomorphism invariance in the continuous. We show how to impose renaming invariance at the level of quantum superpositions of graphs.
5.16 A Large-Scale Distributed Framework for Quantum Irregular Dynamics Simulations
Participant: Pablo Arrighi.
15 In traditional quantum computing, e.g. in the quantum circuit model, the size of the data structure describing basis elements is well known, because the dimensionality is fixed. General quantum systems, however, exhibit basis elements of variable size, and state spaces having dynamically unbounded, possibly infinite dimensionality, e.g. for quantum Turing machines or quantum field theories. When seeking to simulate them classically, this imposes an irregularity on both the memory representation of basis elements and the sparsity of the quantum transformations they undergo. Moreover, the high dimensionality of these problems often makes them memory intensive, potentially requiring truncation methods during the simulation. One prototypical example of this would be quantum causal graph dynamics (QCGD), which feature superpositions of colored graphs of different shapes and sizes, driven by the application of local quantum transformations. Numerical observations show that their reversible counterparts typically grow in size; understanding how this is affected in the quantum regime is an arduous computational challenge requiring a particular HPC expertise. In this work, we address this challenge by developing a computational framework for a scalable simulation of such general irregular quantum systems in distributed-memory parallel environments. We lay out the computational challenges arising from the nature of such simulations and then propose effective parallelization, load balancing, memory management, and parallel sampling strategies to accelerate them. We report parallel scalability and accuracy results for up to 1548 MPI processes on a parallel cluster using our framework for the QCGD simulation.
5.17 A Curry-Howard Correspondence for Linear, Reversible Computation
Participant: Benoît Valiron.
5 In this paper, we present a linear and reversible programming language with inductives types and recursion. The semantics of the languages is based on pattern-matching; we show how ensuring syntactical exhaustivity and non-overlapping of clauses is enough to ensure reversibility. The language allows to represent any Primitive Recursive Function. We then give a Curry-Howard correspondence with the logic μMALL: linear logic extended with least fixed points allowing inductive statements. The critical part of our work is to show how primitive recursion yields circular proofs that satisfy μMALL validity criterion and how the language simulates the cut-elimination procedure of μMALL.
5.18 A Rewriting Theory for Quantum Lambda-Calculus
Participant: Benoît Valiron.
9 Quantum lambda calculus has been studied mainly as an idealized programming language - the evaluation essentially corresponds to a deterministic abstract machine. Very little work has been done to develop a rewriting theory for quantum lambda calculus. Recent advances in the theory of probabilistic rewriting give us a way to tackle this task with tools unavailable a decade ago. Our primary focus are standardization and normalization results.
5.19 Some Results on Causal Modalities in General Spacetimes
Participant: Marco Lewis.
29 Causality is one of the fundamental structures of spacetimes, it determines the possible behaviour and propagation of physical information through different relations. Causal structure can be analysed through the various modal logics it induces. The modal logics for the standard chronological and causal relations of the archetypal Minkowski spacetime have been classified. However only partial results have been achieved for the irreflexive variant of the causal relation, also known as the after relation. Our work continues this analysis towards arbitrary spacetimes. By utilizing the definition of the causal relations through causal paths, we can lift known results about the modal logics of Minkowski spacetime to general spacetimes. In particular, for the after relation, we show that a previously studied formula within the logics of Minkowski spacetime holds in arbitrary spacetimes. We introduce a related modal formula that demonstrates that the logic of two-dimensional spacetimes are more expressive than higher dimensional ones. Lastly, we study the interrelation between the logical properties and physical properties along the causal ladder, a classification of causal structures according to a hierarchy of physically relevant properties.
5.20 Canonical Quantization of the Complex Scalar Field without Making Use of its Real and Imaginary Parts
Participant: Pablo Arnault.
17 We proceed to the canonical quantization of the complex scalar field without making use of its real and imaginary parts. Our motivation is to formally connect, as tightly as possible, the quantum-field notions of particle and antiparticle—most prominently represented, formally, by creation and annihilation operators—to the initial classical field theory—whose main formal object is the field amplitude at a given spacetime point. Our point of view is that doing this via the use of the real and imaginary parts of the field is not satisfying. The derivation demands to consider, just before quantization, the field and its complex conjugate as independent fields, which yields a system of two copies of independent complex scalar fields. One then proceeds to quantization with these two copies, which leads to the introduction of two families of creation and annihilation operators, corresponding to particles on the one hand, and antiparticles on the other hand. One realizes that having two such families is the only hope for being able to "invert" the definitions of the creation and annihilation in terms of the Fourier quantized fields, so as to obtain an expression of the direct-space fields in terms of these creation and annihilation operators, because the real-field condition used in the case of a real scalar field does not hold for a complex scalar field. This hope is then met by introducing the complex-conjugate constraint at the quantum level, that is, that the second independent field copy is actually the complex conjugate of the first. All standard results are then recovered in a rigorous and purely deductive way. While we reckon our derivation exists in the literature, we have not found it.
6 Bilateral contracts and grants with industry
6.1 Quandela
Participants: Benoît Valiron, Pablo Arrighi, Nicolas Heurtel.
In the context of a PhD funded by CIFRE, QuaCS and Quandela are building a collaboration on the study of quantum linear optics. The approach is both theoretical –with the development of a formal language for reasoning on optical circuits, and practical, targeted towards simulation.
6.2 Eviden
Participants: Marc Baboulin, Océane Koska.
The collaboration with Eviden (Cyril Allouche's group) is related to Marc Baboulin's research on the convergence between Quantum Computing and HPC. It consists mainly in designing hybrid quantum-classical algorithms that could accelerate existing HPC applications in scientific computing, data analytics and optimization. For instance we are currently working on linear algebra solvers that leverage the capabilities of quantum and classical processors to compute accurate solutions. We also work on hybrid programming models that enable to concretely implement these algorithms in existing HPC codes.
7 Partnerships and cooperations
7.1 International initiatives
7.1.1 Participation in other International Programs
QISS (John Templeton grant)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
The Quantum Information Structure of Spacetime
-
Partner Institutions:
- Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Vienna
- Rotman Institute for Philosophy, Western University
- Center for Theoretical Physics, Aix-Marseille University
- Quantum Group and Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford
- Perimeter Institute
- University of Paris-Saclay, Quantum Computation Structures group
- Quantum Information and Computation Initiative, HKU
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
- University of California Santa Barbara, Physics dpt
- Center for Quantum Information and Communication, Brussels
- Quantum Information Laboratory, Rome La Sapienza University
- Penn State University, Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos
- Center for Mathematical Sciences, UNAM
- Bard College, New York
- ETH Zürich
- The University of Melbourne
- Royal Holloway, University of London
- Universität Bonn
-
Date:
2023-2026
-
Additionnal info:
QISS aims to found the physics of quantum spacetime on an information theoretical basis, bring within reach empirical access to quantum gravity phenomenology leveraging rapidly advancing quantum technologies, and promote interactions between physicists and philosophers. The broader scope of the consortium is to establish a long term research program that brings together the represented communities, towards the common goal of unravelling the Quantum Information Structure of Gravity.
7.2 International research visitors
7.2.1 Visits of international scientists
Other international visits to the team
Ofek Bengyat
-
Status
(PhD)
-
Institution of origin:
IQOQI, U. of Vienna
-
Country:
Austria
-
Dates:
11 March – 13 March
-
Context of the visit:
Seminar
-
Mobility program/type of mobility:
QISS node-to-node visit
Balázs FREI
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin:
Imperial College London
-
Country:
UK
-
Dates:
16 February – 31 May
-
Context of the visit:
collaboration with Zamdzhiev
-
Mobility program/type of mobility:
research stay
7.2.2 Visits to international teams
Research stays abroad
Pablo Arrighi
-
Visited institution:
Universidad de la Republica and Universidad de Montevideo
-
Country:
Uruguay
-
Dates:
14 March – 31 March
-
Context of the visit:
QCOMICAL
-
Mobility program/type of mobility:
Seminars and collaboration.
Pablo Arrighi
-
Visited institution:
Universidad de los Andes, Bogota
-
Country:
Colombie
-
Dates:
13 October – 14 November
-
Context of the visit:
Collaboration.
-
Mobility program/type of mobility:
Collaboration.
Benoit Valiron
-
Visited institution:
Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay
-
Country:
Uruguay
-
Dates:
21 juin - 6 juillet 2025
-
Context of the visit:
Collaboration.
-
Mobility program/type of mobility:
Visit in the context of the QCOMICAL project.
7.3 European initiatives
7.3.1 Horizon Europe
QCOMICAL
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Quantum Computing and its Calcul
-
Partner Institutions:
- CENTRALESUPELEC, France
- UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, France
- Inria, France
- UNIVERSITE PARIS CITE, France
- UNIVERSITE GRENOBLE ALPES, France
- UNIVERSITE D'AIX MARSEILLE, France
- UNIVERSITE PARIS-EST, France
- QUANDELA, France
- UNIVERSITA DI PISA, Italy
- Universita' degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy
- UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI, Italy
- UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES, Argentina
- UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE QUILMES, Argentina
- UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPUBLICA, Uruguay
-
Date:
2024-2028
-
Additionnal info:
QCOMICAL aims at designing and studying quantum programming languages, their types, the corresponding logic through the Curry-Howard correspondence, and other foundations of quantum programming languages.
7.4 National initiatives
BPI-AeroQat
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Quantum Algorithms for Next Generation Aerospace Equipment
-
Partner Institutions:
- INRIA, France
- Alice & Bob, France
- Thales, France
-
Date:
2024-2027
-
Additionnal info:
BPI-AeroQat aims at developing fault tolerant quantum computer, in line with the French government’s recommendations to assess accurately what ressources will be needed, and therefore a timeline of when quantum computers able to optimize the design of airborne equipments will be available.
EPiQ (PEPR Quantique)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Etude de la pile quantique : Algorithmes, modèles de calcul et simulation pour l’informatique quantique
-
Partner Institutions:
- INRIA, France
- CNRS, France
- CEA, France
-
Date:
2022-2027
-
Additionnal info:
EPiQ aims at (1) Understanding the advantages and limits of quan- tum computing via both quantum complexity research and the discovery and enhancement of algo- rithms (2) Defining the framework for quantum computation using high-level languages, compari- son of computational models as well as using their relations for program optimization (3) Develop simulation tools to anticipate the performances of algorithms on noisy quantum machines.
EQIP (Inria challenge project)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Engineering for Quantum Information Processors
-
Partner Institution:
- INRIA, France
-
Date:
2021-2024
-
Additionnal info:
The long-term objective of this line of work is to build a large universal quantum computer and the main scientific challenges today are to identify potential approaches for scaling up the small quantum processors consisting of a few tens of qubits already available, to anticipate how to program these new machines, and to understand what new capabilities will become accessible once quantum computing becomes available.
TaQC (ANR)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Taming Quantum Causality
-
Partner Institutions:
- UPSaclay - LMF Université Paris-Saclay - Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles
- Inria Centre de Recherche Inria de Lyon - AT-LYS
- NEEL Institut Néel
- LARSIM Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
-
Date:
2023-2027
-
Additionnal info:
Quantum technologies provide advantages by exploiting non-classical resources, such as superposition or entanglement. Recently, it has been realized that one can obtain new advantages by exploiting causal structures that are inherently quantum. This quantum "causal indefiniteness" constitutes a novel resource and opens new perspectives in quantum information. Despite foundational progress and several experimental realizations, the concrete implications for quantum computing nevertheless remain poorly understood so far. In this project we will work to bridge this gap and to develop quantum causality as a new non-classical resource on par with superposition and entanglement.
To achieve this, we will develop three directions. (1) Firstly, we will develop a Generalised Probabilistic Theories approach to understand causal indefiniteness within a larger class of models. This will help clarify which causally indefinite process are physical and what precise role is played by genuinely nonclassical resources such as superposition and entanglement. (2) Secondly, we will go beyond the standard example of the "quantum switch" to study more concrete models of causally indefinite computation. In doing so, we will systematically explore the possible applications of causal indefiniteness and unveil the potential of causally indefinite computations. (3) Finally, we will use ZX-Calculus to harness the capabilities of causal indefiniteness at the compilation level. Using ZX-Calculus as a springboard towards programming causally indefinite computations will help us optimize the use of this new resource.
Together, these goals work towards our ultimate objective of finding the right arguments in the right language to give causal indefiniteness a unique place among the leading conceptual and empirical paradigms of quantum information.
HQI (National Quantum Plan project)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Hybrid HPC-Quantum platform and a research program
-
Partner Institutions:
- INRIA, France
- CNRS, France
- CEA, France
- GENCI, France
- France Universités, France
- ANR, France
- PIA4, France
- France Relance, France
-
Date:
2022-2027
-
Additionnal info:
HQI is an integrated ini- tiative. It combines a hybrid computing platform that couples several quantum processors with GENCI’s Joliot-Curie supercomputer hosted at TGCC (CEA), and an academic and industrial research program with user enablement
QuantPhy (ANR-CPJ)
Participants: Pablo Arnault, Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin, Marc de Visme, Benoît Valiron, Renaud Vilmart, Matt Wilson, Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
-
Title:
Hybrid HPC-Quantum platform and a research program
-
Partner Institutions:
- Université Paris-Saclay, France
-
Date:
2023-2028
-
Additionnal info:
This is the 200KEUR endowment around the Junior Professor Chair at Université Paris-Saclay that has been attributed to the group. We have recruited Esteban Castro-Ruiz as a the chair holder, but he left after a year for a Junior Group leader position at U. of Vienna. The position will be filled by Thomas Galley in 2026.
Q-LOOP
Participants: Renaud Vilmart, Benoît Valiron.
-
Title:
Q-LOOP
-
Partner Institutions:
- INRIA
- CNRS
- CEA
- Siemens
- Alice&Bob
- C12
- Quandela
- Siquance
- Silent Waves
- ST
- UGA
- STM
-
Date:
2024-2030
-
Additionnal info:
The Q-Loop project aims to identify ways of scaling up solid-state qubit control and readout chains. The ability to address a large number of qubits is necessary for the advent of fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) in order to open up its use to many application areas. Q-Loop draws on integration approaches already implemented in industrial-scale microelectronics, adapting them to the context and constraints of quantum computing, particularly operation at cryogenic temperatures.
7.5 Regional initiatives
AQEDP
Participants: Renaud Vilmart, Marc Baboulin.
-
Title:
Algorithmes Quantiques appliqués aux Equations aux Dérivées Partielles
-
Partner Institutions:
- INRIA
- IRT SystemX
- C12
-
Date:
2025-2028
-
Additionnal info:
The objective of this project is to develop and explore various methods for effectively solving mechanical problems, whether linear or non-linear, by combining quantum algorithms with traditional numerical methods used for solving partial differential equations (PDEs).
8 Dissemination
8.1 Promoting scientific activities
8.1.1 Scientific events: organisation
Member of the organizing committees
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev for PLanQC'26.
- Renaud Vilmart for Journées Informatiques Quantique (JIQ) 2025.
8.1.2 Scientific events: selection
Chair of conference program committees
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev for PLanQC'26.
Member of the conference program committees
- Renaud Vilmart for QPL 2025.
- Pablo Arrighi for QPL 2025, Quantum simulation and quantum walks (QSQW) 2025.
- Benoît Valiron for PLanQC'25, PLDI 2025, LICS 2026, RC 2025, IWQC 2025.
Reviewer
- Marc de Visme for LICS, FoSSaCS.
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev for LICS, FoSSaCS, ESOP.
- Renaud Vilmart for FoSSaCS, ESOP, QPL, MFCS, NACO, ICTAC, QCE.
- Pablo Arrighi for QPL, QSQW.
- Benoît Valiron for PLanQC, PLDI, LICS, RC, IWQC, ARITH, POPL.
8.1.3 Journal
Member of the editorial boards
- Pablo Arrighi for TCS.
- Benoît Valiron for LMCS.
- Marc Baboulin for Parallel Computing.
Reviewer - reviewing activities
- Marc de Visme for Discrete Event Dynamic Systems (DEDS).
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev for Logical Methods in Computer Science (LMCS).
- Renaud Vilmart for Quantum, PRX.
- Pablo Arrighi for Quantum, PRL.
- Pablo Arnault for Quantum, PRL.
8.1.4 Invited talks
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev. CATNIP (Categories Networking Project). University of Edinburgh. October 2025.
- Pablo Arrighi. Quantum cellular automata : structure and quantum simulation of QED, invited talk at XIV Conference on Quantum Foundations, Buenos Aires, November 2025.
- Benoît Valiron. Tutorial on Quantum Programming Languages for the QCOMICAL school in Nancy, November 2025.
- Benoît Valiron. Tutorial on Quantum Programming languages with classical control at the MAQI summer school in Orsay, June 2025.
- Benoît Valiron. Tutorial on Quantum Programming Language at QUEST-IS, Palaiseau, December 2025.
- Marc Vaboulin. Tutorial on Quantum Algorithms for High-Performance Computing at the MAQI summer school, Orsay, June 2025.
- Marc Baboulin. Invited talk at SouthWestX Summit, Saarbrucken, July 2025.
- Marc Baboulin. Invited talk at ASQ3 workshop, Paris, September 2025.
- Marc Baboulin. Invited talk at Workshop on Approximate Computing, Paris, October 2025.
- Marc Baboulin. Invited talk at NumerIQ, Jacques Louis Lions Lab, December 2025.
8.1.5 Leadership within the scientific community
- Renaud Vilmart is a co-supervisor of GT IQ (groupe de travail Informatique Quantique).
- Pablo Arrighi, Marc Baboulin and Benoît Valiron are members of the Quantum center of Saclay's executive committee.
- Pablo Arrighi is a member of the Center for Quantum Spacetime's board.
- Pablo Arrighi is a member of the Bureau du Comité des Équipes Projet.
- Benoît Valiron and Vladimir Zamdzhiev are members of IFIP Working Group on Foundations of Quantum Computation.
- Marc Baboulin is head of the GT Quantum Computing (GDR C4P) at CNRS.
- Marc Baboulin is co-head of WP "numerical libraries" in the french Exascale project (Numpex).
8.1.6 Scientific expertise
- Pablo Arrighi refered grants for Institut Courtois (Canada), ARIS (Slovenia), and SNSF (Switzerland).
8.1.7 Research administration
- Renaud Vilmart is member of the scientific council of Inria Saclay.
- Marc de Visme is member of the Conseil Scientifique of the LMF.
8.2 Teaching - Supervision - Juries - Educational and pedagogical outreach
8.2.1 Teaching administration
- Renaud Vilmart and Pablo Arnault are organizers of the master internships of the Master QDCS (M1 and M2).
- Benoît Valiron is an organizer of the master QMI (M2).
8.2.2 Teaching courses
Participant: Renaud Vilmart.
- Elements of computer science for quantum technologies. Arteq, ENS Paris-Saclay.
- ZX-Calculus. Master 2 QDCS.
- Introduction to functional programming. L2 UFR sciences.
- Advanced functional programming. L3 UFR sciences.
Participant: Vladimir Zamdzhiev.
- Introduction to Categories. MPRI.
- Initiation to Research. MPRI.
Participant: Pablo Arnault.
- Foundations for Quantum Information. M1 QDCS.
Participant: Marc de Visme.
- Elements of computer science for quantum technologies. Arteq, ENS Paris-Saclay.
Participant: Matthew Wilson.
Approximately 160 hours of teaching accross graduate and undergraduate computer science, including; Information systems, algorithms, advanced algorithms, coding project supervision, artificial intelligence.
Participant: Benoît Valiron.
Professor of Computer Science at CentraleSupélec. On top of my mandatory 192 hours of (computer science) teaching in the School engineering curriculum, I give two introductory courses in quantum algorithms and programming in the QDCS Master and in the ArteQ program.
Participant: Marc Baboulin.
Professor of Computer Science at Université Paris-Saclay/ Polytech Paris-Saclay (quantum computing, high-performance computing, numerical algorithms).
8.2.3 Supervision
The following PhD theses are supervised by the team:
- Benoît Valiron , Marc de Visme and Renaud Vilmart : Antoine Guilmin on graphical languages for infinite dimension quantum programming.
- Benoît Valiron , Vladimir Zamdzhiev : Thea Li on Quantum Coherence Spaces.
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev : Kinnari Dave on Combining classical and quantum control: A logical, syntactic and semantic perspective.
- Benoît Valiron and Renaud Vilmart : Julien Lamiroy on Logical Interpretation of indefinite causal orders.
- Benoît Valiron and Renaud Vilmart : Adham Zekri on Compilation of the HHL algorithm on cat qubits.
- Pablo Arrighi and Pablo Arnault : Dogukan Bakircioglu on Quantum simulation of quantum field theories.
- Pablo Arrighi and Pablo Arnault : Aymane Maaitat on Feynman path integrals and quantum automata.
- Pablo Arrighi : Seonghun Jung on Causal decompositions of quantum processes.
- Pablo Arrighi and Matt Wilson : Octave Mestoudjian on Generalised subsystems for quantum theory.
- Pablo Arrighi Marin Costes on Quantum networks theory.
- Benoît Valiron and Pablo Arrighi Nicolas Heurtel on Measurement-based quantum computing for photonics at Quandela (CIFRE).
- Benoit Valiron Jérome Ricciardi on verification of quantum circuit equivalence. Co-supervision with CEA-LIST/LSL.
- Benoit Valiron Alexis Roux on quantum computation for radar applications. Co-supervision with SONDRA laboratory.
- Marc Baboulin Océane Koska on quantum algorithms for HPC.
- Marc Baboulin and Renaud Vilmart Sunheang Ty on Quantum methods for solving PDEs.
- Marc Baboulin Simon Renard on quantum-classical HPC worksflows. Co-supervision with Inria Rennes.
8.2.4 Juries
- Vladimir Zamdzhiev : President of internship jury at ENS Paris-Saclay.
- Renaud Vilmart : Expert member of Matthew Sutcliffe's PhD defense (Oxford).
- Pablo Arrighi : Expert member of Julien Zylberman's PhD defense (Sorbonne U.). Referee member of Marco Túlio Quintino's HDR defense (Sorbonne Université).
- Benoît Valiron : Reviewer and head of jury for Marío Silva's PhD thesis (Nancy). Expert member for Andreas Fyrillas' PhD thesis (Paris-Saclay).
8.3 Popularization
Pablo Arrighi 's previous result on the Arrow of Time (cf. last year's report) inspired two popular science papers:
8.3.1 Productions (articles, videos, podcasts, serious games, ...)
- Marc Baboulin : Interview in Who's Who France on the future of quantum computing, June 2025.
- Marc Baboulin : Interview in Journal du Net on "Bridging quantum computing and HPC", August 2025.
8.3.2 Participation in Live events
- Pablo Arrighi Informatique quantique : premier contact, BPI Université, Inria-Academy, Webinar with 1000 participants registered, June 2025.
- Benoit Valiron Calcul quantique du point de vue de l'informatique, Café Science CentraleSupélec. Hybrid presentation, 150 participants total, June 2025.
- Marc Baboulin : QAP Computing startup project presented at VivaTech 2025, June 2025.
9 Scientific production
9.1 Major publications
- 1 articleTime arrow without past hypothesis: a toy model explanation.New Journal of Physics2611November 2024, 113019HALDOI
- 2 articleMixed precision iterative refinement for low-rank matrix and tensor approximations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing4752025, A2906-A2935HALDOI
- 3 inproceedingsA Complete Equational Theory for Quantum Circuits.38th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)2023 38th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)Boston, United StatesIEEEJuly 2023, 1-13HALDOI
- 4 articleA relativistic discrete spacetime formulation of 3+1 QED.Quantum7November 2023, 1179HALDOI
9.2 Publications of the year
International journals
International peer-reviewed conferences
Conferences without proceedings
Reports & preprints
9.3 Cited publications
- 26 unpublishedOn quantum superpositions of graphs, no-signalling and covariance.November 2020, working paper or preprintHALback to text
- 27 articleMixed precision iterative refinement for low-rank matrix and tensor approximations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing4752025, A2906-A2935HALDOIback to text
- 28 unpublishedQuantum Petri Nets with Event Structure semantics.August 2025, working paper or preprintHALDOIback to text
- 29 miscSome Results on Causal Modalities in General Spacetimes.2026, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14029back to text