EN FR
EN FR

2025Activity report​​​‌Project-TeamQURIOSITY

RNSR: 202324386L​

Creation of the​‌ Project-Team: 2023 January 01​​

Each year, Inria research​​​‌ teams publish an Activity​ Report presenting their work​‌ and results over the​​ reporting period. These reports​​​‌ follow a common structure,​ with some optional sections​‌ depending on the specific​​ team. They typically begin​​​‌ by outlining the overall​ objectives and research programme,​‌ including the main research​​ themes, goals, and methodological​​​‌ approaches. They also describe​ the application domains targeted​‌ by the team, highlighting​​ the scientific or societal​​​‌ contexts in which their​ work is situated.

The​‌ reports then present the​​ highlights of the year,​​​‌ covering major scientific achievements,​ software developments, or teaching​‌ contributions. When relevant, they​​ include sections on software,​​​‌ platforms, and open data,​ detailing the tools developed​‌ and how they are​​ shared. A substantial part​​​‌ is dedicated to new​ results, where scientific contributions​‌ are described in detail,​​ often with subsections specifying​​​‌ participants and associated keywords.​

Finally, the Activity Report​‌ addresses funding, contracts, partnerships,​​ and collaborations at various​​​‌ levels, from industrial agreements​ to international cooperations. It​‌ also covers dissemination and​​ teaching activities, such as​​​‌ participation in scientific events,​ outreach, and supervision. The​‌ document concludes with a​​ presentation of scientific production,​​​‌ including major publications and​ those produced during the​‌ year.

Keywords

Computer Science​​ and Digital Science

  • A3.4.​​​‌ Machine learning and statistics​
  • A4.2. Correcting codes
  • A4.3.3.​‌ Cryptographic protocols
  • A4.3.4. Quantum​​ Cryptography
  • A4.3.5. Cryptanalyse quantique​​​‌
  • A4.6. Authentication
  • A5.9. Signal​ processing
  • A6.1.2. Stochastic Modeling​‌
  • A6.5. Mathematical modeling for​​ physical sciences
  • A7.1. Algorithms​​​‌
  • A7.1.4. Quantum algorithms
  • A8.​ Mathematics of computing
  • A8.2.​‌ Optimization
  • A8.6. Information theory​​
  • A8.8. Network science
  • A8.13.​​​‌ Quantum computing

Other Research​ Topics and Application Domains​‌

  • B5.11. Quantum systems
  • B6.2.​​ Network technologies
  • B9.1. Education​​​‌
  • B9.10. Privacy

1 Team​ members, visitors, external collaborators​‌

Research Scientists

  • Marco Fanizza​​ [INRIA, Researcher​​​‌, from Jul 2025​]
  • Cambyse Rouze [​‌INRIA, ISFP]​​
  • Mirjam Weilenmann [INRIA​​​‌, Researcher, from​ Feb 2025]

Faculty​‌ Members

  • Romain Alleaume [​​Team leader, Télécom​​​‌ Paris, Professor,​ HDR]
  • Peter Johnson​‌ Brown [TELECOM PARIS​​, Associate Professor]​​​‌
  • Paul Hilaire [TELECOM​ PARIS, from May​‌ 2025]
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde​​ [TELECOM PARIS,​​​‌ Associate Professor]

Post-Doctoral​ Fellows

  • Adam Artymowicz [​‌INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow​​, from Oct 2025​​​‌]
  • Dávid Bugár [​TELECOM PARIS]
  • Shivang​‌ Srivastava [Telecom Paris​​]
  • Alireza Tasdighi [​​​‌Telecom Paris, from​ Feb 2025]

PhD​‌ Students

  • Ali Almasi [​​IP PARIS, from​​​‌ Oct 2025]
  • Guilhem​ Doat [IP Paris​‌]
  • Seonghun Jung [​​Université Paris-Saclay, from​​ Sep 2025]
  • Jan​​​‌ Kochanowski [IP PARIS‌]
  • Tristan Nemoz [‌​‌IP PARIS]
  • Marco​​ Pompili [IP Paris​​​‌, from Dec 2025‌]
  • Guillaume Ricard [‌​‌Telecom Paris]
  • Bora​​ Ulu [University of​​​‌ Geneva, from Oct‌ 2025]

Interns and‌​‌ Apprentices

  • Dorian Arnold [​​TELECOM PARIS, from​​​‌ Mar 2025 until Aug‌ 2025]
  • Tom Guerinel‌​‌ [Telecom Paris,​​ until Jul 2025]​​​‌
  • Jeanne Lucas [Telecom‌ Paris, from Sep‌​‌ 2025]
  • Nicolas Moulonguet​​ [IP Paris,​​​‌ Intern, from Sep‌ 2025]
  • Olgierd Zurek‌​‌ [IP Paris,​​ from May 2025 until​​​‌ Jul 2025]

Administrative‌ Assistant

  • Natalia Alves [‌​‌INRIA]

2 Overall​​ objectives

Quriosity's ambition​​​‌ is to extend the‌ application horizon of quantum‌​‌ information science by addressing​​ novel questions positioned at​​​‌ the intersection between theoretical‌ research in quantum information‌​‌ and the engineering of​​ quantum devices, with a​​​‌ focus on approaches combining‌ digital and quantum photonics‌​‌ technologies.

The overarching goal​​ of the project-team will​​​‌ be to push forward‌ our ability to harness‌​‌ and exploit high-dimensional complex​​ quantum systems for quantum​​​‌ information processing and quantum‌ communications purposes.

Leveraging a‌​‌ dual approach combining fundamental​​ research in quantum information​​​‌ with quantum photonics expertise,‌ Quriosity will strive to‌​‌ take advantage of and​​ develop strong synergies with​​​‌ the unique quantum ecosystem‌ of Saclay and to‌​‌ pursue objectives that have​​ the potential to bring​​​‌ radical advances to several‌ application domains of quantum‌​‌ technologies, ranging from cryptography​​ to computing:

  • Design quantum-enhanced​​​‌ cryptographic hardware, leveraging concepts‌ based on computational hardness‌​‌ and quantum information.
  • Conceive​​ and engineer photonic-based processors​​​‌ and systems capable of‌ achieving quantum advantage in‌​‌ computation or communication tasks.​​
  • Develop efficient quantum information​​​‌ processing schemes implementable on‌ near-term hardware and advance‌​‌ the theoretical framework to​​ understand the fundamental limits​​​‌ of noisy quantum information‌ processing.

3 Research program‌​‌

The research program that​​ we aim to lead​​​‌ in the Quriosity project-team‌ intends to embrace a‌​‌ relatively wide area of​​ theoretical questions, ranging from​​​‌ quantum cryptography, that we‌ ambition to combine with‌​‌ complexity-based schemes and establish​​ as a framework to​​​‌ enhance hardware security, to‌ the mathematical foundations of‌​‌ quantum information and quantum​​ computing. Conversely, we also​​​‌ intend to develop research‌ capable of leveraging photonics‌​‌ and digital information processing​​ technologies to design systems​​​‌ capable of producing high-dimensional‌ and controllable quantum states‌​‌ of light in order​​ to push forward the​​​‌ frontiers of quantum information‌ processing advantage.

3.1 Research‌​‌ axis 1: Quantum cryptography​​ complexity and hardware frontiers​​​‌

This axis aims to‌ identify and solve frontier‌​‌ research topics in quantum​​ cryptography, from two main​​​‌ perspectives. First by exploring‌ the interplay between security‌​‌ models - including computational​​ ones - and theoretical​​​‌ quantum cryptography, allowing to‌ build protocols with stronger‌​‌ security properties and lesser​​ resource requirements. Second by​​​‌ laying a special emphasis‌ on interplay between quantum‌​‌ cryptography and hardware security,​​ with the need to​​​‌ develop extended techniques for‌ quantum cryptographic hardware security‌​‌ certification, but also the​​​‌ idea to strengthen hardware​ security and its resilience​‌ to information leakage by​​ resorting to quantum cryptographic​​​‌ constructions.

3.1.1 Everlasting security​ from a quantum-computational hybrid​‌ model

We proposed in​​ 2015 a security model​​​‌ that we later coined​ a Quantum Computational Timelock​‌ (QCT) security model. It​​ consists in assuming that​​​‌ computationally secure encryption may​ only be broken after​‌ time much longer than​​ the coherence time of​​​‌ quantum memories available at​ the time of protocol​‌ execution. The QCT security​​ model opens the possibility​​​‌ to propose new quantum​ cryptographic constructions and in​‌ particular to make use​​ of encoding and security​​​‌ proof techniques that strongly​ depart from “traditional” quantum​‌ conjugate coding that is​​ a central ingredient in​​​‌ most quantum cryptographic protocols.​

Figure 1

Description of the QCT​‌ security model

Figure 1​​: QCT security model:​​​‌ Assumption (a): Short-term secure​ encryption during time t​‌comp​​, during which Alice​​​‌ and Bob can exchange​ an ephemeral classical secret​‌ S. Assumption (b):​​ Time-limited quantum memory, with​​​‌ coherence time tc​oht​‌comp​​.

The QCT security​​​‌ model opens towards a​ rich variety of fascinating​‌ questions, that we have​​ certainly not all identified.​​​‌ In the coming years​ we intend to push​‌ forward the theoretical analysis​​ of several of these​​​‌ questions, that relate to​ the computational frontiers of​‌ quantum cryptography. One ongoing​​ direction consists in studying​​​‌ key agreement constructions whose​ security can be reduced​‌ to distributed computational problems​​ that exhibit an exponential​​​‌ separation in terms of​ quantum or classical communication​‌ complexity.

As an alternative​​ way to build secure​​​‌ protocols in the QCT​ model, we also intend​‌ to investigate pseudo-random quantum​​ states, which can​​​‌ be seen as a​ computational variant of a​‌ t-design, i.e. an​​ ensemble of quantum states​​​‌ characterized by the fact​ that t copies of​‌ one sampled state are​​ statistically indistinguishable from t​​​‌ copies of a states​ picked uniformly at random.​‌ Interestingly, construction of pseudo-random​​ states can be based​​​‌ on quantum-secure one-way functions,​ and therefore from the​‌ first assumption. This line​​ of work will also​​​‌ allow us to consider​ realistic and pratical constructions​‌ of quantum cryptographic schemes​​ based on computational and​​​‌ /or quantum-hardware security assumptions.​ We also intend to​‌ study constructions for quantum​​ physically uncloneable functions qPUFs​​​‌ and their aplication.

3.1.2​ Device-independent cryptography

Device-independent cryptography​‌ allows one to perform​​ quantum cryptography with reduced​​​‌ or even no trust​ assumptions on the quantum​‌ hardware. It remains a​​ challenge experimentally and pushing​​​‌ the performance (in terms​ of key rate, or​‌ trust reduction) of device-independent​​ cryptography defines an active​​​‌ research frontier for quatum​ cryptography. Recent implementations of​‌ DI-QKD179,​​ 93, 93 have​​​‌ shown that whilst it​ is now feasible, it​‌ has a relatively low​​ rate and can only​​​‌ be executed over a​ short distance. By improving​‌ the theoretical methods for​​ analyzing various protocols and​​​‌ security proofs and by​ improving the protocol design​‌ we can look to​​ boost the rates of​​ these protocols and push​​​‌ them towards a more‌ viable technology. Examples of‌​‌ such improvements include protocol​​ design modifications 87,​​​‌ 70 and improved methods‌ to calculate rates 56‌​‌, 57, 86​​. Our goals are​​​‌ to develop better designed‌ protocols and security proofs‌​‌ (assessing their performance in​​ experiments) and to investigate​​​‌ the fundamental limitations of‌ DI protocol rates Overall‌​‌ pushing the practicality of​​ DI forwards and improving​​​‌ our understanding of its‌ limitations.

As a complementary‌​‌ line of research we​​ will also investigate prospects​​​‌ of semi-device-independent protocols as‌ a viable near-term alternative‌​‌ to device-independent security. Proposed​​ protocols rely on assumptions​​​‌ of system energy 85‌, dimension bounds and‌​‌ bounded distrust 88 amongst​​ others. We will investigate​​​‌ alternative assumptions and derive‌ resulting protocols to be‌​‌ analyzed and subsequently implemented.​​ We will also apply​​​‌ the semi-device-independent framework to‌ the problem of hardware‌​‌ verification, designing tests to​​ establish that the hardware​​​‌ is functioning correctly whilst‌ placing limited trust on‌​‌ the components.

3.1.3 Quantum-enhanced​​ leakage-resilience

We will also​​​‌ investigate some questions placed‌ at the intersection between‌​‌ classical hardware security and​​ quantum cryptography, namely how​​​‌ to prove the security‌ of a cryptographic protocols‌​‌ when implemented using hardware,​​ such as processors or​​​‌ storage, that may leak‌ some of the security-sensitive‌​‌ information.

We intend to​​ tackle leakage-resilience cryptography from​​​‌ a new viewpoint, that‌ will consist in integrating‌​‌ quantum cryptographic constructions as​​ a base layer within​​​‌ cryptographic systems, in order‌ to obtain security guarantees‌​‌ even in presence of​​ information leakage with strictly​​​‌ weaker assumptions than existing‌ classical leakage-resilience protocols. We‌​‌ will first consider simple​​ cryptographic protocols such as​​​‌ One-Time-Pad encryption or authentication‌ protocols relying on Physically‌​‌ Uncloneable Functions PUFs. We​​ intend for example to​​​‌ investigate how the use‌ of hybrid classical-quantum cryptographic‌​‌ hardware, comprising quantum channels​​ to interconnect processors or​​​‌ secure storage sites, can‌ lead to cryptographic protocols‌​‌ with provable security under​​ some realistic information leakage​​​‌ models.

3.1.4 Real-world quantum‌ cryptography

40 year of‌​‌ quantum cryptography (QC) have​​ lead to major theoretical​​​‌ and technological advances, with‌ fundamental impact on the‌​‌ field of information security.​​ Market adoption however remains​​​‌ limited, with major challenges‌ that practical QC still‌​‌ needs to be overcome​​ in order to become​​​‌ widely used in real-world‌ applications. We identify in‌​‌ particular two main challenges:​​ 1) cryptographic advantage, namely​​​‌ the design of protocols‌ for which the use‌​‌ of QC in combination​​ with classical cryptography gives​​​‌ a competitive edge over‌ classical cryptography only; 2)‌​‌ security certification of quantum​​ cryptographic implementations. Quriosity intends​​​‌ to actively contribute to‌ lift these barriers and‌​‌ to foster the development​​ of real-world quantum cryptography​​​‌ and in particular to‌ the uptake of a‌​‌ French and European industry.​​ The development of a​​​‌ QC industry is indeed‌ becoming an important topic,‌​‌ with strategic investments from​​ leading scientific countries (China,​​​‌ Korea, Japan, UK, etc.‌ ) including also notably‌​‌ the EU27 supporthing the​​ EuroQCI initiative. On the​​​‌ other hand, the adoption‌ of quantum cryptography for‌​‌ real-world application remains often​​​‌ considered with skepticism by​ representatives of the cybersecurity​‌ community, stressing the dire​​ need of cross-disciplinary vision​​​‌ combining best-in-class classical and​ quantum cryptography expertise.

Regarding​‌ cryptographic advantage, our conviction​​ is that one should​​​‌ not aim at constructions​ where quantum cryptography would​‌ just functionally replace classical​​ cryptography, but on the​​​‌ other hand to identify​ applications where the use​‌ of QC combined with​​ post-quantum cryptography (PQC) can​​​‌ present strict security gain​ over PQC alone.

Regarding​‌ security certification, it has​​ become a central challenge​​​‌ in particular in the​ context of the EuroQCI​‌ initiative aiming at developing​​ a pan-European quantum communication​​​‌ infrastructure, together with an​ industry, in the next​‌ 10 years It constitutes​​ a complex task, requiring​​​‌ the collaboration of experts​ from different fields. In​‌ future years, we intend​​ to tackle this question​​​‌ from different angles: on​ the theory side, we​‌ intend to propose a​​ shift in the security​​​‌ objective towards everlasting security,​ and demonstrate how this​‌ can make the security​​ certification of key establishment​​​‌ based on QKD combined​ with ephemeral post-quantum cryptography​‌ primitives much more tractable.​​ On the system engineering​​​‌ side and in resonance​ with Section 3.2,​‌ we intend to identify​​ and close implementation security​​​‌ gaps in modern CV-QKD​ systems relying on digital​‌ signal processing, notably the​​ complex interplay between calibration​​​‌ procedure and finite-size security,​ but also between Nyquist​‌ pulse shaping and leakage.​​

3.2 Research axis 2:​​​‌ Multimode photonic systems for​ quantum information processing and​‌ communications

Building a quantum​​ processor that we could​​​‌ use to solve real-world​ problems with practical benefits​‌ might constitute one of​​ the most burning scientific​​​‌ and technological challenges of​ the beginning of the​‌ 21st century. Very interestingly,​​ recent results indicate that​​​‌ quantum optical circuits constitute​ a very promising approach​‌ for quantum information processing,​​ in particularly high-dimensional linear​​​‌ optics systems, which can​ form a (weaker) non-universal​‌ quantum computing platform, and​​ yet efficiently perform tasks​​​‌ intractable for a classical​ computer, such as Boson​‌ Sampling 46.

We​​ will actively investigate new​​​‌ theoretical questions related to​ quantum information processing with​‌ high-dimensional photonic system, and​​ their interplay with technology​​​‌ and experiments.

3.2.1 Quantum​ coherent communications and digital​‌ signal processing

Quantum Key​​ Distribution (QKD) systems are​​​‌ among the most advanced​ quantum communications technologies available​‌ today. QKD therefore provides​​ an ideal platform to​​​‌ test novel system designs​ and validate quantum communication​‌ technology over real networks​​ Leveraging essential features of​​​‌ modern optical communication systems,​ and in particular high​‌ sampling rates and digital​​ signal processing 74,​​​‌ quantum coherent communications systems​ constitute a recent and​‌ promising route towards high-rates,​​ highly integrated and cost-effective​​​‌ quantum communication systems. They​ rely on two central​‌ ingredients: -Spectrally efficient modulation​​ formats and coherent detection,​​​‌ exploiting phase and intensity​ information and able to​‌ operate a very high​​ rates (> GHz) even​​​‌ with shot-noise limited receivers.​ - Digital signal processing​‌ that takes advantage of​​ the high sampling rates​​​‌ to digitally evaluate and​ compensate many impairments of​‌ the communications such as​​ optical carrier phase noise​​ or polarization mode dispersion,​​​‌ using dedicated algorithms.

In‌ collaboration with Prof. Yves‌​‌ Jaouen from the GTO​​ team of Telecom Paris,and​​​‌ working on a state-of-the-art‌ experimental platform, Quriosity has‌​‌ designed and demonstrated for​​ the first time DSP-enhanced​​​‌ quantum communications, with noise‌ control performances that allow‌​‌ to successfully run QKD​​ over metropolitan distances while​​​‌ being jointly deployed over‌ classical coherent optical link‌​‌ 50. We have​​ also filed a patent​​​‌ about this general concept‌ and our inventive system‌​‌ design.

In the future,​​ we then aim to​​​‌ leverage digital signal processing‌ and machine learning (ML)‌​‌ techniques to characterize and​​ mitigate noise in order​​​‌ to push further our‌ ability to operate quantum‌​‌ communications over existing optical​​ fibers, in coexistence with​​​‌ classical signals.

As a‌ complementary line of research,‌​‌ we intend to theoretically​​ study multimode quantum coherent​​​‌ communications using multimode shaping‌ of the local oscillator,‌​‌ taking inspiration from 58​​. We also intend​​​‌ to explore the possibility‌ to rely on CV‌​‌ multimode encoding as a​​ way to experimentally implement​​​‌ new quantum cryptographic constructions‌ in the hybrid quantum‌​‌ computational security models introduced​​ in Section 3.1.​​​‌

3.2.2 Quantum information processing‌ with a programmable frequency‌​‌ processor

In collaboration with​​ the teams of Nadia​​​‌ Belabas and Pascale Senellart‌ at C2N and in‌​‌ the context of the​​ ParisQCI project, we study​​​‌ how to combine high-dimensional‌ photonic gates in the‌​‌ frequency domain, to efficiently​​ synthesize high-dimensional unitary transformations.​​​‌ Leveraging on the possibility‌ to parallelize single-qubit unitaries,‌​‌ that we have recently​​ analyzed 71 we intend​​​‌ to study how such‌ systems could be leveraged‌​‌ for optical quantum information​​ processing, and in particular​​​‌ for quantum metrology. In‌ the future, we will‌​‌ also investigate how to​​ scale the platform to​​​‌ perform information processing with‌ high-dimensional quantum states, opening‌​‌ the possibility to achieve​​ quantum computational advantage, but​​​‌ also implementation routes for‌ the hybrid quantum-computational cryptographic‌​‌ protocols in the QCT​​ model, studied in Section​​​‌ 3.1

Figure 2

Multimode programmable linear‌ optical circuit and associated‌​‌ experimental devices (Spatial Light​​ Modulators: SLM, Multimode fibers:​​​‌ MMF, Detection of single‌ photons multipixel APDs).

Figure‌​‌ 2: Multimode programmable​​ linear optical circuit and​​​‌ associated experimental devices (Spatial‌ Light Modulators: SLM, Multimode‌​‌ fibers: MMF, Detection of​​ single photons multipixel APDs).​​​‌ This experimental platform, implemented,‌ at the international state‌​‌ of the art in​​ the team of Sylvain​​​‌ Gigan, at LKB, allows‌ to create, in a‌​‌ programmable way, an arbitrary​​ unitary transformation on quantum​​​‌ states of light, in‌ high dimension. (Credit: Complex‌​‌ Quantum Optics team, LKB,​​ ENS Paris).

3.2.3 Quantum​​​‌ information processing using multimode‌ programmable linear circuits

In‌​‌ collaboration with the team​​ of Sylvain Gigan at​​​‌ ENS Ulm, and in‌ the context of Francesco‌​‌ Mazzoncini's PhD that we​​ co-supervise, we aim to​​​‌ use a multimode programmable‌ linear circuit, built around‌​‌ a multimode fiber (cf.​​ Figure 2) to​​​‌ perform some fundamental tests‌ and demonstrations of quantum‌​‌ communication advantage, related to​​ fundamental problems such as​​​‌ the Vector in a‌ Subspace 81.

The‌​‌ prospects of this work​​​‌ are very promising: first​ they could lead to​‌ the first experimental demonstration​​ of a exponential communication​​​‌ complexity gap between one-way​ quantum communication and two-way​‌ classical communications and may​​ also open towards the​​​‌ possibility for experimentally robust​ Bell inequality violations 76​‌, with applications for​​ quantum cryptography and also​​​‌ in quantum computing.

3.2.4​ Photonic Noise Correction in​‌ Fault-Tolerant Quantum Systems

In​​ collaboration with Quandela and​​​‌ as part of Katia​ Hakem's CIFRE PhD thesis,​‌ this project aims to​​ develop adaptive fault-tolerant architectures​​​‌ tailored to photonic quantum​ systems. Traditional quantum error​‌ correction (QEC) frameworks often​​ fail to address photonic-specific​​​‌ errors such as photon​ loss, impurity, and distinguishability.​‌ Our approach focuses on​​ accurately modeling the propagation​​​‌ of these errors in​ linear-optical systems and designing​‌ correction protocols that leverage​​ the heralded nature of​​​‌ most photonic errors. By​ integrating feedforward mechanisms, we​‌ seek to optimize resource​​ efficiency and performance. This​​​‌ work is critical not​ only for photonic quantum​‌ computing but also for​​ hybrid and distributed quantum​​​‌ platforms, where photonic links​ are often considered bottleneck​‌ for scalability.

3.2.5 Efficient​​ Generation of Photonic Graph​​​‌ States

Graph states are​ a fundamental resource for​‌ quantum information technologies, enabling​​ advancements in sensing, communication,​​​‌ and computing. This project​ focuses on developing resource-optimized​‌ protocols for generating photonic​​ graph states, with an​​​‌ emphasis on minimizing photon​ and operational overhead. We​‌ will first explore hardware-agnostic​​ heuristics to identify universally​​​‌ applicable generation techniques, then​ specialize these protocols for​‌ photonic systems. By reducing​​ resource demands, this work​​​‌ will accelerate the deployment​ of graph states in​‌ quantum algorithms and fault-tolerant​​ architectures, bridging the gap​​​‌ between theoretical potential and​ experimental feasibility.

3.2.6 Development​‌ of Early-Fault Tolerant Quantum​​ Computing

Current quantum hardware​​​‌ is limited by noise,​ yet full fault tolerance​‌ remains resource-prohibitive. This project​​ explores early-fault tolerant schemes​​​‌ - partial error correction​ strategies that reduce noise​‌ without the overhead of​​ full fault tolerance. By​​​‌ identifying regimes where noise​ is sufficiently suppressed to​‌ enable quantum advantage, we​​ aim to unlock practical​​​‌ applications on near-term devices.​ This approach could serve​‌ as a critical stepping​​ stone, offering tangible benefits​​​‌ in algorithm performance and​ system reliability while paving​‌ the way for fully​​ fault-tolerant quantum computing.

3.3​​​‌ Research axis 3: Mathematical​ foundations of quantum information​‌

Quantum information and computation​​ are built upon the​​​‌ mathematical frameworks of functional​ analysis and information theory.​‌ Developing our understanding of​​ the mathematical underpinnings of​​​‌ these theories can in​ turn lead to new​‌ insights and applications. At​​ Quriosity, one of​​​‌ our aims is to​ explore quantum information theory​‌ through the lens of​​ the underlying mathematics. In​​​‌ a nutshell, we will​ parallelly develop new analytic​‌ and numerical tools for​​ the study of quantum​​​‌ entropic quantities and complex​ quantum systems made of​‌ spin or bosonic degrees​​ of freedom. We will​​​‌ in turn consider these​ systems to design new,​‌ physically motivated models of​​ noise-robust quantum computing.

3.3.1​​​‌ Convex relaxations of quantum​ optimization problems

Convex optimization​‌ concerns the optimization of​​ convex functions over convex​​ sets. This family of​​​‌ optimization problems has several‌ particularly nice properties, including‌​‌ the guarantee of global​​ optima, which makes them​​​‌ particularly appealing from both‌ the perspective of the‌​‌ mathematics and the applications.​​ They are widely applicable​​​‌ to many domains of‌ science but in particular‌​‌ they arise rather naturally​​ in the context of​​​‌ quantum theory as many‌ of the relevant objects‌​‌ (states, channels and measurements)​​ form convex sets.

We​​​‌ will aim to develop‌ and apply techniques in‌​‌ convex optimization theory to​​ problems within quantum information​​​‌ and quantum computing. Recent‌ examples of our work‌​‌ in this area include​​ 56, 57 where​​​‌ we developed semidefinite programming‌ relaxations for entropic optimization‌​‌ problems relevant to device​​ independent cryptography. Continuing this​​​‌ line of research we‌ aim to extend these‌​‌ techniques to other entropic​​ quantities beyond the relative​​​‌ entropy, for instance to‌ the Petz and sandwiched‌​‌ families of Rényi divergences.​​ We also have the​​​‌ ambitious goal of understanding‌ and characterizing what classes‌​‌ of functions, relevant in​​ the context of quantum​​​‌ theory, are amenable to‌ such semidefinite programming approximations.‌​‌ In other words, what​​ optimization problems in quantum​​​‌ information theory and quantum‌ computing can we approximate?‌​‌

A well-known example concerns​​ strengthenings of the monotonicity​​​‌ of the relative entropy‌ under the action of‌​‌ a quantum channel or​​ a Markovian evolution known​​​‌ as strong data processing‌ and modified logarithmic Sobolev‌​‌ inequalities. These fundamental inequalities​​ are known to be​​​‌ hard to prove analytically,‌ even for simple random‌​‌ walks on n-cycles,​​ and convex relaxation techniques​​​‌ were recently successfully used‌ to approximate them 66‌​‌. We are currently​​ collaborating with Omar Fawzi​​​‌ and Daniel Stilck França‌ from QINFO to adapt‌​‌ these numerical tools to​​ the quantum realm. In​​​‌ the future, we will‌ consider extending these tools‌​‌ to the infinite dimensional​​ bosonic setting in order​​​‌ to approach long-standing conjectures‌ such as the entropy‌​‌ photon number inequality 69​​. This research direction​​​‌ will complement analytic approaches‌ presented in Section 3.3.2‌​‌.

3.3.2 Fundamental properties​​ of entropies

Entropies are​​​‌ fundamental quantities in quantum‌ information theory, obtaining operational‌​‌ meanings in terms of​​ rates of various tasks​​​‌ 65. By improving‌ our understanding of these‌​‌ quantities, we can in​​ turn gain new insights​​​‌ into the various applications‌ in which they appear.‌​‌

For example, new chain​​ rules for Rényi entropies​​​‌ 64 led to a‌ versatile framework for cryptographic‌​‌ security proofs 49.​​ The result, known as​​​‌ the entropy accumulation theorem,‌ effectively gives sufficient conditions‌​‌ under which the entropy​​ of a large system​​​‌ can be accurately described‌ by the entropy of‌​‌ its individual systems. At​​ QURIOSITY we aim to​​​‌ understand under which conditions‌ does entropy accumulate in‌​‌ this manner? By understanding​​ the minimal requirements for​​​‌ entropy to accumulate we‌ can understand the minimal‌​‌ requirements under which a​​ randomness based cryptographic protocol​​​‌ functions securely. Moreover, we‌ aim to investigate the‌​‌ connection between the entropy​​ accumulation theorem and the​​​‌ related works of the‌ quantum probability estimation framework‌​‌ 92. This is​​​‌ an alternative method to​ break large entropies down​‌ into smaller quantities and​​ reports several advantages over​​​‌ the entropy accumulation theorem.​ Understanding how advantages from​‌ one technique can be​​ transferred to the other​​​‌ will lead to much​ stronger theoretical results and​‌ would have immediate applications​​ to improve security proofs​​​‌ and rates of cryptographic​ protocols, leading to more​‌ practical technologies.

Other types​​ of decompositions of entropic​​​‌ quantities of interacting complex​ systems into smaller components​‌ involving marginals over subsystems​​ include generalizations of the​​​‌ famous strong subadditivity of​ the relative entropy known​‌ as approximate tensor-stability of​​ the relative entropy. These​​​‌ are at the core​ of most successful methods​‌ for finding the speed​​ of convergence of Gibbs​​​‌ sampling algorithms based on​ the modified logarithmic Sobolev​‌ inequality. In previous work,​​ we successfully extended these​​​‌ notions to the quantum​ realm 68 and applied​‌ them to problems in​​ network quantum information theory​​​‌ 54, 62 and​ open complex quantum systems​‌ 59, 51.​​ Extensions and refinements of​​​‌ these concepts will lead​ to new breakthroughs in​‌ both fields (see Sections​​ 3.3.3 and 3.3.4).​​​‌

3.3.3 Complexity and entanglement​ properties of quantum Gibbs​‌ states

A complexity theoretical​​ definition of the quantum​​​‌ phase of a state​ ψ consists in taking​‌ the vicinity of states​​ which are reachable from​​​‌ ψ after applying a​ local evolution during a​‌ short period of time.​​ A topologically ordered phase​​​‌ has the property that​ the time required to​‌ reach it starting from​​ a trivial (i.e. product)​​​‌ state scales extensively with​ the system size. In​‌ other words, topological order​​ can be described in​​​‌ terms of circuit depth​ lower bounds. The classification​‌ of quantum phases of​​ matter is by now​​​‌ a very well-established field​ with far-reaching applications e.g.​‌ to the construction of​​ good quantum error-correcting codes​​​‌ exploiting the properties of​ topologically ordered phases. However,​‌ a more realistic description​​ of a quantum mechanical​​​‌ system is in terms​ of a finite temperature​‌ Gibbs state describing its​​ thermal equilibrium with a​​​‌ large environment. Despite their​ practical relevance, until recently​‌ Gibbs states were primarily​​ studied by mathematical physicists,​​​‌ and many fundamental questions​ regarding their use in​‌ quantum information processing remain​​ open. We propose to​​​‌ investigate the complexity of​ quantum Gibbs states through​‌ the scope of their​​ finite temperature phase transitions.​​​‌ Additionally to its fundamental​ value, this research direction​‌ will undoubtedly lead to​​ several important practical applications,​​​‌ as described in section​ 3.3.4.

In the​‌ setting of classical Gibbs​​ measures, analogous questions have​​​‌ been intensively studied from​ the perspective of Markov​‌ chain Monte Carlo algorithms​​ (MCMC). On regular lattices,​​​‌ the analysis of the​ speed of convergence of​‌ MCMC for lattice spin​​ systems is by now​​​‌ well-understood through the study​ of correlations at equilibrium.​‌ The generalization to general​​ interaction graphs is still​​​‌ a very active field​ of research in theoretical​‌ computer science, probability theory​​ and mathematical physics 60​​​‌. The problem becomes​ even harder in the​‌ quantum regime, where purely​​ quantum mechanical effects, e.g.​​ long-range entanglement, may cause​​​‌ the quantum Markov chain‌ to slow down in‌​‌ an unpredicted manner. For​​ the important case of​​​‌ commuting interactions, which include‌ most hitherto studied Hamiltonians‌​‌ for the purpose of​​ quantum error-correction, and for​​​‌ physical dynamics generated by‌ the weak coupling of‌​‌ the system with a​​ large environment (Davies dynamics),​​​‌ general results were obtained‌ through spectral methods. However‌​‌ the latter are not​​ powerful enough to distinguish​​​‌ evolutions generating topologically ordered‌ states from rapidly mixing‌​‌ ones. Instead, more involved​​ techniques, e.g. entropic inequalities,​​​‌ are needed. In 53‌, 59, 52‌​‌, 51, we​​ were able to prove​​​‌ rapid mixing by extending‌ one of the most‌​‌ successful classical approaches to​​ prove rapid mixing based​​​‌ on the modified logarithmic‌ Sobolev inequality and the‌​‌ approximate tensor-stability of the​​ relative entropy (cf Section​​​‌ 3.3.2). Extending this‌ novel powerful approach, we‌​‌ plan to conduct a​​ systematic joint study of​​​‌ mixing times and thermal‌ stability of topological quantum‌​‌ order in low lattice​​ dimensions. We will conduct​​​‌ this research in collaboration‌ with Daniel Stilck França‌​‌ from QINFO with whom​​ we co-authored 59.​​​‌ We also see a‌ clear connection with the‌​‌ research focus of Daniel​​ Malz who was recently​​​‌ recruited as a junior‌ professor at Inria Saclay,‌​‌ the mathematical and theoretical​​ condensed matter physicists at​​​‌ CPhT, as well as‌ the team PEIPS at‌​‌ CMAP (X).

3.3.4 Mathematical​​ analysis of quantum memories​​​‌

In parallel to the‌ previous research plan, we‌​‌ will conduct a mathematical​​ analysis on the storage​​​‌ of quantum information and‌ the concept of self-correction‌​‌ in complex quantum systems.​​ Early work on the​​​‌ storage time of candidates‌ of self-correcting quantum memories‌​‌ relied on the connection​​ to the energy barrier​​​‌ of the system, that‌ is the energy the‌​‌ system must reach for​​ a logical error to​​​‌ occur, via an empirical‌ principle called the Arrhenius‌​‌ law. More recently, the​​ energy barrier was rigorously​​​‌ related to spectral properties‌ of the evolution, whereas‌​‌ some no-go theorems showed​​ the impossibility of an​​​‌ exact mathematical formulation of‌ the Arrhenius law. Here‌​‌ instead, we plan to​​ relate the memory lifetime​​​‌ of a device directly‌ to properties of its‌​‌ thermal equilibrium state. We​​ currently work on this​​​‌ research direction in the‌ setting of lattice spin‌​‌ systems with Anthony Leverrier​​ and Ivan Bardet from​​​‌ the team COSMIQ through‌ the development of spectral‌​‌ methods, and plan to​​ extend our framework to​​​‌ lattices with bosonic degrees‌ of freedom in the‌​‌ near future. We also​​ plan to initiate a​​​‌ dialogue with Jean-René Chazottes‌ from CPhT (X) on‌​‌ refinements of our techniques​​ using concentration and entropic​​​‌ inequalities which already proved‌ their usefulness in the‌​‌ study of hitting times​​ of classical Markov chains​​​‌ and their metastability. One‌ of our long–term goals‌​‌ is to find systems​​ with thermally stable entanglement,​​​‌ both stable against thermal‌ fluctuations and robust against‌​‌ local perturbations. Such a​​ theoretical result would be​​​‌ of very high practical‌ interest since experimental implementations‌​‌ are inevitably subject to​​​‌ noise and errors.

3.3.5​ Tomography of complex quantum​‌ systems

As the size​​ of quantum devices continues​​​‌ to increase beyond what​ can be easily simulated​‌ classically, new challenges have​​ appeared concerning the robust​​​‌ and efficient characterization of​ their states. This often​‌ necessitates the preparation and​​ destructive measurement of exponentially​​​‌ many copies of the​ quantum system, as well​‌ as the storage of​​ measurement outcomes in a​​​‌ classical memory. Recently, new​ methods of tomography have​‌ been proposed which precisely​​ leverage this important simplification​​​‌ to develop efficient state​ learning algorithms. One highly​‌ relevant development in this​​ direction is that of​​​‌ classical shadows 72,​ 73. In we​‌ propose a better solution​​ by combining classical shadows​​​‌ with new insights from​ the emerging field of​‌ quantum optimal transport. Our​​ current first step only​​​‌ applies to topologically trivial​ quantum states such as​‌ high-temperature Gibbs states or​​ outputs of shallow quantum​​​‌ circuits, and more effort​ is needed to adapt​‌ and generalize our algorithm​​ to non-trivial phases. We​​​‌ envision three new major​ contributions: First, we will​‌ develop constrained versions of​​ concentration inequalities in order​​​‌ to develop efficient tomography​ algorithms of complex quantum​‌ states, assuming the prior​​ knowledge of their phase.​​​‌ This line of research​ is original even in​‌ the classical setting where​​ works on constrained entropic​​​‌ inequalities only very recently​ appeared in the literature.​‌ The expertise of Jean-René​​ Chazottes from CPhT (X)​​​‌ will prove crucial to​ the success of this​‌ project. Second, we will​​ extend the framework of​​​‌ shadow tomography to CV​ quantum systems. The main​‌ difficulties here are two-fold:​​ first, CV systems are​​​‌ infinite-dimensional in nature, and​ hence some physical constraints​‌ need to be imposed​​ on the states that​​​‌ one can hope to​ learn, such as their​‌ energy. Moreover, the set​​ of measurements (homodyne/heterodyne) available​​​‌ in photonic experiments further​ limits the type of​‌ observables that one can​​ hope to predict. In​​​‌ order to ensure the​ wide applicability of the​‌ method and test the​​ resulting algorithm, we will​​​‌ rely on the already​ established interactions of IQA​‌ with the groups of​​ experimentalists at IP Paris​​​‌ and Saclay, and initiate​ a fruitful dialogue with​‌ start-up like Quandela and​​ Pasqal. In the future,​​​‌ we will use these​ methods to devise hardware-oriented​‌ noise-learning algorithms for many-body​​ systems. For this, we​​​‌ plan to get in​ touch with the experts​‌ on statistical learning among​​ IP Paris, and in​​​‌ particular at LIX.

3.3.6​ Formal tools for higher-order​‌ quantum computation

The theoretical​​ study of quantum computation​​​‌ and its advantages has,​ in the past decade,​‌ opened to a new​​ perspective: higher-order quantum computation,​​​‌ i.e. the way in​ which one can transform​‌ black-box quantum gates by​​ inserting them into computation​​​‌ architectures. This is useful​ to study the ways​‌ in which one can​​ query subroutines in quantum​​​‌ computation, a pratice that​ is bound to become​‌ ubiquitous, for example in​​ delegated quantum computing. The​​​‌ study of higher-order quantum​ computation has already led​‌ to promising as well​​ as disconcerting results, such​​ as about the difficulty​​​‌ of formally defining a‌ quantum version of the‌​‌ computational `if' clause 48​​, or the fact​​​‌ that one might be‌ able to query two‌​‌ unknown gates in a​​ `superposed order of application',​​​‌ using a computation architecture‌ called the quantum switch‌​‌ 63. Using the​​ latter leads to computational​​​‌ advantages for certain tasks‌ 47. However, the‌​‌ mathematical study of higher-order​​ quantum processes quickly encounters​​​‌ thorny formal issues related‌ to their non-trivial compositional‌​‌ structure.

Overcoming these issues​​ would require the development​​​‌ of a specific and‌ robust type system, stipulating‌​‌ which inputs a given​​ higher-order quantum process admits​​​‌ and which output it‌ produces. Despite recent advances‌​‌ 75, currently available​​ type systems are not​​​‌ detailed enough to provide‌ a fully compositional view‌​‌ of higher-order quantum computation.​​ Our work thus focuses​​​‌ on refining them, through‌ the encoding of sectorial‌​‌ structure, i.e. information about​​ how quantum channels behave​​​‌ with respect to certain‌ direct-sum decompositions of their‌​‌ input and output spaces,​​ using the recently developed​​​‌ framework of routed quantum‌ circuits 89, 90‌​‌. Progress in this​​ direction will pave the​​​‌ way to computer manipulation‌ of complex higher-order processes,‌​‌ for instance to numerically​​ optimise the advantage they​​​‌ yield.

3.3.7 Causal structure‌ in quantum theory

Many‌​‌ of the peculiarities of​​ quantum theory can be​​​‌ tracked down to it‌ not matching our classical‌​‌ notion of causal structure​​ 91; this leads​​​‌ to the question of‌ how one could develop‌​‌ a quantum notion of​​ causal structure, on which​​​‌ some progress has been‌ achieved recently 55.‌​‌ Exploring quantum theory from​​ a causal perspective yields​​​‌ potential progress in understanding‌ its structure and potential‌​‌ applications, in particular for​​ the aforementioned higher-order quantum​​​‌ processes, whose performances are‌ directly connected to their‌​‌ causal structure. In that​​ regard, a particularly important​​​‌ conjecture to prove is‌ that of causal decompositions‌​‌77, which puts​​ forward a tentative equivalence​​​‌ between a unitary channel's‌ causal structure (operational data‌​‌ about which of its​​ inputs can affect which​​​‌ of its outputs) and‌ its compositional structure (mathematical‌​‌ data about how it​​ can be written as​​​‌ the composition of sub-channels).‌ If such a conjecture‌​‌ (which has not been​​ proven yet in the​​​‌ general case) were to‌ be true, it would‌​‌ yield a remarkable mathematical​​ lever on the relationship​​​‌ between the operational and‌ formal sides of quantum‌​‌ theory. We investigate this​​ conjecture mathematically with the​​​‌ aim to prove it‌ in more and more‌​‌ general cases; this involves​​ abstract mathematical methods employing​​​‌ C* algebras. More generally,‌ we explore how the‌​‌ latter might provide a​​ useful formal basis for​​​‌ considerations of causality in‌ a quantum context.

4‌​‌ Application domains

Quriosity positions​​ its activity at the​​​‌ - fruitful - frontier‌ between theoretical research in‌​‌ quantum computer science and​​ mathematics, and quantum technology​​​‌ engineering and applications.

We‌ in particular believe that‌​‌ useful quantum inventions and​​ technologies are going to​​​‌ emerge from the current‌ investments in quantum information‌​‌ sciences and technologies, much​​​‌ before large scale (and​ error corrected) quantum computers​‌ can be built.

Our​​ research programs opens in​​​‌ particular towards such perspective,​ on different aspects:

  • The​‌ development of more efficient​​ and higher security quantum​​​‌ cryptographic protocols.
  • The ability​ to leverage quantum cryptography​‌ principles and tecnnologies to​​ strengthen hardware security.
  • The​​​‌ design of cost-effective quantum​ communications systems that can​‌ tightly integrated into modern​​ communication infrastructures, making them​​​‌ widely deployable.
  • The design​ of better quantum memories​‌ and therefore larger quantum​​ computer as well as​​​‌ quantum networks.

5 Social​ and environmental responsibility

5.1​‌ Footprint of research activities​​

Quriosity members are individually,​​​‌ and collectively making efforts​ to reduce their carbon​‌ footprint, in particular by​​ taking the plane much​​​‌ less than before the​ Covid period. Augustin Vanrietvelde​‌ and Peter Brown will​​ moreover act as carbon​​​‌ footprint delegates for Quriosity​, and report to​‌ a working group at​​ LTCI level, whose objective​​​‌ will be to increase​ the global awareness on​‌ carbon footprint, and steer​​ the discussions to help​​​‌ decide on collective regulatory​ measures.

5.2 Impact of​‌ research results

Scientific publication​​

Quriosity aims at publishing​​​‌ high-impact papers in high​ profile journals such as​‌ Nature, Science, Physical Review,​​ Quantum, IEEE Transactions on​​​‌ Information Theory, as well​ as top conferences in​‌ our field such as​​ QIP, QCrypt, TQC as​​​‌ well as Crypto, EuroCrypt,​ CHES.

Innovation

Telecom Paris​‌ currently holds 5 granted​​ patents: 3 on hybrid​​​‌ quantum computational cryptography (axis​ 3.1) and 2​‌ on quantum coherent communications​​ (axis 3.2). We​​​‌ plan to patent technological​ innovations, including foundamental proposals​‌ for which we see​​ a clear implementation route​​​‌ and possible exploitation paths.​

Teaching

  Quriosity intends to​‌ play a vigorous role​​ in the training of​​​‌ the future generation of​ quantum engineers and researchers.​‌ In collaboration with the​​ QuACs Inria team (CentraleSupélec​​​‌ and UPSaclay) and the​ PhiQus Inria team (Ecole​‌ Polytechnique), Quriosity (Telecom Paris-Inria)​​ is coordinating the new​​​‌ M2 master program QMI​ (Quantique, Mathematiques, Informatique) that​‌ has been launched at​​ IP Paris level in​​​‌ september 2025, and is​ the first master program​‌ centered on mathematical and​​ CS aspects of quantum​​​‌ research and technology.

6​ Highlights of the year​‌

  • Successful opening of the​​ Master Program QMI (Quantique,​​​‌ Mathématiques, Informatique), coordinated by​ Telecom Paris/ Quriosity, in​‌ collaboration with Ecole Polytechnique,​​ CentraleSupelec and Université Paris-Saclay​​​‌ with a first cohort​ of 17 students.
  • Cambyse​‌ Rouzé invited to give​​ a tutorial on quantum​​​‌ Gibbs sampling at QIP​ 2025.
  • The team has​‌ obtained remarkable results with​​ 7 submitted papers accepted​​​‌ as regular talks at​ the conference QIP 2026:​‌
    • Causal decompositions of 1D​​ quantum cellular automata: Augustin​​​‌ Vanrietvelde, Octave Mestoudjian, Pablo​ Arrighi Heisenberg-limited Hamiltonian learning​‌ continuous variable systems via​​ engineered dissipation: Tim Möbus,​​​‌ Andreas Bluhm, Tuvia Gefen,​ Yu Tong, Albert H.​‌ Werner, Cambyse Rouzé
    • Efficient​​ Learning Algorithms for Structured​​​‌ Bosonic and Fermionic Unitary​ Operators: Marco Fanizza, Vishnu​‌ Iyer, Junseo Lee, Antonio​​ A. Mele, Francesco A.​​​‌ Mele
    • The NPA hierarchy​ does not always attain​‌ the commuting operator value:​​ Marco Fanizza, Larissa Kroell,​​ Arthur Mehta, Connor Paddock,​​​‌ Denis Rochette, William Slofstra,‌ Yuming Zhao
    • Non-iid hypothesis‌​‌ testing: from classical to​​ quantum: Giacomo De Palma,​​​‌ Marco Fanizza, Ryan O'Donnell,‌ Connor Mowry
    • Quantum Gibbs‌​‌ states are locally Markov:​​ Chi-Fang (Anthony) Chen, Cambyse​​​‌ Rouzé
    • Merge:
      • Complexity of‌ mixed Schatten norms of‌​‌ quantum maps: Jan Kochanowski,​​ Omar Fawzi, Cambyse Rouzé​​​‌
      • Computational aspects of the‌ trace norm contraction coefficient:‌​‌ Idris Delsol, Omar Fawzi,​​ Jan Kochanowski, Akshay Ramachandran​​​‌

7 Latest software developments,‌ platforms, open data

7.1‌​‌ Latest software developments

7.1.1​​ Ket.jl

  • Name:
    Ket.jl: Toolbox​​​‌ for quantum information, nonlocality‌ and entanglement
  • Keywords:
    Julia‌​‌ programming language, Quantum Information​​
  • Functional Description:
    Ket.jl is​​​‌ a toolbox for quantum‌ information, nonlocality and entanglement‌​‌ written in the Julia​​ programming language.
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Peter Johnson Brown‌
  • Partners:
    Universidad de Valladolid,‌​‌ University of Siegen, Zuse​​ Institute Berlin

7.2 Open​​​‌ data

8 New results‌

8.1 Research axis 1:‌​‌ Quantum cryptography complexity and​​ hardware frontiers

8.1.1 Computational​​​‌ models in quantum cryptography‌

Participants: Romain Alléaume,‌​‌ Peter Brown, Francesco​​ Mazzoncini, Tristan Nemoz​​​‌, Błażej Kuzaka,‌ Jeanne Lucas.

We‌​‌ investigate how computational assumptions​​ can be leveraged quantum​​​‌ cryptographic protocols that keep‌ a strict security advantage,‌​‌ with respect to classical​​ (computational) cryptography, while also​​​‌ allowing to obtain performances‌ and properties that go‌​‌ beyond quantum cryptography in​​ the plain model. To​​​‌ this end we have‌ proposed a key distribution‌​‌ protocol in the so-called​​ Quantum Computational Timelock model,​​​‌ whose security can be‌ based on communication complexity‌​‌ gap between classical and​​ quantum communication 8.​​​‌ In collaboration with LKB‌ (team of Sylvain Gigan)‌​‌ we also proposed a​​ first experimental demonstration of​​​‌ quantum versus classical communicaton‌ two-way complexity advantage.

In‌​‌ the context of the​​ PhD of Tristan Nemoz,​​​‌ we have focused on‌ the mathematical structure and‌​‌ applications of quantum pseudorandom​​ states (PRS), and established​​​‌ a lower bound on‌ the distinguishing probabability between‌​‌ any real-valued PRS and​​ a family of Haar-random​​​‌ states 35. We‌ wrote a general audience‌​‌ article on hybridization of​​ classical and quantum cryptography​​​‌ 5. In parallel,‌ we investigate how PRS‌​‌ security definition could be​​ translated to the practically​​​‌ motivated context of bosonic‌ coherent states (and hence‌​‌ implementable using existing quantum​​ communication systems), and study​​​‌ how to design and‌ prove the security of‌​‌ a key exchange protocol​​ based on PRS, in​​​‌ the QCT model.

8.1.2‌ New results for device-independent‌​‌ cryptography

Participants: Lewis Wooltorton​​, Peter Brown,​​​‌ Roger Colbeck, Thomas‌ Hahn, Ernest Tan‌​‌, Bora Ulu,​​ Nicolas Brunner, Mirjam​​​‌ Weilenmann, Costantino Budroni‌, Miguel Navascués,‌​‌ Aby Philip.

In​​ 30 we develop tight​​​‌ analytical solutions to the‌ finite-size key-rate problem of‌​‌ device-independent cryptography. This vastly​​ simplifies the security proof​​​‌ whilst also improving the‌ achievable rates.

In 14‌​‌ we developed new methods​​ to build multipartite Bell​​​‌ inequalities that certify maximal‌ randomness demonstrating the limits‌​‌ of multipartite device-independent randomness​​ generation. In 15 we​​​‌ solved an open problem‌ recently posed for device-independent‌​‌ conference key agreement protocols,​​​‌ showing that genuinely multipartite​ entanglement is not necessary​‌ to generate secret key​​ – weakening the requirements​​​‌ of these protocols.

We​ have furthermore proposed a​‌ technique to turn setups​​ that do not allow​​​‌ us to prove positive​ key rates for DI-QKD​‌ into setups that do​​ 10. These techniques​​​‌ are based on classical​ pre- and post-processing of​‌ data and can thus​​ in principle be straightforwardly​​​‌ applied to data from​ implementations of current protocols.​‌

In addition, we have​​ proved results on the​​​‌ vulnearbility of protocols in​ networks against memory attacks​‌ 12. This restricts​​ the network topologies in​​​‌ which self-testing and communication​ protocols with quantum advantages​‌ are practically feasible without​​ imposing an i.i.d. assumption.​​​‌

8.2 Research axis 2:​ Multimode photonic systems for​‌ quantum information processing and​​ communications

8.2.1 Quantum Coherent​​​‌ Communication and Digital Signal​ Processing

Participants: Romain Alléaume​‌, Gjuillaume Ricard,​​ Nicolas Fabre, Thomas​​​‌ Pousset, Yves Jaouën​, Matteo Schiavon,​‌ Jeanne Lucas, Shivang​​ Srivastava.

In 38​​​‌ we have shown how​ shot noise calibration can​‌ be optimally performed in​​ CV-QKD given some knowledge​​​‌ on the receiver noise​ spectral decomposition.

In 9​‌, we have developped​​ a quantized theory of​​​‌ Kramers-Krönig coherent detection and​ illustrated how it can​‌ be used in quantum​​ communications but also applied​​​‌ to single-photon tomography. We​ are now investigating the​‌ impact of digital signal​​ processing on quantum communications.​​​‌

We moreover contributed to​ the review article 41​‌, accepted for publication​​ in Review of Modern​​​‌ Physcis, writing the section​ on CV-QKD certification.

8.2.2​‌ Quantum Networking

Participants: Romain​​ Alléaume, Thomas Rivera​​​‌, Pierre-Enguerrand Verdier.​

In 11, we​‌ have studied how time​​ multiplexing could be beneficially​​​‌ used as a mean​ to perform long-distance discrete​‌ variable QKD in coexistence​​ with classical communications.

8.2.3​​​‌ Learning bosonic channels

Participants:​ Marco Fanizza, Vishnu​‌ Iyer, Junseo Lee​​, Antonio A. Mele​​​‌, Francesco A. Mele​.

We have initiated​‌ the study of finite-sample​​ size learning of black-box​​​‌ bosonic channels. We considered​ the problem of learning​‌ a Gaussian unitary on​​ m modes and derived​​​‌ rigorous guarantees on the​ number of queries needed​‌ to learn the process​​ accurately in the energy​​​‌ constrained diamond norm distance,​ which is a physically​‌ motivated metric. The algorithm​​ uses only Gaussian operations.​​​‌ In particular, we show​ that with access to​‌ probes of arbitrarily high​​ energy, it is possible​​​‌ to learn the unitary​ with 2m+​‌2 queries at any​​ precision 24.

8.2.4​​​‌ Adaptive Syndrome Extraction Based​ on Heralded Gates

Participants:​‌ Ha Cong Nguyen,​​ Paul Hilaire.

The​​​‌ goal of this project​ is to leverage heralded​‌ errors in fault-tolerant quantum​​ computing to enhance performance.​​​‌ By dynamically reconfiguring quantum​ circuits using classical information​‌ about photonic errors, we​​ exploit these errors more​​​‌ effectively. Our approach is​ applicable to all CSS​‌ codes and has demonstrated​​ a significant improvement in​​​‌ fault-tolerant thresholds. Specifically, it​ achieves over a 20%​‌ increase in the fault-tolerant​​ threshold for the surface​​ code under a circuit-level​​​‌ noise model, while substantially‌ reducing resource requirements. A‌​‌ paper detailing these results​​ is currently in preparation.​​​‌

8.2.5 Comparison of Fusion-Based‌ and Spin-Optical Quantum Computing‌​‌ Architectures Under Photonic Error​​ Models

Participants: Katia Hakem​​​‌, Stephen Wein,‌ Paul Hilaire.

The‌​‌ objective of this project​​ is to compare the​​​‌ efficiency of existing photonic‌ fault-tolerant architectures and photonic‌​‌ sources in terms of​​ error correction performance. We​​​‌ have developed a general‌ strategy to address both‌​‌ distinguishability errors and photon​​ loss. This work includes​​​‌ the first comprehensive performance‌ assessment of distinguishability errors‌​‌ in fusion-based quantum computing.​​ Our findings reveal performance​​​‌ differences of up to‌ an order of magnitude,‌​‌ depending on the specific​​ photonic source and architecture​​​‌ used. A paper presenting‌ these results is currently‌​‌ in preparation.

8.3 Research​​ axis 3: Mathematical foundations​​​‌ of quantum information

8.3.1‌ Causal models in quantum‌​‌ theory

Participants: Augustin Vanrietvelde​​, Seonghun Jung,​​​‌ Pablo Arrighi, Octave‌ Mestoudjian.

We are‌​‌ investigating the relationship (and​​ in particular the potential​​​‌ equivalence) between the causal‌ structure of quantum dynamics‌​‌ and their compositional structure.​​ In 43, we​​​‌ presented an important proof,‌ showing that this equivalence‌​‌ holds in a general​​ and important case that​​​‌ of one-dimensional quantum cellular‌ automata. This is based‌​‌ on a general theory​​ of partitions of quantum​​​‌ systems, which we concurrently‌ developed.

8.3.2 Quantum reference‌​‌ frames and compositionality

Participants:​​ Augustin Vanrietvelde, Guilhem​​​‌ Doat.

We are‌ investigating quantum reference frames,‌​‌ in which a system's​​ physical quantities are described​​​‌ with respect to those‌ of a reference, potentially‌​‌ superposed, other system. In​​ doat2025, we proposed a​​​‌ clarification and analysis of‌ the conceptual differences between‌​‌ existing frameworks for describing​​ quantum reference frames, and​​​‌ proposed an operational argument‌ discriminating between these approaches.‌​‌ We are currently working​​ on an analysis and​​​‌ resolution of the paradox‌ of the third particle,‌​‌ a problem arising in​​ the context of these​​​‌ approaches.

8.3.3 Learning complex‌ quantum states

Participants: Marco‌​‌ Fanizza, Cambyse Rouzé​​, Daniel Stilck França​​​‌, James D Watson‌, Tim Möbus,‌​‌ Andreas Bluhm, Matthia​​ C Caro, Giacomo​​​‌ De Palma, Connor‌ Mowry, Ryan O'Donnell‌​‌.

In 67,​​ we initiated the problem​​​‌ of learning the time-dependent‌ evolution of a locally‌​‌ interacting n-qubit system on​​ a graph of effective​​​‌ dimension D using only‌ preparation of product Pauli‌​‌ eigenstates, evolution under the​​ time-dependent generator for given​​​‌ times, and measurements in‌ product Pauli bases. These‌​‌ results provide a scalable​​ tool to verify state-preparation​​​‌ procedures (e.g. adiabatic protocols)‌ and characterize time-dependent noise‌​‌ in quantum devices. In​​ 36 we have considered​​​‌ the problem of testing‌ if the average of‌​‌ an unknown non-iid product​​ state is equal or​​​‌ far from a a‌ target known state, showing‌​‌ that the same performance​​ of the iid case​​​‌ is attainable, also improving‌ analogous results in the‌​‌ classical case. In our​​ analysis, we introduce a​​​‌ quantum generalization of the‌ Efron-Stein inequality.

8.3.4 Complexity‌​‌ of quantum Gibbs states​​​‌

Participants: Ivan Bardet,​ Ángela Capel, Li​‌ Gao, Daniel Stilck​​ França, Angelo Lucia​​​‌, David Peres-García,​ Cambyse Rouzé, Jan​‌ Kochanowski, Alvaro Alhambra​​, Paul Gondolf,​​​‌ Simone Warzel, Sebastian​ Stengele.

We have​‌ kept on working on​​ the complexity of Gibbs​​​‌ sampling algorithms. In 84​, 83, we​‌ proved the first general​​ polynomial runtime bounds for​​​‌ such Gibbs samplers at​ high enough temperature. Our​‌ methods were recently extended​​ to Fermionic Hamiltonians at​​​‌ any temperature, including temperatures​ at which the Gibbs​‌ states are entangled and​​ where no concurrent classical​​​‌ method is currently known​ for the task of​‌ approximating physical properties. In​​ 61, we prove​​​‌ limitations of these algorithms​ by finding a randomized​‌ classical algorithm to compute​​ the log-partition function of​​​‌ weakly interacting fermions with​ polynomial runtime in both​‌ the system size and​​ precision.

Next, we will​​​‌ further investigate the connections​ between sampling and computing​‌ physical properties of quantum​​ many-body systems at thermal​​​‌ equilibrium. More precisely, we​ will focus on proving​‌ lower bounds on known​​ classical algorithms for the​​​‌ latter in parameter ranges​ for which our samplers​‌ converge in polynomial time.​​ We will also study​​​‌ encodings of specific quantum​ algorithms into Gibbs samplers​‌ with the goal of​​ finding better robustness of​​​‌ the latter against standard​ noise models. Extensions to​‌ infinite dimensional systems such​​ as quantum continuous variables​​​‌ will also be considered.​

8.3.5 Development of a​‌ Quantum Error Correction Simulation​​ Framework

Participants: Maxime Garnier​​​‌, Paul Hilaire.​

This project aims to​‌ develop advanced simulation tools​​ for quantum error correction.​​​‌ The framework is designed​ to handle fault-tolerant gates​‌ and adaptive fault-tolerant circuits,​​ such as those used​​​‌ in the adaptive syndrome​ extraction project. It is​‌ continuously evolving to accommodate​​ further developments and offers​​​‌ versatility for a wide​ range of applications in​‌ quantum error correction research.​​ It will be publicly​​​‌ released soon.

8.3.6 Adaptations​ of quantum theory and​‌ how to distinguish them​​ experimentally

Participants: Mirjam Weilenmann​​​‌, Nicolas Gisin,​ Pavel Sekatski, Kuntal​‌ Sengupta, Roger Colbeck​​.

Generalised probabilistic theories​​​‌ are a way to​ understand quantum theory and​‌ its properties in a​​ more general formalism and​​​‌ to understand how deviations​ from it affect the​‌ physical observations we make.​​ We have performed works​​​‌ on comparing quantum theory​ to other such theories,​‌ most notably quantum theory​​ over real Hilbert spaces​​​‌ 13, where we​ showed a difference between​‌ this theory and its​​ complex analogue even under​​​‌ restricted source-independence, refining the​ result from 82.​‌ Our work further proposes​​ a hierarchy of semi​​​‌ definite programs that include​ a partial source independence​‌ contraint, which may be​​ of independent interest.

In​​​‌ addition, we have compared​ the correlations obtainable from​‌ quantum systems with those​​ from another family of​​​‌ theories that lack a​ specific relabelling symmetry 39​‌. We proved that​​ quantum theory outperforms these​​​‌ theories in network experiments.​

8.3.7 Random purification of​‌ states and channels and​​ applications

Participants: Marco Fanizza​​, Senrui Chen,​​​‌ Filippo Girardi, Ludovico‌ Lami, Francesco A.‌​‌ Mele, Haimeng Zhao​​.

The result of​​​‌ 80 greatly simplified the‌ analysis of optimal tomography‌​‌ by deriving a channel​​ that converts copies of​​​‌ a mixed state into‌ copies of the same‌​‌ random purification. We are​​ are exploring extensions of​​​‌ this idea in bosonic‌ systems, where we derived‌​‌ a random purification channel​​ for passive Gaussian states​​​‌ 33, and for‌ channels, were we introduced‌​‌ a random Stinespring dilation​​ supermap for parallel queries,​​​‌ giving an explicit efficient‌ circuit to implement it‌​‌ 28. We are​​ currently working on extending​​​‌ the Gaussian purification to‌ general Gaussian state and‌​‌ the channel dilation to​​ the adaptive setting.

9​​​‌ Bilateral contracts and grants‌ with industry

Participants: Romain‌​‌ Alléaume, Paul Hilaire​​.

9.1 Bilateral contracts​​​‌ with industry

Orange Innovation‌

CIFRE with Orange Innovation‌​‌ (Chatillon) on Discrete Variable​​ Quantum Key Distribution and​​​‌ Time Multiplexing, PhD Student:‌ Pierre-Enguerrand Verdier.

9.2 Grants‌​‌ with industry

Paris Region​​ PhD Grant, collaboration with​​​‌ Quandela

Doctoral project of‌ Guillaume Ricard, on Quatum‌​‌ Coherent Communications and Digital​​ Signal Processing, Funded by​​​‌ Paris funded by Paris‌ Region (region Ile-de France)‌​‌ in the context of​​ the Paris Region PhD​​​‌ call, with a planned‌ collaboration with Quandela on‌​‌ noise mitigation in optical​​ coherent quantum communications.

CIFRE​​​‌ PhD Grant, collaboration with‌ Quandela

Doctoral project of‌​‌ Katia Hakem, on fault-tolerant​​ quantum computation with photonic​​​‌ hardware-constraints model, funded by‌ ANRT.

10 Partnerships and‌​‌ cooperations

10.1 International research​​ visitors

10.1.1 Visits of​​​‌ international scientists

Artymowicz Adam‌

  • Status
    PhD
  • Institution of‌​‌ origin
    Caltech
  • Country
    USA​​
  • Dates
    3rd February -​​​‌ 7th February
  • Context of‌ visit
    Visiting Cambyse Rouzé‌​‌
  • Type of mobility
    Research​​ visit, talk

Zaw Lin​​​‌ Htoo

  • Status
    PhD
  • Institution‌ of origin
    Singapore Centre‌​‌ for Quantum Technologies
  • Country​​
    Singapore
  • Dates
    7th April​​​‌ - 11th April
  • Context‌ of visit
    Visiting Mirjam‌​‌ Weilenmann
  • Type of mobility​​
    Research visit, talk

Scalet​​​‌ Samuel

  • Status
    PhD
  • Institution‌ of origin
    University of‌​‌ Cambridge
  • Country
    UK
  • Dates​​
    February - April
  • Context​​​‌ of visit
    Visiting Cambyse‌ Rouzé
  • Type of mobility‌​‌
    Research visit, talk

Budroni​​ Constantino

  • Status
    Professor
  • Institution​​​‌ of origin
    University of‌ Pisa
  • Country
    Italy
  • Dates‌​‌
    2nd June - 6th​​ June
  • Context of visit​​​‌
    Visiting Mirjam Weilenmann
  • Type‌ of mobility
    Research visit,‌​‌ talk

Navascues Miguel

  • Status​​
    Research Group Leader
  • Institution​​​‌ of origin
    IQOQI Vienna‌
  • Country
    Austria
  • Dates
    2nd‌​‌ June - 6th June​​
  • Context of visit
    Visiting​​​‌ Mirjam Weilenmann
  • Type of‌ mobility
    Research visit, talk‌​‌

Lumbreras Josep

  • Status
    PhD​​
  • Institution of origin
    National​​​‌ University of Singapore
  • Country‌
    Singapore
  • Dates
    2nd September‌​‌
  • Context of visit
    Seminar​​ Talk
  • Type of mobility​​​‌
    Research visit, talk

Hahn‌ Thomas

  • Status
    PhD
  • Institution‌​‌ of origin
    Weizmann Institute​​
  • Country
    Israel
  • Dates
    10th​​​‌ November - 14th November‌
  • Context of visit
    Visiting‌​‌ Jan Kochanowski
  • Type of​​ mobility
    Research visit, talk​​​‌

Angrisani Armando

  • Status
    Postdoc‌
  • Institution of origin
    EPFL‌​‌ Lausanne
  • Country
    Switzerland
  • Dates​​
    1st December - 5th​​​‌ December
  • Context of visit‌
    Visiting team
  • Type of‌​‌ mobility
    Research visit, talk​​​‌

Ulu Bora

  • Status
    PhD​
  • Institution of origin
    University​‌ of Geneva
  • Country
    Switzerland​​
  • Dates
    November - December​​​‌
  • Context of visit
    Visiting​ Mirjam Weilenmann
  • Type of​‌ mobility
    Research visit, talk​​

10.2 European initiatives

10.2.1​​​‌ Horizon Europe

Quantum Secure​ Network Partnership

Participants: Romain​‌ Alléaume, Peter Brown​​, Nicolas Fabre,​​​‌ Guillaume Ricard, Yves​ Jaouën, Tristan Nemoz​‌, Thomas Pousset.​​

  • Partner Institutions:

    The Quantum​​​‌ Secure Networks Partnership (QSNP)​ aims at creating a​‌ sustainable European ecosystem in​​ quantum cryptography and communication.​​​‌ Its 42 partners are​ world-leading academic groups, research​‌ and technology organizations (RTOs),​​ quantum component and system​​​‌ spin-offs, cybersecurity providers, integrators,​ and telecommunication operators. The​‌ Partnership thus has the​​ expertise in all technology​​​‌ development phases, from new​ designs to field deployment,​‌ making it ideal to​​ carry out the future​​​‌ Specific Grant Agreement (SGA)​ projects.

    1. ICFO-The Institute of​‌ Photonic Sciences, Spain, (Coordinator)​​
    2. Centre National de la​​​‌ Recherche Scientifique, France
    3. Institut​ Polytechnique de Paris, France​‌
    4. Technical University of Denmark,​​ Denmark
    5. Universidad Politécnica de​​​‌ Madrid, Spain
    6. Friedrich-Alexander University​
    7. Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
    8. QuTech, at​‌ the Technical
    9. University Delft,​​ Netherlands
    10. Università di Padova,​​​‌ Italy
    11. AIT Austrian Institute​ of Technology, Austria
    12. Palacky​‌ University Olomouc, Czech Rep.​​
    13. Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal​​​‌
    14. Universidade de Vigo, Spain​
    15. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium​‌
    16. Universität Wien, Austria
    17. Université​​ libre de Bruxelles, Belgium​​​‌
    18. University of Warsaw, Poland​
    19. University of Malta, Malta​‌
    20. Institute of Communications and​​ Computer Systems, Greece
    21. Universität​​​‌ Paderborn, Germany
    22. Inria Cosmiq​ team, France
    23. National and​‌ Kapodistrian University of Athens​​ (NKUA),Greece
    24. Instituto De Telecomunicacoes,​​​‌ Portugal
    25. Politecnico di Bari,​ Italy,
    26. Fraunhofer Heinrich-Hertz-Institut, Germany​‌
    27. Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique​​ et aux Energies Alternatives,​​​‌ France
    28. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven,​ Netherland
    29. Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre,​‌ Belgium
    30. University College Cork,​​ Ireland
    31. QuSide, Spain
    32. LuxQuanta,​​​‌ Spain
    33. Micro Photon Devices,​ Italy
    34. ThinkQuantum, Italy
    35. VPIphotonics​‌ GmbH, Germany
    36. Alea Quantum​​ Technologies ApS, Denmark
    37. Q*Bird,​​​‌ Nertherlands
    38. Cryptonext Security, France​
    39. Nokia Bell Labs, France​‌
    40. Nextworks, Italy
    41. Deutsche Telekom,​​ Germany
    42. Telefónica, Spain
    43. TIM​​​‌ S.p.A, Italy
    44. Orange SA,France​
  • Contract ID:
    QSNP, HORIZON-CL4-2022-QUANTUM-04-SGA​‌
  • Information on the contract​​
    Information on the Contract:​​​‌ Special Grant Agreement in​ the context of a​‌ Federated Grant Agreement related​​ to the Quantum Communications​​​‌ Pillar of the European​ Quantum Technology Flagship.
  • Duration:​‌
    March 2023 – Dec​​ 2026
  • Description:
    The Quantum​​​‌ Secure Networks Partnership (QSNP)​ is structured around three​‌ main Science and Technology​​ (ST) pillars. The first​​​‌ two pillars, “Next Generation​ Protocols” and “Integration”, focus​‌ on frontier research and​​ innovation led mostly by​​​‌ academic partners and RTOs.​ The third ST pillar​‌ “Use cases and Applications”​​ aims at expanding the​​​‌ industrial and economic impact​ of QSN technologies and​‌ is mostly driven by​​ companies. In order to​​​‌ achieve the specific objectives​ within each pillar and​‌ ensure that know-how transfer​​ and synergy between them​​​‌ are coherent and effective,​ QSNP has established ST​‌ activities corresponding to the​​ three main layers of​​​‌ the technology value chain,​ “Components and Systems”, “Networks”​‌ and “Cryptography and Security”.​​ Future SGA projects will​​​‌ be able to efficiently​ rely on this framework,​‌ in such a way​​ that the ultimate objective​​ of developing quantum communication​​​‌ technology for critical European‌ infrastructures, such as EuroQCI,‌​‌ and private information and​​ communication market sectors, will​​​‌ be achieved. QSNP will‌ contribute to achieving European‌​‌ sovereignty in quantum technology​​ for cybersecurity. At the​​​‌ same time, it will‌ generate significant economic benefits‌​‌ to the whole society,​​ including training a new​​​‌ generation of scientists and‌ engineers, and the creation‌​‌ of high-tech jobs in​​ the rapidly growing quantum​​​‌ industry.
  • Role of Quriosity‌:
    Quriosity has important‌​‌ participations on Quantum Coherent​​ Communications System Design (WP2),​​​‌ Theory of Quantum Cryptography‌ and in particular on‌​‌ Device-Independent Quantum Crypography (WP3),​​ Hybrid Quantum-Computational Cryptography (WP4​​​‌ and WP6).
    • Romain Alléaume‌ leads one of the‌​‌ 3 pillars of the​​ project, devoted to Integration​​​‌ (at hardware, middleware and‌ cryptographic applications levels) and‌​‌ is member of the​​ Executive Board of QSNP​​​‌
    • Romain Alléaume leads WP6‌ on Quantum and Classical‌​‌ Cryptography Integration.
    • Romain Alléaume​​ leads IP Paris contribution​​​‌ to WP4 on Quantum‌ Cryptographic Protocols beyond QKD.‌​‌
    • Peter Brown leads IP​​ Paris contribution to WP3​​​‌ on Device-Independent QKD and‌ QRNG.
    • Several teams from‌​‌ IP Paris participates to​​ the project: Quriosity, GTO,​​​‌ C2 at Telecom Paris‌ and GRACE at LIX/Ecole‌​‌ Polytechnique.

10.2.2 Digital Europe​​

FranceQCI

Participants: Romain Alléaume​​​‌, Peter Brown,‌ Guillaume Ricard, Tristan‌​‌ Nemoz, Thomas Pousset​​.

  • Partner Institutions:
    1. Orange​​​‌ SA,France (Coordinator)
    2. Institut-Mines-Telecom (IMT),‌ France
    3. Airbus Defense and‌​‌ Space, France
    4. Thales SIX,​​ France
    5. CryptoNext Security, France​​​‌
    6. CNRS, France
    7. Thales Alenia‌ Space, France
    8. CNRS Université‌​‌ Cote d'Azur, France
    9. Sorbonne​​ Université, France
    10. WeLinQ SAS,​​​‌ France
    11. VeriQloud, France
    12. Direction‌ des Services de la‌​‌ Navigation Aérienne, DSNA, France​​
  • Contract ID:
    Project: 101091675​​​‌ — FranceQCI — DIGITAL-2021-QCI-01‌
  • Duration:
    January 2023 –‌​‌ Dec 2025
  • Description:
    The​​ objective of the project​​​‌ is to test use‌ cases of quantum communication‌​‌ technologies and to deploy​​ advanced national quantum systems​​​‌ with existing communication networks‌ in support of national‌​‌ QCI initiatives.
  • Role of​​ Quriosity:
    Quriosity, represented​​​‌ as IMT, contributes to‌ network design and deployment‌​‌ (WP2), to security studies​​ (WP3), and leads the​​​‌ activity on training (WP7)‌ by coordinating the first‌​‌ executive education training offfer​​ (in France) on quantum​​​‌ communication and cryptography, in‌ collaboration with Sorbonne University‌​‌ and Orange Innovation.

10.3​​ National initiatives

PEPR QCommTestbed​​​‌

Participants: Romain Alléaume,‌ Peter Brown, Nicolas‌​‌ Fabre, Yves Jaouën​​, Tristan Nemoz,​​​‌ Thomas Pousset.

  • Partner‌ Institutions:
    1. Institut-Mines-Telecom (IMT), France‌​‌
    2. CNRS Université Cote d'Azur,​​ France
    3. Sorbonne Université, France​​​‌
    4. CEA Leti, France
    5. C2N,‌ France
    6. Université Paris-Cité, France‌​‌
  • Contract ID:
    PC 4.3​​ « QCommTestbed » (Quantum​​​‌ communication testbeds)
  • Duration:
    01/07/2022‌ – 30/06/2027
  • Description:
    The‌​‌ objective of the QcommTestbed​​ project is to lay​​​‌ the foundations for fiber‌ optic and free-space quantum‌​‌ networks on a regional​​ and longer-term national scale,​​​‌ making it possible to‌ connect systems including quantum‌​‌ elements (transmitters and receivers,​​ processors, sensors) via repeater​​​‌ nodes. The project also‌ aims to make decisive‌​‌ advances in the TRL​​ of quantum communication systems,​​​‌ and also in their‌ security evaluation and testing,‌​‌ to pave the way​​​‌ for their wider adoption​ and ubiquituous deployment.
  • Role​‌ of Quriosity:
    • Demonstration​​ of ITS secure communication​​​‌ over a single fiber,​ based on joint CV-QKD​‌ and classical communication integration.​​
    • Performance and Cost of​​​‌ Long-Term Secure Storage based​ on CV-QKD
    • Vulnerability analysis​‌ of a QKD (VAN)​​ system. Definition of an​​​‌ evaluation methodology (based on​ the Common Criteria.
    • Experimental​‌ Demonstration of Mulimode Frequency-encoded​​ Key Distribution in the​​​‌ QCT model
HQI –​ Hybrid Quantum Initiative

Participants:​‌ Cambyse Rouzé, Paul​​ Hilaire.

  • Partner Institutions:​​​‌
    1. Inria, France
    2. CNRS, France​
    3. CEA, France
  • Contract ID:​‌
    ANR-22- PNCQ-0002
  • Duration:
    2023​​ – 2028
  • Description:
    the​​​‌ HQI iniative aims at​ developing a hybrid computing​‌ platform, interconnecting classical HPC​​ systems with quantum devices,​​​‌ seen as accelerators. It​ will be available for​‌ an international community bringing​​ together laboratories, start-ups and​​​‌ industries. The goal is​ to make it easier​‌ for them to access​​ quantum computing, to identify,​​​‌ develop and test new​ use case. The research​‌ program is led by​​ CEA and Inria, supported​​​‌ by GENCI and France​ Universités. Endowed with a​‌ €36M budget, it aims​​ at developing a programming​​​‌ and compilation software stack​ for hybrid computing, including​‌ libraries for specific business​​ (healthcare, chemistry, finance, etc)​​​‌ or transversal (Machine Learning,​ optimization, etc) applications.
  • Role​‌ of Quriosity:
    • Coordination​​ of Work Package 5​​​‌ on characterization and correction​ of noise in hybrid​‌ quantum systems.
    • Development of​​ theoretical and experimental methodologies​​​‌ for noise identification, modeling,​ and mitigation in quantum​‌ communication and hybrid quantum​​ platforms.
    • Contribution to cross-platform​​​‌ benchmarking and validation protocols.​
    • Design and integration of​‌ a library of early​​ fault-tolerant quantum error-correcting codes​​​‌ adapted to noisy intermediate-scale​ and hybrid quantum architectures.​‌

11 Dissemination

11.1 Promoting​​ scientific activities

11.1.1 Scientific​​​‌ events: organisation

Member of​ the organizing committees
  • Paul​‌ Hilaire: Member of the​​ local organizing committee of​​​‌ QEC 2027, Paris.
  • Mirjam​ Weilenmann: Member of the​‌ organizing committee of the​​ workshop "Quantum Correlations and​​​‌ Measurements" 2026, Les Diablerets​ (CH).
  • Romain Alléaume: Member​‌ of the organization committee​​ of the MAQI Summer​​​‌ School (Mathematical Aspects of​ Quantum Information), 2025, Gif-sur-Yvette.​‌

11.1.2 Scientific events: selection​​

Member of the conference​​​‌ program committees
  • Mirjam Weilenmann:​ Member of the program​‌ committee of QPL 2025.​​
  • Cambyse Rouzé: Member of​​​‌ the program committee of​ QIP 2026.
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde:​‌ Member of the program​​ committee of QPL 2025.​​​‌
Reviewer
  • Peter Brown for​ BIID, ISIT and QCrypt​‌
  • Mirjam Weilenmann for QIP,​​ AQIS, BIID,
  • Marco Fanizza​​​‌ f or QIP
  • Romain​ Alléaume for QCNC, ISIT​‌

11.1.3 Journal

Reviewer -​​ reviewing activities
  • Peter Brown​​​‌ for Nature, Nature Communications​ in Physics and Quantum​‌
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde for PRL​​ and Quantum
  • Mirjam Weilenmann​​​‌ for PRA, Nature Communications​ and Nature Physics
  • Marco​‌ Fanizza for PRL, PRX​​ Quantum, Quantum, IEEE Transactions​​​‌ on Information Theory
  • Romain​ Alleaume for Nature Communications,​‌ Quantum, PRL.

11.1.4 Invited​​ talks

  • Peter Brown. Invited​​​‌ Tutorial at Mathematical Aspects​ of Quantum Information Summer​‌ School, Paris-Saclay. Title: Randomness,​​ entropy and accumulation.
  • Peter​​​‌ Brown. Invited Tutorial at​ Young Quantum Information Scientists​‌ Conference, Barcelona. Title: Device-independent​​ cryptography.
  • Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited​​ tutorial at the Mathematics​​​‌ and Physics of Quantum‌ Computing and Quantum Learning,‌​‌ Porquerolles. Title: Quantum Correlations.​​
  • Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited tutorial​​​‌ at the Mathematical Aspects‌ of Quantum Information summer‌​‌ school, Institut Pascal, Université​​ Paris Saclay. Title: Network​​​‌ non-locality.
  • Mirjam Weilenmann: Invited‌ talk at 15th annual‌​‌ conference on relativistic quantum​​ information (north), Naples, June​​​‌ 2025. Title: Monogamy relations‌ for relativistically causal correlations.‌​‌
  • Cambyse Rouzé: Invited tutorial​​ at QIP 2025, Raleigh,​​​‌ February 2025. Title: Quantum‌ Gibbs sampling.
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde:‌​‌ Invited talk at QISS​​ 2025, Vienna, Qpril 2025.​​​‌ Title: Fighting for a‌ cause.
  • Marco Fanizza: Invited‌​‌ tutorial at 1st AIMS​​ Workshop and School on​​​‌ The Theory of Quantum‌ Learning Algorithms, AIMS, Cape‌​‌ Town, South Africa, Nov​​ 2025. Title: Tutorial on​​​‌ Quantum state certification and‌ quantum tomography.
  • Marco Fanizza:‌​‌ Invited talk 6th Nottingham​​ Workshop on Quantum Non-Equilibrium​​​‌ Dynamics, University of Nottingham,‌ UK, Oct 2025. Title:‌​‌ Modelling and learning finitely​​ correlated states.
  • Romain Alléaume:​​​‌ Invited talk at the‌ Workshop on Entanglement Assisted‌​‌ Communication Networks (EACN), September​​ 10 to 12 at​​​‌ EURECOM, Sophia Antipolis. Title:‌ Quantum cryptography from decoherence‌​‌ and short-term computational assumptions​​ .

11.1.5 Leadership within​​​‌ the scienific community

  • Romain‌ Alléaume as member of‌​‌ the ANR CE47 committee​​ on Quantum Technologies
  • Romain​​​‌ Alléaume as member of‌ QSNP Executive board
  • Romain‌​‌ Alléaume as member of​​ the QuantiP bureau, for​​​‌ the Quantum Communication axis.‌
  • Romain Alléaume as Rapporteur,‌​‌ for the Quantum PEPR​​ scientific workshop (Cryptography and​​​‌ Quantum Networks).

11.1.6 Scientific‌ expertise

  • Peter Brown as‌​‌ grant reviewer
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde​​ as reviewer for various​​​‌ grants
  • Romain Alléaume as‌ grant reviewer

11.1.7 Research‌​‌ administration

  • Peter Brown as​​ member of the LTCI​​​‌ council.
  • Peter Brown as‌ référent mobilité.
  • Romain Alléaume‌​‌ as member for the​​ Quantum-Saclay Comex.
  • Romain Alléaume​​​‌ as member of the‌ Step2 steering committee.
  • Romain‌​‌ Alléaume as member of​​ the conseil du LTCI.​​​‌
  • Romain Alléaume as member‌ of the PhD Track‌​‌ Quantum Science and Technology​​ committee.

11.2 Teaching -​​​‌ Supervision - Juries -‌ Educational and pedagogical outreach‌​‌

11.2.1 Teaching

L3 courses​​
  • Peter Brown, Augustin Vanrietvelde,​​​‌ Jan Kochanowski, Tristan Nemoz,‌ Guilhem Doat. A quantum‌​‌ hackathon. 16 hetd, 24​​ students.
  • Romain Alléaume, Quantum​​​‌ Physics, 12 hetd,  200‌ students (for 3 lectures),‌​‌ or 24 students (for​​ 4 TDs).
M1 courses​​​‌
  • Peter Brown, Augustin Vanrietvelde,‌ Romain Alléaume. An introduction‌​‌ to quantum information and​​ quantum computing. 31.5 hetd,​​​‌ 30 students.
  • Peter Brown.‌ Continuous optimisation and numerical‌​‌ analysis. 31.5 hetd. 30​​ students.
M2 courses
  • Peter​​​‌ Brown, Cambyse Rouzé. Quantum‌ Shannon Theory. 39 hetd,‌​‌ 17 students.
  • Mirjam Weilenmann,​​ Peter Brown, Cambyse Rouzé,​​​‌ Augustin Vanrietvelde, Marco Fanizza,‌ Paul Hilaire, Guilhem Doat.‌​‌ A crash course for​​ QMI. 88.5 hetd, 17​​​‌ students.
  • Romain Alléaume, Paul‌ Hilaire. Quantum hardware for‌​‌ the theorist. 22.5 hetd.​​ 15 students.
  • Marco Fanizza,​​​‌ Cambyse Rouzé. Quantum Complex‌ quantum systems. 39 hetd,‌​‌ 13 students.
  • Romain Alléaume,​​ Quantum Cryptography (QEng program),​​​‌ 20 hetd, 7 students.‌
Project courses
  • Peter Brown.‌​‌ Artishow – A python​​ implementation of semidefinite relaxations​​​‌ for polynomial optimisation. (4‌ students working 180 hours)‌​‌ 30 hetd.

11.2.2 Supervision​​​‌

PhD students
  • Peter Brown​ (50%) and Cambyse Rouzé​‌ (50%), PhD supervision of​​ Ali Almasi.
  • Cambyse Rouzé​​​‌ (50%), PhD supervision of​ Jan Kochanowski.
  • Romain Alléaume​‌ (50%) and Peter Brown​​ (50%), PhD supervision of​​​‌ Tristan Nemoz.
  • Romain Alléaume​ (50%) and Nicolas Fabre​‌ (50%), PhD supervision of​​ Thomas Pousset
  • Romain Alléaume​​​‌ (50%) and Yves Jaouen​ (50%), PhD supervision of​‌ Guillaume Ricard
  • Romain Alléaume​​ (20%) and Thomas River​​​‌ (80%), PhD supervision of​ Pierre Enguerrand.
  • Augustin Varietvelde​‌ (75%) and Romain Alléaume​​ (25%), PhD supervision of​​​‌ Guilhem Doat
  • Paul Hilaire​ (50%) , PhD direction​‌ of Katia Hakem
  • Mirjam​​ Weilenmann (100%), PhD supervision​​​‌ of Marco Pompili.
Master's​ students
  • Peter Brown (100%),​‌ Internship supervision of Dorian​​ Arnold (6 months).
  • Peter​​​‌ Brown (100%), Internship supervision​ of Gustavo Froes Do​‌ Vale (3 months).
  • Peter​​ Brown (100%), Supervisor of​​​‌ PhD-track student Ali Almasi.​
  • Paul Hilaire (100%), Internship​‌ supervision of Ha Cong​​ NGuyen (6 months).
  • Mirjam​​​‌ Weilenmann (100%), Internship supervision​ of Olgierd Zurek (2.5​‌ months).
  • Mirjam Weilenmann (100%),​​ Supervisor of PhD-track student​​​‌ Golshan Lirabi.
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde​ (100%), supervisor of Seonghun​‌ Jung (5 months).
  • Augustin​​ Vanrietvelde (100%), supervisor of​​​‌ Nicolas Moulonguet (5 months).​
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde (100%), supervisor​‌ of Cynthia El Akoum​​ (2.5 months).
  • Marco Fanizza​​​‌ (50%), supervisor of Enrique​ Escobar Fernández-Marcote (Master's thesis​‌ at University of COpenhagen).​​
  • Romain Alléaume (100%), supervisor​​​‌ of Tom Guerinel (3​ months).

11.2.3 Juries

Recruitment​‌ Juries
  • Romain Alléaume member​​ of the jury for​​​‌ the Inria CRCN/ISFP 2025​ campaign, Inria Lyon.
  • Romain​‌ Alléaume member of the​​ hiring commmittee for the​​​‌ Maître de conférences position​ entitled "Quantum Communication Systems​‌ and Networks", LIP6, Sorbonne​​ Université, May 23 2025.​​​‌
PhD Juries
  • Peter Brown,​ PhD examiner of Carlos​‌ Pascual-García, ICFO Barcelona.
  • Mirjam​​ Weilenmann, PhD examiner of​​​‌ Pierre Botteron, Université de​ Toulouse.
  • Cambyse Rouzé, PhD​‌ examiner of Tony Metger,​​ ETH Zurich.
  • Cambyse Rouzé,​​​‌ PhD examiner of Matthijs​ Vernooij, TU Delft.
  • Augustin​‌ Vanrietvelde, PhD examiner of​​ Anne-Catherine de la Hamette,​​​‌ IQOQI Vienna.
  • Romain Alléaume,​ PhD rapporteur of Verena​‌ Yacoub, LIP6, Sorbonne Université.​​
  • Romain Alléaume, HDR Examiner​​​‌ of Amirhossein Ghassiedi, Nokia,​ July 2025.
Comité de​‌ Suivi (CSI)
  • Peter Brown,​​ CSI member of Basile​​​‌ Buffin, LTCI, Telecom Paris.​
  • Peter Brown, CSI member​‌ of Alexis Rosio, LIP6,​​ Sorbonne University.
  • Paul Hilaire,​​​‌ CSI member of Bruno​ Costa Alves Freire, COSMIQ,​‌ Inria Paris/ Pasqal
  • Cambyse​​ Rouzé, CSI member of​​​‌ Elie Bermot, Pasqal &​ IRIF.
  • Cambyse Rouzé, CSI​‌ member of Tigran Sedrakyan,​​ LIP6.
  • Augustin Vanrietvelde, CSI​​​‌ member of Dogukan Bakircioglu,​ LMF.
  • Romain Alléaume, CSI​‌ member of CSI member​​ of Nguyen Dinh Duy​​​‌ (supervisor, Hieu Phan), LTCI.​
  • Romain Alléaume, CSI member​‌ of Antoine Urban (supervisor​​ Matthieu Rambaud), LTCI.
  • Romain​​​‌ Alléaume, CSI member of​ Manon Hugenot (supervisor Eleni​‌ Diamanti, LIP6).
  • Romain Alléaume,​​ CSI member of Jinwei​​​‌ Zheng (supervisor, Hieu Phan),​ LTCI.
PhD Grant Juries​‌
  • Paul Hilaire: QuantEdu grant​​ jury member.
  • Paul Hilaire:​​​‌ Seminars in two high​ schools on quantum computing​‌ (in the context of​​ CNRS's "Année du quantique"​​​‌ program)

12 Scientific production​

12.1 Major publications

  • 1​‌ miscÁ.Ángela Capel​​, P.Paul Gondolf​​, J.Jan Kochanowski​​​‌ and C.Cambyse Rouzé‌. Quasi-optimal sampling from‌​‌ Gibbs states via non-commutative​​ optimal transport metrics.​​​‌2024HALDOI
  • 2‌ miscF.Francesco Mazzoncini‌​‌, B.Balthazar Bauer​​, P.Peter Brown​​​‌ and R.Romain Alléaume‌. Hybrid Quantum Cryptography‌​‌ from Communication Complexity.​​November 2023HAL
  • 3​​​‌ articleG.Giacomo de‌ Palma, M.Milad‌​‌ Marvian, C.Cambyse​​ Rouzé and D.Daniel​​​‌ Stilck Franca. Limitations‌ of variational quantum algorithms:‌​‌ a quantum optimal transport​​ approach.PRX Quantum​​​‌4January 2023,‌ 010309HALDOI
  • 4‌​‌ miscL.Lewis Wooltorton​​, P.Peter Brown​​​‌ and R.Roger Colbeck‌. Device-independent quantum key‌​‌ distribution with arbitrarily small​​ nonlocality.September 2023​​​‌HAL

12.2 Publications of‌ the year

International journals‌​‌

International peer-reviewed conferences

Conferences without proceedings​​​‌

  • 18 inproceedingsO.Omar​ Fawzi, J.Jan​‌ Kochanowski, C.Cambyse​​ Rouzé and T.Thomas​​​‌ van Himbeeck. Additivity​ and chain rules for​‌ quantum entropies via multi-index​​ Schatten norms.TQC​​​‌ 2025 - Theory of​ Quantum Computation, Communication and​‌ CryptographyBangalore, India2025​​HAL

Reports & preprints​​​‌

Other​​ scientific publications

  • 45 article​​​‌P.Peter Brown.​ Cheat-proof random numbers generated​‌ from quantum entanglement.​​Nature6428069June​​​‌ 2025, 875-876HAL​DOI

12.3 Cited publications​‌

  • 46 inproceedingsS.Scott​​ Aaronson and A.Alex​​​‌ Arkhipov. The computational​ complexity of linear optics​‌.Proceedings of the​​ forty-third annual ACM symposium​​​‌ on Theory of computing​2011, 333--342back​‌ to text
  • 47 article​​M.Mateus Araújo,​​​‌ F.Fabio Costa and​ Ċ.Ċaslav Brukner.​‌ Computational advantage from quantum-controlled​​ ordering of gates.​​​‌Physical review letters113​252014, 250402​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 48 articleM.Mateus​​​‌ Araújo, A.Adrien​ Feix, F.Fabio​‌ Costa and Ċ.Ċaslav​​ Brukner. Quantum circuits​​​‌ cannot control unknown operations​.New Journal of​‌ Physics1692014​​, 093026DOIback​​​‌ to text
  • 49 article​R.Rotem Arnon-Friedman,​‌ F.Frédéric Dupuis,​​ O.Omar Fawzi,​​​‌ R.Renato Renner and​ T.Thomas Vidick.​‌ Practical device-independent quantum cryptography​​ via entropy accumulation.​​​‌Nature communications91​2018, 459back​‌ to text
  • 50 article​​R.Raphaël Aymeric,​​​‌ Y.Yves Jaouën,​ C.Cédric Ware and​‌ R.Romain Alléaume.​​ Symbiotic joint operation of​​​‌ quantum and classical coherent​ communications.arXiv preprint​‌ arXiv:2202.069422022back to​​ text
  • 51 articleI.​​​‌Ivan Bardet, Á.​Ángela Capel, L.​‌Li Gao, A.​​Angelo Lucia, D.​​​‌David Pérez-García and C.​Cambyse Rouzé. Entropy​‌ decay for Davies semigroups​​ of a one dimensional​​​‌ quantum lattice.arXiv​ preprint arXiv:2112.006012021back​‌ to textback to​​ text
  • 52 articleI.​​Ivan Bardet, Á.​​​‌Ángela Capel, L.‌Li Gao, A.‌​‌Angelo Lucia, D.​​David Pérez-García and C.​​​‌Cambyse Rouzé. Rapid‌ thermalization of spin chain‌​‌ commuting Hamiltonians.arXiv​​ preprint arXiv:2112.005932021back​​​‌ to text
  • 53 article‌I.Ivan Bardet,‌​‌ Á.Ángela Capel and​​ C.Cambyse Rouzé.​​​‌ Approximate Tensorization of the‌ Relative Entropy for Noncommuting‌​‌ Conditional Expectations.Annales​​ Henri Poincaré231​​​‌2021, 101--140back‌ to text
  • 54 article‌​‌I.Ivan Bardet,​​ M.Marius Junge,​​​‌ N.Nicholas Laracuente,‌ C.Cambyse Rouzé and‌​‌ D. S.Daniel Stilck​​ França. Group Transference​​​‌ Techniques for the Estimation‌ of the Decoherence Times‌​‌ and Capacities of Quantum​​ Markov Semigroups.IEEE​​​‌ Transactions on Information Theory‌6752021,‌​‌ 2878-2909DOIback to​​ text
  • 55 articleJ.​​​‌Jonathan Barrett, R.‌Robin Lorenz and O.‌​‌Ognyan Oreshkov. Quantum​​ causal models.DOI​​​‌back to text
  • 56‌ articleP.Peter Brown‌​‌, H.Hamza Fawzi​​ and O.Omar Fawzi​​​‌. Computing conditional entropies‌ for quantum correlations.‌​‌Nature communications121​​2021, 1--12back​​​‌ to textback to‌ text
  • 57 articleP.‌​‌Peter Brown, H.​​Hamza Fawzi and O.​​​‌Omar Fawzi. Device-independent‌ lower bounds on the‌​‌ conditional von Neumann entropy​​.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13692​​​‌2021back to text‌back to text
  • 58‌​‌ articleY.Yin Cai​​, J.Jonathan Roslund​​​‌, G.Giulia Ferrini‌, F.Francesco Arzani‌​‌, X.X Xu​​, C.Claude Fabre​​​‌ and N.Nicolas Treps‌. Multimode entanglement in‌​‌ reconfigurable graph states using​​ optical frequency combs.​​​‌Nature communications81‌2017, 1--9back‌​‌ to text
  • 59 article​​Á.Ángela Capel,​​​‌ C.Cambyse Rouzé and‌ D. S.Daniel Stilck‌​‌ França. The modified​​ logarithmic Sobolev inequality for​​​‌ quantum spin systems: classical‌ and commuting nearest neighbour‌​‌ interactions, (QIP talk, presented​​ at ICMP).arXiv:2009.11817​​​‌2020back to text‌back to textback‌​‌ to text
  • 60 inproceedings​​Z.Zongchen Chen,​​​‌ K.Kuikui Liu and‌ E.Eric Vigoda.‌​‌ Optimal Mixing of Glauber​​ Dynamics: Entropy Factorization via​​​‌ High-Dimensional Expansion.Proceedings‌ of the 53rd Annual‌​‌ ACM SIGACT Symposium on​​ Theory of ComputingSTOC​​​‌ 2021New York, NY,‌ USAVirtual, ItalyAssociation‌​‌ for Computing Machinery2021​​, 1537?1550URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451035​​​‌DOIback to text‌
  • 61 articleH.Hongrui‌​‌ Chen, C.Cambyse​​ Rouzé, J.Jielun​​​‌ Chen, J.Jiaqing‌ Jiang, S. O.‌​‌Samuel O Scalet,​​ Y.Yongtao Zhan,​​​‌ G. K.Garnet Kin‌ Chan, L.Lexing‌​‌ Ying and Y.Yu​​ Tong. Convergence of​​​‌ the Cumulant Expansion and‌ Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Weakly‌​‌ Interacting Fermions.arXiv​​ preprint arXiv:2512.120102025back​​​‌ to text
  • 62 article‌H.-C.Hao-Chung Cheng,‌​‌ N.Nilanjana Datta and​​ C.Cambyse Rouzé.​​​‌ Strong Converse Bounds in‌ Quantum Network Information Theory‌​‌.IEEE Transactions on​​ Information Theory674​​​‌2021, 2269-2292DOI‌back to text
  • 63‌​‌ articleG.Giulio Chiribella​​​‌, G. M.Giacomo​ Mauro D’Ariano, P.​‌Paolo Perinotti and B.​​Benoit Valiron. Quantum​​​‌ computations without definite causal​ structure.Physical Review​‌ A8822013​​, 022318DOIback​​​‌ to text
  • 64 article​F.Frédéric Dupuis,​‌ O.Omar Fawzi and​​ R.Renato Renner.​​​‌ Entropy accumulation.Communications​ in Mathematical Physics379​‌2020, 1--47back​​ to text
  • 65 article​​​‌P.Philippe Faist.​ The Entropy Zoo.​‌https://phfaist.com/entropyzooback to text​​
  • 66 articleO.Oisín​​​‌ Faust and H.Hamza​ Fawzi. Sum-of-Squares proofs​‌ of logarithmic Sobolev inequalities​​ on finite Markov chains​​​‌.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04988​2021back to text​‌
  • 67 articleD. S.​​Daniel Stilck França,​​​‌ T.Tim Möbus,​ C.Cambyse Rouzé and​‌ A. H.Albert H​​ Werner. Learning and​​​‌ certification of local time-dependent​ quantum dynamics and noise​‌.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08500​​2025back to text​​​‌
  • 68 articleL.Li​ Gao and C.Cambyse​‌ Rouzé. Complete Entropic​​ Inequalities for Quantum Markov​​​‌ Chains.Archive for​ Rational Mechanics and Analysis​‌2451may 2022​​, 183--238URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-022-01785-1​​​‌DOIback to text​
  • 69 inproceedingsS.Saikat​‌ Guha, B. I.​​Baris I. Erkmen and​​​‌ J. H.Jeffrey H.​ Shapiro. The Entropy​‌ Photon-Number Inequality and its​​ consequences.2008 Information​​​‌ Theory and Applications Workshop​2008, 128-130DOI​‌back to text
  • 70​​ articleT. A.Thomas​​​‌ A Hahn and E.-Z.​ Y.Ernest Y-Z Tan​‌. Fidelity Bounds for​​ Device-Independent Advantage Distillation.​​​‌arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.032132021​back to text
  • 71​‌ articleA.Antoine Henry​​, R.Ravi Raghunathan​​​‌, G.Guillaume Ricard​, B.Baptiste Lefaucher​‌, F.Filippo Miatto​​, N.Nadia Belabas​​​‌, I.Isabelle Zaquine​ and R.Romain Alléaume​‌. Parallelizable Synthesis of​​ Arbitrary Single-Qubit Gates with​​​‌ Linear Optics and Time-Frequency​ Encoding.Physical Review​‌ A1076June​​ 2023, 062610HAL​​​‌DOIback to text​
  • 72 articleH.-Y.Hsin-Yuan​‌ Huang, R.Richard​​ Kueng and J.John​​​‌ Preskill. Predicting many​ properties of a quantum​‌ system from very few​​ measurements.Nature Physics​​​‌1610June 2020​, 1050--1057URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 73 articleH.-Y.Hsin-Yuan​​​‌ Huang, R.Richard​ Kueng, G.Giacomo​‌ Torlai, V. V.​​Victor V Albert and​​​‌ J.John Preskill.​ Provably efficient machine learning​‌ for quantum many-body problems​​.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12627​​​‌2021back to text​
  • 74 articleK.Kikuchi​‌ Kazuro. Fundamentals of​​ Coherent Optical Fiber Communications​​​‌.in Journal of​ Lightwave Technology vol. 34,​‌ N¬∞12016back to​​ text
  • 75 articleA.​​​‌Aleks Kissinger and S.​Sander Uijlen. A​‌ categorical semantics for causal​​ structure.Logical Methods​​​‌ in Computer ScienceVolume​ 15, Issue 32019​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 76 articleS.Sophie​​​‌ Laplante, M.Mathieu​ Laurière, A.Alexandre​‌ Nolin, J.Jérémie​​ Roland and G.Gabriel​​​‌ Senno. Robust Bell​ inequalities from communication complexity​‌.Quantum22018​​, 72back to​​ text
  • 77 articleR.​​​‌Robin Lorenz and J.‌Jonathan Barrett. Causal‌​‌ and compositional structure of​​ unitary transformations.Quantum​​​‌52021, 511‌DOIback to text‌​‌
  • 78 unpublishedF.Francesco​​ Mazzoncini, B.Balthazar​​​‌ Bauer, P.Peter‌ Brown and R.Romain‌​‌ Alléaume. Hybrid Quantum​​ Cryptography from Communication Complexity​​​‌.December 2023,‌ working paper or preprint‌​‌HALback to text​​
  • 79 articleD.DP​​​‌ Nadlinger, P.P‌ Drmota, B.BC‌​‌ Nichol, G.G​​ Araneda, D.D​​​‌ Main, R.R‌ Srinivas, D.DM‌​‌ Lucas, C.CJ​​ Ballance, K.K​​​‌ Ivanov, E.E‌ Tan and others.‌​‌ Device-independent quantum key distribution​​.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14600​​​‌2021back to text‌
  • 80 miscA.Angelos‌​‌ Pelecanos, J.Jack​​ Spilecki, E.Ewin​​​‌ Tang and J.John‌ Wright. Mixed state‌​‌ tomography reduces to pure​​ state tomography.2025​​​‌, URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15806back‌ to text
  • 81 inproceedings‌​‌O.Oded Regev and​​ B.Bo'az Klartag.​​​‌ Quantum one-way communication can‌ be exponentially stronger than‌​‌ classical communication.Proceedings​​ of the forty-third annual​​​‌ ACM symposium on Theory‌ of computing2011,‌​‌ 31--40back to text​​
  • 82 articleM.-O.Marc-Olivier​​​‌ Renou, D.David‌ Trillo, M.Mirjam‌​‌ Weilenmann, T. P.​​Thinh P Le,​​​‌ A.Armin Tavakoli,‌ N.Nicolas Gisin,‌​‌ A.Antonio Acín and​​ M.Miguel Navascués.​​​‌ Quantum theory based on‌ real numbers can be‌​‌ experimentally falsified.Nature​​60078902021,​​​‌ 625--629back to text‌
  • 83 articleC.Cambyse‌​‌ Rouzé, D. S.​​Daniel Stilck França and​​​‌ Á. M.Álvaro M‌ Alhambra. Optimal quantum‌​‌ algorithm for Gibbs state​​ preparation.arXiv preprint​​​‌ arXiv:2411.048852024back to‌ text
  • 84 articleC.‌​‌Cambyse Rouzé, D.​​Daniel Stilck França,​​​‌ E.Emilio Onorati and‌ J. D.James D‌​‌ Watson. Efficient learning​​ of ground and thermal​​​‌ states within phases of‌ matter.Nature Communications‌​‌1512024,​​ 7755back to text​​​‌
  • 85 articleD.Davide‌ Rusca, T.Thomas‌​‌ Van Himbeeck, A.​​Anthony Martin, J.​​​‌ B.Jonatan Bohr Brask‌, W.Weixu Shi‌​‌, S.Stefano Pironio​​, N.Nicolas Brunner​​​‌ and H.Hugo Zbinden‌. Self-testing quantum random-number‌​‌ generator based on an​​ energy bound.Physical​​​‌ Review A1006‌2019, 062338back‌​‌ to text
  • 86 article​​E.-Z. Y.Ernest Y-Z​​​‌ Tan, R.René‌ Schwonnek, K. T.‌​‌Koon Tong Goh,​​ I. W.Ignatius William​​​‌ Primaatmaja and C.-W. C.‌Charles C-W Lim.‌​‌ Computing secure key rates​​ for quantum cryptography with​​​‌ untrusted devices.npj‌ Quantum Information71‌​‌2021, 1--6back​​ to text
  • 87 article​​​‌E.-Z. Y.Ernest Y-Z‌ Tan, P.Pavel‌​‌ Sekatski, J.-D.Jean-Daniel​​ Bancal, R.René​​​‌ Schwonnek, R.Renato‌ Renner, N.Nicolas‌​‌ Sangouard and C.-W. C.​​Charles C-W Lim.​​​‌ Improved DIQKD protocols with‌ finite-size analysis.arXiv‌​‌ preprint arXiv:2012.087142020back​​​‌ to text
  • 88 article​A.Armin Tavakoli.​‌ Semi-device-independent framework based on​​ restricted distrust in prepare-and-measure​​​‌ experiments.Physical Review​ Letters126212021​‌, 210503back to​​ text
  • 89 articleA.​​​‌Augustin Vanrietvelde, H.​Hlér Kristjánsson and J.​‌Jonathan Barrett. Routed​​ quantum circuits.Quantum​​​‌5Jul 2021,​ 503DOIback to​‌ text
  • 90 articleA.​​Augustin Vanrietvelde, N.​​​‌Nick Ormrod, H.​Hlér Kristjánsson and J.​‌Jonathan Barrett. Consistent​​ circuits for indefinite causal​​​‌ order.6 2022​back to text
  • 91​‌ articleC. J.Christopher​​ J Wood and R.​​​‌ W.Robert W Spekkens​. The lesson of​‌ causal discovery algorithms for​​ quantum correlations: causal explanations​​​‌ of Bell-inequality violations require​ fine-tuning.New Journal​‌ of Physics173​​March 2015, 033002​​​‌URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033002DOIback​ to text
  • 92 article​‌Y.Yanbao Zhang,​​ H.Honghao Fu and​​​‌ E.Emanuel Knill.​ Efficient randomness certification by​‌ quantum probability estimation.​​Physical review research2​​​‌12020, 013016​back to text
  • 93​‌ articleW.Wei Zhang​​, T.Tim van​​​‌ Leent, K.Kai​ Redeker, R.Robert​‌ Garthoff, R.Rene​​ Schwonnek, F.Florian​​​‌ Fertig, S.Sebastian​ Eppelt, V.Valerio​‌ Scarani, C.-W. C.​​Charles C-W Lim and​​​‌ H.Harald Weinfurter.​ Experimental device-independent quantum key​‌ distribution between distant users​​.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00575​​​‌2021back to text​back to text
  1. 1​‌DI-QKD stand for Device-Independent​​ Quantum Key Distribution