2025Activity reportProject-TeamQURIOSITY
RNSR: 202324386L- Research center Inria Saclay Centre at Institut Polytechnique de Paris
- In partnership with:Institut Polytechnique de Paris
- Team name: Quantum Information Processing and Communication
- In collaboration with:Laboratoire Traitement et Communication de l'Information
Creation of the Project-Team: 2023 January 01
Each year, Inria research teams publish an Activity Report presenting their work and results over the reporting period. These reports follow a common structure, with some optional sections depending on the specific team. They typically begin by outlining the overall objectives and research programme, including the main research themes, goals, and methodological approaches. They also describe the application domains targeted by the team, highlighting the scientific or societal contexts in which their work is situated.
The reports then present the highlights of the year, covering major scientific achievements, software developments, or teaching contributions. When relevant, they include sections on software, platforms, and open data, detailing the tools developed and how they are shared. A substantial part is dedicated to new results, where scientific contributions are described in detail, often with subsections specifying participants and associated keywords.
Finally, the Activity Report addresses funding, contracts, partnerships, and collaborations at various levels, from industrial agreements to international cooperations. It also covers dissemination and teaching activities, such as participation in scientific events, outreach, and supervision. The document concludes with a presentation of scientific production, including major publications and those produced during the year.
Keywords
Computer Science and Digital Science
- A3.4. Machine learning and statistics
- A4.2. Correcting codes
- A4.3.3. Cryptographic protocols
- A4.3.4. Quantum Cryptography
- A4.3.5. Cryptanalyse quantique
- A4.6. Authentication
- A5.9. Signal processing
- A6.1.2. Stochastic Modeling
- A6.5. Mathematical modeling for physical sciences
- A7.1. Algorithms
- A7.1.4. Quantum algorithms
- A8. Mathematics of computing
- A8.2. Optimization
- A8.6. Information theory
- A8.8. Network science
- A8.13. Quantum computing
Other Research Topics and Application Domains
- B5.11. Quantum systems
- B6.2. Network technologies
- B9.1. Education
- B9.10. Privacy
1 Team members, visitors, external collaborators
Research Scientists
- Marco Fanizza [INRIA, Researcher, from Jul 2025]
- Cambyse Rouze [INRIA, ISFP]
- Mirjam Weilenmann [INRIA, Researcher, from Feb 2025]
Faculty Members
- Romain Alleaume [Team leader, Télécom Paris, Professor, HDR]
- Peter Johnson Brown [TELECOM PARIS, Associate Professor]
- Paul Hilaire [TELECOM PARIS, from May 2025]
- Augustin Vanrietvelde [TELECOM PARIS, Associate Professor]
Post-Doctoral Fellows
- Adam Artymowicz [INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow, from Oct 2025]
- Dávid Bugár [TELECOM PARIS]
- Shivang Srivastava [Telecom Paris]
- Alireza Tasdighi [Telecom Paris, from Feb 2025]
PhD Students
- Ali Almasi [IP PARIS, from Oct 2025]
- Guilhem Doat [IP Paris]
- Seonghun Jung [Université Paris-Saclay, from Sep 2025]
- Jan Kochanowski [IP PARIS]
- Tristan Nemoz [IP PARIS]
- Marco Pompili [IP Paris, from Dec 2025]
- Guillaume Ricard [Telecom Paris]
- Bora Ulu [University of Geneva, from Oct 2025]
Interns and Apprentices
- Dorian Arnold [TELECOM PARIS, from Mar 2025 until Aug 2025]
- Tom Guerinel [Telecom Paris, until Jul 2025]
- Jeanne Lucas [Telecom Paris, from Sep 2025]
- Nicolas Moulonguet [IP Paris, Intern, from Sep 2025]
- Olgierd Zurek [IP Paris, from May 2025 until Jul 2025]
Administrative Assistant
- Natalia Alves [INRIA]
2 Overall objectives
Quriosity's ambition is to extend the application horizon of quantum information science by addressing novel questions positioned at the intersection between theoretical research in quantum information and the engineering of quantum devices, with a focus on approaches combining digital and quantum photonics technologies.
The overarching goal of the project-team will be to push forward our ability to harness and exploit high-dimensional complex quantum systems for quantum information processing and quantum communications purposes.
Leveraging a dual approach combining fundamental research in quantum information with quantum photonics expertise, Quriosity will strive to take advantage of and develop strong synergies with the unique quantum ecosystem of Saclay and to pursue objectives that have the potential to bring radical advances to several application domains of quantum technologies, ranging from cryptography to computing:
- Design quantum-enhanced cryptographic hardware, leveraging concepts based on computational hardness and quantum information.
- Conceive and engineer photonic-based processors and systems capable of achieving quantum advantage in computation or communication tasks.
- Develop efficient quantum information processing schemes implementable on near-term hardware and advance the theoretical framework to understand the fundamental limits of noisy quantum information processing.
3 Research program
The research program that we aim to lead in the Quriosity project-team intends to embrace a relatively wide area of theoretical questions, ranging from quantum cryptography, that we ambition to combine with complexity-based schemes and establish as a framework to enhance hardware security, to the mathematical foundations of quantum information and quantum computing. Conversely, we also intend to develop research capable of leveraging photonics and digital information processing technologies to design systems capable of producing high-dimensional and controllable quantum states of light in order to push forward the frontiers of quantum information processing advantage.
3.1 Research axis 1: Quantum cryptography complexity and hardware frontiers
This axis aims to identify and solve frontier research topics in quantum cryptography, from two main perspectives. First by exploring the interplay between security models - including computational ones - and theoretical quantum cryptography, allowing to build protocols with stronger security properties and lesser resource requirements. Second by laying a special emphasis on interplay between quantum cryptography and hardware security, with the need to develop extended techniques for quantum cryptographic hardware security certification, but also the idea to strengthen hardware security and its resilience to information leakage by resorting to quantum cryptographic constructions.
3.1.1 Everlasting security from a quantum-computational hybrid model
We proposed in 2015 a security model that we later coined a Quantum Computational Timelock (QCT) security model. It consists in assuming that computationally secure encryption may only be broken after time much longer than the coherence time of quantum memories available at the time of protocol execution. The QCT security model opens the possibility to propose new quantum cryptographic constructions and in particular to make use of encoding and security proof techniques that strongly depart from “traditional” quantum conjugate coding that is a central ingredient in most quantum cryptographic protocols.
Description of the QCT security model
The QCT security model opens towards a rich variety of fascinating questions, that we have certainly not all identified. In the coming years we intend to push forward the theoretical analysis of several of these questions, that relate to the computational frontiers of quantum cryptography. One ongoing direction consists in studying key agreement constructions whose security can be reduced to distributed computational problems that exhibit an exponential separation in terms of quantum or classical communication complexity.
As an alternative way to build secure protocols in the QCT model, we also intend to investigate pseudo-random quantum states, which can be seen as a computational variant of a -design, i.e. an ensemble of quantum states characterized by the fact that copies of one sampled state are statistically indistinguishable from copies of a states picked uniformly at random. Interestingly, construction of pseudo-random states can be based on quantum-secure one-way functions, and therefore from the first assumption. This line of work will also allow us to consider realistic and pratical constructions of quantum cryptographic schemes based on computational and /or quantum-hardware security assumptions. We also intend to study constructions for quantum physically uncloneable functions qPUFs and their aplication.
3.1.2 Device-independent cryptography
Device-independent cryptography allows one to perform quantum cryptography with reduced or even no trust assumptions on the quantum hardware. It remains a challenge experimentally and pushing the performance (in terms of key rate, or trust reduction) of device-independent cryptography defines an active research frontier for quatum cryptography. Recent implementations of DI-QKD179, 93, 93 have shown that whilst it is now feasible, it has a relatively low rate and can only be executed over a short distance. By improving the theoretical methods for analyzing various protocols and security proofs and by improving the protocol design we can look to boost the rates of these protocols and push them towards a more viable technology. Examples of such improvements include protocol design modifications 87, 70 and improved methods to calculate rates 56, 57, 86. Our goals are to develop better designed protocols and security proofs (assessing their performance in experiments) and to investigate the fundamental limitations of DI protocol rates Overall pushing the practicality of DI forwards and improving our understanding of its limitations.
As a complementary line of research we will also investigate prospects of semi-device-independent protocols as a viable near-term alternative to device-independent security. Proposed protocols rely on assumptions of system energy 85, dimension bounds and bounded distrust 88 amongst others. We will investigate alternative assumptions and derive resulting protocols to be analyzed and subsequently implemented. We will also apply the semi-device-independent framework to the problem of hardware verification, designing tests to establish that the hardware is functioning correctly whilst placing limited trust on the components.
3.1.3 Quantum-enhanced leakage-resilience
We will also investigate some questions placed at the intersection between classical hardware security and quantum cryptography, namely how to prove the security of a cryptographic protocols when implemented using hardware, such as processors or storage, that may leak some of the security-sensitive information.
We intend to tackle leakage-resilience cryptography from a new viewpoint, that will consist in integrating quantum cryptographic constructions as a base layer within cryptographic systems, in order to obtain security guarantees even in presence of information leakage with strictly weaker assumptions than existing classical leakage-resilience protocols. We will first consider simple cryptographic protocols such as One-Time-Pad encryption or authentication protocols relying on Physically Uncloneable Functions PUFs. We intend for example to investigate how the use of hybrid classical-quantum cryptographic hardware, comprising quantum channels to interconnect processors or secure storage sites, can lead to cryptographic protocols with provable security under some realistic information leakage models.
3.1.4 Real-world quantum cryptography
40 year of quantum cryptography (QC) have lead to major theoretical and technological advances, with fundamental impact on the field of information security. Market adoption however remains limited, with major challenges that practical QC still needs to be overcome in order to become widely used in real-world applications. We identify in particular two main challenges: 1) cryptographic advantage, namely the design of protocols for which the use of QC in combination with classical cryptography gives a competitive edge over classical cryptography only; 2) security certification of quantum cryptographic implementations. Quriosity intends to actively contribute to lift these barriers and to foster the development of real-world quantum cryptography and in particular to the uptake of a French and European industry. The development of a QC industry is indeed becoming an important topic, with strategic investments from leading scientific countries (China, Korea, Japan, UK, etc. ) including also notably the EU27 supporthing the EuroQCI initiative. On the other hand, the adoption of quantum cryptography for real-world application remains often considered with skepticism by representatives of the cybersecurity community, stressing the dire need of cross-disciplinary vision combining best-in-class classical and quantum cryptography expertise.
Regarding cryptographic advantage, our conviction is that one should not aim at constructions where quantum cryptography would just functionally replace classical cryptography, but on the other hand to identify applications where the use of QC combined with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) can present strict security gain over PQC alone.
Regarding security certification, it has become a central challenge in particular in the context of the EuroQCI initiative aiming at developing a pan-European quantum communication infrastructure, together with an industry, in the next 10 years It constitutes a complex task, requiring the collaboration of experts from different fields. In future years, we intend to tackle this question from different angles: on the theory side, we intend to propose a shift in the security objective towards everlasting security, and demonstrate how this can make the security certification of key establishment based on QKD combined with ephemeral post-quantum cryptography primitives much more tractable. On the system engineering side and in resonance with Section 3.2, we intend to identify and close implementation security gaps in modern CV-QKD systems relying on digital signal processing, notably the complex interplay between calibration procedure and finite-size security, but also between Nyquist pulse shaping and leakage.
3.2 Research axis 2: Multimode photonic systems for quantum information processing and communications
Building a quantum processor that we could use to solve real-world problems with practical benefits might constitute one of the most burning scientific and technological challenges of the beginning of the 21st century. Very interestingly, recent results indicate that quantum optical circuits constitute a very promising approach for quantum information processing, in particularly high-dimensional linear optics systems, which can form a (weaker) non-universal quantum computing platform, and yet efficiently perform tasks intractable for a classical computer, such as Boson Sampling 46.
We will actively investigate new theoretical questions related to quantum information processing with high-dimensional photonic system, and their interplay with technology and experiments.
3.2.1 Quantum coherent communications and digital signal processing
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) systems are among the most advanced quantum communications technologies available today. QKD therefore provides an ideal platform to test novel system designs and validate quantum communication technology over real networks Leveraging essential features of modern optical communication systems, and in particular high sampling rates and digital signal processing 74, quantum coherent communications systems constitute a recent and promising route towards high-rates, highly integrated and cost-effective quantum communication systems. They rely on two central ingredients: -Spectrally efficient modulation formats and coherent detection, exploiting phase and intensity information and able to operate a very high rates (> GHz) even with shot-noise limited receivers. - Digital signal processing that takes advantage of the high sampling rates to digitally evaluate and compensate many impairments of the communications such as optical carrier phase noise or polarization mode dispersion, using dedicated algorithms.
In collaboration with Prof. Yves Jaouen from the GTO team of Telecom Paris,and working on a state-of-the-art experimental platform, Quriosity has designed and demonstrated for the first time DSP-enhanced quantum communications, with noise control performances that allow to successfully run QKD over metropolitan distances while being jointly deployed over classical coherent optical link 50. We have also filed a patent about this general concept and our inventive system design.
In the future, we then aim to leverage digital signal processing and machine learning (ML) techniques to characterize and mitigate noise in order to push further our ability to operate quantum communications over existing optical fibers, in coexistence with classical signals.
As a complementary line of research, we intend to theoretically study multimode quantum coherent communications using multimode shaping of the local oscillator, taking inspiration from 58. We also intend to explore the possibility to rely on CV multimode encoding as a way to experimentally implement new quantum cryptographic constructions in the hybrid quantum computational security models introduced in Section 3.1.
3.2.2 Quantum information processing with a programmable frequency processor
In collaboration with the teams of Nadia Belabas and Pascale Senellart at C2N and in the context of the ParisQCI project, we study how to combine high-dimensional photonic gates in the frequency domain, to efficiently synthesize high-dimensional unitary transformations. Leveraging on the possibility to parallelize single-qubit unitaries, that we have recently analyzed 71 we intend to study how such systems could be leveraged for optical quantum information processing, and in particular for quantum metrology. In the future, we will also investigate how to scale the platform to perform information processing with high-dimensional quantum states, opening the possibility to achieve quantum computational advantage, but also implementation routes for the hybrid quantum-computational cryptographic protocols in the QCT model, studied in Section 3.1
Multimode programmable linear optical circuit and associated experimental devices (Spatial Light Modulators: SLM, Multimode fibers: MMF, Detection of single photons multipixel APDs).
3.2.3 Quantum information processing using multimode programmable linear circuits
In collaboration with the team of Sylvain Gigan at ENS Ulm, and in the context of Francesco Mazzoncini's PhD that we co-supervise, we aim to use a multimode programmable linear circuit, built around a multimode fiber (cf. Figure 2) to perform some fundamental tests and demonstrations of quantum communication advantage, related to fundamental problems such as the Vector in a Subspace 81.
The prospects of this work are very promising: first they could lead to the first experimental demonstration of a exponential communication complexity gap between one-way quantum communication and two-way classical communications and may also open towards the possibility for experimentally robust Bell inequality violations 76, with applications for quantum cryptography and also in quantum computing.
3.2.4 Photonic Noise Correction in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Systems
In collaboration with Quandela and as part of Katia Hakem's CIFRE PhD thesis, this project aims to develop adaptive fault-tolerant architectures tailored to photonic quantum systems. Traditional quantum error correction (QEC) frameworks often fail to address photonic-specific errors such as photon loss, impurity, and distinguishability. Our approach focuses on accurately modeling the propagation of these errors in linear-optical systems and designing correction protocols that leverage the heralded nature of most photonic errors. By integrating feedforward mechanisms, we seek to optimize resource efficiency and performance. This work is critical not only for photonic quantum computing but also for hybrid and distributed quantum platforms, where photonic links are often considered bottleneck for scalability.
3.2.5 Efficient Generation of Photonic Graph States
Graph states are a fundamental resource for quantum information technologies, enabling advancements in sensing, communication, and computing. This project focuses on developing resource-optimized protocols for generating photonic graph states, with an emphasis on minimizing photon and operational overhead. We will first explore hardware-agnostic heuristics to identify universally applicable generation techniques, then specialize these protocols for photonic systems. By reducing resource demands, this work will accelerate the deployment of graph states in quantum algorithms and fault-tolerant architectures, bridging the gap between theoretical potential and experimental feasibility.
3.2.6 Development of Early-Fault Tolerant Quantum Computing
Current quantum hardware is limited by noise, yet full fault tolerance remains resource-prohibitive. This project explores early-fault tolerant schemes - partial error correction strategies that reduce noise without the overhead of full fault tolerance. By identifying regimes where noise is sufficiently suppressed to enable quantum advantage, we aim to unlock practical applications on near-term devices. This approach could serve as a critical stepping stone, offering tangible benefits in algorithm performance and system reliability while paving the way for fully fault-tolerant quantum computing.
3.3 Research axis 3: Mathematical foundations of quantum information
Quantum information and computation are built upon the mathematical frameworks of functional analysis and information theory. Developing our understanding of the mathematical underpinnings of these theories can in turn lead to new insights and applications. At Quriosity, one of our aims is to explore quantum information theory through the lens of the underlying mathematics. In a nutshell, we will parallelly develop new analytic and numerical tools for the study of quantum entropic quantities and complex quantum systems made of spin or bosonic degrees of freedom. We will in turn consider these systems to design new, physically motivated models of noise-robust quantum computing.
3.3.1 Convex relaxations of quantum optimization problems
Convex optimization concerns the optimization of convex functions over convex sets. This family of optimization problems has several particularly nice properties, including the guarantee of global optima, which makes them particularly appealing from both the perspective of the mathematics and the applications. They are widely applicable to many domains of science but in particular they arise rather naturally in the context of quantum theory as many of the relevant objects (states, channels and measurements) form convex sets.
We will aim to develop and apply techniques in convex optimization theory to problems within quantum information and quantum computing. Recent examples of our work in this area include 56, 57 where we developed semidefinite programming relaxations for entropic optimization problems relevant to device independent cryptography. Continuing this line of research we aim to extend these techniques to other entropic quantities beyond the relative entropy, for instance to the Petz and sandwiched families of Rényi divergences. We also have the ambitious goal of understanding and characterizing what classes of functions, relevant in the context of quantum theory, are amenable to such semidefinite programming approximations. In other words, what optimization problems in quantum information theory and quantum computing can we approximate?
A well-known example concerns strengthenings of the monotonicity of the relative entropy under the action of a quantum channel or a Markovian evolution known as strong data processing and modified logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. These fundamental inequalities are known to be hard to prove analytically, even for simple random walks on -cycles, and convex relaxation techniques were recently successfully used to approximate them 66. We are currently collaborating with Omar Fawzi and Daniel Stilck França from QINFO to adapt these numerical tools to the quantum realm. In the future, we will consider extending these tools to the infinite dimensional bosonic setting in order to approach long-standing conjectures such as the entropy photon number inequality 69. This research direction will complement analytic approaches presented in Section 3.3.2.
3.3.2 Fundamental properties of entropies
Entropies are fundamental quantities in quantum information theory, obtaining operational meanings in terms of rates of various tasks 65. By improving our understanding of these quantities, we can in turn gain new insights into the various applications in which they appear.
For example, new chain rules for Rényi entropies 64 led to a versatile framework for cryptographic security proofs 49. The result, known as the entropy accumulation theorem, effectively gives sufficient conditions under which the entropy of a large system can be accurately described by the entropy of its individual systems. At QURIOSITY we aim to understand under which conditions does entropy accumulate in this manner? By understanding the minimal requirements for entropy to accumulate we can understand the minimal requirements under which a randomness based cryptographic protocol functions securely. Moreover, we aim to investigate the connection between the entropy accumulation theorem and the related works of the quantum probability estimation framework 92. This is an alternative method to break large entropies down into smaller quantities and reports several advantages over the entropy accumulation theorem. Understanding how advantages from one technique can be transferred to the other will lead to much stronger theoretical results and would have immediate applications to improve security proofs and rates of cryptographic protocols, leading to more practical technologies.
Other types of decompositions of entropic quantities of interacting complex systems into smaller components involving marginals over subsystems include generalizations of the famous strong subadditivity of the relative entropy known as approximate tensor-stability of the relative entropy. These are at the core of most successful methods for finding the speed of convergence of Gibbs sampling algorithms based on the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality. In previous work, we successfully extended these notions to the quantum realm 68 and applied them to problems in network quantum information theory 54, 62 and open complex quantum systems 59, 51. Extensions and refinements of these concepts will lead to new breakthroughs in both fields (see Sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.4).
3.3.3 Complexity and entanglement properties of quantum Gibbs states
A complexity theoretical definition of the quantum phase of a state consists in taking the vicinity of states which are reachable from after applying a local evolution during a short period of time. A topologically ordered phase has the property that the time required to reach it starting from a trivial (i.e. product) state scales extensively with the system size. In other words, topological order can be described in terms of circuit depth lower bounds. The classification of quantum phases of matter is by now a very well-established field with far-reaching applications e.g. to the construction of good quantum error-correcting codes exploiting the properties of topologically ordered phases. However, a more realistic description of a quantum mechanical system is in terms of a finite temperature Gibbs state describing its thermal equilibrium with a large environment. Despite their practical relevance, until recently Gibbs states were primarily studied by mathematical physicists, and many fundamental questions regarding their use in quantum information processing remain open. We propose to investigate the complexity of quantum Gibbs states through the scope of their finite temperature phase transitions. Additionally to its fundamental value, this research direction will undoubtedly lead to several important practical applications, as described in section 3.3.4.
In the setting of classical Gibbs measures, analogous questions have been intensively studied from the perspective of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms (MCMC). On regular lattices, the analysis of the speed of convergence of MCMC for lattice spin systems is by now well-understood through the study of correlations at equilibrium. The generalization to general interaction graphs is still a very active field of research in theoretical computer science, probability theory and mathematical physics 60. The problem becomes even harder in the quantum regime, where purely quantum mechanical effects, e.g. long-range entanglement, may cause the quantum Markov chain to slow down in an unpredicted manner. For the important case of commuting interactions, which include most hitherto studied Hamiltonians for the purpose of quantum error-correction, and for physical dynamics generated by the weak coupling of the system with a large environment (Davies dynamics), general results were obtained through spectral methods. However the latter are not powerful enough to distinguish evolutions generating topologically ordered states from rapidly mixing ones. Instead, more involved techniques, e.g. entropic inequalities, are needed. In 53, 59, 52, 51, we were able to prove rapid mixing by extending one of the most successful classical approaches to prove rapid mixing based on the modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality and the approximate tensor-stability of the relative entropy (cf Section 3.3.2). Extending this novel powerful approach, we plan to conduct a systematic joint study of mixing times and thermal stability of topological quantum order in low lattice dimensions. We will conduct this research in collaboration with Daniel Stilck França from QINFO with whom we co-authored 59. We also see a clear connection with the research focus of Daniel Malz who was recently recruited as a junior professor at Inria Saclay, the mathematical and theoretical condensed matter physicists at CPhT, as well as the team PEIPS at CMAP (X).
3.3.4 Mathematical analysis of quantum memories
In parallel to the previous research plan, we will conduct a mathematical analysis on the storage of quantum information and the concept of self-correction in complex quantum systems. Early work on the storage time of candidates of self-correcting quantum memories relied on the connection to the energy barrier of the system, that is the energy the system must reach for a logical error to occur, via an empirical principle called the Arrhenius law. More recently, the energy barrier was rigorously related to spectral properties of the evolution, whereas some no-go theorems showed the impossibility of an exact mathematical formulation of the Arrhenius law. Here instead, we plan to relate the memory lifetime of a device directly to properties of its thermal equilibrium state. We currently work on this research direction in the setting of lattice spin systems with Anthony Leverrier and Ivan Bardet from the team COSMIQ through the development of spectral methods, and plan to extend our framework to lattices with bosonic degrees of freedom in the near future. We also plan to initiate a dialogue with Jean-René Chazottes from CPhT (X) on refinements of our techniques using concentration and entropic inequalities which already proved their usefulness in the study of hitting times of classical Markov chains and their metastability. One of our long–term goals is to find systems with thermally stable entanglement, both stable against thermal fluctuations and robust against local perturbations. Such a theoretical result would be of very high practical interest since experimental implementations are inevitably subject to noise and errors.
3.3.5 Tomography of complex quantum systems
As the size of quantum devices continues to increase beyond what can be easily simulated classically, new challenges have appeared concerning the robust and efficient characterization of their states. This often necessitates the preparation and destructive measurement of exponentially many copies of the quantum system, as well as the storage of measurement outcomes in a classical memory. Recently, new methods of tomography have been proposed which precisely leverage this important simplification to develop efficient state learning algorithms. One highly relevant development in this direction is that of classical shadows 72, 73. In we propose a better solution by combining classical shadows with new insights from the emerging field of quantum optimal transport. Our current first step only applies to topologically trivial quantum states such as high-temperature Gibbs states or outputs of shallow quantum circuits, and more effort is needed to adapt and generalize our algorithm to non-trivial phases. We envision three new major contributions: First, we will develop constrained versions of concentration inequalities in order to develop efficient tomography algorithms of complex quantum states, assuming the prior knowledge of their phase. This line of research is original even in the classical setting where works on constrained entropic inequalities only very recently appeared in the literature. The expertise of Jean-René Chazottes from CPhT (X) will prove crucial to the success of this project. Second, we will extend the framework of shadow tomography to CV quantum systems. The main difficulties here are two-fold: first, CV systems are infinite-dimensional in nature, and hence some physical constraints need to be imposed on the states that one can hope to learn, such as their energy. Moreover, the set of measurements (homodyne/heterodyne) available in photonic experiments further limits the type of observables that one can hope to predict. In order to ensure the wide applicability of the method and test the resulting algorithm, we will rely on the already established interactions of IQA with the groups of experimentalists at IP Paris and Saclay, and initiate a fruitful dialogue with start-up like Quandela and Pasqal. In the future, we will use these methods to devise hardware-oriented noise-learning algorithms for many-body systems. For this, we plan to get in touch with the experts on statistical learning among IP Paris, and in particular at LIX.
3.3.6 Formal tools for higher-order quantum computation
The theoretical study of quantum computation and its advantages has, in the past decade, opened to a new perspective: higher-order quantum computation, i.e. the way in which one can transform black-box quantum gates by inserting them into computation architectures. This is useful to study the ways in which one can query subroutines in quantum computation, a pratice that is bound to become ubiquitous, for example in delegated quantum computing. The study of higher-order quantum computation has already led to promising as well as disconcerting results, such as about the difficulty of formally defining a quantum version of the computational `if' clause 48, or the fact that one might be able to query two unknown gates in a `superposed order of application', using a computation architecture called the quantum switch 63. Using the latter leads to computational advantages for certain tasks 47. However, the mathematical study of higher-order quantum processes quickly encounters thorny formal issues related to their non-trivial compositional structure.
Overcoming these issues would require the development of a specific and robust type system, stipulating which inputs a given higher-order quantum process admits and which output it produces. Despite recent advances 75, currently available type systems are not detailed enough to provide a fully compositional view of higher-order quantum computation. Our work thus focuses on refining them, through the encoding of sectorial structure, i.e. information about how quantum channels behave with respect to certain direct-sum decompositions of their input and output spaces, using the recently developed framework of routed quantum circuits 89, 90. Progress in this direction will pave the way to computer manipulation of complex higher-order processes, for instance to numerically optimise the advantage they yield.
3.3.7 Causal structure in quantum theory
Many of the peculiarities of quantum theory can be tracked down to it not matching our classical notion of causal structure 91; this leads to the question of how one could develop a quantum notion of causal structure, on which some progress has been achieved recently 55. Exploring quantum theory from a causal perspective yields potential progress in understanding its structure and potential applications, in particular for the aforementioned higher-order quantum processes, whose performances are directly connected to their causal structure. In that regard, a particularly important conjecture to prove is that of causal decompositions77, which puts forward a tentative equivalence between a unitary channel's causal structure (operational data about which of its inputs can affect which of its outputs) and its compositional structure (mathematical data about how it can be written as the composition of sub-channels). If such a conjecture (which has not been proven yet in the general case) were to be true, it would yield a remarkable mathematical lever on the relationship between the operational and formal sides of quantum theory. We investigate this conjecture mathematically with the aim to prove it in more and more general cases; this involves abstract mathematical methods employing C* algebras. More generally, we explore how the latter might provide a useful formal basis for considerations of causality in a quantum context.
4 Application domains
Quriosity positions its activity at the - fruitful - frontier between theoretical research in quantum computer science and mathematics, and quantum technology engineering and applications.
We in particular believe that useful quantum inventions and technologies are going to emerge from the current investments in quantum information sciences and technologies, much before large scale (and error corrected) quantum computers can be built.
Our research programs opens in particular towards such perspective, on different aspects:
- The development of more efficient and higher security quantum cryptographic protocols.
- The ability to leverage quantum cryptography principles and tecnnologies to strengthen hardware security.
- The design of cost-effective quantum communications systems that can tightly integrated into modern communication infrastructures, making them widely deployable.
- The design of better quantum memories and therefore larger quantum computer as well as quantum networks.
5 Social and environmental responsibility
5.1 Footprint of research activities
Quriosity members are individually, and collectively making efforts to reduce their carbon footprint, in particular by taking the plane much less than before the Covid period. Augustin Vanrietvelde and Peter Brown will moreover act as carbon footprint delegates for Quriosity, and report to a working group at LTCI level, whose objective will be to increase the global awareness on carbon footprint, and steer the discussions to help decide on collective regulatory measures.
5.2 Impact of research results
Scientific publication
Quriosity aims at publishing high-impact papers in high profile journals such as Nature, Science, Physical Review, Quantum, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, as well as top conferences in our field such as QIP, QCrypt, TQC as well as Crypto, EuroCrypt, CHES.
Innovation
Telecom Paris currently holds 5 granted patents: 3 on hybrid quantum computational cryptography (axis 3.1) and 2 on quantum coherent communications (axis 3.2). We plan to patent technological innovations, including foundamental proposals for which we see a clear implementation route and possible exploitation paths.
Teaching
Quriosity intends to play a vigorous role in the training of the future generation of quantum engineers and researchers. In collaboration with the QuACs Inria team (CentraleSupélec and UPSaclay) and the PhiQus Inria team (Ecole Polytechnique), Quriosity (Telecom Paris-Inria) is coordinating the new M2 master program QMI (Quantique, Mathematiques, Informatique) that has been launched at IP Paris level in september 2025, and is the first master program centered on mathematical and CS aspects of quantum research and technology.
6 Highlights of the year
- Successful opening of the Master Program QMI (Quantique, Mathématiques, Informatique), coordinated by Telecom Paris/ Quriosity, in collaboration with Ecole Polytechnique, CentraleSupelec and Université Paris-Saclay with a first cohort of 17 students.
- Cambyse Rouzé invited to give a tutorial on quantum Gibbs sampling at QIP 2025.
- The team has obtained remarkable results with 7 submitted papers accepted as regular talks at the conference QIP 2026:
- Causal decompositions of 1D quantum cellular automata: Augustin Vanrietvelde, Octave Mestoudjian, Pablo Arrighi Heisenberg-limited Hamiltonian learning continuous variable systems via engineered dissipation: Tim Möbus, Andreas Bluhm, Tuvia Gefen, Yu Tong, Albert H. Werner, Cambyse Rouzé
- Efficient Learning Algorithms for Structured Bosonic and Fermionic Unitary Operators: Marco Fanizza, Vishnu Iyer, Junseo Lee, Antonio A. Mele, Francesco A. Mele
- The NPA hierarchy does not always attain the commuting operator value: Marco Fanizza, Larissa Kroell, Arthur Mehta, Connor Paddock, Denis Rochette, William Slofstra, Yuming Zhao
- Non-iid hypothesis testing: from classical to quantum: Giacomo De Palma, Marco Fanizza, Ryan O'Donnell, Connor Mowry
- Quantum Gibbs states are locally Markov: Chi-Fang (Anthony) Chen, Cambyse Rouzé
- Merge:
- Complexity of mixed Schatten norms of quantum maps: Jan Kochanowski, Omar Fawzi, Cambyse Rouzé
- Computational aspects of the trace norm contraction coefficient: Idris Delsol, Omar Fawzi, Jan Kochanowski, Akshay Ramachandran
7 Latest software developments, platforms, open data
7.1 Latest software developments
7.1.1 Ket.jl
-
Name:
Ket.jl: Toolbox for quantum information, nonlocality and entanglement
-
Keywords:
Julia programming language, Quantum Information
-
Functional Description:
Ket.jl is a toolbox for quantum information, nonlocality and entanglement written in the Julia programming language.
- URL:
-
Contact:
Peter Johnson Brown
-
Partners:
Universidad de Valladolid, University of Siegen, Zuse Institute Berlin
7.2 Open data
8 New results
8.1 Research axis 1: Quantum cryptography complexity and hardware frontiers
8.1.1 Computational models in quantum cryptography
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Peter Brown, Francesco Mazzoncini, Tristan Nemoz, Błażej Kuzaka, Jeanne Lucas.
We investigate how computational assumptions can be leveraged quantum cryptographic protocols that keep a strict security advantage, with respect to classical (computational) cryptography, while also allowing to obtain performances and properties that go beyond quantum cryptography in the plain model. To this end we have proposed a key distribution protocol in the so-called Quantum Computational Timelock model, whose security can be based on communication complexity gap between classical and quantum communication 8. In collaboration with LKB (team of Sylvain Gigan) we also proposed a first experimental demonstration of quantum versus classical communicaton two-way complexity advantage.
In the context of the PhD of Tristan Nemoz, we have focused on the mathematical structure and applications of quantum pseudorandom states (PRS), and established a lower bound on the distinguishing probabability between any real-valued PRS and a family of Haar-random states 35. We wrote a general audience article on hybridization of classical and quantum cryptography 5. In parallel, we investigate how PRS security definition could be translated to the practically motivated context of bosonic coherent states (and hence implementable using existing quantum communication systems), and study how to design and prove the security of a key exchange protocol based on PRS, in the QCT model.
8.1.2 New results for device-independent cryptography
Participants: Lewis Wooltorton, Peter Brown, Roger Colbeck, Thomas Hahn, Ernest Tan, Bora Ulu, Nicolas Brunner, Mirjam Weilenmann, Costantino Budroni, Miguel Navascués, Aby Philip.
In 30 we develop tight analytical solutions to the finite-size key-rate problem of device-independent cryptography. This vastly simplifies the security proof whilst also improving the achievable rates.
In 14 we developed new methods to build multipartite Bell inequalities that certify maximal randomness demonstrating the limits of multipartite device-independent randomness generation. In 15 we solved an open problem recently posed for device-independent conference key agreement protocols, showing that genuinely multipartite entanglement is not necessary to generate secret key – weakening the requirements of these protocols.
We have furthermore proposed a technique to turn setups that do not allow us to prove positive key rates for DI-QKD into setups that do 10. These techniques are based on classical pre- and post-processing of data and can thus in principle be straightforwardly applied to data from implementations of current protocols.
In addition, we have proved results on the vulnearbility of protocols in networks against memory attacks 12. This restricts the network topologies in which self-testing and communication protocols with quantum advantages are practically feasible without imposing an i.i.d. assumption.
8.2 Research axis 2: Multimode photonic systems for quantum information processing and communications
8.2.1 Quantum Coherent Communication and Digital Signal Processing
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Gjuillaume Ricard, Nicolas Fabre, Thomas Pousset, Yves Jaouën, Matteo Schiavon, Jeanne Lucas, Shivang Srivastava.
In 38 we have shown how shot noise calibration can be optimally performed in CV-QKD given some knowledge on the receiver noise spectral decomposition.
In 9, we have developped a quantized theory of Kramers-Krönig coherent detection and illustrated how it can be used in quantum communications but also applied to single-photon tomography. We are now investigating the impact of digital signal processing on quantum communications.
We moreover contributed to the review article 41, accepted for publication in Review of Modern Physcis, writing the section on CV-QKD certification.
8.2.2 Quantum Networking
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Thomas Rivera, Pierre-Enguerrand Verdier.
In 11, we have studied how time multiplexing could be beneficially used as a mean to perform long-distance discrete variable QKD in coexistence with classical communications.
8.2.3 Learning bosonic channels
Participants: Marco Fanizza, Vishnu Iyer, Junseo Lee, Antonio A. Mele, Francesco A. Mele.
We have initiated the study of finite-sample size learning of black-box bosonic channels. We considered the problem of learning a Gaussian unitary on modes and derived rigorous guarantees on the number of queries needed to learn the process accurately in the energy constrained diamond norm distance, which is a physically motivated metric. The algorithm uses only Gaussian operations. In particular, we show that with access to probes of arbitrarily high energy, it is possible to learn the unitary with queries at any precision 24.
8.2.4 Adaptive Syndrome Extraction Based on Heralded Gates
Participants: Ha Cong Nguyen, Paul Hilaire.
The goal of this project is to leverage heralded errors in fault-tolerant quantum computing to enhance performance. By dynamically reconfiguring quantum circuits using classical information about photonic errors, we exploit these errors more effectively. Our approach is applicable to all CSS codes and has demonstrated a significant improvement in fault-tolerant thresholds. Specifically, it achieves over a 20% increase in the fault-tolerant threshold for the surface code under a circuit-level noise model, while substantially reducing resource requirements. A paper detailing these results is currently in preparation.
8.2.5 Comparison of Fusion-Based and Spin-Optical Quantum Computing Architectures Under Photonic Error Models
Participants: Katia Hakem, Stephen Wein, Paul Hilaire.
The objective of this project is to compare the efficiency of existing photonic fault-tolerant architectures and photonic sources in terms of error correction performance. We have developed a general strategy to address both distinguishability errors and photon loss. This work includes the first comprehensive performance assessment of distinguishability errors in fusion-based quantum computing. Our findings reveal performance differences of up to an order of magnitude, depending on the specific photonic source and architecture used. A paper presenting these results is currently in preparation.
8.3 Research axis 3: Mathematical foundations of quantum information
8.3.1 Causal models in quantum theory
Participants: Augustin Vanrietvelde, Seonghun Jung, Pablo Arrighi, Octave Mestoudjian.
We are investigating the relationship (and in particular the potential equivalence) between the causal structure of quantum dynamics and their compositional structure. In 43, we presented an important proof, showing that this equivalence holds in a general and important case that of one-dimensional quantum cellular automata. This is based on a general theory of partitions of quantum systems, which we concurrently developed.
8.3.2 Quantum reference frames and compositionality
Participants: Augustin Vanrietvelde, Guilhem Doat.
We are investigating quantum reference frames, in which a system's physical quantities are described with respect to those of a reference, potentially superposed, other system. In doat2025, we proposed a clarification and analysis of the conceptual differences between existing frameworks for describing quantum reference frames, and proposed an operational argument discriminating between these approaches. We are currently working on an analysis and resolution of the paradox of the third particle, a problem arising in the context of these approaches.
8.3.3 Learning complex quantum states
Participants: Marco Fanizza, Cambyse Rouzé, Daniel Stilck França, James D Watson, Tim Möbus, Andreas Bluhm, Matthia C Caro, Giacomo De Palma, Connor Mowry, Ryan O'Donnell.
In 67, we initiated the problem of learning the time-dependent evolution of a locally interacting n-qubit system on a graph of effective dimension D using only preparation of product Pauli eigenstates, evolution under the time-dependent generator for given times, and measurements in product Pauli bases. These results provide a scalable tool to verify state-preparation procedures (e.g. adiabatic protocols) and characterize time-dependent noise in quantum devices. In 36 we have considered the problem of testing if the average of an unknown non-iid product state is equal or far from a a target known state, showing that the same performance of the iid case is attainable, also improving analogous results in the classical case. In our analysis, we introduce a quantum generalization of the Efron-Stein inequality.
8.3.4 Complexity of quantum Gibbs states
Participants: Ivan Bardet, Ángela Capel, Li Gao, Daniel Stilck França, Angelo Lucia, David Peres-García, Cambyse Rouzé, Jan Kochanowski, Alvaro Alhambra, Paul Gondolf, Simone Warzel, Sebastian Stengele.
We have kept on working on the complexity of Gibbs sampling algorithms. In 84, 83, we proved the first general polynomial runtime bounds for such Gibbs samplers at high enough temperature. Our methods were recently extended to Fermionic Hamiltonians at any temperature, including temperatures at which the Gibbs states are entangled and where no concurrent classical method is currently known for the task of approximating physical properties. In 61, we prove limitations of these algorithms by finding a randomized classical algorithm to compute the log-partition function of weakly interacting fermions with polynomial runtime in both the system size and precision.
Next, we will further investigate the connections between sampling and computing physical properties of quantum many-body systems at thermal equilibrium. More precisely, we will focus on proving lower bounds on known classical algorithms for the latter in parameter ranges for which our samplers converge in polynomial time. We will also study encodings of specific quantum algorithms into Gibbs samplers with the goal of finding better robustness of the latter against standard noise models. Extensions to infinite dimensional systems such as quantum continuous variables will also be considered.
8.3.5 Development of a Quantum Error Correction Simulation Framework
Participants: Maxime Garnier, Paul Hilaire.
This project aims to develop advanced simulation tools for quantum error correction. The framework is designed to handle fault-tolerant gates and adaptive fault-tolerant circuits, such as those used in the adaptive syndrome extraction project. It is continuously evolving to accommodate further developments and offers versatility for a wide range of applications in quantum error correction research. It will be publicly released soon.
8.3.6 Adaptations of quantum theory and how to distinguish them experimentally
Participants: Mirjam Weilenmann, Nicolas Gisin, Pavel Sekatski, Kuntal Sengupta, Roger Colbeck.
Generalised probabilistic theories are a way to understand quantum theory and its properties in a more general formalism and to understand how deviations from it affect the physical observations we make. We have performed works on comparing quantum theory to other such theories, most notably quantum theory over real Hilbert spaces 13, where we showed a difference between this theory and its complex analogue even under restricted source-independence, refining the result from 82. Our work further proposes a hierarchy of semi definite programs that include a partial source independence contraint, which may be of independent interest.
In addition, we have compared the correlations obtainable from quantum systems with those from another family of theories that lack a specific relabelling symmetry 39. We proved that quantum theory outperforms these theories in network experiments.
8.3.7 Random purification of states and channels and applications
Participants: Marco Fanizza, Senrui Chen, Filippo Girardi, Ludovico Lami, Francesco A. Mele, Haimeng Zhao.
The result of 80 greatly simplified the analysis of optimal tomography by deriving a channel that converts copies of a mixed state into copies of the same random purification. We are are exploring extensions of this idea in bosonic systems, where we derived a random purification channel for passive Gaussian states 33, and for channels, were we introduced a random Stinespring dilation supermap for parallel queries, giving an explicit efficient circuit to implement it 28. We are currently working on extending the Gaussian purification to general Gaussian state and the channel dilation to the adaptive setting.
9 Bilateral contracts and grants with industry
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Paul Hilaire.
9.1 Bilateral contracts with industry
Orange Innovation
CIFRE with Orange Innovation (Chatillon) on Discrete Variable Quantum Key Distribution and Time Multiplexing, PhD Student: Pierre-Enguerrand Verdier.
9.2 Grants with industry
Paris Region PhD Grant, collaboration with Quandela
Doctoral project of Guillaume Ricard, on Quatum Coherent Communications and Digital Signal Processing, Funded by Paris funded by Paris Region (region Ile-de France) in the context of the Paris Region PhD call, with a planned collaboration with Quandela on noise mitigation in optical coherent quantum communications.
CIFRE PhD Grant, collaboration with Quandela
Doctoral project of Katia Hakem, on fault-tolerant quantum computation with photonic hardware-constraints model, funded by ANRT.
10 Partnerships and cooperations
10.1 International research visitors
10.1.1 Visits of international scientists
Artymowicz Adam
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
Caltech
-
Country
USA
-
Dates
3rd February - 7th February
-
Context of visit
Visiting Cambyse Rouzé
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Zaw Lin Htoo
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
Singapore Centre for Quantum Technologies
-
Country
Singapore
-
Dates
7th April - 11th April
-
Context of visit
Visiting Mirjam Weilenmann
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Scalet Samuel
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
University of Cambridge
-
Country
UK
-
Dates
February - April
-
Context of visit
Visiting Cambyse Rouzé
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Budroni Constantino
-
Status
Professor
-
Institution of origin
University of Pisa
-
Country
Italy
-
Dates
2nd June - 6th June
-
Context of visit
Visiting Mirjam Weilenmann
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Navascues Miguel
-
Status
Research Group Leader
-
Institution of origin
IQOQI Vienna
-
Country
Austria
-
Dates
2nd June - 6th June
-
Context of visit
Visiting Mirjam Weilenmann
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Lumbreras Josep
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
National University of Singapore
-
Country
Singapore
-
Dates
2nd September
-
Context of visit
Seminar Talk
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Hahn Thomas
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
Weizmann Institute
-
Country
Israel
-
Dates
10th November - 14th November
-
Context of visit
Visiting Jan Kochanowski
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Angrisani Armando
-
Status
Postdoc
-
Institution of origin
EPFL Lausanne
-
Country
Switzerland
-
Dates
1st December - 5th December
-
Context of visit
Visiting team
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
Ulu Bora
-
Status
PhD
-
Institution of origin
University of Geneva
-
Country
Switzerland
-
Dates
November - December
-
Context of visit
Visiting Mirjam Weilenmann
-
Type of mobility
Research visit, talk
10.2 European initiatives
10.2.1 Horizon Europe
Quantum Secure Network Partnership
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Peter Brown, Nicolas Fabre, Guillaume Ricard, Yves Jaouën, Tristan Nemoz, Thomas Pousset.
-
Partner Institutions:
The Quantum Secure Networks Partnership (QSNP) aims at creating a sustainable European ecosystem in quantum cryptography and communication. Its 42 partners are world-leading academic groups, research and technology organizations (RTOs), quantum component and system spin-offs, cybersecurity providers, integrators, and telecommunication operators. The Partnership thus has the expertise in all technology development phases, from new designs to field deployment, making it ideal to carry out the future Specific Grant Agreement (SGA) projects.
- ICFO-The Institute of Photonic Sciences, Spain, (Coordinator)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France
- Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France
- Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
- Friedrich-Alexander University
- Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
- QuTech, at the Technical
- University Delft, Netherlands
- Università di Padova, Italy
- AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Austria
- Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Rep.
- Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal
- Universidade de Vigo, Spain
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
- Universität Wien, Austria
- Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
- University of Warsaw, Poland
- University of Malta, Malta
- Institute of Communications and Computer Systems, Greece
- Universität Paderborn, Germany
- Inria Cosmiq team, France
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA),Greece
- Instituto De Telecomunicacoes, Portugal
- Politecnico di Bari, Italy,
- Fraunhofer Heinrich-Hertz-Institut, Germany
- Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, France
- Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherland
- Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre, Belgium
- University College Cork, Ireland
- QuSide, Spain
- LuxQuanta, Spain
- Micro Photon Devices, Italy
- ThinkQuantum, Italy
- VPIphotonics GmbH, Germany
- Alea Quantum Technologies ApS, Denmark
- Q*Bird, Nertherlands
- Cryptonext Security, France
- Nokia Bell Labs, France
- Nextworks, Italy
- Deutsche Telekom, Germany
- Telefónica, Spain
- TIM S.p.A, Italy
- Orange SA,France
-
Contract ID:
QSNP, HORIZON-CL4-2022-QUANTUM-04-SGA
-
Information on the contract
Information on the Contract: Special Grant Agreement in the context of a Federated Grant Agreement related to the Quantum Communications Pillar of the European Quantum Technology Flagship.
-
Duration:
March 2023 – Dec 2026
-
Description:
The Quantum Secure Networks Partnership (QSNP) is structured around three main Science and Technology (ST) pillars. The first two pillars, “Next Generation Protocols” and “Integration”, focus on frontier research and innovation led mostly by academic partners and RTOs. The third ST pillar “Use cases and Applications” aims at expanding the industrial and economic impact of QSN technologies and is mostly driven by companies. In order to achieve the specific objectives within each pillar and ensure that know-how transfer and synergy between them are coherent and effective, QSNP has established ST activities corresponding to the three main layers of the technology value chain, “Components and Systems”, “Networks” and “Cryptography and Security”. Future SGA projects will be able to efficiently rely on this framework, in such a way that the ultimate objective of developing quantum communication technology for critical European infrastructures, such as EuroQCI, and private information and communication market sectors, will be achieved. QSNP will contribute to achieving European sovereignty in quantum technology for cybersecurity. At the same time, it will generate significant economic benefits to the whole society, including training a new generation of scientists and engineers, and the creation of high-tech jobs in the rapidly growing quantum industry.
-
Role of Quriosity:
Quriosity has important participations on Quantum Coherent Communications System Design (WP2), Theory of Quantum Cryptography and in particular on Device-Independent Quantum Crypography (WP3), Hybrid Quantum-Computational Cryptography (WP4 and WP6).
- Romain Alléaume leads one of the 3 pillars of the project, devoted to Integration (at hardware, middleware and cryptographic applications levels) and is member of the Executive Board of QSNP
- Romain Alléaume leads WP6 on Quantum and Classical Cryptography Integration.
- Romain Alléaume leads IP Paris contribution to WP4 on Quantum Cryptographic Protocols beyond QKD.
- Peter Brown leads IP Paris contribution to WP3 on Device-Independent QKD and QRNG.
- Several teams from IP Paris participates to the project: Quriosity, GTO, C2 at Telecom Paris and GRACE at LIX/Ecole Polytechnique.
10.2.2 Digital Europe
FranceQCI
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Peter Brown, Guillaume Ricard, Tristan Nemoz, Thomas Pousset.
-
Partner Institutions:
- Orange SA,France (Coordinator)
- Institut-Mines-Telecom (IMT), France
- Airbus Defense and Space, France
- Thales SIX, France
- CryptoNext Security, France
- CNRS, France
- Thales Alenia Space, France
- CNRS Université Cote d'Azur, France
- Sorbonne Université, France
- WeLinQ SAS, France
- VeriQloud, France
- Direction des Services de la Navigation Aérienne, DSNA, France
-
Contract ID:
Project: 101091675 — FranceQCI — DIGITAL-2021-QCI-01
-
Duration:
January 2023 – Dec 2025
-
Description:
The objective of the project is to test use cases of quantum communication technologies and to deploy advanced national quantum systems with existing communication networks in support of national QCI initiatives.
-
Role of Quriosity:
Quriosity, represented as IMT, contributes to network design and deployment (WP2), to security studies (WP3), and leads the activity on training (WP7) by coordinating the first executive education training offfer (in France) on quantum communication and cryptography, in collaboration with Sorbonne University and Orange Innovation.
10.3 National initiatives
PEPR QCommTestbed
Participants: Romain Alléaume, Peter Brown, Nicolas Fabre, Yves Jaouën, Tristan Nemoz, Thomas Pousset.
-
Partner Institutions:
- Institut-Mines-Telecom (IMT), France
- CNRS Université Cote d'Azur, France
- Sorbonne Université, France
- CEA Leti, France
- C2N, France
- Université Paris-Cité, France
-
Contract ID:
PC 4.3 « QCommTestbed » (Quantum communication testbeds)
-
Duration:
01/07/2022 – 30/06/2027
-
Description:
The objective of the QcommTestbed project is to lay the foundations for fiber optic and free-space quantum networks on a regional and longer-term national scale, making it possible to connect systems including quantum elements (transmitters and receivers, processors, sensors) via repeater nodes. The project also aims to make decisive advances in the TRL of quantum communication systems, and also in their security evaluation and testing, to pave the way for their wider adoption and ubiquituous deployment.
-
Role of Quriosity:
- Demonstration of ITS secure communication over a single fiber, based on joint CV-QKD and classical communication integration.
- Performance and Cost of Long-Term Secure Storage based on CV-QKD
- Vulnerability analysis of a QKD (VAN) system. Definition of an evaluation methodology (based on the Common Criteria.
- Experimental Demonstration of Mulimode Frequency-encoded Key Distribution in the QCT model
HQI – Hybrid Quantum Initiative
Participants: Cambyse Rouzé, Paul Hilaire.
-
Partner Institutions:
- Inria, France
- CNRS, France
- CEA, France
-
Contract ID:
ANR-22- PNCQ-0002
-
Duration:
2023 – 2028
-
Description:
the HQI iniative aims at developing a hybrid computing platform, interconnecting classical HPC systems with quantum devices, seen as accelerators. It will be available for an international community bringing together laboratories, start-ups and industries. The goal is to make it easier for them to access quantum computing, to identify, develop and test new use case. The research program is led by CEA and Inria, supported by GENCI and France Universités. Endowed with a €36M budget, it aims at developing a programming and compilation software stack for hybrid computing, including libraries for specific business (healthcare, chemistry, finance, etc) or transversal (Machine Learning, optimization, etc) applications.
-
Role of Quriosity:
- Coordination of Work Package 5 on characterization and correction of noise in hybrid quantum systems.
- Development of theoretical and experimental methodologies for noise identification, modeling, and mitigation in quantum communication and hybrid quantum platforms.
- Contribution to cross-platform benchmarking and validation protocols.
- Design and integration of a library of early fault-tolerant quantum error-correcting codes adapted to noisy intermediate-scale and hybrid quantum architectures.
11 Dissemination
11.1 Promoting scientific activities
11.1.1 Scientific events: organisation
Member of the organizing committees
- Paul Hilaire: Member of the local organizing committee of QEC 2027, Paris.
- Mirjam Weilenmann: Member of the organizing committee of the workshop "Quantum Correlations and Measurements" 2026, Les Diablerets (CH).
- Romain Alléaume: Member of the organization committee of the MAQI Summer School (Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Information), 2025, Gif-sur-Yvette.
11.1.2 Scientific events: selection
Member of the conference program committees
- Mirjam Weilenmann: Member of the program committee of QPL 2025.
- Cambyse Rouzé: Member of the program committee of QIP 2026.
- Augustin Vanrietvelde: Member of the program committee of QPL 2025.
Reviewer
- Peter Brown for BIID, ISIT and QCrypt
- Mirjam Weilenmann for QIP, AQIS, BIID,
- Marco Fanizza f or QIP
- Romain Alléaume for QCNC, ISIT
11.1.3 Journal
Reviewer - reviewing activities
- Peter Brown for Nature, Nature Communications in Physics and Quantum
- Augustin Vanrietvelde for PRL and Quantum
- Mirjam Weilenmann for PRA, Nature Communications and Nature Physics
- Marco Fanizza for PRL, PRX Quantum, Quantum, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Romain Alleaume for Nature Communications, Quantum, PRL.
11.1.4 Invited talks
- Peter Brown. Invited Tutorial at Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Information Summer School, Paris-Saclay. Title: Randomness, entropy and accumulation.
- Peter Brown. Invited Tutorial at Young Quantum Information Scientists Conference, Barcelona. Title: Device-independent cryptography.
- Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited tutorial at the Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Computing and Quantum Learning, Porquerolles. Title: Quantum Correlations.
- Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited tutorial at the Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Information summer school, Institut Pascal, Université Paris Saclay. Title: Network non-locality.
- Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited talk at 15th annual conference on relativistic quantum information (north), Naples, June 2025. Title: Monogamy relations for relativistically causal correlations.
- Cambyse Rouzé: Invited tutorial at QIP 2025, Raleigh, February 2025. Title: Quantum Gibbs sampling.
- Augustin Vanrietvelde: Invited talk at QISS 2025, Vienna, Qpril 2025. Title: Fighting for a cause.
- Marco Fanizza: Invited tutorial at 1st AIMS Workshop and School on The Theory of Quantum Learning Algorithms, AIMS, Cape Town, South Africa, Nov 2025. Title: Tutorial on Quantum state certification and quantum tomography.
- Marco Fanizza: Invited talk 6th Nottingham Workshop on Quantum Non-Equilibrium Dynamics, University of Nottingham, UK, Oct 2025. Title: Modelling and learning finitely correlated states.
- Romain Alléaume: Invited talk at the Workshop on Entanglement Assisted Communication Networks (EACN), September 10 to 12 at EURECOM, Sophia Antipolis. Title: Quantum cryptography from decoherence and short-term computational assumptions .
11.1.5 Leadership within the scienific community
- Romain Alléaume as member of the ANR CE47 committee on Quantum Technologies
- Romain Alléaume as member of QSNP Executive board
- Romain Alléaume as member of the QuantiP bureau, for the Quantum Communication axis.
- Romain Alléaume as Rapporteur, for the Quantum PEPR scientific workshop (Cryptography and Quantum Networks).
11.1.6 Scientific expertise
- Peter Brown as grant reviewer
- Augustin Vanrietvelde as reviewer for various grants
- Romain Alléaume as grant reviewer
11.1.7 Research administration
- Peter Brown as member of the LTCI council.
- Peter Brown as référent mobilité.
- Romain Alléaume as member for the Quantum-Saclay Comex.
- Romain Alléaume as member of the Step2 steering committee.
- Romain Alléaume as member of the conseil du LTCI.
- Romain Alléaume as member of the PhD Track Quantum Science and Technology committee.
11.2 Teaching - Supervision - Juries - Educational and pedagogical outreach
11.2.1 Teaching
L3 courses
- Peter Brown, Augustin Vanrietvelde, Jan Kochanowski, Tristan Nemoz, Guilhem Doat. A quantum hackathon. 16 hetd, 24 students.
- Romain Alléaume, Quantum Physics, 12 hetd, 200 students (for 3 lectures), or 24 students (for 4 TDs).
M1 courses
- Peter Brown, Augustin Vanrietvelde, Romain Alléaume. An introduction to quantum information and quantum computing. 31.5 hetd, 30 students.
- Peter Brown. Continuous optimisation and numerical analysis. 31.5 hetd. 30 students.
M2 courses
- Peter Brown, Cambyse Rouzé. Quantum Shannon Theory. 39 hetd, 17 students.
- Mirjam Weilenmann, Peter Brown, Cambyse Rouzé, Augustin Vanrietvelde, Marco Fanizza, Paul Hilaire, Guilhem Doat. A crash course for QMI. 88.5 hetd, 17 students.
- Romain Alléaume, Paul Hilaire. Quantum hardware for the theorist. 22.5 hetd. 15 students.
- Marco Fanizza, Cambyse Rouzé. Quantum Complex quantum systems. 39 hetd, 13 students.
- Romain Alléaume, Quantum Cryptography (QEng program), 20 hetd, 7 students.
Project courses
- Peter Brown. Artishow – A python implementation of semidefinite relaxations for polynomial optimisation. (4 students working 180 hours) 30 hetd.
11.2.2 Supervision
PhD students
- Peter Brown (50%) and Cambyse Rouzé (50%), PhD supervision of Ali Almasi.
- Cambyse Rouzé (50%), PhD supervision of Jan Kochanowski.
- Romain Alléaume (50%) and Peter Brown (50%), PhD supervision of Tristan Nemoz.
- Romain Alléaume (50%) and Nicolas Fabre (50%), PhD supervision of Thomas Pousset
- Romain Alléaume (50%) and Yves Jaouen (50%), PhD supervision of Guillaume Ricard
- Romain Alléaume (20%) and Thomas River (80%), PhD supervision of Pierre Enguerrand.
- Augustin Varietvelde (75%) and Romain Alléaume (25%), PhD supervision of Guilhem Doat
- Paul Hilaire (50%) , PhD direction of Katia Hakem
- Mirjam Weilenmann (100%), PhD supervision of Marco Pompili.
Master's students
- Peter Brown (100%), Internship supervision of Dorian Arnold (6 months).
- Peter Brown (100%), Internship supervision of Gustavo Froes Do Vale (3 months).
- Peter Brown (100%), Supervisor of PhD-track student Ali Almasi.
- Paul Hilaire (100%), Internship supervision of Ha Cong NGuyen (6 months).
- Mirjam Weilenmann (100%), Internship supervision of Olgierd Zurek (2.5 months).
- Mirjam Weilenmann (100%), Supervisor of PhD-track student Golshan Lirabi.
- Augustin Vanrietvelde (100%), supervisor of Seonghun Jung (5 months).
- Augustin Vanrietvelde (100%), supervisor of Nicolas Moulonguet (5 months).
- Augustin Vanrietvelde (100%), supervisor of Cynthia El Akoum (2.5 months).
- Marco Fanizza (50%), supervisor of Enrique Escobar Fernández-Marcote (Master's thesis at University of COpenhagen).
- Romain Alléaume (100%), supervisor of Tom Guerinel (3 months).
11.2.3 Juries
Recruitment Juries
- Romain Alléaume member of the jury for the Inria CRCN/ISFP 2025 campaign, Inria Lyon.
- Romain Alléaume member of the hiring commmittee for the Maître de conférences position entitled "Quantum Communication Systems and Networks", LIP6, Sorbonne Université, May 23 2025.
PhD Juries
- Peter Brown, PhD examiner of Carlos Pascual-García, ICFO Barcelona.
- Mirjam Weilenmann, PhD examiner of Pierre Botteron, Université de Toulouse.
- Cambyse Rouzé, PhD examiner of Tony Metger, ETH Zurich.
- Cambyse Rouzé, PhD examiner of Matthijs Vernooij, TU Delft.
- Augustin Vanrietvelde, PhD examiner of Anne-Catherine de la Hamette, IQOQI Vienna.
- Romain Alléaume, PhD rapporteur of Verena Yacoub, LIP6, Sorbonne Université.
- Romain Alléaume, HDR Examiner of Amirhossein Ghassiedi, Nokia, July 2025.
Comité de Suivi (CSI)
- Peter Brown, CSI member of Basile Buffin, LTCI, Telecom Paris.
- Peter Brown, CSI member of Alexis Rosio, LIP6, Sorbonne University.
- Paul Hilaire, CSI member of Bruno Costa Alves Freire, COSMIQ, Inria Paris/ Pasqal
- Cambyse Rouzé, CSI member of Elie Bermot, Pasqal & IRIF.
- Cambyse Rouzé, CSI member of Tigran Sedrakyan, LIP6.
- Augustin Vanrietvelde, CSI member of Dogukan Bakircioglu, LMF.
- Romain Alléaume, CSI member of CSI member of Nguyen Dinh Duy (supervisor, Hieu Phan), LTCI.
- Romain Alléaume, CSI member of Antoine Urban (supervisor Matthieu Rambaud), LTCI.
- Romain Alléaume, CSI member of Manon Hugenot (supervisor Eleni Diamanti, LIP6).
- Romain Alléaume, CSI member of Jinwei Zheng (supervisor, Hieu Phan), LTCI.
PhD Grant Juries
- Paul Hilaire: QuantEdu grant jury member.
- Paul Hilaire: Seminars in two high schools on quantum computing (in the context of CNRS's "Année du quantique" program)
12 Scientific production
12.1 Major publications
- 1 miscQuasi-optimal sampling from Gibbs states via non-commutative optimal transport metrics.2024HALDOI
- 2 miscHybrid Quantum Cryptography from Communication Complexity.November 2023HAL
- 3 articleLimitations of variational quantum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach.PRX Quantum4January 2023, 010309HALDOI
- 4 miscDevice-independent quantum key distribution with arbitrarily small nonlocality.September 2023HAL
12.2 Publications of the year
International journals
International peer-reviewed conferences
Conferences without proceedings
Reports & preprints
Other scientific publications
12.3 Cited publications
- 46 inproceedingsThe computational complexity of linear optics.Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing2011, 333--342back to text
- 47 articleComputational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates.Physical review letters113252014, 250402DOIback to text
- 48 articleQuantum circuits cannot control unknown operations.New Journal of Physics1692014, 093026DOIback to text
- 49 articlePractical device-independent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation.Nature communications912018, 459back to text
- 50 articleSymbiotic joint operation of quantum and classical coherent communications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.069422022back to text
- 51 articleEntropy decay for Davies semigroups of a one dimensional quantum lattice.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.006012021back to textback to text
- 52 articleRapid thermalization of spin chain commuting Hamiltonians.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.005932021back to text
- 53 articleApproximate Tensorization of the Relative Entropy for Noncommuting Conditional Expectations.Annales Henri Poincaré2312021, 101--140back to text
- 54 articleGroup Transference Techniques for the Estimation of the Decoherence Times and Capacities of Quantum Markov Semigroups.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory6752021, 2878-2909DOIback to text
- 55 articleQuantum causal models.DOIback to text
- 56 articleComputing conditional entropies for quantum correlations.Nature communications1212021, 1--12back to textback to text
- 57 articleDevice-independent lower bounds on the conditional von Neumann entropy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.136922021back to textback to text
- 58 articleMultimode entanglement in reconfigurable graph states using optical frequency combs.Nature communications812017, 1--9back to text
- 59 articleThe modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality for quantum spin systems: classical and commuting nearest neighbour interactions, (QIP talk, presented at ICMP).arXiv:2009.118172020back to textback to textback to text
- 60 inproceedingsOptimal Mixing of Glauber Dynamics: Entropy Factorization via High-Dimensional Expansion.Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of ComputingSTOC 2021New York, NY, USAVirtual, ItalyAssociation for Computing Machinery2021, 1537?1550URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451035DOIback to text
- 61 articleConvergence of the Cumulant Expansion and Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Weakly Interacting Fermions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.120102025back to text
- 62 articleStrong Converse Bounds in Quantum Network Information Theory.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory6742021, 2269-2292DOIback to text
- 63 articleQuantum computations without definite causal structure.Physical Review A8822013, 022318DOIback to text
- 64 articleEntropy accumulation.Communications in Mathematical Physics3792020, 1--47back to text
- 65 articleThe Entropy Zoo.https://phfaist.com/entropyzooback to text
- 66 articleSum-of-Squares proofs of logarithmic Sobolev inequalities on finite Markov chains.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.049882021back to text
- 67 articleLearning and certification of local time-dependent quantum dynamics and noise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.085002025back to text
- 68 articleComplete Entropic Inequalities for Quantum Markov Chains.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis2451may 2022, 183--238URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-022-01785-1DOIback to text
- 69 inproceedingsThe Entropy Photon-Number Inequality and its consequences.2008 Information Theory and Applications Workshop2008, 128-130DOIback to text
- 70 articleFidelity Bounds for Device-Independent Advantage Distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.032132021back to text
- 71 articleParallelizable Synthesis of Arbitrary Single-Qubit Gates with Linear Optics and Time-Frequency Encoding.Physical Review A1076June 2023, 062610HALDOIback to text
- 72 articlePredicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements.Nature Physics1610June 2020, 1050--1057URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7DOIback to text
- 73 articleProvably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.126272021back to text
- 74 articleFundamentals of Coherent Optical Fiber Communications.in Journal of Lightwave Technology vol. 34, N°12016back to text
- 75 articleA categorical semantics for causal structure.Logical Methods in Computer ScienceVolume 15, Issue 32019DOIback to text
- 76 articleRobust Bell inequalities from communication complexity.Quantum22018, 72back to text
- 77 articleCausal and compositional structure of unitary transformations.Quantum52021, 511DOIback to text
- 78 unpublishedHybrid Quantum Cryptography from Communication Complexity.December 2023, working paper or preprintHALback to text
- 79 articleDevice-independent quantum key distribution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.146002021back to text
- 80 miscMixed state tomography reduces to pure state tomography.2025, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15806back to text
- 81 inproceedingsQuantum one-way communication can be exponentially stronger than classical communication.Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing2011, 31--40back to text
- 82 articleQuantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified.Nature60078902021, 625--629back to text
- 83 articleOptimal quantum algorithm for Gibbs state preparation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.048852024back to text
- 84 articleEfficient learning of ground and thermal states within phases of matter.Nature Communications1512024, 7755back to text
- 85 articleSelf-testing quantum random-number generator based on an energy bound.Physical Review A10062019, 062338back to text
- 86 articleComputing secure key rates for quantum cryptography with untrusted devices.npj Quantum Information712021, 1--6back to text
- 87 articleImproved DIQKD protocols with finite-size analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.087142020back to text
- 88 articleSemi-device-independent framework based on restricted distrust in prepare-and-measure experiments.Physical Review Letters126212021, 210503back to text
- 89 articleRouted quantum circuits.Quantum5Jul 2021, 503DOIback to text
- 90 articleConsistent circuits for indefinite causal order.6 2022back to text
- 91 articleThe lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning.New Journal of Physics173March 2015, 033002URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033002DOIback to text
- 92 articleEfficient randomness certification by quantum probability estimation.Physical review research212020, 013016back to text
- 93 articleExperimental device-independent quantum key distribution between distant users.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.005752021back to textback to text