EN FR
EN FR

2025Activity report​​Project-TeamGEOMERIX

RNSR: 202224337M​​​‌

Creation​​​‌ of the Project-Team: 2022​ September 01

Each year,​‌ Inria research teams publish​​ an Activity Report presenting​​​‌ their work and results​ over the reporting period.​‌ These reports follow a​​ common structure, with some​​​‌ optional sections depending on​ the specific team. They​‌ typically begin by outlining​​ the overall objectives and​​​‌ research programme, including the​ main research themes, goals,​‌ and methodological approaches. They​​ also describe the application​​​‌ domains targeted by the​ team, highlighting the scientific​‌ or societal contexts in​​ which their work is​​​‌ situated.

The reports then​ present the highlights of​‌ the year, covering major​​ scientific achievements, software developments,​​​‌ or teaching contributions. When​ relevant, they include sections​‌ on software, platforms, and​​ open data, detailing the​​​‌ tools developed and how​ they are shared. A​‌ substantial part is dedicated​​ to new results, where​​​‌ scientific contributions are described​ in detail, often with​‌ subsections specifying participants and​​ associated keywords.

Finally, the​​​‌ Activity Report addresses funding,​ contracts, partnerships, and collaborations​‌ at various levels, from​​ industrial agreements to international​​​‌ cooperations. It also covers​ dissemination and teaching activities,​‌ such as participation in​​ scientific events, outreach, and​​​‌ supervision. The document concludes​ with a presentation of​‌ scientific production, including major​​ publications and those produced​​​‌ during the year.

Keywords​

Computer Science and Digital​‌ Science

  • A5.5. Computer graphics​​
  • A5.5.1. Geometrical modeling
  • A5.5.4.​​​‌ Animation
  • A6.1.4. Multiscale modeling​
  • A6.1.5. Multiphysics modeling
  • A6.2.5.​‌ Numerical Linear Algebra
  • A6.2.6.​​ Optimization
  • A6.2.8. Computational geometry​​​‌ and meshes
  • A6.5.1. Solid​ mechanics
  • A6.5.2. Fluid mechanics​‌
  • A8.3. Geometry, Topology
  • A8.7.​​ Graph theory
  • A8.12. Optimal​​​‌ transport
  • A9.2. Machine learning​
  • A9.2.1. Supervised learning
  • A9.2.2.​‌ Unsupervised learning
  • A9.2.4. Optimization​​ and learning
  • A9.2.6. Neural​​​‌ networks

Other Research Topics​ and Application Domains

  • B9.2.2.​‌ Cinema, Television
  • B9.2.3. Video​​ games
  • B9.5.1. Computer science​​​‌
  • B9.5.2. Mathematics
  • B9.5.3. Physics​
  • B9.5.5. Mechanics
  • B9.5.6. Data​‌ science

1 Team members,​​ visitors, external collaborators

Research​​​‌ Scientists

  • Steve Oudot [​Team leader, INRIA​‌, Senior Researcher,​​ HDR]
  • Jiong Chen​​​‌ [INRIA, Researcher​]
  • Mathieu Desbrun [​‌INRIA, Senior Researcher​​]
  • Pooran Memari [​​​‌CNRS, Researcher,​ HDR]
  • Maksims Ovsjanikovs​‌ [LIX, Senior​​ Researcher, HDR]​​​‌

Post-Doctoral Fellows

  • Mark Gillespie​ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​‌ Fellow]
  • Bingchen Gong​​ [Ecole Polytechnique]​​​‌
  • Antoine Guédon [Ecole​ Polytechnique]
  • David Loiseaux​‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​​ Fellow]
  • Emery Pierson​​​‌ [Ecole Polytechnique]​

PhD Students

  • Nasim Bagheri​‌ Shouraki [IP PARIS​​]
  • Aude Bouille [​​​‌INRIA, from Oct​ 2025]
  • Theo Braune​‌ [ECOLE POLY PALAISEAU​​]
  • Lucas Brifault [​​​‌DASSAULT SYSTEMES, from​ May 2025]
  • Emilien​‌ Ganier [ECOLE POLY​​ PALAISEAU, from Oct​​ 2025]
  • Julien Gaubil​​​‌ [INRIA, from‌ Sep 2025]
  • Diego‌​‌ Gomez [Ecole Polytechnique​​]
  • Souhail Hadgi [​​​‌ECOLE POLY PALAISEAU]‌
  • Tamara Kunzle [Sorbonne‌​‌ University]
  • Jingyi Li​​ [IP PARIS]​​​‌
  • Leopold Maillard [DASSAULT‌ SYSTEMES]
  • Nissim Maruani‌​‌ [INRIA, Co-advised​​ with Pierre Alliez (Inria​​​‌ Sophia-Antipolis)]
  • Marceau Michel‌ [SHOM, co-advised‌​‌ with Romain Billot (IMT​​ Atlantique)]
  • Julie Mordacq​​​‌ [Ministère Armées,‌ from Sep 2025]‌​‌
  • Julie Mordacq [Ministère​​ Armées, until Aug​​​‌ 2025]
  • Theo Prosper‌ [ECOLE POLY PALAISEAU‌​‌, from Oct 2025​​]
  • Ramana Sundararaman [​​​‌Ecole Polytechnique, until‌ Apr 2025]
  • Erkan‌​‌ Turan [Ecole Polytechnique​​]

Interns and Apprentices​​​‌

  • Octave Mortain [ENS‌ PARIS, Intern,‌​‌ from Apr 2025 until​​ Jun 2025]
  • Theo​​​‌ Prosper [INRIA,‌ Intern, from Apr‌​‌ 2025 until Jul 2025​​]
  • Shu Yang [​​​‌INRIA, Intern,‌ from Mar 2025 until‌​‌ Aug 2025]

Administrative​​ Assistant

  • Michael Barbosa [​​​‌INRIA]

Visiting Scientist‌

  • Yueqi Cao [IMPERIAL‌​‌ COLLEGE LDN, from​​ Jul 2025 until Aug​​​‌ 2025]

2 Overall‌ objectives

Historical context. Geometry‌​‌ has been a unifying​​ formalism for science: predictive​​​‌ models of the world‌ around us have often‌​‌ been derived using geometric​​ notions which formalize observable​​​‌ symmetries and experimental invariants.‌ Tools such as differential‌​‌ geometry and tensor calculus​​ quickly became invaluable in​​​‌ describing the complexity of‌ natural phenomena and mechanical‌​‌ systems through concise equations,​​ condensing local and global​​​‌ properties into simple relations‌ between measurable quantities. Today,‌​‌ geometry (be it Euclidean​​ or not) is at​​​‌ the core of many‌ current physical theories: general‌​‌ relativity, electromagnetism (E&M), gauge​​ theory, quantum mechanics, as​​​‌ well as solid and‌ fluid mechanics, all have‌​‌ strong underlying structures that​​ are best described and​​​‌ elucidated through geometric notions‌ like differential forms, curvatures,‌​‌ vector bundles, connections, and​​ covariant derivative. Geometry also​​​‌ creeps up in unexpected‌ fields such as number‌​‌ theory and functional analysis,​​ offering new insights and​​​‌ even breakthroughs, e.g., the‌ use of algebraic geometry‌​‌ to address Fermat's last​​ theorem.

Geometry in Digital​​​‌ Sciences. In sharp contrast,‌ the role of geometry‌​‌ was mostly ignored at​​ the inception of computer​​​‌ science. Yet, it has‌ now become clear that‌​‌ digital sciences are imbued​​ with an overwhelming amount​​​‌ of fundamentally geometric and‌ topological concepts. Some are‌​‌ rather obvious, when dealing​​ with the modeling of​​​‌ Euclidean shapes in computer‌ graphics or the analysis‌​‌ of images in computer​​ vision for instance; some​​​‌ are more subtle, such‌ as the “manifold hypothesis”‌​‌ underlying a number of​​ supervised or unsupervised learning​​​‌ techniques; and some are‌ only nascent, such as‌​‌ the fields of Information​​ Geometry (basically, the geometry​​​‌ used to understand probability‌ distributions), Geometric Statistics (new‌​‌ statistical methodology for non-Euclidean​​ entities), and Topological Data​​​‌ Analysis (where algebraic topology‌ is used as a‌​‌ tool to enhance data​​ analysis pipelines). In fact,​​​‌ even the discretization of‌ physical theories needed to‌​‌ offer fast numerical simulation​​​‌ has brought geometry back​ to the forefront after​‌ it was understood that​​ the loss of numerical​​​‌ fidelity in standard numerical​ methods is due to​‌ a fundamental failure to​​ preserve geometric or topological​​​‌ structures of the underlying​ continuous models: partial differential​‌ equations (PDEs) modeling our​​ physical world are typically​​​‌ encoding invariants and structures​ that are independent of​‌ the choice of coordinates​​ used to express the​​​‌ equations and the tensors​ involved in them; but​‌ invariance to the choice​​ of basis is often​​​‌ lost during discretization, as​ numerical approximations will in​‌ general not capture, let​​ alone preserve, the key​​​‌ geometric structures that exist​ in the continuous case.​‌ Seeing these numerical issues​​ through the lens of​​​‌ geometry is thus not​ just of academic interest:​‌ failure to maintain geometric​​ invariants has serious consequences​​​‌ for the accuracy and​ stability of solutions.

Rationale.​‌ Given the unusual reach​​ of geometry and its​​​‌ rich literature, there is​ an opportunity to assemble​‌ a team of experts​​ in geometry and its​​​‌ vernacular, to help broadly​ impact digital science and​‌ technology. We thus propose​​ the creation of a​​​‌ new project-team whose core​ scientific mission is to​‌ use geometry as a​​ bedrock for the development​​​‌ of numerical tools and​ algorithms: we wish​‌ to exploit the properties​​ of infinite-dimensional and finite-dimensional​​​‌ spaces that are related​ with distance, shape, size,​‌ and relative position, and​​ bringing them to bear​​​‌ on computational discretizations and​ algorithms for analysis, processing,​‌ and simulation. Adhering​​ to geometric structures and​​​‌ invariants as a guiding​ principle for computations is​‌ a rich source of​​ both theoretical and practical​​​‌ challenges, allowing to combine​ concepts and results from​‌ different areas of geometry​​ broadly construed to produce​​​‌ new computational tools with​ solid mathematical foundations. While​‌ our team will be​​ very focused in terms​​​‌ of the mathematical foundations​ and tools upon which​‌ it builds, it will​​ also be very broad​​​‌ in terms of applications​ given the pervasiveness of​‌ geometry in sciences and​​ technology. This makes for​​​‌ an unusual, yet powerful​ scientific setup that will​‌ facilitate interdisciplinary projects through​​ the common use of​​​‌ geometric foundations and their​ specialized terminology. It will​‌ also allow us to​​ contribute sporadically to pure​​​‌ and computational mathematics when​ appropriate in order to​‌ push our scientific mission​​ forward.

Positioning. We see​​​‌ GeomeriX as first and​ foremost Inria Saclay’s graphics​‌ team, but with wider​​ objectives afforded by the​​​‌ broad relevance of geometry.​ It is worth noting​‌ that graphics has evolved​​ to the point where​​​‌ it often intersects with​ applied mathematics, machine learning,​‌ vision, and computational science​​ in some of its​​​‌ efforts, and GeomeriX intends​ to continue this trend.​‌

Objectives. Our project-team's overall​​ scientific objective is to​​​‌ contribute, through a geometric​ perspective, both foundational and​‌ practical methods for geometric​​ data processing. In particular,​​​‌ we seek the development​ of predictive computational tools​‌ by drawing from the​​ many facets of geometry​​​‌ and topology: whether it​ be discrete geometry, basic​‌ differential geometry or exterior​​ calculus, symplectic geometry, persistent​​ homology or sheaf theory,​​​‌ optimal transport, Riemannian or‌ conformal geometry, these‌​‌ topics of geometry inform​​ and guide both our​​​‌ discretizations and algorithmic designs‌ towards computing. Note that‌​‌ we do not plan​​ to merely adapt and​​​‌ exploit geometric concepts and‌ understanding for numerical purposes,‌​‌ as our focus on​​ digital data may even​​​‌ result in contributions to‌ these mathematical fields, extending‌​‌ the current body of​​ knowledge. While we intentionally​​​‌ leave the range of‌ our mathematical foundations open‌​‌ so as not to​​ restrict our potential team-wide​​​‌ explorations, we concentrate our‌ research on four concrete‌​‌ themes, which we believe​​ can be most significantly​​​‌ impacted by a geometric‌ approach to developing new‌​‌ numerical tools:

  1. Euclidean​​ shape processing: from​​​‌ computer graphics to geometry‌ processing and vision, the‌​‌ analysis and manipulation of​​ low-dimensional shapes (2D and​​​‌ 3D) is an important‌ endeavor with applications covering‌​‌ a wide range of​​ areas from entertainment and​​​‌ classical computer-aided design, to‌ reverse engineering and biomedical‌​‌ engineering. Our project-team intends​​ to lead efforts in​​​‌ this competitive field, with‌ key contributions in shape‌​‌ matching, geometric analysis, and​​ discrete calculus on meshes.​​​‌
  2. Simulation: traditional finite-element‌ treatments of various physical‌​‌ models have had tremendous​​ success. Recently, a number​​​‌ of geometric integrators have‌ upended the field, either‌​‌ through structure-preserving integration which​​ offers improved statistical predictability​​​‌ by respecting the geometric‌ properties of the exact‌​‌ flow of the differential​​ equations, or through novel​​​‌ discretizations of the state‌ space. We intend to‌​‌ continue introducing novel integration​​ methods for increasingly complex​​​‌ multiphysics systems, as well‌ as exploiting the use‌​‌ of learning methods to​​ accelerate simulation.
  3. Dynamical systems​​​‌: we intend to‌ leverage the geometric nature‌​‌ of dynamical systems to​​ investigate and promote high-dimensional​​​‌ data analysis for dynamics:‌ the study of dynamical‌​‌ systems from a limited​​ number of observations of​​​‌ the state of a‌ given system (for example,‌​‌ time series or a​​ sparse set of trajectories)​​​‌ offers a unique opportunity‌ to develop scalable computational‌​‌ tools to detect or​​ characterize unusual features and​​​‌ coherent structures. Meanwhile, the‌ study of dynamical systems‌​‌ from a combinatorial point​​ of view opens up​​​‌ the possibility of characterizing‌ their invariant sets and‌​‌ assessing their stability.
  4. Data​​ science: finally, we​​​‌ are intent on exploring‌ the underlying role of‌​‌ geometry in machine learning​​ and statistical analysis. This​​​‌ role has been put‌ forward in the recent‌​‌ years, with the emergence​​ of approaches such as​​​‌ geometric deep learning or‌ topological data analysis, whose‌​‌ aim is to leverage​​ the underlying geometry or​​​‌ topology of the data‌ to enhance the performance,‌​‌ robustness, or explainability of​​ the methods used for​​​‌ their analysis. We will‌ pursue investigations toward this‌​‌ goal, concentrating our efforts​​ on topics related to​​​‌ explainable feature design, geometric‌ feature learning, geometry-driven learning,‌​‌ and geometry for categorical​​ and mixed data types.​​​‌

Evidently, our research efforts‌ may at times lie‌​‌ across multiple of these​​ themes given our multi-disciplinary​​​‌ objectives, and it is‌ our hope that we‌​‌ will all eventually participate​​​‌ in the four themes.​

3 Research program

Below​‌ we introduce the details​​ of our four research​​​‌ themes, in four separate​ subsections. In each subsection,​‌ we first present the​​ scientific focus and research​​​‌ objectives of the corresponding​ theme, then we detail​‌ the research topics we​​ intend to address and​​​‌ how we plan to​ leverage topology and geometry​‌ for each one of​​ them. For each theme,​​​‌ we list the most​ likely contributors, and organize​‌ the various subtopics within​​ each theme from short​​​‌ to long-term goals, based​ on our current expectations​‌ and focus.

3.1 Geometry​​ for Euclidean shape processing​​​‌

Euclidean space is the​ default setting of classical​‌ geometry in two or​​ three dimensions. Shapes in​​​‌ 3D space are of​ particular interest as they​‌ represent the typical objects​​ we interact with. Geometry​​​‌ processing is an area​ of research focusing on​‌ these low-dimensional shapes in​​ Euclidean space, with the​​​‌ goal to design algorithms,​ data structures, as well​‌ as analysis tools for​​ their digital acquisition, reconstruction,​​​‌ analysis, manipulation, synthesis, classification,​ transmission, and animation. Digital​‌ shapes are typically discretized​​ through either point clouds,​​​‌ triangle meshes, or polygonal​ meshes for surfaces, and​‌ through tetrahedron or polytopal​​ meshes for volumes. Analyzing​​​‌ and manipulating these digital​ representations already involve fundamental​‌ difficulties in terms of​​ efficiency, scalability, and robustness​​​‌ to arbitrary sampling, for​ which computational geometry and​‌ computer graphics have generated​​ a number of key​​​‌ algorithms. Simple surface meshes​ in 3D also offer​‌ a simple context in​​ which to define discrete​​​‌ notions of basic topological​ properties (quantities preserved through​‌ arbitrary stretching, such as​​ Euler characteristic, genus, Betti​​​‌ numbers, etc) and relevant​ geometric properties (normal, curvatures,​‌ covariant derivatives, parallel transport,​​ etc). Yet the digital​​​‌ counterpart of the low-dimensional​ case of Euclidean geometry​‌ is far from being​​ settled or complete: it​​​‌ remains obviously relevant in​ a number of scientific​‌ fields on which we​​ plan to focus. A​​​‌ few research directions of​ particular interest are described​‌ below.

Operator-based methods for​​ shape analysis

We plan​​​‌ to develop novel approaches​ for representing and manipulating​‌ geometric concepts as linear​​ functional operators. Specifically​​​‌ we will focus on​ tools for shape matching,​‌ design and analysis of​​ differential quantities such as​​​‌ vector fields or cross​ fields, shape deformation and​‌ shape comparison, where functional​​ approaches have recently been​​​‌ shown to provide a​ natural and discretization-agnostic representation​‌ 111, 44,​​ 45, 121.​​​‌ This “functional” point of​ view is classical in​‌ many scientific areas, including​​ dynamical systems (where the​​​‌ pullback with respect to​ a map is closely​‌ related to the Koopman​​ or composition operator, allowing​​​‌ the study ergodicity or​ mixing property of non-linear​‌ maps through the spectral​​ properties of a linear​​​‌ operator), differential geometry (where​ vector fields are often​‌ defined by their action​​ on real-valued functions) and​​​‌ representation theory among others.​ However, it has only​‌ recently been adopted in​​ geometry processing with tremendous​​​‌ and constantly growing potential​ in both axiomatic or​‌ even learning-based approaches 100​​, 89, 72​​. We will continue​​​‌ developing efficient and robust‌ algorithms by considering shapes‌​‌ as functional spaces and​​ by representing various geometric​​​‌ operations as linear operators‌ acting on appropriate real-valued‌​‌ functions. In addition to​​ the efficiency and robustness​​​‌ of methods obtained by‌ considering this linear operator‌​‌ point of view of​​ geometry processing and dynamical​​​‌ systems, another very significant‌ advantage of these techniques‌​‌ is that they allow​​ to express many different​​​‌ geometric operations in a‌ common language. This means,‌​‌ for example, that it​​ makes it easy to​​​‌ define the pushforward of‌ a vector field with‌​‌ respect to a map​​ by simply considering a​​​‌ composition of appropriate discrete‌ operators. Despite the significant‌​‌ recent success of tools​​ within this area, especially​​​‌ related to the functional‌ map framework 112,‌​‌ there does not exist​​ a unified coherent theoretical​​​‌ framework in which different‌ geometric concepts can be‌​‌ represented and manipulated via​​ their functional equivalents. Our​​​‌ main long-term goal therefore‌ would be to establish‌​‌ a novel field within​​ geometry processing by creating​​​‌ both a computational framework‌ and a coherent theoretical‌​‌ formalism in which all​​ of the different basic​​​‌ geometric operations can be‌ expressed, and thus in‌​‌ which different concepts can​​ “communicate” with one another.​​​‌ We believe that such‌ a formalism and associated‌​‌ computational tools, already quite​​ well developed, will not​​​‌ only greatly extend the‌ scope of applicability of‌​‌ many existing geometry processing​​ pipelines, but will also​​​‌ help expand this language‌ to novel concepts, and‌​‌ ultimately help pave the​​ way towards representation-agnostic geometric​​​‌ data manipulation.

Discrete metrics‌ and applications.

While three-dimensional‌​‌ shapes are often encoded​​ via their Euclidean embedding,​​​‌ numerous research efforts have‌ focused on studying and‌​‌ discretizing their intrinsic metric.​​ Regge calculus 119,​​​‌ an early approach to‌ numerical relativity without coordinates,‌​‌ proposed the use of​​ edge lengths to encode​​​‌ a piecewise-Euclidean metric per‌ simplex, from which the‌​‌ Riemann curvature tensor can​​ be easily computed to​​​‌ derive local areas or‌ curvatures. This early work‌​‌ led to a series​​ of alternative metric representations:​​​‌ tip angles, for instance,‌ are known to encode‌​‌ the intrinsic geometry of​​ a triangle mesh up​​​‌ to a scaling, while‌ local measurements (an angle‌​‌ 120 or a length​​ cross-ratio 96 per edge)​​​‌ later formed the basis‌ of circle patterns 48‌​‌, 94 as well​​ as conformal representations 126​​​‌; the discrete Laplace-Beltrami‌ cotan formula 115 also‌​‌ determines the edge lengths​​ of a triangle mesh​​​‌ (and thus its discrete‌ metric) up to a‌​‌ global scaling 138.​​ More recently, generalized notions​​​‌ of metrics were proposed;‌ for instance, 86 presented‌​‌ a characterization of an​​ augmented discrete metric resulting​​​‌ from the orthogonal primal-dual‌ structure of weighted triangulations.‌​‌ Common to many of​​ these various metric characterizations​​​‌ is the existence of‌ convex energies which allow‌​‌ to efficiently compute these​​ metrics from various boundary​​​‌ conditions. We intend to‌ investigate the discrete treatment‌​‌ of metric for low-dimensional​​ manifolds as a counterpart​​​‌ to the discretization of‌ antisymmetric tensors (differential forms),‌​‌ which is far less​​​‌ studied — and a​ discrete theory unifying symmetric​‌ and anti-symmetric tensors remains​​ elusive despite recent advances​​​‌ 85. Moreover, the​ metric of a surface​‌ is known in the​​ continuous realm to induce​​​‌ Hodge stars and a​ canonical torsion-free Levi-Civita connection​‌ (or parallel transport), but​​ this picture is far​​​‌ less clear for discrete​ manifolds, even if the​‌ construction of arbitrary-order discrete​​ Hodge stars and metric​​​‌ connections are well understood​ by now. A few​‌ research directions on generalized​​ metrics seem particularly interesting​​​‌ due to their likelihood​ of resulting in novel​‌ algorithmic and computational frameworks:​​

  • Metric-dependent meshing: Given a​​​‌ set of metric-based operators,​ optimized mesh structures can​‌ be designed to offer​​ optimal accuracy akin to​​​‌ Hodge-star mesh optimization for​ the augmented weighted metric​‌ proposed in 108.​​ Another interesting research question​​​‌ is the existence and​ construction of intrinsic Delaunay​‌ triangulation, the most common​​ discrete shape representation, with​​​‌ respect to a particular​ metric 49.
  • Metric-aware​‌ sampling: Metric-dependent descriptors such​​ as the pair correlation​​​‌ function are particularly efficient​ in characterizing statistical properties​‌ of point distributions for​​ texture synthesis 73.​​​‌ Extending this framework to​ arbitrary non-flat domains through​‌ Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) seem​​ particularly promising.
  • Shape characterization:​​​‌ Highly convoluted embeddings like​ the cortical surface of​‌ the brain and its​​ functional connectivity graph are​​​‌ naturally hyperbolic in nature​ 54. However, investigating​‌ a link between cortical​​ folding and the volumetric​​​‌ fiber bundle structure from​ a pure geometric viewpoint​‌ through a hyperbolic metric​​ characterization has surprisingly not​​​‌ be done in brain​ analysis, despite striking visual​‌ similarities between brain folding​​ and geometric realizations of​​​‌ the hyperbolic plane (see​ 131 and Taimiņa's crochet​‌ model). We are hoping​​ that this intrinsic metric​​​‌ characterization can be investigated​ through recent discrete hyperbolic​‌ parametrization tools 81,​​ which may also lead​​​‌ to other shape classification​ techniques in more general​‌ contexts.
  • Piecewise-linear maps: We​​ also wish to study​​​‌ the classification of the​ deformation of a triangle​‌ mesh through its induced​​ metric change in the​​​‌ embedding space. Developing an​ approach to decompose such​‌ a diffeomorphic piecewise-linear map​​ into canonical geometric transformations​​​‌ through either linear algebra​ or convex minimization could​‌ offer new discrete equivalences​​ for conformal, equiareal, and​​​‌ curvature-preserving maps between triangulations,​ with direct applications to​‌ mesh parameterization and more​​ general processing of discrete​​​‌ meshes.
  • Geodesic abstractions: curve-network​ representations 84 based on​‌ a few geodesics to​​ describe a shape provide​​​‌ a compact encoding of​ surfaces. While it is​‌ increasingly useful for artistic​​ depictions, we also want​​​‌ to study its relevance​ as a compact compression​‌ scheme from which the​​ shape and its metric​​​‌ can be derived with​ controllable precision.
  • Metric-dependent cage​‌: Finally, we also​​ want to understand how​​​‌ to define optimized metric-dependent​ cages for intuitive &​‌ expressive deformation and animation​​ of complex shapes 129​​​‌, and how these​ cages can be understood​‌ as polygonal or polyhedral​​ cells to locally simplify​​​‌ a simplicial complex.

Discrete​ differential and tensor calculus.​‌

When working on low-dimensional​​ spaces, the use of​​ meshes (as opposed to​​​‌ just point clouds) pays‌ dividends as it allows‌​‌ for the development of​​ discrete versions of Exterior​​​‌ Calculus (see DEC 68‌ or FEEC 42),‌​‌ where k-dimensional integrals​​ can be directly evaluated​​​‌ in k-cells, and‌ differentiation can formally achieved‌​‌ through the boundary operator:​​ the concept of chains​​​‌ and cochains from algebraic‌ topology forms the basis‌​‌ of a discrete analog​​ of Cartan's exterior calculus​​​‌ of differential forms, providing‌ crucial numerical tools such‌​‌ as a discrete de​​ Rham cohomology and a​​​‌ discrete Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition that‌ precisely mimick their continuous‌​‌ counterparts. Moreover, finite elements​​ of arbitrary order can​​​‌ be associated with these‌ discrete forms through subdivision‌​‌ 83 to provide a​​ powerful Isogeometric Analysis (IGA).​​​‌ Recent developments 101,‌ 82 have offered also‌​‌ a discrete approach to​​ tangent vector fields. While​​​‌ DEC encodes vector fields‌ as 1-forms, processing tangent‌​‌ vectors and, more generally,​​ directional fields sampled at​​​‌ vertices of discrete surfaces‌ requires the development of‌​‌ discrete (metric) connections 65​​, 101 (which can​​​‌ be seen as discrete‌ equivalent to the Christoffel‌​‌ symbols) to handle the​​ non-linearity of non-flat domains.​​​‌ From these connections can‌ be derived the usual‌​‌ continuous notions of covariant​​ derivatives or Killing operator,​​​‌ and these discrete operators‌ demonstrate the same intimate‌​‌ link between geometry and​​ topology as exemplified by​​​‌ the hairy ball theorem‌ (Hopf index theorem). While‌​‌ these operators apply equally​​ well on discrete three-manifolds,​​​‌ much remains to do:‌ properly defining the notion‌​‌ of curvature matrix-valued 2-form​​ or torsion vector-valued 2-form​​​‌ in 3D and checking‌ that these definitions provide‌​‌ consistent Bianchi identities (i.e.,​​ there exists an exterior​​​‌ covariant derivative satisfying fundamental‌ geometric and topological properties)‌​‌ is an exciting research​​ direction. Not only will​​​‌ it allow to deal‌ with the line singularities‌​‌ in hexahedral meshing robustly​​, but it will​​​‌ also provide a Bochner‌ Laplacian (also called the‌​‌ vector Laplacian) in 3D​​ devoid of the type​​​‌ of spurious modes that‌ discrete Laplacians over flat‌​‌ domains can introduce if​​ one does not enforce​​​‌ a proper discrete deRham‌ complex. Such a tensor‌​‌ calculus for three-manifolds may​​ allow us to explore​​​‌ possible applications in the‌ context of general relativity‌​‌ in the longer term.​​ Finally, the design of​​​‌ simplicial or cell meshes‌ that guarantee accurate computations‌​‌ while approximating a given​​ domain well remains an​​​‌ important endeavor for practical‌ applications.

3.2 Geometry for‌​‌ simulation

Mathematical models of​​ the evolution in time​​​‌ of mechanical systems generally‌ involve systems of differential‌​‌ equations. Simulating a physical​​ system consists in figuring​​​‌ out how to move‌ the system forward in‌​‌ time from a set​​ of initial conditions, allowing​​​‌ the computation of an‌ actual trajectory through classical‌​‌ methods such as fourth-order​​ Runge-Kutta or Newmark schemes.​​​‌ However, a geometric —‌ instead of a traditional‌​‌ numerical-analytic — approach to​​ the problem of time​​​‌ integration is particularly pertinent‌ 87: the very‌​‌ essence of a mechanical​​ system is indeed characterized​​​‌ by its symmetries and‌ invariants (e.g., momenta), thus‌​‌ preserving these geometric notions​​​‌ into the discrete computational​ setting is of paramount​‌ importance if one wants​​ discrete time integration to​​​‌ properly capture the underlying​ continuous motion. Considering mechanics​‌ from a variational point​​ of view goes back​​​‌ to Euler, Lagrange and​ Hamilton 75, and​‌ Poincaré famously stated that​​ geometry and physics are​​​‌ “indissociable”. The variational principle​ most important for continuous​‌ mechanics is due to​​ Hamilton, and is often​​​‌ called Hamilton’s principle or​ the least action principle​‌: it states that​​ a dynamical system always​​​‌ finds an optimal course​ from one position to​‌ another. One consequence is​​ that we can recast​​​‌ the traditional way of​ thinking about an object​‌ accelerating in response to​​ applied forces, into a​​​‌ geometric viewpoint: the path​ followed by the object​‌ between two space-time positions​​ has optimal geometric properties,​​​‌ analogous to the notion​ of geodesics on curved​‌ surfaces. This point of​​ view is equivalent to​​​‌ Newton’s laws in the​ context of classical mechanics,​‌ but is broad enough​​ to encompass physical models​​​‌ ranging to E&M and​ quantum mechanics 104.​‌ While the idea of​​ discretizing variational formulations of​​​‌ mechanics is standard for​ elliptic problems using Galerkin​‌ Finite Element methods for​​ instance, only recently did​​​‌ it get used to​ derive variational time-stepping algorithms​‌ for mechanical systems 105​​. These variational integrators​​​‌ have been shown to​ be remarkably versatile, powerful,​‌ and general for simulations​​ of physical phenomena when​​​‌ compared to traditional numerical​ time stepping methods: the​‌ symplectic character of variational​​ integrators guarantees good statistical​​​‌ predictability through accurate preservation​ of the geometric properties​‌ of the exact flow​​ of the differential equations.​​​‌ We endeavor to continue​ contributing to this particular​‌ application of geometry and​​ extend it further, as​​​‌ we foresee a number​ of interesting scientific developments​‌ and industrial applications.

State-space​​ discretization of statistical physics.​​​‌

Kinetic equations are used​ to describe a variety​‌ of phenomena in various​​ scientific fields, ranging from​​​‌ rarefied gas dynamics and​ plasma physics to biology​‌ and socio-economics, and appear​​ naturally when one considers​​​‌ a statistical description of​ a large particle system​‌ evolving in time. In​​ incompressible fluid simulation, kinetic​​​‌ solvers based on the​ lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)​‌ have generated growing interest​​ due to their use​​​‌ of the Boltzmann transport​ equation and to its​‌ unusual state-space discretization based​​ on a computationally-efficient lattice​​​‌ 124: compared to​ macroscopic solvers directly integrating​‌ Navier-Stokes equations, LBM totally​​ bypasses the difficult issue​​​‌ of discretizing advection to​ high order, and absence​‌ of global pressure solves​​ makes for extremely efficient​​​‌ parallel implementations, which are​ now surpassing alternative discretizations​‌ 98. However, the​​ numerical treatment of the​​​‌ collision operator of the​ Boltmann equation has not​‌ reached maturity; most surprising​​ is the complete absence​​​‌ of geometric approaches to​ deal with Boltzmann equations​‌. One should be​​ able to formulate a​​​‌ variational approach to LBM​ based on Hamilton's principle​‌ to derive a systematic​​ integrator with guaranteed accuracy​​​‌ and structure-preserving properties. Moreover,​ while dealing with isothermal​‌ and incompressible flows is​​ a good starting point,​​ the kinetic standpoint of​​​‌ fluid dynamics is not‌ theoretically restricted to this‌​‌ case: far more complex​​ physical systems, from compressible​​​‌ flow (with shocks), to‌ thermal conductivity, to even‌​‌ acoustics for example, can​​ be handled; but far​​​‌ less is known on‌ how to handle these‌​‌ more involved cases computationally,​​ because no systematic numerical​​​‌ approach to handle Boltzmann‌ equations is known. Success‌​‌ in our geometric approach​​ to LBM should offer​​​‌ a much better handle‌ to deal with these‌​‌ difficult cases: between new​​ Hermite regularization tools 50​​​‌, 64 and the‌ recent introduction of variational‌​‌ integrators for non-equilibrium thermodynamical​​ systems mentioned above should​​​‌ provide the necessary theoretical‌ foundations to establish a‌​‌ geometric solver for this​​ generalized case.

Learning-aided simulation.​​​‌

Computational physics is experiencing‌ a tectonic shift as‌​‌ data-driven approaches are quickly​​ becoming mainstream. While we​​​‌ do not adhere to‌ the idea being floated‌​‌ that numerical integration could​​ be simply “learned” to​​​‌ improve current solvers, the‌ fact is that many‌​‌ machine learning tools may​​ have profound influence in​​​‌ practical applications using simulation.‌ Long standing problems such‌​‌ as the design of​​ perfectly matched layers (PML,​​​‌ an artificial absorbing layer‌ for transport equations used‌​‌ to reduce the domain​​ of simulation without suffering​​​‌ from reflected waves 62‌) or flux limiters‌​‌ in high resolution schemes​​ 133 (to avoid the​​​‌ spurious oscillations (wiggles) that‌ would otherwise occur due‌​‌ to shocks or sharp​​ changes) could be found​​​‌ through training, and applied‌ at very low numerical‌​‌ cost. We are curious​​ to see if geometry​​​‌ can help design better‌ architectures or approaches for‌​‌ this type of learning-aided​​ simulation, by helping with​​​‌ better loss functions (with‌ soft constraints) or better‌​‌ architectures (to enforce hard​​ constraints) that account for​​​‌ the importance of structure‌ preservation. Learning the highly‌​‌ non-linear and chaotic dynamics​​ of fluids is also​​​‌ an interesting direction: we‌ believe that one can‌​‌ infer predictive high-frequency details​​ of a turbulent flow​​​‌ from a low-resolution simulation‌ as it is an‌​‌ attractive alternative to non-linear​​ turbulence modeling, extending the​​​‌ computationally-expensive Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS‌ 40), Large-Eddy Simulation‌​‌ (LES 92), or​​ Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES 125​​​‌) models used in‌ CFD. Many other learning‌​‌ efforts in the domain​​ of simulation are being​​​‌ explored, in particular towards‌ the goal of allowing‌​‌ real-time design of shapes​​ that satisfy some physical​​​‌ properties, such as lowest‌ drag for improved aerodynamics‌​‌ or highest stiffness for​​ a light cantilever.

Geometric​​​‌ integration of physical systems‌ and multiphysics.

Although the‌​‌ use of geometric integrators​​ for differential equations in​​​‌ computational physics has recently‌ brought off many numerical‌​‌ improvements, the large body​​ of knowledge in differential​​​‌ geometric mechanics remains vastly‌ under-utilized in discrete mechanics.‌​‌ Many mechanical systems require​​ geometric objects such as​​​‌ diffeomorphisms, vector fields, or‌ (principal) connections for which‌​‌ no structure-preserving discretization exists.​​ Hydrodynamics, for instance, has​​​‌ well established and rich‌ differential geometric foundations, but‌​‌ rare are the numerical​​ methods that take advantage​​​‌ of this rich body‌ of knowledge as yet.‌​‌ Yet, satisfying a form​​​‌ of “particle relabeling” symmetry​ 104 on a discrete​‌ level could directly enforce​​ Kelvin’s circulation theorem, a​​​‌ momentum preservation as important​ as angular momentum preservation​‌ for rigid bodies. Relativity​​ is another example, albeit​​​‌ much more involved, where​ structure-preserving numerics would strongly​‌ impact the scientific community:​​ having discretizations automatically enforcing​​​‌ Bianchi’s identities would not​ only simplify the numerical​‌ procedures involved in gravitational​​ theory (as spectral accuracy​​​‌ would no longer be​ required to avoid spurious​‌ modes), but could in​​ fact result in conservation​​​‌ of energy and angular​ momentum. Moreover, multiphysics (coupled​‌ mechanical systems involving more​​ than one simultaneously occurring​​​‌ physical field) can be​ consistently described through constrained​‌ variational principles: a simple,​​ yet already interesting example​​​‌ is the case of​ the equations of motion​‌ for the garden hose,​​ where rod dynamics coupled​​​‌ with fluid motion was​ only fully modeled (along​‌ with its nonlinear solutions​​ of traveling-wave type) a​​​‌ few years back 117​ through such a geometric​‌ treatment. Now that a​​ variational formulation of nonequilibrium​​​‌ thermodynamics extending Hamilton's principle​ to include irreversible processes​‌ has been proposed 79​​, we are particularly​​​‌ interested in advancing further​ the arsenal of computational​‌ methods for physical simulation.​​

3.3 Geometry for dynamical​​​‌ systems

Dynamical systems –​ whether physical, biological, chemical,​‌ or social – are​​ ubiquitous in nature, and​​​‌ their study deals with​ the concept of change,​‌ rate of change, rate​​ of rate of change,​​​‌ etc. Dynamical systems are​ often better elucidated and​‌ modeled through topology and​​ geometry. Whether we​​​‌ consider a continuous-time dynamical​ system (flow) or discrete-time​‌ dynamical system (map), the​​ geometric theory of dynamical​​​‌ systems studies phase portraits:​ on the state-space manifold​‌ (a geometric model for​​ the set of all​​​‌ possible states of the​ system), the global behavior​‌ of the dynamical system​​ is determined by a​​​‌ cellular structure of basins​ enclosed by separatrices,​‌ each basin being dominated​​ by a different specific​​​‌ behavior or fate. A​ system's trajectories on the​‌ state-space manifold determine velocity​​ vectors by differentiation; conversely,​​​‌ velocity vectors determine trajectories​ by integration. Bifurcations can​‌ also be understood as​​ geometric models for the​​​‌ controlled change of one​ system into another, while​‌ the rate of divergence​​ of trajectories in phase​​​‌ space measures a system's​ stability. Given this overwhelming​‌ relevance of geometry in​​ dynamical systems, we intend​​​‌ to dedicate some of​ our activities to develop​‌ geometry-based computational tools to​​ study time series and​​​‌ dynamical systems: while classic​ dynamical systems theory has​‌ established solid foundations to​​ study structures in steady​​​‌ and time-periodic flows and​ maps, new tools are​‌ needed to analyze the​​ complexity of time series​​​‌ or aperiodic large-scale flows​ from sampled trajectories, and​‌ to automatically generate a​​ simplified skeleton of the​​​‌ overall dynamics of a​ system from input data.​‌ We discuss a few​​ directions we are interested​​​‌ in further impacting next.​

Time series.

Geometric methods​‌ play an important part​​ in the study of​​​‌ time series. Of particular​ interest are time-delay embeddings,​‌ which are generically able​​ to capture the underlying​​ state space and dynamics​​​‌ from which the time‌ series data have been‌​‌ acquired, by the Takens​​ embedding theorem 128.​​​‌ Such embeddings transform discrete‌ time series into point‌​‌ clouds in Euclidean space,​​ so that the underlying​​​‌ geometry of the point‌ cloud reflects the geometry‌​‌ of the phase space​​ the data originate from.​​​‌ By doing so, questions‌ related to the seasonality‌​‌ or anomalous behavior of​​ the time series are​​​‌ naturally reformulated into questions‌ about the geometry or‌​‌ topology of their embeddings​​ 114. Beside this​​​‌ approach, other more direct‌ methods apply geometric or‌​‌ topological tools in the​​ original physical or frequency​​​‌ domain, which, despite its‌ simplicity, has proven to‌​‌ be relevant in various​​ contexts 67, 71​​​‌. A common thread‌ to all these developments‌​‌ is their restriction to​​ numerical time series, including​​​‌ (but not restricted to)‌ data for which geometry‌​‌ plays an obvious role—e.g.​​ inertial or gyroscopic sensor​​​‌ data. With potential medical‌ applications in mind, one‌​‌ of our main long-term​​ goals will be to​​​‌ adapt and extend these‌ approaches to handle categorical‌​‌ data, in connection​​ to the item in​​​‌ the Geometry for data‌ science theme. We also‌​‌ plan to find principled​​ methods to tuning the​​​‌ various parameters involved in‌ the techniques, e.g. the‌​‌ window size in time-delay​​ embeddings: we will seek​​​‌ to optimize or learn‌ these parameters automatically, in‌​‌ connection to the item​​ Geometry-driven learning in the​​​‌ Geometry for data science‌ theme. We will also‌​‌ seek to make these​​ parameters adaptive, e.g. using​​​‌ time-varying window sizes in‌ time-delay embeddings of irregular‌​‌ time series, in order​​ to obtain more accurate​​​‌ data representations and improved‌ learning performance.

Coherent structures.‌​‌

Another interesting area in​​ need of new numerical​​​‌ methods concerns coherent structures,‌ i.e., persisting features of‌​‌ a flow over long​​ periods that tend to​​​‌ favor or inhibit material‌ transport between distinct flow‌​‌ regions. While there is​​ no universally agreed-upon definition​​​‌ for coherent structures (there‌ exist ergodicity-based 53,‌​‌ observer-based 106, and​​ probabilistic 77 approaches to​​​‌ their definition), most variants‌ and associated computational methods‌​‌ assume a fine knowledge​​ of the Eulerian velocity​​​‌ field in space and‌ time to deduce a‌​‌ good approximation of the​​ flow. However, flows are​​​‌ often known only as‌ a set of sparse‌​‌ particle trajectories in time​​ (an example is the​​​‌ trajectory of buoys in‌ the ocean). Such a‌​‌ sparse sampling of the​​ dynamical system does not​​​‌ lend itself well to‌ a geometric analysis of‌​‌ transport, so topological methods​​ have recently been proposed​​​‌ to extract structures from‌ a sparse set of‌​‌ trajectories by measuring their​​ entanglement 130, 41​​​‌, 137 based on‌ the theory of braid‌​‌ groups, a classical​​ area of topology. Coherent​​​‌ regions can then be‌ defined as containing particles‌​‌ that possibly mix with​​ other particles within the​​​‌ region itself but do‌ not mix with particles‌​‌ outside the region; the​​ set of trajectories arising​​​‌ from the particles within‌ a coherent region forms‌​‌ a coherent bundle.​​​‌ Even if the use​ of braid groups offers​‌ sound foundations and numerical​​ tools for the definition​​​‌ of coherent structures in​ 2D, there has been​‌ only limited efforts in​​ developing practical and scalable​​​‌ computational tools for the​ efficient analysis of flow​‌ structures in 3D, offering​​ a clear opportunity for​​​‌ us to try new​ geometric insights.

Invariant sets.​‌

Much of the theory​​ of dynamical systems revolves​​​‌ around the existence and​ structure of invariant sets,​‌ which by definition are​​ subsets of the state​​​‌ space that are invariant​ under the action of​‌ the dynamics. Invariant sets​​ come in many different​​​‌ forms (stationary solutions, periodic​ orbits, connecting orbits, chaotic​‌ invariant sets, etc), and​​ their structure can be​​​‌ very complicated and can​ undergo drastic changes under​‌ perturbations of the system,​​ thus making their study​​​‌ difficult. This is all​ the more true in​‌ practical applications, where the​​ systems are only known​​​‌ through space and/or time​ discretizations. Conley index theory​‌ 63 overcomes these issues​​ by restricting the focus​​​‌ to invariant sets that​ admit an isolating neighborhood,​‌ and by introducing a​​ topological invariant—the Conley index—that​​​‌ characterizes whether such isolated​ invariant sets are attracting,​‌ repelling, or saddle-like. It​​ is defined as the​​​‌ homotopy type of a​ pair of compact subsets​‌ of the neighborhood, and​​ it is proven to​​​‌ be independent of the​ choice of neighborhood—thus characterizing​‌ the invariant set itself.​​ We are interested in​​​‌ the study of invariant​ sets in the discrete​‌ space and continuous time​​ setting, where the space​​​‌ is typically described by​ a simplicial complex and​‌ the dynamics by a​​ combinatorial vector (or multivector)​​​‌ field. Building upon Forman's​ seminal work in combinatorial​‌ dynamical systems 74,​​ recent advances 46,​​​‌ 99 have shown that​ isolated invariant sets and​‌ their Conley indices can​​ be properly defined even​​​‌ in this setting, and​ that they can be​‌ related to the dynamics​​ of some upper semicontinuous​​​‌ acyclic multivalued map defined​ on the geometric realization​‌ of the simplicial complex;​​ in simpler terms, not​​​‌ only can Conley index​ theory be adapted to​‌ the combinatorial setting, but​​ it also connects to​​​‌ its classical analog in​ the underlying space. Two​‌ important questions for applications​​ arise from this line​​​‌ of work: (1) how​ to compute the invariant​‌ sets and their Conley​​ indices (including choosing relevant​​​‌ isolating neighboroods) efficiently? (2)​ how do they behave​‌ under perturbations of the​​ input vector field or​​​‌ simplicial complex? These questions​ have just started to​‌ be addressed 69,​​ 70, mostly through​​​‌ the lens of single-parameter​ topological persistence theory, developed​‌ in the context of​​ topological data analysis. We​​​‌ intend to push this​ direction further, notably using​‌ multi-parameter persistence theory to​​ cope with some of​​​‌ the key difficulties such​ as the choice of​‌ isolating neighborhoods.

3.4 Geometry​​ for data science

The​​​‌ last decade has seen​ the advent of machine​‌ learning (ML), and in​​ particular deep learning (DL),​​​‌ in a large variety​ of fields, including some​‌ directly connected to geometry.​​ For instance, DL-based approaches​​ have become increasingly popular​​​‌ in geometry processing 118‌ due to their ability‌​‌ to outperform state-of-the-art, domain-specific​​ methods by leveraging the​​​‌ ever-increasing amounts of available‌ labeled data. On the‌​‌ downside, DL approaches suffer​​ from a general lack​​​‌ of explainability. Moreover, their‌ performances can be disappointing‌​‌ on small data due​​ to their large numbers​​​‌ of parameters; this is‌ especially true with end-to-end‌​‌ learning pipelines, which tend​​ to require humongous amounts​​​‌ of training data to‌ learn the right data‌​‌ representation. Finally, DL is​​ by essence tied to​​​‌ Euclidean data representations, and‌ as such it requires‌​‌ intermediate transforms in order​​ to be applicable to​​​‌ non-Euclidean data types such‌ as graphs or probability‌​‌ measures. Because of these​​ limitations, we are seeing​​​‌ a rise of geometric‌ and topological methods for‌​‌ data science in general,​​ and for ML and​​​‌ DL in particular, whose‌ aim is to help‌​‌ address the aforementioned challenges​​ as well as others.​​​‌ For instance, geometric deep‌ learning 51 tries to‌​‌ generalize deep neural models​​ to non-Euclidean domains. This​​​‌ includes for instance using‌ information geometry to apply‌​‌ deep neural models in​​ probability spaces. Topological data​​​‌ analysis (TDA) 109 is‌ another popular approach to‌​‌ enhance ML and DL​​ methods. It contributes to​​​‌ data science in at‌ least three different ways:‌​‌ first, by providing data​​ mining tools that can​​​‌ help users uncover hidden‌ structures in data; second,‌​‌ by providing generic descriptors​​ for geometric data that​​​‌ can be turned into‌ features for ML and‌​‌ DL with provable stability​​ properties; third, by integrating​​​‌ itself deeply into existing‌ ML methods or DL‌​‌ architectures to enhance their​​ performances or to analyze​​​‌ their behavior 59,‌ 102. Other contributions‌​‌ of geometry to data​​ science at large include:​​​‌ the use of Forman’s‌ Ricci curvature and its‌​‌ corresponding Ricci flow in​​ networks, to understand the​​​‌ networks' properties and growth‌ 134; the application‌​‌ of the Hodge-Hemholtz decomposition​​ to statistical ranking problems​​​‌ with sparse response data,‌ with theoretical connections to‌​‌ both PageRank and LASSO​​ 91; the use​​​‌ of Reeb graphs or‌ Morse-Smale complexes in statistical‌​‌ inference 60 as well​​ as in data visualization​​​‌ 132. These important‌ developments reinforce our argument‌​‌ that geometry and topology​​ have their role to​​​‌ play in the elaboration‌ of the next-generation data‌​‌ analysis tools. We plan​​ to focus on a​​​‌ few research directions related‌ to these developments, which‌​‌ are of particular interest​​ in our view.

Deep​​​‌ learning for large-scale 3D‌ geometric data analysis.

We‌​‌ first propose to develop​​ efficient algorithms and mathematical​​​‌ tools for analyzing large‌ geometric data collections using‌​‌ Deep Learning techniques. This​​ includes 3D shapes represented​​​‌ as triangle or quad‌ meshes, volumetric data, point‌​‌ clouds possibly embedded in​​ high-dimensions, and graphs representing​​​‌ geometric (e.g. proximity) data.‌ Our project is motivated‌​‌ by the fact that​​ large annotated collections of​​​‌ geometric models have recently‌ become available 58,‌​‌ 136, and that​​ machine learning algorithms applied​​​‌ to such collections have‌ shown promising initial results,‌​‌ both for data analysis​​​‌ as well as synthesis.​ We believe that these​‌ results can be significantly​​ extended by building on​​​‌ recent advances in geometry​ processing, optimization and learning.​‌ Our ultimate goal is​​ to design novel deep​​​‌ learning techniques capable both​ of handling geometric data​‌ directly and of combining​​ and integrating different data​​​‌ sources into a unified​ analysis pipeline. A key​‌ challenge in this project​​ is the fact that​​​‌ geometric data can come​ in a myriad different​‌ representations, such as point​​ clouds and meshes among​​​‌ others, with variable sampling​ and discretization. Furthermore, geometric​‌ shapes can undergo both​​ rigid and non-rigid deformations.​​​‌ Unfortunately, most existing deep​ learning approaches focus only​‌ on a particular type​​ of representations and deformation​​​‌ classes (e.g., considering purely​ extrinsic or purely intrinsic​‌ methods). Instead we propose​​ to place special focus​​​‌ on designing learning techniques​ capable of handing diverse​‌ multimodal data sources undergoing​​ arbitrary deformations, in a​​​‌ coherent theoretical and practical​ framework. Moreover we propose​‌ to develop novel powerful​​ interactive tools for analysis​​​‌ and annotation, to help​ harness user input, and​‌ also provide better mechanisms​​ for exploration of variability​​​‌ in the data 121​, 113.

Explainable​‌ geometric and topological features​​ for data.

Another of​​​‌ our goals is to​ design geometric and topological​‌ features that can capture​​ richer content from the​​​‌ data, while maintaining the​ robustness and stability properties​‌ that the existing features​​ enjoy. If we can​​​‌ make our features rich​ enough so that they​‌ characterize the input data​​ (or their underlying geometric​​​‌ structures, assuming such structures​ exist) completely, then we​‌ will be able to​​ leverage them in the​​​‌ context of explainable AI,​ to compute pre-images with​‌ guarantees on the corresponding​​ interpretations. In cases where​​​‌ our features cannot completely​ describe the data, we​‌ will study the geometry​​ of the fibers of​​​‌ the feature extraction step,​ in order to quantify​‌ the discrepancy that may​​ appear between different interpretations​​​‌ of the same feature.​ We envision two complementary​‌ approaches for this:

  • The​​ first approach relies on​​​‌ feature aggregation. In the​ context of TDA for​‌ instance, one may consider​​ using multiple filtrations (or​​​‌ filter functions on a​ fixed simplicial complex), computing​‌ their corresponding topological descriptors,​​ then aggregating these descriptors​​​‌ together to form a​ feature vector.
  • The second​‌ approach relies on more​​ elaborate geometric and topological​​​‌ tools to design the​ features. The idea is​‌ to encode the joint​​ effect of multiple geometric​​​‌ and topological constructions on​ the data, in a​‌ more integrated way than​​ just by aggregating the​​​‌ corresponding features. By encoding​ more complex effects, we​‌ hope to extract a​​ richer content using smaller​​​‌ constructions.

Research on the​ first approach in TDA​‌ started with 66,​​ 80, who proved​​​‌ that, in the special​ case where the data​‌ are sampled from some​​ subanalytic compact sets in​​​‌ Euclidean space n​, the compact sets​‌ themselves are fully described​​ by the aggregated features​​​‌ obtained by orthogonal projections​ onto lines. This follows​‌ from a more fundamental​​ result on the invertibility​​ of the Radon transforms​​​‌ of constructible functions 123‌, to which the‌​‌ above aggregated features belong.​​ This initial result has​​​‌ sparked a thriving new‌ direction of research, exploring‌​‌ larger and larger classes​​ of compact sets 90​​​‌, 103, 110‌. Many important questions‌​‌ arise from this line​​ of work, some of​​​‌ which have been partially‌ addressed, including: what kind‌​‌ of stability or robustness​​ properties do these aggregated​​​‌ features enjoy? Can the‌ size of the collection‌​‌ of filter functions used​​ be reduced, to become​​​‌ finite and (more importantly)‌ independent of the compact‌​‌ set under consideration? Can​​ the aggregated features be​​​‌ computed efficiently? Can non-Euclidean‌ compact sets, such as‌​‌ manifolds or length spaces,​​ be considered as well,​​​‌ with similar guarantees?

The‌ second approach is related‌​‌ to the development of​​ multi-parameter persistence 55,​​​‌ which is undeniably the‌ most widely open and‌​‌ long-standing research topic in​​ TDA today. The core​​​‌ challenge is to define‌ computationally tractable algebraic invariants‌​‌ that can capture as​​ much of the joint​​​‌ structure of multiple topological‌ constructions as possible. The‌​‌ notorious difficulty of this​​ question comes from the​​​‌ fact that the algebraic‌ objects underlying multi-parameter topological‌​‌ constructions are significantly more​​ complicated than the ones​​​‌ underlying single-parameter constructions. The‌ question also connects to‌​‌ notoriously hard problems in​​ other areas of pure​​​‌ mathematics, such as the‌ classification of isomorphism classes‌​‌ of indecomposable poset representations​​ in quiver representation theory​​​‌ for instance. It can‌ benefit from these connections,‌​‌ as mathematical tools that​​ have been developed for​​​‌ those problems can be‌ imported into the TDA‌​‌ literature—several promising such imports​​ have been made in​​​‌ the recent past, including‌ from representation theory 47‌​‌ and from sheaf theory​​ 93. In turn,​​​‌ mathematical and algorithmic advances‌ made in multi-parameter persistence‌​‌ may benefit these other​​ areas of mathematics as​​​‌ well. This is clearly‌ a high-risk and long-term‌​‌ research topic, but if​​ successful, it may eventually​​​‌ have an enormous impact‌ on TDA and related‌​‌ areas.

Geometric feature learning.​​

Geometry and topology have​​​‌ played a key role‌ in the design of‌​‌ feature extraction pipelines for​​ certain types of data.​​​‌ The numerous existing geometric‌ features for geometry processing‌​‌ (shape contexts 76,​​ differential and integral invariants​​​‌ 116, heat or‌ wave kernel signatures 43‌​‌, 127, etc.)​​ are a sign of​​​‌ the importance of this‌ topic for the computer‌​‌ graphics community. Meanwhile, the​​ TDA community has developed​​​‌ generic feature extraction pipelines,‌ based on combinatorial constructions‌​‌ and their algebraic invariants,​​ which have proven to​​​‌ be useful in a‌ variety of application domains‌​‌ 109. All these​​ approaches are, however, handcrafted,​​​‌ with hyperparameters being tuned‌ via manual, grid, or‌​‌ random search. Our goal​​ is to make these​​​‌ approaches transition from a‌ paradigm of feature engineering‌​‌ to that of feature​​ learning, in order to​​​‌ set up end-to-end learning‌ pipelines for improved performances‌​‌ and adaptability. Two complementary​​ directions are considered:

  • designing​​​‌ piecewise-smooth variants of the‌ existing pipelines, with a‌​‌ fine control over the​​​‌ underlying stratification. This will​ make it possible to​‌ apply variational optimization methods,​​ typically stochastic (sub-)gradient descent,​​​‌ and to optimize the​ gradient sampling steps for​‌ improved convergence rates.
  • designing​​ novel pipelines based on​​​‌ a combination of geometric/topological​ tools and deep learning,​‌ in order to get​​ the best out of​​​‌ both worlds.

Research in​ the first direction is​‌ still in its infancy.​​ Promising theoretical advances were​​​‌ made recently, towards understanding​ the piecewise differentiability of​‌ the basic topological persistence​​ operator in full generality​​​‌ 97, as well​ as towards optimizing its​‌ parameters using classical stochastic​​ gradient descent 56.​​​‌ Can the knowledge gained​ in these studies about​‌ the underlying stratification of​​ the operator be leveraged​​​‌ to optimize the gradient​ sampling step and thus​‌ improve the convergence rates?​​ Can these results be​​​‌ extended to more advanced​ pipelines, such as the​‌ one for Mapper or​​ for zigzags and multi-parameter​​​‌ persistence?

The idea behind​ the second direction is​‌ to integrate topological or​​ geometric layers into neural​​​‌ network architectures such as​ auto-encoders or GANs for​‌ feature extraction — the​​ challenge being to determine​​​‌ how to do it​ in the appropriate way,​‌ so that we can​​ make the most of​​​‌ this combination. This question​ connects to the research​‌ topic described further down​​ in this section.

Geometry-driven​​​‌ learning.

Most of the​ contributions of geometry and​‌ topology to machine learning​​ until recently have been​​​‌ to the design of​ pre-processing steps (e.g. feature​‌ extraction) to enhance the​​ performances of the learning​​​‌ pipeline. There is now​ a thriving effort of​‌ the community toward integrating​​ geometric and/or topological computations​​​‌ deeper into the core​ of the pipeline. This​‌ includes for instance: ToMATo​​ 59, which integrates​​​‌ a TDA-based feedback loop​ into density based algorithms​‌ to improve their stability​​ and robustness; topological regularizers​​​‌ 61, 88,​ which add topology-based regularization​‌ terms to the loss​​ in supervised statistical learning;​​​‌ topological layers 57,​ 78, 95,​‌ which are meant to​​ be incorporated into neural​​​‌ networks. Meanwhile, geometry and​ topology have been used​‌ to analyze the behavior​​ of neural networks 122​​​‌, 52. This​ exciting line of work​‌ is just emerging, and​​ our intent is to​​​‌ push this direction further,​ in particular to address​‌ the following important questions:​​

  • How can we generalize​​​‌ the use of topological​ layers in neural networks?​‌ This question is connected​​ to the differentiability of​​​‌ the TDA pipeline, addressed​ in the research topic​‌ Geometric feature learning.​​ Inded, generalizing the current​​​‌ (nascent) framework for differential​ calculus and optimization with​‌ the TDA pipeline will​​ be key to designing​​​‌ both generic and effective​ topological layers. Another more​‌ practical aspect of the​​ question is to evaluate​​​‌ the contribution of topological​ layers as initial or​‌ intermediate layers, depending on​​ the neural network architecture​​​‌ that they are combined​ with and on the​‌ data they are applied​​ to.
  • The same question​​​‌ arises for topological regularizers,​ with similar theoretical and​‌ practical challenges.
  • The development​​ of richer families of​​ geometric and topological descriptors,​​​‌ undertaken in the item‌ Richer geometric and topological‌​‌ features for data,​​ will eventually lead to​​​‌ the question of generalizing‌ the current differentiable framework‌​‌ to these new descriptors,​​ in order to make​​​‌ them as widely applicable‌ as the current descriptors,‌​‌ and also to the​​ practical question of determining​​​‌ how to best combine‌ them with existing loss‌​‌ functions, regularizers, or neural​​ network architectures.
  • The aforementioned​​​‌ contributions and research directions‌ concern mostly supervised learning.‌​‌ Can we contribute as​​ well to unsupervised learning​​​‌ problems, including clustering (as‌ ToMATo does already for‌​‌ density-based clustering), dimensionality reduction,​​ or unsupervised feature learning?​​​‌ This question connects also‌ to the research topic‌​‌ Geometric feature learning described​​ previously. One direction we​​​‌ may explore is the‌ design of geometric or‌​‌ topological layers to be​​ inserted in unsupervised neural​​​‌ network architectures such as‌ auto-encoders or GANs.
  • Finally,‌​‌ as TDA is concerned​​ primarily with topology, an​​​‌ obvious (yet still wide‌ open) question to ask‌​‌ is whether it can​​ contribute to the current​​​‌ effort towards generating neural‌ network architectures automatically.
Geometry‌​‌ for categorical and mixed​​ data types.

Categorical data​​​‌ types are notoriously hard‌ to deal with in‌​‌ the context of ML​​ and AI. Indeed, most​​​‌ of the existing ML‌ toolbox has been designed‌​‌ specifically to work with​​ numerical variables, usually sitting​​​‌ in some vector or‌ metric space. By contrast,‌​‌ spaces of categorical data​​ do not naturally come​​​‌ equipped with a linear‌ structure nor a metric.‌​‌ More importantly, these spaces​​ are discrete by nature,​​​‌ so choices of metrics‌ or (dis-)similarity measures can‌​‌ be scarce, with limited​​ effects on the learning​​​‌ efficiency. To make things‌ worse, categorical variables are‌​‌ often mixed with numerical​​ variables, and choosing a​​​‌ proper weighting for them‌ is a challenge in‌​‌ its own right. Meanwhile,​​ categorical variables play an​​​‌ important part in many‌ applications: for instance, in‌​‌ precision medicine, where the​​ monitoring of patients relies​​​‌ on collected longitudinal data‌ that include not only‌​‌ numerical variables such as​​ temperature or blood pressure,​​​‌ but also categorical variables‌ such as illness antecedents‌​‌ or symptoms lists. Thus,​​ handling categorical and mixed​​​‌ data types represents an‌ important challenge today. Unfortunately,‌​‌ with very few exceptions​​ 135, it has​​​‌ been mostly overlooked so‌ far in the development‌​‌ of topological methods for​​ ML and AI, so​​​‌ our goal will be‌ to help fix this‌​‌ situation. The standard approach​​ for handling categorical variables​​​‌ is to define a‌ proper vector representation, then‌​‌ to apply—either off-the-shelf or​​ with minor adaptations—an analysis​​​‌ method designed for numerical‌ variables to the new‌​‌ data representation. A prototypical​​ instance of this approach​​​‌ is Multiple Correspondance Analysis‌ for dimensionality reduction 39‌​‌, which applies classical​​ PCA to the one-hot​​​‌ encoding matrix of the‌ input data. A variant‌​‌ of the approach replaces​​ the vector representation by​​​‌ a suitable metric or‌ (dis-)similarity measure on the‌​‌ initial categorical variables or​​ on some transformed version​​​‌ of those. For instance,‌ in clustering, one can‌​‌ define a metric on​​​‌ the input data, e.g.​ Jaccard or Hamming distance,​‌ then apply a hierarchical​​ bottom-up clustering algorithm such​​​‌ as single-linkage to the​ resulting distance matrix. This​‌ variant seems quite appropriate​​ for geometric or topological​​​‌ methods, since the latter​ typically work with metric​‌ or (dis-)similarity spaces. The​​ challenge is to determine​​​‌ with which metrics or​ (dis-)similarity measures, and on​‌ which data types, geometric​​ or topological methods will​​​‌ be provably better.

A​ more refined version of​‌ the approach learns the​​ new data representation instead​​​‌ of engineering it, which​ is particularly relevant when​‌ end-to-end learning pipelines are​​ sought for. The methods​​​‌ are usually taylored to​ a specific data type,​‌ for instance word2vec 107​​ computes word embeddings for​​​‌ text data using a​ two-layer neural network. Our​‌ developments in the research​​ topic Geometry-driven learning will​​​‌ make it possible to​ combine TDA layers with​‌ such networks, and thus​​ to benefit from the​​​‌ most recent advances on​ representation learning for these​‌ data types. The challenge​​ will be to understand​​​‌ when and how to​ make the most of​‌ this combination.

4 Application​​ domains

Our work aims​​​‌ at a wide range​ of applications covering 3D​‌ shape analysis and processing,​​ simulation, and data science​​​‌ in general. While we​ typically focus on contributions​‌ that are of a​​ fundamental, mathematical and algorithmic​​​‌ nature, we seek collaborations​ with academics and industrial​‌ from applied fields, who​​ can use our tools​​​‌ on practical and concrete​ problems. Here are a​‌ few examples of collaborations:​​

  • In the context of​​​‌ 3D geometry processing, we​ collaborate with Dassault Systèmes​‌ for a) the PhD​​ of Lucas Brifault on​​​‌ the design of novel​ geometric representations for shapes​‌ through measure theory and​​ novel numerical optimal transport​​​‌ tools (as part of​ the MediTwin consortium funded​‌ by the French government​​ as part of France​​​‌ 2030) and b) the​ PhD of Mariem Mezghanni​‌ on the design of​​ physical simulation layers for​​​‌ 3D modeling.
  • In the​ context of personalized medicine,​‌ we collaborate with statisticians​​ and medical doctors to​​​‌ incorporate our geometric and​ topological features into learning​‌ pipelines to design better​​ dynamic treatment regimens (AEx​​​‌ PreMediT).
  • In a collaboration​ with the French Ministry​‌ of Defense, we seek​​ to develop tools to​​​‌ analyze multimodal time series​ data in order to​‌ predict the appearance of​​ G-LOCs among fighter jet​​​‌ pilots in training or​ in operation (PhD of​‌ Julie Mordacq).
  • In collaboration​​ with Télécom Paris, Sorbonne​​​‌ Université (ISIR), and INSEI​ (Institut national supérieur de​‌ formation et de recherche​​ pour l’éducation inclusive), we​​​‌ develop accessible tools based​ on embossed geometric tactile​‌ patterns. In continuity with​​ our earlier research on​​​‌ geometric pattern synthesis, we​ extend these approaches to​‌ tactile accessibility. We design​​ embossed tactile patterns to​​​‌ encode visual information through​ structured geometry. Our work​‌ focuses on low-cost fabrication​​ using simple embossed printing​​​‌ techniques. We develop a​ formal method for haptic​‌ perception grounded in geometric​​ modeling. This method has​​​‌ been validated through a​ long-term user study during​‌ this year with visually​​ impaired participants. A complete​​ analysis is currently available​​​‌ in a preprint submitted‌ to Eurohaptics 2026 (PhD‌​‌ of Nasim Bagheri).

Beside​​ these few illustrative examples,​​​‌ GeomeriX also maintains regular‌ collaborations with Sanofi, EDF,‌​‌ Danone R&D, Immersion Tools,​​ as well as with​​​‌ several key players in‌ the world-wide tech industry,‌​‌ including Ansys, Adobe Research,​​ Disney/Pixar, NVidia.

5 Highlights​​​‌ of the year

5.1‌ Thematic programs organization

  • Steve‌​‌ Oudot , in collaboration​​ with Sira Gratz (Aarhus​​​‌ University) and Kaveh Mousavand‌ (OIST), coordinated the thematic‌​‌ program TDA-PARTI: Topological Data​​ Analysis, Persistence And Representation​​​‌ Theory Intertwined, which‌ took place at the‌​‌ Okinawa Institute of Science​​ and Technology (OIST) from​​​‌ June 23 to August‌ 8 2025. This thematic‌​‌ program featured mini-courses, expository​​ lectures and colloquium talks,​​​‌ and also a symposium‌ on the latest advances‌​‌ in representation theory and​​ topological data analysis.
  • Mathieu​​​‌ Desbrun , in collaboration‌ with Jacques-Olivier Lachaud (Université‌​‌ de Savoie Mont-Blanc), has​​ assembled an organizing committee​​​‌ and a set of‌ 24 invited speakers for‌​‌ a 5-day conference on​​ Geometry and Computing at​​​‌ CIRM in Luminy to‌ be held in Fall‌​‌ of 2026.
  • Mathieu Desbrun​​ is now chair of​​​‌ the ACM SIGGRAPH Academy‌ award committe, for the‌​‌ next four years.

5.2​​ Awards

  • Jiong Chen received​​​‌ the Early Career Research‌ Award from the ACM‌​‌ SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium​​ on Computer Animation (SCA),​​​‌ the premier specialized conference‌ in computer animation in‌​‌ the world.
  • The "​​Spatially-Regularized Optimal Transport"​​​‌ paper 30 by Lucas‌ Brifault , David Cohen-Steiner‌​‌ (Inria Sophia-Antipolis) and Mathieu​​ Desbrun received a Best​​​‌ Paper Honorary Mention award‌ at SIGGRAPH Asia 2025.‌​‌
  • Souhaib Attaiki, who did​​ his PhD at GeomeriX,​​​‌ received the PhD Thesis‌ award from IP Paris,‌​‌ and a runner-up award​​ (Accessit) from GdR IG-RV,​​​‌ the French Computer Graphics‌ association.

5.3 Distinctions

  • The‌​‌ paper on T-REGS 37​​, by Julie Mordacq​​​‌ , David Loiseaux and‌ Steve Oudot , in‌​‌ collaboration with Vicky Kalogeiton​​ (LIX, École polytechnique), was​​​‌ accepted as a spotlight‌ paper at NeurIPS 2025.‌​‌

6 Latest software developments,​​ platforms, open data

Most​​​‌ of our publications come‌ with public code reproducing‌​‌ the results presented in​​ the papers. When the​​​‌ project is particularly general‌ and useful to our‌​‌ community, we release the​​ code in the Inria​​​‌ gitlab.

6.1 Latest software‌ developments

6.1.1 LUbie

  • Name:‌​‌
    Lightning-fast Boundary Element Method​​
  • Keywords:
    3D, Boundary element​​​‌ method
  • Functional Description:
    The‌ boundary element method (BEM)‌​‌ is commonly used due​​ to the reduced dimensionality​​​‌ it offers: for three-dimensional‌ linear problems, it only‌​‌ requires variables on the​​ domain boundary to solve​​​‌ and evaluate the solution‌ throughout space, making it‌​‌ a valuable tool in​​ a wide variety of​​​‌ applications. However, BEM has‌ poor computational scalability and‌​‌ huge memory requirements for​​ large-scale problems, limiting their​​​‌ applicability and efficiency in‌ practice. By leveraging connections‌​‌ with Gaussian Processes and​​ exploiting the sparse structure​​​‌ of the inverses of‌ boundary integral matrices, we‌​‌ introduce a variational preconditioner​​ that can be computed​​​‌ via a sparse inverse-Cholesky‌ factorization in a massively‌​‌ parallel manner. We show​​​‌ that applying our preconditioner​ to generalized minimal residual​‌ (GMRES) algorithm greatly improves​​ the efficiency of BEM​​​‌ solves, up to four​ orders of magnitude in​‌ our series of tests.​​
  • URL:
  • Publication:
  • Contact:
    Jiong Chen
  • Participants:​
    Mathieu Desbrun, Jiong Chen​‌

6.1.2 PoNQ: a Neural​​ QEM-based Mesh Representation

  • Name:​​​‌
    A Neural QEM-based Mesh​ Representation
  • Keyword:
    Neural representation​‌
  • Functional Description:
    A novel​​ learnable mesh representation through​​​‌ a set of local​ 3D sample Points and​‌ their associated Normals and​​ Quadric error metrics (QEM)​​​‌ w.r.t. the underlying shape,​ which we denote PoNQ.​‌ A global mesh is​​ directly derived from PoNQ​​​‌ by efficiently leveraging the​ knowledge of the local​‌ quadric errors. Besides marking​​ the first use of​​​‌ QEM within a neural​ shape representation, our contribution​‌ guarantees both topological and​​ geometrical properties by ensuring​​​‌ that a PoNQ mesh​ does not self-intersect and​‌ is always the boundary​​ of a volume. Notably,​​​‌ our representation does not​ rely on a regular​‌ grid, is supervised directly​​ by the target surface​​​‌ alone, and also handles​ open surfaces with boundaries​‌ and/or sharp features. We​​ demonstrate the efficacy of​​​‌ PoNQ through a learning-based​ mesh prediction from SDF​‌ grids and show that​​ our method surpasses recent​​​‌ state-of-the-art techniques in terms​ of both surface and​‌ edge-based metrics.
  • Contact:
    Pierre​​ Alliez
  • Participants:
    Nissim Maruani,​​​‌ Mathieu Desbrun, Pierre Alliez​

7 New results

We​‌ list our new results​​ for each of the​​​‌ four themes that our​ team is articulated around.​‌

7.1 Geometry for Euclidean​​ shape processing

7.1.1 Efficient​​​‌ and Scalable Spatial Regularization​ of Optimal Transport

Participants:​‌ Mathieu Desbrun, Lucas​​ Brifault.

In collaboration​​​‌ with David Coehne-Steiner from​ Inria Sophia-Antipolis.

In 30​‌, we introduce a​​ novel approach to spatial​​​‌ regularization of optimal transport​ problems. Based on the​‌ notion of forward and​​ backward “mean maps” of​​​‌ a transport plan, we​ introduce a convex formulation​‌ of optimal transport problems​​ that incorporates regularization of​​​‌ these mean maps to​ promote spatial continuity of​‌ the resulting optimal plan.​​ Unlike previous regularization approaches​​​‌ that required the optimization​ of all the transport​‌ plan coefficients, our formulation​​ translates into an ADMM-based​​​‌ solver combined with Sinkhorn​ type algorithms, which drastically​‌ reduces the number of​​ variables and scales up​​​‌ to large problems. We​ demonstrate the usefulness and​‌ efficiency of this new​​ computational tool for various​​​‌ applications and for different​ regularizations.

7.1.2 Discrete Torsion​‌ of Connection Forms on​​ Simplicial Meshes

Participants: Mathieu​​​‌ Desbrun, Mark Gillespie​, Theo Braune.​‌

In collaboration with Yiying​​ Tong (Michigan State University,​​​‌ USA).

While discrete (metric)​ connections have become a​‌ staple of n-vector field​​ design and analysis on​​​‌ simplicial meshes, the notion​ of torsion of a​‌ discrete connection has remained​​ unstudied. This is all​​​‌ the more surprising as​ torsion is a crucial​‌ component in the fundamental​​ theorem of Riemannian geometry,​​​‌ which introduces the existence​ and uniqueness of the​‌ Levi-Civita connection induced by​​ the metric. In 19​​​‌, we extend the​ existing geometry processing toolbox​‌ by providing torsion control​​ over discrete connections. Our​​ approach consists in first​​​‌ introducing a new discrete‌ Levi-Civita connection for a‌​‌ metric with locally-constant curvature​​ to replace the hinge​​​‌ connection of a triangle‌ mesh whose curvature is‌​‌ concentrated at singularities; from​​ this reference connection, we​​​‌ define the discrete torsion‌ of a connection to‌​‌ be the discrete dual​​ 1-form by which a​​​‌ connection deviates from our‌ discrete Levi-Civita connection. We‌​‌ discuss how the curvature​​ and torsion of a​​​‌ discrete connection can then‌ be controlled and assigned‌​‌ in a manner consistent​​ with the continuous case.​​​‌ We also illustrate our‌ approach through theoretical analysis‌​‌ and practical examples arising​​ in vector and frame​​​‌ design.

7.1.3 ShapeShifter: 3D‌ Variations Using Multiscale and‌​‌ Sparse Point-Voxel Diffusion

Participants:​​ Mathieu Desbrun, Nissim​​​‌ Maruani.

In collaboration‌ with Adone Research (San‌​‌ Francisco, USA) and Inria​​ Sophia-Antipolis.

This work 36​​​‌ proposes ShapeShifter, a new‌ 3D generative model that‌​‌ learns to synthesize shape​​ variations based on a​​​‌ single reference model. While‌ generative methods for 3D‌​‌ objects have recently attracted​​ much attention, current techniques​​​‌ often lack geometric details‌ and/or require long training‌​‌ times and large resources.​​ Our approach remedies these​​​‌ issues by combining sparse‌ voxel grids and point,‌​‌ normal, and color sampling​​ within a multiscale neural​​​‌ architecture that can be‌ trained efficiently and in‌​‌ parallel. We show that​​ our resulting variations better​​​‌ capture the fine details‌ of their original input‌​‌ and can handle more​​ general types of surfaces​​​‌ than previous SDF-based methods.‌ Moreover, we offer interactive‌​‌ generation of 3D shape​​ variants, allowing more human​​​‌ control in the design‌ loop if needed.

7.1.4‌​‌ Linear-Time Transport with Rectified​​ Flows

Participants: Pooran Memari​​​‌.

In collaboration with‌ Université Lyon 1.

Matching‌​‌ probability distributions allows to​​ compare or interpolate them,​​​‌ or model their manifold.‌ Optimal transport is a‌​‌ tool that solves this​​ matching problem. However, despite​​​‌ the development of numerous‌ exact and approximate algorithms,‌​‌ these approaches remain too​​ slow for large datasets​​​‌ due to the inherent‌ challenge of optimizing transport‌​‌ plans. Taking intuitions from​​ recent advances in rectified​​​‌ flows, in 21 ,‌ we propose an algorithm‌​‌ that, while not resulting​​ in optimal transport plans,​​​‌ produces transport plans from‌ uniform densities to densities‌​‌ stored on grids that​​ resemble the optimal ones​​​‌ in practice. Our algorithm‌ has linear-time complexity with‌​‌ respect to the problem​​ size and is embarrassingly​​​‌ parallel. It is also‌ trivial to implement, essentially‌​‌ computing three summed-area tables​​ and advecting particles with​​​‌ velocities easily computed from‌ these tables using simple‌​‌ arithmetic. This already allows​​ for applications such as​​​‌ stippling and area-preserving mesh‌ parameterization. Combined with linearized‌​‌ transport ideas, we further​​ extend our approach to​​​‌ match two non-uniform distributions.‌ This allows for wider‌​‌ applications such as shape​​ interpolation or barycenters, matching​​​‌ the quality of more‌ complex optimal or approximate‌​‌ transport solvers while resulting​​ in orders of magnitude​​​‌ speedups, with applications both‌ in 2D and 3D.‌​‌

7.1.5 MILo: Mesh-In-the-Loop Gaussian​​ Splatting for Detailed and​​​‌ Efficient Surface Reconstruction

Participants:‌ Antoine Guédon, Nissim‌​‌ Maruani, Maks Ovsjanikov​​​‌. While recent advances​ in Gaussian Splatting have​‌ enabled fast reconstruction of​​ high-quality 3D scenes from​​​‌ images, extracting accurate surface​ meshes remains a challenge.​‌ Current approaches extract the​​ surface through costly post-processing​​​‌ steps, resulting in the​ loss of fine geometric​‌ details or requiring significant​​ time and leading to​​​‌ very dense meshes with​ millions of vertices. More​‌ fundamentally, the a posteriori​​ conversion from a volumetric​​​‌ to a surface representation​ limits the ability of​‌ the final mesh to​​ preserve all geometric structures​​​‌ captured during training. We​ present MILo in 25​‌, a novel Gaussian​​ Splatting framework that bridges​​​‌ the gap between volumetric​ and surface representations by​‌ differentiably extracting a mesh​​ from the 3D Gaussians.​​​‌ We design a fully​ differentiable procedure that constructs​‌ the mesh-including both vertex​​ locations and connectivity-at every​​​‌ iteration directly from the​ parameters of the Gaussians,​‌ which are the only​​ quantities optimized during training.​​​‌ Our method introduces three​ key technical contributions: (1)​‌ a bidirectional consistency framework​​ ensuring both representations-Gaussians and​​​‌ the extracted mesh-capture the​ same underlying geometry during​‌ training; (2) an adaptive​​ mesh extraction process performed​​​‌ at each training iteration,​ which uses Gaussians as​‌ differentiable pivots for Delaunay​​ triangulation; (3) a novel​​​‌ method for computing signed​ distance values from the​‌ 3D Gaussians that enables​​ precise surface extraction while​​​‌ avoiding geometric erosion. Our​ approach can reconstruct complete​‌ scenes, including backgrounds, with​​ state-of-the-art quality while requiring​​​‌ an order of magnitude​ fewer mesh vertices than​‌ previous methods. Due to​​ their light weight and​​​‌ empty interior, our meshes​ are well suited for​‌ downstream applications such as​​ physics simulations and animation.​​​‌

7.1.6 DiffuMatch: Category-Agnostic Spectral​ Diffusion Priors for Robust​‌ Non-rigid Shape Matching

Participants:​​ Emery Pierson, Lei​​​‌ Li, Maks Ovsjanikov​. Deep functional maps​‌ have recently emerged as​​ a powerful tool for​​​‌ solving non-rigid shape correspondence​ tasks. Methods that use​‌ this approach combine the​​ power and flexibility of​​​‌ the functional map framework,​ with data-driven learning for​‌ improved accuracy and generality.​​ However, most existing methods​​​‌ in this area restrict​ the learning aspect only​‌ to the feature functions​​ and still rely on​​​‌ axiomatic modeling for formulating​ the training loss or​‌ for functional map regularization​​ inside the networks. This​​​‌ limits both the accuracy​ and the applicability of​‌ the resulting approaches only​​ to scenarios where assumptions​​​‌ of the axiomatic models​ hold. In this work​‌ 38, we show,​​ for the first time,​​​‌ that both in-network regularization​ and functional map training​‌ can be replaced with​​ data-driven methods. For this,​​​‌ we first train a​ generative model of functional​‌ maps in the spectral​​ domain using score-based generative​​​‌ modeling, built from a​ large collection of high-quality​‌ maps. We then exploit​​ the resulting model to​​​‌ promote the structural properties​ of ground truth functional​‌ maps on new shape​​ collections. Remarkably, we demonstrate​​​‌ that the learned models​ are category-agnostic, and can​‌ fully replace commonly used​​ strategies such as enforcing​​​‌ Laplacian commutativity or orthogonality​ of functional maps. Our​‌ key technical contribution is​​ a novel distillation strategy​​ from diffusion models in​​​‌ the spectral domain. Experiments‌ demonstrate that our learned‌​‌ regularization leads to better​​ results than axiomatic approaches​​​‌ for zero-shot non-rigid shape‌ matching.

7.1.7 ZeroKey: Point-Level‌​‌ Reasoning and Zero-Shot 3D​​ Keypoint Detection from Large​​​‌ Language Models

Participants: Bingchen‌ Gong, Diego Gomez‌​‌, Maks Ovsjanikov.​​ We propose in 32​​​‌ a novel zero-shot approach‌ for keypoint detection on‌​‌ 3D shapes. Point-level reasoning​​ on visual data is​​​‌ challenging as it requires‌ precise localization capability, posing‌​‌ problems even for powerful​​ models like DINO or​​​‌ CLIP. Traditional methods for‌ 3D keypoint detection rely‌​‌ heavily on annotated 3D​​ datasets and extensive supervised​​​‌ training, limiting their scalability‌ and applicability to new‌​‌ categories or domains. In​​ contrast, our method utilizes​​​‌ the rich knowledge embedded‌ within Multi-Modal Large Language‌​‌ Models (MLLMs). Specifically, we​​ demonstrate, for the first​​​‌ time, that pixel-level annotations‌ used to train recent‌​‌ MLLMs can be exploited​​ for both extracting and​​​‌ naming salient keypoints on‌ 3D models without any‌​‌ ground truth labels or​​ supervision. Experimental evaluations demonstrate​​​‌ that our approach achieves‌ competitive performance on standard‌​‌ benchmarks compared to supervised​​ methods, despite not requiring​​​‌ any 3D keypoint annotations‌ during training. Our results‌​‌ highlight the potential of​​ integrating language models for​​​‌ localized 3D shape understanding.‌ This work opens new‌​‌ avenues for cross-modal learning​​ and underscores the effectiveness​​​‌ of MLLMs in contributing‌ to 3D computer vision‌​‌ challenges.

7.1.8 NAM: Neural​​ Adjoint Maps for refining​​​‌ shape correspondences

Participants: Maks‌ Ovsjanikov. In this‌​‌ paper 27, we​​ propose a novel approach​​​‌ to refine 3D shape‌ correspondences by leveraging multi-layer‌​‌ perceptions within the framework​​ of functional maps. Central​​​‌ to our contribution is‌ the concept of Neural‌​‌ Adjoint Maps, a novel​​ neural representation that generalizes​​​‌ the traditional solution of‌ functional maps for estimating‌​‌ correspondence between manifolds. Fostering​​ our neural representation, we​​​‌ propose an iterative algorithm‌ explicitly designed to enhance‌​‌ the precision and robustness​​ of shape correspondence across​​​‌ diverse modalities such as‌ meshes and point clouds.‌​‌ By harnessing the expressive​​ power of non-linear solutions,​​​‌ our method captures intricate‌ geometric details and feature‌​‌ correspondences that conventional linear​​ approaches often overlook. Extensive​​​‌ evaluations on standard benchmarks‌ and challenging datasets demonstrate‌​‌ that our approach achieves​​ state-of-the-art accuracy for both​​​‌ isometric and non-isometric meshes‌ and for point clouds‌​‌ where traditional methods frequently​​ struggle. Moreover, we show​​​‌ the versatility of our‌ method in tasks such‌​‌ as signal and neural​​ field transfer, highlighting its​​​‌ broad applicability to domains‌ including computer graphics, medical‌​‌ imaging, and other fields​​ demanding precise transfer of​​​‌ information among 3D shapes.‌ Our work sets a‌​‌ new standard for shape​​ correspondence refinement, offering robust​​​‌ tools across various applications.‌

7.1.9 Escaping Plato's Cave:‌​‌ Towards the Alignment of​​ 3D and Text Latent​​​‌ Spaces

Participants: Souhail Hadgi‌, Diego Gomez,‌​‌ Maks Ovsjanikov. Recent​​ works have shown that,​​​‌ when trained at scale,‌ unimodal 2D vision and‌​‌ text encoders converge to​​ learned features that share​​​‌ remarkable structural properties, despite‌ arising from different representations.‌​‌ However, the role of​​​‌ 3D encoders with respect​ to other modalities remains​‌ unexplored. Furthermore, existing 3D​​ foundation models that leverage​​​‌ large datasets are typically​ trained with explicit alignment​‌ objectives with respect to​​ frozen encoders from other​​​‌ representations. In this work​ 33, we investigate​‌ the possibility of a​​ posteriori alignment of representations​​​‌ obtained from uni-modal 3D​ encoders compared to text-based​‌ feature spaces. We show​​ that naive post-training feature​​​‌ alignment of uni-modal text​ and 3D encoders results​‌ in limited performance. We​​ then focus on extracting​​​‌ subspaces of the corresponding​ feature spaces and discover​‌ that by projecting learned​​ representations onto well-chosen lowerdimensional​​​‌ subspaces the quality of​ alignment becomes significantly higher,​‌ leading to improved accuracy​​ on matching and retrieval​​​‌ tasks. Our analysis further​ sheds light on the​‌ nature of these shared​​ subspaces, which roughly separate​​​‌ between semantic and geometric​ data representations. Overall, ours​‌ is the first work​​ that helps to establish​​​‌ a baseline for post-training​ alignment of 3D unimodal​‌ and text feature spaces,​​ and helps to highlight​​​‌ both the shared and​ unique properties of 3D​‌ data compared to other​​ representations.

7.1.10 FourieRF: Few-Shot​​​‌ NeRFs via Progressive Fourier​ Frequency Control

Participants: Diego​‌ Gomez, Bingchen Gong​​, Maks Ovsjanikov.​​​‌ We present in 31​ a novel approach for​‌ few-shot NeRF estimation, aimed​​ at avoiding local artifacts​​​‌ and capable of efficiently​ reconstructing real scenes. In​‌ contrast to previous methods​​ that rely on pre-trained​​​‌ modules or various data-driven​ priors that only work​‌ well in specific scenarios,​​ our method is fully​​​‌ generic and is based​ on controlling the frequency​‌ of the learned signal​​ in the Fourier domain.​​​‌ We observe that in​ NeRF learning methods, highfrequency​‌ artifacts often show up​​ early in the optimization​​​‌ process, and the network​ struggles to correct them​‌ due to the lack​​ of dense supervision in​​​‌ few-shot cases. To counter​ this, we introduce an​‌ explicit curriculum training procedure,​​ which progressively adds higher​​​‌ frequencies throughout optimization, thus​ favoring global, low-frequency signals​‌ initially, and only adding​​ details later. We represent​​​‌ the radiance fields using​ a grid-based model and​‌ introduce an efficient approach​​ to control the frequency​​​‌ band of the learned​ signal in the Fourier​‌ domain. Therefore our method​​ achieves faster reconstruction and​​​‌ better rendering quality than​ purely MLP-based methods. We​‌ show that our approach​​ is general and is​​​‌ capable of producing high-quality​ results on real scenes,​‌ at a fraction of​​ the cost of competing​​​‌ methods. Our method opens​ the door to efficient​‌ and accurate scene acquisition​​ in the few-shot NeRF​​​‌ setting.

7.1.11 GANFusion: Feed-Forward​ Text-to-3D with Diffusion in​‌ GAN Space

Participants: Souhail​​ Attaiki, Maks Ovsjanikov​​​‌. In this work​ 29, we train​‌ a feed-forward text-to-3D diffusion​​ generator for human characters​​​‌ using only single-view 2D​ data for supervision. Existing​‌ 3D generative models cannot​​ yet match the fidelity​​​‌ of image or video​ generative models. State-of-the-art 3D​‌ generators are either trained​​ with explicit 3D supervision​​​‌ and are thus limited​ by the volume and​‌ diversity of existing 3D​​ data. Meanwhile, generators that​​ can be trained with​​​‌ only 2D data as‌ supervision typically produce coarser‌​‌ results, cannot be text-conditioned,​​ or must revert to​​​‌ test-time optimization. We observe‌ that GAN- and diffusion-based‌​‌ generators have complementary qualities:​​ GANs can be trained​​​‌ efficiently with 2D supervision‌ to produce high-quality 3D‌​‌ objects but are hard​​ to condition on text.​​​‌ In contrast, denoising diffusion‌ models can be conditioned‌​‌ efficiently but tend to​​ be hard to train​​​‌ with only 2D supervision.‌ We introduce GANFusion, which‌​‌ starts by generating unconditional​​ triplane features for 3D​​​‌ data using a GAN‌ architecture trained with only‌​‌ single-view 2D data. We​​ then generate random samples​​​‌ from the GAN, caption‌ them, and train a‌​‌ text-conditioned diffusion model that​​ directly learns to sample​​​‌ from the space of‌ good triplane features that‌​‌ can be decoded into​​ 3D objects.

7.2 Geometry​​​‌ for simulation

7.2.1 Kinetic‌ Free-Surface Flows and Foams‌​‌ with Sharp Interfaces

Participants:​​ Mathieu Desbrun.

In​​​‌ collaboration with Jiao Tong‌ University, Shanghai.

Kinetic multiphase‌​‌ flow solvers have recently​​ demonstrated exquisitely complex and​​​‌ turbulent fluid phenomena involving‌ splashing and bubbling. However,‌​‌ they require full simulation​​ of both the liquid​​​‌ phase and the air‌ to capture a large‌​‌ spectrum of fluid behaviors.​​ Moreover, they rely on​​​‌ diffuse interface tracking to‌ properly account for the‌​‌ interfacial forces involved in​​ fluid-air interactions. Consequently, simulating​​​‌ visually appealing fluids is‌ extremely compute intensive given‌​‌ the required resolution to​​ capture small bubbles, and​​​‌ foam simulation is unattainable‌ with this family of‌​‌ methods. While water simulation​​ involves density and viscosity​​​‌ differences between the two‌ phases so large that‌​‌ one can safely ignore​​ the dynamics of air,​​​‌ so-called kinetic free-surface solvers‌ that only consider the‌​‌ liquid motion have been​​ unable to reproduce the​​​‌ full gamut of turbulent‌ fluid behaviors, being often‌​‌ unstable for even moderately​​ complex scenarios. By revisiting​​​‌ kinetic solvers using sharp‌ interfaces and incorporating recent‌​‌ advances in single-phase and​​ multiphase LBM solvers, we​​​‌ propose in  28 a‌ free-surface kinetic solver, which‌​‌ we call HOME-FREE LBM,​​ that not only handles​​​‌ turbulence, glugging, and bubbling,‌ but even foam where‌​‌ bubbles stick to each​​ other through surface tension.​​​‌ We demonstrate that our‌ fluid simulator allows for‌​‌ fast and robust bubble​​ growth, breakup, and coalescence,​​​‌ at a fraction of‌ the computational time that‌​‌ existing CG fluid solvers​​ require.

7.2.2 Lightning-fast Boundary​​​‌ Element Method

Participants: Jiong‌ Chen, Mathieu Desbrun‌​‌.

In collaboration with​​ Florian Schäfer (Courant Institute,​​​‌ NYC, NY, USA).

Boundary‌ element methods (BEM) for‌​‌ solving linear elliptic partial​​ differential equations have gained​​​‌ traction in a wide‌ range of graphics applications:‌​‌ they eliminate the need​​ for volumetric meshing by​​​‌ solving for variables exclusively‌ on the domain boundary‌​‌ through a linear boundary​​ integral equation (BIE). However,​​​‌ BEM often generate dense‌ and ill-conditioned linear systems‌​‌ that lead to poor​​ computational scalability and substantial​​​‌ memory demands for large-scale‌ problems, limiting their applicability‌​‌ and efficiency in practice.​​ In 20, we​​​‌ address these limitations by‌ generalizing the Kaporin-based approach‌​‌ to asymmetric preconditioning: we​​​‌ construct a sparse approximation​ of the inverse-LU factorization​‌ of arbitrary BIE matrices​​ in a massively parallel​​​‌ manner. Our sparse inverse-LU​ factorization, when employed as​‌ a preconditioner for the​​ generalized minimal residual (GMRES)​​​‌ method, significantly enhances the​ efficiency of BIE solves,​‌ often yielding orders-of-magnitude speedups​​ in solving times.

7.2.3​​​‌ Immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann mesoscale​ method for wetting problems​‌

Participants: Mathieu Desbrun.​​

In collaboration with Kiwon​​​‌ Um (Telecom Paris) and​ a bunch of colleagues​‌ from AQTIVATE (European project).​​

In 17, we​​​‌ develop a mesoscale computational​ model to describe the​‌ interaction of a droplet​​ with a solid. The​​​‌ model is based on​ the hybrid combination of​‌ the immersed boundary and​​ the lattice Boltzmann computational​​​‌ schemes: the former is​ used to model the​‌ non-ideal sharp interface of​​ the droplet coupled with​​​‌ the inner and outer​ fluids, simulated with the​‌ lattice Boltzmann scheme. We​​ further introduce an interaction​​​‌ force to model the​ wetting interactions of the​‌ droplet with the solid​​ at mesoscale: this interaction​​​‌ force is designed with​ the key computational advantage​‌ of providing a regularization​​ of the interface profile​​​‌ close to the contact​ line, avoiding abrupt curvature​‌ changes that could otherwise​​ cause numerical instabilities. The​​​‌ proposed model substantially improves​ earlier immersed boundary -​‌ lattice Boltzmann models for​​ wetting in that it​​​‌ allows a description of​ an ample variety of​‌ wetting interactions, ranging from​​ hydrophobic to hydrophilic cases,​​​‌ without the need for​ any pre-calibration study on​‌ model parameters to be​​ used. Model validations against​​​‌ theoretical results for droplet​ shape at equilibrium and​‌ scaling laws for droplet​​ spreading dynamics are addressed.​​​‌

7.2.4 Solver-in-the-loop approach to​ closure of shell models​‌ of turbulence

Participants: Mathieu​​ Desbrun.

In collaboration​​​‌ with Kiwon Um (Telecom​ Paris) and a bunch​‌ of colleagues from AQTIVATE​​ (European project).

This work​​​‌ 23 studies an a​ posteriori data-driven approach (known​‌ as solver-in-the-loop) for subgrid​​ modeling of a shell​​​‌ model for turbulence. This​ approach takes advantage of​‌ the differentiable physics paradigm​​ of deep learning, allowing​​​‌ a neural network model​ to interact with the​‌ differential equation solver over​​ time during the training​​​‌ process. The closure model​ is, then, naturally exposed​‌ to equations-informed input distributions​​ by accounting for prior​​​‌ corrections over the temporal​ evolution in training. Such​‌ a characteristic makes this​​ approach depart from the​​​‌ conventional a priori instantaneous​ training paradigm and often​‌ leads to a more​​ accurate and stable closure​​​‌ model. Our study demonstrates​ that the closure learned​‌ via this a posteriori​​ approach is able to​​​‌ reproduce high-order statistical moments​ of interest also in​‌ closures of high Reynolds​​ number turbulence. Moreover, we​​​‌ investigate the performance of​ the learned model by​‌ experimenting with the effect​​ of unrolling in time,​​​‌ which has remained for​ the most part unexplored​‌ in the literature. Finally,​​ we discuss potential extensions​​​‌ of this approach to​ Navier-Stokes equations.

7.3 Geometry​‌ for data science

7.3.1​​ LACONIC: A 3D Layout​​​‌ Adapter for Controllable Image​ Creation

Participants: Léopold Maillard​‌, Maks Ovsjanikov.​​ Existing generative approaches for​​ guided image synthesis of​​​‌ multi-object scenes typically rely‌ on 2D controls in‌​‌ the image or text​​ space. As a result,​​​‌ these methods struggle to‌ maintain and respect consistent‌​‌ three-dimensional geometric structure, underlying​​ the scene. In this​​​‌ paper 34, we‌ propose a novel conditioning‌​‌ approach, training method and​​ adapter network that can​​​‌ be plugged into pretrained‌ text-to-image diffusion models. Our‌​‌ approach provides a way​​ to endow such models​​​‌ with 3D-awareness, while leveraging‌ their rich prior knowledge.‌​‌ Our method supports camera​​ control, conditioning on explicit​​​‌ 3D geometries and, for‌ the first time, accounts‌​‌ for the entire context​​ of a scene, i.e.,​​​‌ both on and off-screen‌ items, to synthesize plausible‌​‌ and semantically rich images.​​ Despite its multi-modal nature,​​​‌ our model is lightweight,‌ requires a reasonable number‌​‌ of data for supervised​​ learning and shows remarkable​​​‌ generalization power. We also‌ introduce methods for intuitive‌​‌ and consistent image editing​​ and restyling, e.g., by​​​‌ positioning, rotating or resizing‌ individual objects in a‌​‌ scene. Our method integrates​​ well within various image​​​‌ creation workflows and enables‌ a richer set of‌​‌ applications compared to previous​​ approaches.

7.3.2 AtomSurf :​​​‌ Surface Representation for Learning‌ on Protein Structures

Participants:‌​‌ Souhail Hadgi, Vincent​​ Mallet, Maks Ovsjanikov​​​‌. While there has‌ been significant progress in‌​‌ evaluating and comparing different​​ representations for learning on​​​‌ protein data, the role‌ of surface-based learning approaches‌​‌ remains not well-understood. In​​ particular, there is a​​​‌ lack of direct and‌ fair benchmark comparison between‌​‌ the best available surface-based​​ learning methods against alternative​​​‌ representations such as graphs.‌ Moreover, the few existing‌​‌ surface-based approaches either use​​ surface information in isolation​​​‌ or, at best, perform‌ global pooling between surface‌​‌ and graph-based architectures. In​​ this work 35,​​​‌ we fill this gap‌ by first adapting a‌​‌ state-of-the-art surface encoder for​​ protein learning tasks. We​​​‌ then perform a direct‌ and fair comparison of‌​‌ the resulting method against​​ alternative approaches within the​​​‌ Atom3D benchmark, highlighting the‌ limitations of pure surface-based‌​‌ learning. Finally, we propose​​ an integrated approach, which​​​‌ allows learned feature sharing‌ between graphs and surface‌​‌ representations on the level​​ of nodes and vertices​​​‌ across all layers. We‌ demonstrate that the resulting‌​‌ architecture achieves state-of-the-art results​​ on all tasks in​​​‌ the Atom3D benchmark, while‌ adhering to the strict‌​‌ benchmark protocol, as well​​ as more broadly on​​​‌ binding site identification and‌ binding pocket classification. Furthermore,‌​‌ we use coarsened surfaces​​ and optimize our approach​​​‌ for efficiency, making our‌ tool competitive in training‌​‌ and inference time with​​ existing techniques.

7.3.3 Finding​​​‌ antibodies in cryo-EM maps‌ with CrAI

Participants: Maks‌​‌ Ovsjanikov. Therapeutic antibodies​​ have emerged as a​​​‌ prominent class of new‌ drugs due to their‌​‌ high specificity and their​​ ability to bind to​​​‌ several protein targets. Once‌ an initial antibody has‌​‌ been identified, its design​​ and characteristics are refined​​​‌ using structural information, when‌ it is available. Cryo-EM‌​‌ is currently the most​​ effective method to obtain​​​‌ 3D structures. It relies‌ on well-established methods to‌​‌ process raw data into​​​‌ a 3D map, which​ may, however, be noisy​‌ and contain artifacts. To​​ fully interpret these maps​​​‌ the number, position, and​ structure of antibodies and​‌ other proteins present must​​ be determined. Unfortunately, existing​​​‌ automated methods addressing this​ step have limited accuracy,​‌ require additional inputs and​​ high-resolution maps, and exhibit​​​‌ long running times. We​ propose in 26 the​‌ first fully automatic and​​ efficient method dedicated to​​​‌ finding antibodies in cryo-EM​ maps: CrAI. This machine​‌ learning approach leverages the​​ conserved structure of antibodies​​​‌ and a dedicated novel​ database that we built​‌ to solve this problem.​​ Running a prediction takes​​​‌ only a few seconds,​ instead of hours, and​‌ requires nothing but the​​ cryo-EM map, seamlessly integrating​​​‌ within automated analysis pipelines.​ Our method can find​‌ the location and pose​​ of both Fabs and​​​‌ VHHs at resolutions up​ to 10 Å and​‌ is significantly more reliable​​ than existing approaches.

7.3.4​​​‌ Signed Barcodes for Multi-parameter​ Persistence via Rank Decompositions​‌ and Rank-Exact Resolutions

Participants:​​ Steve Oudot.

In​​​‌ collaboration with Magnus Botnan​ (VU Amsterdam) and Steffen​‌ Oppermann (NTNU).

In this​​ work 18, we​​​‌ introduce the signed barcode,​ a new visual representation​‌ of the global structure​​ of the rank invariant​​​‌ of a multi-parameter persistence​ module or, more generally,​‌ of a poset representation.​​ Like its unsigned counterpart​​​‌ in one-parameter persistence, the​ signed barcode decomposes the​‌ rank invariant as a​​ -linear combination of rank​​​‌ invariants of indicator modules​ supported on segments in​‌ the poset. We develop​​ the theory behind these​​​‌ decompositions, both for the​ usual rank invariant and​‌ for its generalizations, showing​​ under what conditions they​​​‌ exist and are unique.​ We also show that,​‌ like its unsigned counterpart,​​ the signed barcode reflects​​​‌ in part the algebraic​ structure of the module:​‌ specifically, it derives from​​ the terms in the​​​‌ minimal rank-exact resolution of​ the module, i.e., its​‌ minimal projective resolution relative​​ to the class of​​​‌ short exact sequences on​ which the rank invariant​‌ is additive. To complete​​ the picture, we show​​​‌ some experimental results that​ illustrate the contribution of​‌ the signed barcode in​​ the exploration of multi-parameter​​​‌ persistence modules.

7.3.5 Computation​ of gamma-linear projected barcodes​‌ for multiparameter persistence

Participants:​​ Steve Oudot.

In​​​‌ collaboration with Alex Fernandez​ and François Petit (CRESS,​‌ Inserm).

The γ-linear​​ projected barcode was recently​​​‌ introduced as an alternative​ to the well-known fibered​‌ barcode for multiparameter persistence,​​ in which restrictions of​​​‌ the modules to lines​ are replaced by pushforwards​‌ of the modules along​​ linear forms in the​​​‌ polar of some fixed​ cone γ. So​‌ far, the computation of​​ the γ-linear projected​​​‌ barcode has only been​ studied in the functional​‌ setting, in which persistence​​ modules come from the​​​‌ persistent cohomology of ℝ​n-valued functions. In​‌ this work 22 we​​ develop a method that​​​‌ works in the algebraic​ setting directly, for any​‌ multiparameter persistence module over​​ n that is​​​‌ given via a finite​ free resolution. Our approach​‌ is similar to that​​ of RIVET: first, it​​ pre-processes the resolution to​​​‌ build an arrangement in‌ the dual of ℝ‌​‌n and a barcode​​ template in each face​​​‌ of the arrangement; second,‌ given any query linear‌​‌ form u in the​​ polar of γ,​​​‌ it locates u within‌ the arrangement to produce‌​‌ the corresponding barcode efficiently.​​ While our theoretical complexity​​​‌ bounds are similar to‌ the ones of RIVET,‌​‌ our arrangement turns out​​ to be simpler thanks​​​‌ to the linear structure‌ of the space of‌​‌ linear forms. Our theoretical​​ analysis combines sheaf-theoretic and​​​‌ module-theoretic techniques, showing that‌ multiparameter persistence modules can‌​‌ be converted into a​​ special type of complexes​​​‌ of sheaves on vector‌ spaces called conic-complexes, whose‌​‌ derived pushforwards by linear​​ forms have predictable barcodes.​​​‌

7.3.6 Intrinsic Interleaving Distance‌ for Merge Trees

Participants:‌​‌ Steve Oudot.

In​​ collaboration with Ellen Gasparovic​​​‌ (Union College), Elizabeth Munch‌ (Michigan State University), Katharine‌​‌ Turner (Australian National University),​​ Bei Wang (University of​​​‌ Utah) and Yusu Wang‌ (UCSD).

A merge tree‌​‌ is a type of​​ graph-based topological summary that​​​‌ tracks the evolution of‌ connected components in the‌​‌ sublevel sets of scalar​​ functions. Merge trees enjoy​​​‌ widespread applications in data‌ analysis and scientific visualization.‌​‌ In this work 24​​, we consider the​​​‌ problem of comparing two‌ merge trees via the‌​‌ notion of interleaving distance​​ in the metric space​​​‌ setting. We investigate several‌ theoretical properties of such‌​‌ a metric. In particular,​​ we show that the​​​‌ interleaving distance is intrinsic‌ on the space of‌​‌ labeled merge trees and​​ provide an algorithm to​​​‌ construct metric 1-centers for‌ collections of labeled merge‌​‌ trees. We further prove​​ that the intrinsic property​​​‌ of the interleaving distance‌ also holds for the‌​‌ space of unlabeled merge​​ trees. Our results provide​​​‌ practical recipes for performing‌ statistics on merge trees.‌​‌

7.3.7 T-REGS: Minimum Spanning​​ Tree Regularization for Self-Supervised​​​‌ Learning

Participants: Julie Mordacq‌, David Loiseaux,‌​‌ Steve Oudot.

In​​ collaboration with Vicky Kalogeiton​​​‌ (Vista team, LIX, École‌ polytechnique).

Self-supervised learning (SSL)‌​‌ has emerged as a​​ powerful paradigm for learning​​​‌ representations without labeled data,‌ often by enforcing invariance‌​‌ to input transformations such​​ as rotations or blurring.​​​‌ Recent studies have highlighted‌ two pivotal properties for‌​‌ effective representations: (i) avoiding​​ dimensional collapse-where the learned​​​‌ features occupy only a‌ low-dimensional subspace, and (ii)‌​‌ enhancing uniformity of the​​ induced distribution. In this​​​‌ work 37, we‌ introduce T-REGS, a simple‌​‌ regularization framework for SSL​​ based on the length​​​‌ of the Minimum Spanning‌ Tree (MST) over the‌​‌ learned representation. We provide​​ theoretical analysis demonstrating that​​​‌ T-REGS simultaneously mitigates dimensional‌ collapse and promotes distribution‌​‌ uniformity on arbitrary compact​​ Riemannian manifolds. Several experiments​​​‌ on synthetic data and‌ on classical SSL benchmarks‌​‌ validate the effectiveness of​​ our approach at enhancing​​​‌ representation quality.

8 Bilateral‌ contracts and grants with‌​‌ industry

8.1 Bilateral contracts​​ with industry

8.1.1 Contract​​​‌ with DASSAULT SYSTEMES

Participants:‌ Maks Ovsjanikov.

  • Title:‌​‌
    Generative Models for the​​ Guided Synthesis of Complex​​​‌ and Functional 3D Scenes‌
  • Partner Institution(s):
    DASSAULT SYSTEMES‌​‌
  • Date/Duration:
    2023-2026
  • Additionnal info/keywords:​​​‌

    This thesis focuses on​ machine learning applied to​‌ 3D computer vision, specifically​​ addressing challenges related to​​​‌ the automatic synthesis of​ 3D environments.

    The project​‌ funds one PhD student​​ for 3 years.

8.1.2​​​‌ MEDITWIN with DASSAULT SYSTEMES​

Participants: Mathieu Desbrun,​‌ Maks Ovsjanikov.

  • Title:​​
    MEDITWIN: Virtual human twins​​​‌ for medical applications
  • Partner​ Institution(s):
    DASSAULT SYSTEMES
  • Date/Duration:​‌
    2023-2028
  • Additionnal info/keywords:
    In​​ the context of the​​​‌ consortium MEDITWIN, Geomerix has​ started working on geometric​‌ measure theory and reduced​​ models (Desbrun) and non-rigid​​​‌ registration (Ovsjanikov), with two​ students and two postdocs.​‌

9 Partnerships and cooperations​​

9.1 International research visitors​​​‌

9.1.1 Visits of international​ scientists

Inria International Chair​‌
  • We appplied for Jorg​​ Peters (international expert in​​​‌ CAD/CAGD from University of​ Florida), but failed to​‌ receive funding.

9.1.2 Visits​​ to international teams

Sabbatical​​​‌ programme
  • Maks Ovsjanikov Visiting​ Researcher, Google DeepMind, Paris.​‌

9.2 European initiatives

9.2.1​​ Horizon Europe

ERC Consolidator​​​‌ grant VEGA

 

Participants: Maks​ Ovsjanikov.

  • Title:
    VEGA:​‌ Universal Geometric Transfer Learning​​
  • Partner Institution(s):
    • European Research​​​‌ Concil (ERC)
  • Date/Duration:
    2024-2028​
  • Additionnal info/keywords:
    In this​‌ project, we propose to​​ develop a theoretical and​​​‌ practical framework for transfer​ learning with geometric 3D​‌ data. Most existing learning-based​​ approaches, aimed at analyzing​​​‌ 3D data, are based​ on training neural networks​‌ from scratch for each​​ data modality and application.​​​‌ Our main goal will​ be to develop universally-applicable​‌ methods by combining powerful​​ pre-trainable modules with effective​​​‌ multi-scale analysis and fine-tuning,​ given minimal task-specific data.​‌ The overall key to​​ our study will be​​​‌ analyzing rigorous ways, both​ theoretically and in practice,​‌ in which solutions can​​ be transferred and adapted​​​‌ across problems, semantic categories​ and geometric data types.​‌

9.2.2 Other european programs/initiatives​​

Mathieu Desbrun is part​​​‌ of AQTIVATE, a European​ project with funding from​‌ the European Union's research​​ and innovation programme under​​​‌ the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Doctoral​ Networks action and Grant​‌ Agreement No 101072344. He​​ is coadvising (with Kiwon​​​‌ Um, from Telecom Paris)​ three PhD candidates in​‌ this project.

9.3 National​​ initiatives

Contrat de recherche​​​‌ Inria - SHOM

 

Participants:​ Steve Oudot.

  • Title:​‌
    Traitement de nuage de​​ points bathyémtriques (SMF et​​​‌ Lidar) par l'approche apprentissage​ automatique
  • Partner Institution(s):
    • Service​‌ Hydrographique et Océanographique de​​ la Marine (SHOM), Brest,​​​‌ France
  • Date/Duration:
    2024-2028
  • Additionnal​ info/keywords:
    Ce projet a​‌ pour objectif de mieux​​ appréhender, à l’aide de​​​‌ l’apprentissage automatique, la donnée​ bathymétrique sous forme de​‌ nuages de points pour​​ améliorer la description des​​​‌ fonds marins et des​ zones côtières. Ce sujet​‌ est en lien avec​​ le traitement des erreurs​​​‌ ponctuelles de la donnée​ bathymétrique et également avec​‌ l’utilisation de cette donnée​​ pour la génération de​​​‌ modèles numériques de terrain.​
AEx PreMediT

Participants: Steve​‌ Oudot.

  • Title:
    Precision​​ Medicine using Topology
  • Partner​​​‌ Institution(s):
    • CRESS, Hôtel-Dieu, France​
  • Date/Duration:
    2022-2025
  • Additionnal info/keywords:​‌
    While recent advances in​​ machine learning are opening​​​‌ promising prospects for precision​ medicine, the sometimes small​‌ size, sparsity, or partly​​ categorical nature of the​​​‌ data involved pose some​ crucial challenges. The goal​‌ of PreMediT is to​​ address these challenges by​​ integrating information about the​​​‌ geometric and topological structure‌ of the data into‌​‌ the machine learning pipelines.​​

10 Dissemination

10.1 Promoting​​​‌ scientific activities

10.1.1 Scientific‌ events: organisation

General chair,‌​‌ scientific chair
  • Steve Oudot​​ (together with Sira Gratz​​​‌ and Kaveh Mousavand) coordinated‌ the thematic program TDA-PARTI‌​‌ at OIST (see https://www.oist.jp/visiting-program/tp25td​​), June-August, 2025.
  • Steve​​​‌ Oudot (together with Guillaume‌ Moroz from Inria Nancy)‌​‌ organized the 24th​​ French Computational Geometry Days​​​‌ in Roscoff (see https://jga2025.sciencesconf.org/‌), October 13-17, 2025.‌​‌
  • Pooran Memari served as​​ Co-Chair of Eurographics STARs​​​‌ (scientific surveys), 2025.
Member‌ of the organizing committees‌​‌

10.1.2 Scientific events:‌ selection

Member of the‌​‌ conference program committees
  • Jiong​​ Chen served on the​​​‌ Posters jury for SIGGRAPH‌ 2025.
  • Jiong Chen served‌​‌ on the Technical Papers​​ committee for SIGGRAPH Asia​​​‌ 2025.
  • Pooran Memari served‌ as Technical Papers Conflict‌​‌ of Interest (COI) Coordinator,​​ ACM Siggraph Asia 2025.​​​‌
  • Pooran Memari is the‌ Coordinator of the LIX‌​‌ seminar, since April 2025.​​

10.1.3 Journal

Member of​​​‌ the editorial boards
  • Pooran‌ Memari Associate Editor of‌​‌ Computer Graphics Forum (CGF),​​ from April 2021 to​​​‌ March 2025.
  • Mathieu Desbrun‌ Associate Editor of Journal‌​‌ of Geometric Mechanics, AIMS,​​ 2024.
  • Maks Ovsjanikov Associate​​​‌ Editor, Transactions on Visualization‌ and Computer Graphics journal,‌​‌ since 2020.
  • Steve Oudot​​ Associate Editor of the​​​‌ Journal of Computational Geometry,‌ since 2015.

10.1.4 Invited‌​‌ talks

10.1.5​​ Research administration

  • Maks Ovsjanikov​​​‌ Fellow of ELLIS, senior‌ member of the European‌​‌ society for top AI​​​‌ researchers, since 2023.
  • Pooran​ Memari Member of the​‌ Board of the French​​ Chapter of Eurographics (EGFR),​​​‌ since October 2024.
  • Pooran​ Memari Co-responsible for the​‌ Interaction, Graphics & Design​​ (IGD) master’s program at​​​‌ IP-Paris, for the academic​ year 2024-2025.
  • Steve Oudot​‌ member of the Conseil​​ Académique of IP Paris,​​​‌ representing Inria, since 2024​
  • Pooran Memari Member of​‌ the LIX laboratory council,​​ Ecole Polytechnique, since 2020​​​‌
  • Mathieu Desbrun is on​ the Conseil de Direction​‌ for the LIX lab,​​ Ecole Polytechnique
  • Mathieu Desbrun​​​‌ is the "Modeling, Simulation​ and Learning" pole leader​‌ for the LIX lab,​​ Ecole Polytechnique

10.2 Teaching​​​‌ - Supervision - Juries​ - Educational and pedagogical​‌ outreach

10.2.1 Teaching

  • Master:​​ Steve Oudot and Pooran​​​‌ Memari , Computational Geometry​ and Topology, 24h eq-TD,​‌ M2, MPRI;
  • Master: Maks​​ Ovsjanikov, Geometry Processing and​​​‌ Geometric Deep Learning, M2,​ MVA;
  • Master: Steve Oudot,​‌ Topological data analysis, 45h​​ eq-TD, M1, École polytechnique,​​​‌ France;
  • Master: Mathieu Desbrun​ , Digital Representation and​‌ Analysis of Shapes, M2,​​ École polytechnique, France;
  • Master:​​​‌ Mathieu Desbrun , Computer​ Animation, M2, École polytechnique,​‌ France;
  • Master: Pooran Memari​​ , Digital Representation and​​​‌ Analysis of Shapes, M2,​ École polytechnique, France;
  • Master:​‌ Pooran Memari , Geometric​​ Algorithms for Point Patterns​​​‌ and 2D embedded Structures,​ Across Applications in Visual​‌ Computing, Graduate Degree M2-​​ Artificial Intelligence and Advanced​​​‌ Visual Computing, Ecole Polytechnique​ (CSC-54445-EP), France;
  • Master: Maks​‌ Ovsjanikov, Artificial Intelligence and​​ Advanced Visual Computing, École​​​‌ polytechnique, France;
  • Undergrad-Master: Steve​ Oudot, Algorithms for data​‌ analysis in Python, 22.5h​​ eq-TD, L3/M1, École Polytechnique,​​​‌ France.
  • Pooran Memari Bachelor:​ Computer Science Projects Coordinator,​‌ 3rt Year of Bachelor​​ Polytechnique, IP-Paris, since 2019.​​​‌

10.2.2 Supervision

  • PhD in​ progress: Théo Prosper, Institut​‌ Polytechnique de Paris. Analysis​​ of multi-parameter Reeb spaces​​​‌ and Mappers. Started Oct.​ 2025. Steve Oudot and​‌ Mathieu Carrière (Inria Sophia-Antipolis).​​
  • PhD in progress: Julie​​​‌ Mordacq, Analyse Topologique des​ Données et Apprentissage Machine​‌ pour analyser et prédire​​ des transitions de phase​​​‌ en n-dimensions, Institut Polytechnique​ de Paris. Started Sept.​‌ 2022. Steve Oudot and​​ Vicky Kalogeiton (Vista, LIX).​​​‌
  • PhD in progress: Jingyi​ Li, Invariants algébriques effectifs​‌ pour la persistance multi-paramètre,​​ Institut Polytechnique de Paris.​​​‌ Started Nov. 2023. Steve​ Oudot.
  • PhD in progress:​‌ Nasim Bagheri Shouraki, Application​​ of neurocognition to study​​​‌ the effectiveness of geometric​ tactile 2D patterns in​‌ navigation maps and instructions​​ for Visually Impaired Individuals,​​​‌ IP Paris. Start date:​ October 2024. Pooran Memari​‌ and Panos Mavros (Telecom​​ Paris).
  • PhD in progress:​​​‌ Theo Braune, École Polytechnique,​ Palaiseau. Mathieu Desbrun.
  • PhD​‌ in progress: Nissim Maruani,​​ École Polytechnique, Palaiseau. Mathieu​​​‌ Desbrun.
  • PhD in progress:​ Lucas Brifault, École Polytechnique,​‌ Palaiseau. Mathieu Desbrun.
  • PhD​​ in progress: Souhail Hadgi,​​​‌ École Polytechnique, Palaiseau. Maks​ Ovsjanikov.
  • PhD in progress:​‌ Leopold Maillard, Dassault Systèmes.​​ Maks Ovsjanikov.
  • PhD in​​​‌ progress: Diego Gomez, École​ Polytechnique, Palaiseau. Maks Ovsjanikov.​‌
  • PhD in progress: Erkan​​ Turan, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau.​​​‌ Maks Ovsjanikov.
  • PhD in​ progress: Tamara Künzle, Sorbonne​‌ University, co-supervised by Maks​​ Ovsjanikov.
  • PhD in progress:​​​‌ Julien Gaubil, supervised by​ Maks Ovsjanikov.
  • PhD in​‌ progress: Aude Bouillé, Inria,​​ Computational Aspects of Generalized​​ Voronoi Diagrams, Pooran Memari​​​‌ and Mathieu Desbrun
  • PhD‌ in progress: Emilien Ganier,‌​‌ Ecole Polytechnique, Geometric Proximity​​ graphs with Higher-Order Statistical​​​‌ Integration, Pooran Memari and‌ Steve Oudot.

10.2.3 Juries‌​‌

  • Steve Oudot member of​​ the Commission Recherche of​​​‌ Institut Polytechnique de Paris,‌ in charge of evaluating‌​‌ applications to Habilitation à​​ Diriger des Recherches, since​​​‌ 2025.
  • Steve Oudot president‌ of the hiring committee‌​‌ for 3 Assistant Professor​​ positions at the LIX​​​‌ (École Polytechnique), Spring 2025.‌
  • Pooran Memari member of‌​‌ hiring comittee for Université​​ de Strasbourg (20/05/2025),
  • Pooran​​​‌ Memari member of IP-Paris‌ IGD (Interaction, Graphics &‌​‌ Design) Master and PhD​​ Track Selection Committee, since​​​‌ 2021.
  • Pooran Memari Member‌ of PhD Jury, Clément‌​‌ Poull, Université Bourgogne (11/12/2025).​​
  • Pooran Memari Member of​​​‌ PhD Jury, Grégoire Grzeczkowicz‌ (IGN), IGN (13/01/2025).

10.3‌​‌ Popularization

10.3.1 Others science​​ outreach relevant activities

  • Exhibition​​​‌ stand run by PhD‌ student Nasim Bagheri Shouraki‌​‌ , November 17–21, 2025,​​ at École Polytechnique, as​​​‌ part of the 29th‌ edition of the European‌​‌ Week for the Employment​​ of People with Disabilities​​​‌ (EWEPD), focused on our‌ project on the application‌​‌ of geometric tactile patterns​​ to accessibility, with particular​​​‌ emphasis on tactile maps‌ for navigation and education‌​‌ for blind and visually​​ impaired (BVI) people.
  • Pooran​​​‌ Memari participated in the‌ middle school students work-experience‌​‌ week (stage de troisième)​​ at Inria, week of​​​‌ December 15th 2025.

11‌ Scientific production

Major publications‌​‌

11.1 Publications of the​ year

International journals

International‌​‌ peer-reviewed conferences

  • 29 inproceedings​​S.Souhaib Attaiki,​​​‌ P.Paul Guerrero,‌ D.Duygu Ceylan,‌​‌ N. J.Niloy J​​ Mitra and M.Maks​​​‌ Ovsjanikov. GANFusion: Feed-Forward‌ Text-to-3D with Diffusion in‌​‌ GAN Space.WACV​​ 2025 - IEEE/CVF Winter​​​‌ Conference on Applications of‌ Computer VisionTucson, United‌​‌ StatesFebruary 2025HAL​​DOIback to text​​​‌
  • 30 inproceedingsL.Lucas‌ Brifault, D.David‌​‌ Cohen-Steiner and M.Mathieu​​ Desbrun. Efficient and​​​‌ Scalable Spatial Regularization of‌ Optimal Transport.SA‌​‌ Conference Papers '25: SIGGRAPH​​ Asia 2025 Conference Papers​​​‌SA Conference Papers '25:‌ SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference‌​‌ PapersHong Kong Hong​​​‌ Kong, ChinaACMDecember​ 2025, 1-10HAL​‌DOIback to text​​back to text
  • 31​​​‌ inproceedingsD.Diego Gomez​, B.Bingchen Gong​‌ and M.Maks Ovsjanikov​​. FourieRF: Few-Shot NeRFs​​​‌ via Progressive Fourier Frequency​ Control.3DV 2025​‌ - International Conference on​​ 3D VisionSingapore, Singapore​​​‌IEEEFebruary 2025,​ 607-615HALDOIback​‌ to text
  • 32 inproceedings​​B.Bingchen Gong,​​​‌ D.Diego Gomez,​ A.Abdullah Hamdi,​‌ A.Abdelrahman Eldesokey,​​ A.Ahmed Abdelreheem,​​​‌ P.Peter Wonka and​ M.Maks Ovsjanikov.​‌ ZeroKey: Point-Level Reasoning and​​ Zero-Shot 3D Keypoint Detection​​​‌ from Large Language Models​.ICCV 2025 -​‌ International Conference on Computer​​ VisionHonolulu, United States​​​‌arXiv2025HALDOI​back to text
  • 33​‌ inproceedingsS.Souhail Hadgi​​, L.Luca Moschella​​​‌, A.Andrea Santilli​, D.Diego Gomez​‌, Q.Qixing Huang​​, E.Emanuele Rodolà​​​‌, S.Simone Melzi​ and M.Maks Ovsjanikov​‌. Escaping Plato’s Cave:​​ Towards the Alignment of​​​‌ 3D and Text Latent​ Spaces.CVPR 2025​‌ - Conference on Computer​​ Vision and Pattern Recognition​​​‌Nashville, United StatesIEEE​June 2025, 19825-19835​‌HALDOIback to​​ text
  • 34 inproceedingsL.​​​‌Léopold Maillard, T.​Tom Durand, A.​‌ R.Adrien Ramanana Rahary​​ and M.Maks Ovsjanikov​​​‌. LACONIC: A 3D​ Layout Adapter for Controllable​‌ Image Creation.International​​ Conference on Computer Vision,​​​‌ ICCV 2025Honolulu, United​ StatesarXiv2025HAL​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 35 inproceedingsV.Vincent​​​‌ Mallet, S.Souhaib​ Attaiki, Y.Yangyang​‌ Miao, B.Bruno​​ Correia and M.Maks​​​‌ Ovsjanikov. AtomSurf :​ Surface Representation for Learning​‌ on Protein Structures.​​ICLR 2025 - The​​​‌ Thirteenth International Conference on​ Learning RepresentationsSingapore, Singapore​‌April 2025HALDOI​​back to text
  • 36​​​‌ inproceedingsN.Nissim Maruani​, W.Wang Yifan​‌, M.Matthew Fisher​​, P.Pierre Alliez​​​‌ and M.Mathieu Desbrun​. ShapeShifter: 3D Variations​‌ Using Multiscale and Sparse​​ Point-Voxel Diffusion.CVPR​​​‌ 2025 - IEEE/CVF Conference​ on Computer Vision and​‌ Pattern RecognitionNashville (Tenessee),​​ United StatesJune 2025​​​‌HALback to text​
  • 37 inproceedingsJ.Julie​‌ Mordacq, D.David​​ Loiseaux, V.Vicky​​​‌ Kalogeiton and S.Steve​ Oudot. T-REGS: Minimum​‌ Spanning Tree Regularization for​​ Self-Supervised Learning.Advances​​​‌ in Neural Information Processing​ Systems (NeurIPS)NeurIPS 2025​‌ - Annual Conference on​​ Neural Information Processing Systems​​​‌San Diego (CA), United​ StatesOctober 2025HAL​‌back to textback​​ to text
  • 38 inproceedings​​​‌E.Emery Pierson,​ L.Lei Li,​‌ A.Angela Dai and​​ M.Maks Ovsjanikov.​​​‌ DiffuMatch: Category-Agnostic Spectral Diffusion​ Priors for Robust Non-rigid​‌ Shape Matching.ICCV​​ 2025 - International Conference​​​‌ on Computer VisionHonolulu,​ United StatesarXiv2025​‌HALDOIback to​​ text

Cited publications

  • 39​​​‌ articleH.Hervé Abdi​ and D.Dominique Valentin​‌. Multiple correspondence analysis​​.Encyclopedia of measurement​​​‌ and statistics24​2007, 651--657back​‌ to text
  • 40 article​​G.Giancarlo Alfonsi.​​ Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes equations for​​​‌ turbulence modeling.Applied‌ Mechanics Reviews624‌​‌2009back to text​​
  • 41 articleM. R.​​​‌Michael R. Allshouse and‌ J.-L.Jean-Luc Thiffeault.‌​‌ Detecting coherent structures using​​ braids.Physica D:​​​‌ Nonlinear Phenomena2412012‌, 95--105back to‌​‌ text
  • 42 articleD.​​ N.Douglas N. Arnold​​​‌, R. S.Richard‌ S. Falk and R.‌​‌Ragnar Winther. Finite​​ element exterior calculus, homological​​​‌ techniques, and applications.‌Acta Numerica152006‌​‌, 1–155back to​​ text
  • 43 inproceedingsM.​​​‌Mathieu Aubry, U.‌Ulrich Schlickewei and D.‌​‌Daniel Cremers. The​​ wave kernel signature: A​​​‌ quantum mechanical approach to‌ shape analysis.2011‌​‌ IEEE international conference on​​ computer vision workshops (ICCV​​​‌ workshops)IEEE2011,‌ 1626--1633back to text‌​‌
  • 44 inproceedingsO.Omri​​ Azencot, M.Mirela​​​‌ Ben-Chen, F.Fédéric‌ Chazal and M.Maks‌​‌ Ovsjanikov. An operator​​ approach to tangent vector​​​‌ field processing.Computer‌ Graphics Forum325‌​‌Wiley Online Library2013​​, 73--82back to​​​‌ text
  • 45 articleO.‌Omri Azencot, M.‌​‌Maks Ovsjanikov, F.​​Frédéric Chazal and M.​​​‌Mirela Ben-Chen. Discrete‌ derivatives of vector fields‌​‌ on surfaces--an operator approach​​.ACM Trans. Graph.​​​‌3432015,‌ 1--13back to text‌​‌
  • 46 articleB.Bogdan​​ Batko, T.Tomasz​​​‌ Kaczynski, M.Marian‌ Mrozek and T.Thomas‌​‌ Wanner. Linking combinatorial​​ and classical dynamics: Conley​​​‌ index and Morse decompositions‌.Foundations of Computational‌​‌ Mathematics2052020​​, 967--1012back to​​​‌ text
  • 47 articleU.‌Ulrich Bauer, M.‌​‌ B.Magnus B Botnan​​, S.Steffen Oppermann​​​‌ and J.Johan Steen‌. Cotorsion torsion triples‌​‌ and the representation theory​​ of filtered hierarchical clustering​​​‌.Advances in Mathematics‌3692020, 107171‌​‌back to text
  • 48​​ articleA. I.Alexander​​​‌ I. Bobenko and B.‌ A.Boris A. Springborn‌​‌. Variational Principles for​​ Circle Patterns and Koebe's​​​‌ Theorem.Trans. Amer.‌ Math. Soc.3562003‌​‌, 659--689back to​​ text
  • 49 articleJ.-D.​​​‌Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, R.‌Ramsay Dyer and A.‌​‌Arijit Ghosh. Delaunay​​ triangulation of manifolds.​​​‌Foundations of Computational Mathematics‌1822018,‌​‌ 399--431back to text​​
  • 50 articleF.F.​​​‌ Brogi, O.O.‌ Malaspinas, B.B.‌​‌ Chopard and C.C.​​ Bonadonna. Hermite regularization​​​‌ of the lattice Boltzmann‌ method for open source‌​‌ computational aeroacoustics.Journal​​ of the Acoustical Society​​​‌ of America1424‌2017, 2332--2345back‌​‌ to text
  • 51 article​​M. M.Michael M.​​​‌ Bronstein, J.Joan‌ Bruna, Y.Yann‌​‌ LeCun, A.Arthur​​ Szlam and P.Pierre​​​‌ Vandergheynst. Geometric Deep‌ Learning: Going beyond Euclidean‌​‌ data.IEEE Signal​​ Processing Magazine344​​​‌2017, 18-42DOI‌back to text
  • 52‌​‌ inproceedingsR.Rickard Brüel​​ Gabrielsson and G.Gunnar​​​‌ Carlsson. Exposition and‌ Interpretation of the Topology‌​‌ of Neural Networks.​​2019 18th IEEE International​​​‌ Conference On Machine Learning‌ And Applications (ICMLA)2019‌​‌, 1069--1076back to​​​‌ text
  • 53 articleM.​Marko Budiši ć and​‌ I.Igor Mezić.​​ Geometry of the ergodic​​​‌ quotient reveals coherent structures​ in flows.Physica​‌ D: Nonlinear Phenomena241​​152012, 1255--1269​​​‌back to text
  • 54​ articleA.Alberto Cacciola​‌, A.Alessandro Muscoloni​​, V.Vaibhav Narula​​​‌, A.Alessandro Calamuneri​, S.Salvatore Nigro​‌, E. A.Emeran​​ A Mayer, J.​​​‌ S.Jennifer S Labus​, G.Giuseppe Anastasi​‌, A.Aldo Quattrone​​, A.Angelo Quartarone​​​‌ and others. Coalescent​ embedding in the hyperbolic​‌ space unsupervisedly discloses the​​ hidden geometry of the​​​‌ brain.arXiv preprint​ arXiv:1705.041922017back to​‌ text
  • 55 articleG.​​Gunnar Carlsson and A.​​​‌Afra Zomorodian. The​ Theory of Multidimensional Persistence​‌.Discrete and Computational​​ Geometry4212009​​​‌, 71--93back to​ text
  • 56 inproceedingsM.​‌Mathieu Carriere, F.​​Frédéric Chazal, M.​​​‌Marc Glisse, Y.​Yuichi Ike and H.​‌Hariprasad Kannan. Optimizing​​ persistent homology based functions​​​‌.Proc. International Conference​ on Machine Learning2021​‌back to text
  • 57​​ inproceedingsM.Mathieu Carrière​​​‌, F.Frédéric Chazal​, Y.Yuichi Ike​‌, T.Théo Lacombe​​, M.Martin Royer​​​‌ and Y.Yuhei Umeda​. PersLay: a neural​‌ network layer for persistence​​ diagrams and new graph​​​‌ topological signatures.International​ Conference on Artificial Intelligence​‌ and Statistics (PMLR)2020​​, 2786--2796back to​​​‌ text
  • 58 articleA.​ X.Angel X Chang​‌, T.Thomas Funkhouser​​, L.Leonidas Guibas​​​‌, P.Pat Hanrahan​, Q.Qixing Huang​‌, Z.Zimo Li​​, S.Silvio Savarese​​​‌, M.Manolis Savva​, S.Shuran Song​‌, H.Hao Su​​ and others. Shapenet:​​​‌ An information-rich 3d model​ repository.arXiv preprint​‌ arXiv:1512.030122015back to​​ text
  • 59 articleF.​​​‌ d.Fré déric Chazal​, L. J.Leonidas​‌ J. Guibas, S.​​Steve Oudot and P.​​​‌Primoz Skraba. Persistence-Based​ Clustering in Riemannian Manifolds​‌.\bf Journal of​​ the ACM606​​​‌2013, 1--38URL:​ http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2535927DOIback to​‌ textback to text​​
  • 60 articleY.-C.Yen-Chi​​​‌ Chen, C. R.​Christopher R. Genovese and​‌ L.Larry Wasserman.​​ Statistical inference using the​​​‌ Morse-Smale complex.Electronic​ Journal of Statistics11​‌12017, 1390--1433​​back to text
  • 61​​​‌ inproceedingsC.Chao Chen​, X.Xiuyan Ni​‌, Q.Qinxun Bai​​ and Y.Yusu Wang​​​‌. A topological regularizer​ for classifiers via persistent​‌ homology.The 22nd​​ International Conference on Artificial​​​‌ Intelligence and Statistics (PMLR)​2019, 2573--2582back​‌ to text
  • 62 article​​A.Albert Chern.​​​‌ A Reflectionless Discrete Perfectly​ Matched Layer.Journal​‌ of Computational Physics381​​2019, 91--109back​​​‌ to text
  • 63 book​C. C.Charles C​‌ Conley. Isolated invariant​​ sets and the Morse​​​‌ index.38American​ Mathematical Soc.1978back​‌ to text
  • 64 article​​C.Christophe Coreixas,​​​‌ G.Gauthier Wissocq,​ G.Guillaume Puigt,​‌ J.-F.Jean-François Boussuge and​​ P.Pierre Sagaut.​​ Recursive regularization step for​​​‌ high-order lattice Boltzmann methods‌.Phys. Rev. E‌​‌9632017,​​ 033306back to text​​​‌
  • 65 articleK.Keenan‌ Crane, M.Mathieu‌​‌ Desbrun and P.Peter​​ Schröder. Trivial Connections​​​‌ on Discrete Surfaces.‌Computer Graphics Forum (\emph{Symposium‌​‌ on Geometry Processing})29​​52010, 1525--1533​​​‌back to text
  • 66‌ articleJ.Justin Curry‌​‌, S.Sayan Mukherjee​​ and K.Katharine Turner​​​‌. How Many Directions‌ Determine a Shape and‌​‌ other Sufficiency Results for​​ Two Topological Transforms.​​​‌arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.097822018‌back to text
  • 67‌​‌ articleA.Anastasia Deckard​​, R. C.Ron​​​‌ C Anafi, J.‌ B.John B Hogenesch‌​‌, S. B.Steven​​ B Haase and J.​​​‌John Harer. Design‌ and analysis of large-scale‌​‌ biological rhythm studies: a​​ comparison of algorithms for​​​‌ detecting periodic signals in‌ biological data.Bioinformatics‌​‌29242013,​​ 3174--3180back to text​​​‌
  • 68 incollectionM.Mathieu‌ Desbrun, E.Eva‌​‌ Kanso and Y.Yiying​​ Tong. Discrete Differential​​​‌ Forms for Computational Modeling‌.Discrete Differential Geometry‌​‌Springer2007back to​​ text
  • 69 article T.​​​‌ K.Tamal K Dey‌, M.Mateusz Juda‌​‌, T.Tomasz Kapela​​, J.Jacek Kubica​​​‌ and M.Michal Lipiński‌. back to text‌​‌
  • 70 inproceedingsT. K.​​Tamal K. Dey,​​​‌ M.Marian Mrozek and‌ R.Ryan Slechta.‌​‌ Persistence of the Conley​​ Index in Combinatorial Dynamical​​​‌ Systems.36th International‌ Symposium on Computational Geometry‌​‌ (SoCG 2020)164Schloss​​ Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik2020​​​‌, 37:1--37:17back to‌ text
  • 71 inproceedingsM.‌​‌Meryll Dindin, Y.​​Yuhei Umeda and F.​​​‌Frédéric Chazal. Topological‌ data analysis for arrhythmia‌​‌ detection through modular neural​​ networks.Canadian Conference​​​‌ on Artificial IntelligenceSpringer‌2020, 177--188back‌​‌ to text
  • 72 inproceedings​​N.Nicolas Donati,​​​‌ A.Abhishek Sharma and‌ M.Maks Ovsjanikov.‌​‌ Deep geometric functional maps:​​ Robust feature learning for​​​‌ shape correspondence.Proceedings‌ of the IEEE/CVF conference‌​‌ on Computer Vision and​​ Pattern Recognition2020,​​​‌ 8592--8601back to text‌
  • 73 inproceedingsP.Pierre‌​‌ Ecormier-Nocca, P.Pooran​​ Memari, J.James​​​‌ Gain and M.-P.Marie-Paule‌ Cani. Accurate synthesis‌​‌ of multi-class disk distributions​​.Computer Graphics Forum​​​‌38(2)Wiley Online Library‌2019, 157--168back‌​‌ to text
  • 74 article​​R.Robin Forman.​​​‌ Combinatorial vector fields and‌ dynamical systems.Mathematische‌​‌ Zeitschrift22841998​​, 629--681back to​​​‌ text
  • 75 bookT.‌Theodore Frankel. The‌​‌ Geometry of Physics: An​​ Introduction.Cambridge University​​​‌ Press2011back to‌ text
  • 76 inproceedingsA.‌​‌Andrea Frome, D.​​Daniel Huber, R.​​​‌Ravi Kolluri, T.‌Thomas Bülow and J.‌​‌Jitendra Malik. Recognizing​​ Objects in Range Data​​​‌ Using Regional Point Descriptors‌.European Conference on‌​‌ Computer VisionSpringer Berlin​​ Heidelberg2004, 224--237​​​‌back to text
  • 77‌ inproceedingsG.Gary Froyland‌​‌ and K.Kathrin Padberg-Gehle​​. Almost-Invariant and Finite-Time​​​‌ Coherent Sets: Directionality, Duration,‌ and Diffusion.Ergodic‌​‌ Theory, Open Dynamics, and​​​‌ Coherent StructuresSpringer New​ York2014, 171--216​‌back to text
  • 78​​ inproceedingsR. B.Rickard​​​‌ Brüel Gabrielsson, B.​ J.Bradley J Nelson​‌, A.Anjan Dwaraknath​​ and P.Primoz Skraba​​​‌. A topology layer​ for machine learning.​‌International Conference on Artificial​​ Intelligence and StatisticsPMLR​​​‌2020, 1553--1563back​ to text
  • 79 article​‌F.François Gay-Balmaz and​​ H.Hiroaki Yoshimura.​​​‌ From Lagrangian Mechanics to​ Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics: A Variational​‌ Perspective.Entropy21​​12019back to​​​‌ text
  • 80 articleR.​Robert Ghrist, R.​‌Rachel Levanger and H.​​Huy Mai. Persistent​​​‌ homology and Euler integral​ transforms.Journal of​‌ Applied and Computational Topology​​212018,​​​‌ 55--60back to text​
  • 81 articleM.Mark​‌ Gillespie, B.Boris​​ Springborn and K.Keenan​​​‌ Crane. Discrete Conformal​ Equivalence of Polyhedral Surfaces​‌.ACM Trans. Graph.​​4042021back​​​‌ to text
  • 82 article​F.Fernando de Goes​‌, A.Andrew Butts​​ and M.Mathieu Desbrun​​​‌. Discrete Differential Operators​ on Polygonal Meshes.​‌ACM Trans. Graph.39​​42020, Art.​​​‌ 110back to text​
  • 83 articleF.Fernando​‌ de Goes, M.​​Mathieu Desbrun, M.​​​‌Mark Meyer and T.​Tony DeRose. Subdivision​‌ Exterior Calculus for Geometry​​ Processing.ACM Trans.​​​‌ Graph.3542016​, Art. 133back​‌ to text
  • 84 article​​F.Fernando de Goes​​​‌, S.Siome Goldenstein​, M.Mathieu Desbrun​‌ and L.Luiz Velho​​. Exoskeleton: Curve network​​​‌ abstraction for 3D shapes​.Comput. Graph.35​‌1February 2011,​​ 112--121back to text​​​‌
  • 85 articleF.Fernando​ de Goes, B.​‌Beibei Liu, M.​​Max Budninskyi, Y.​​​‌Yiying Tong and M.​Mathieu Desbrun. Discrete​‌ 2-Tensor Fields on Triangulations​​.Comp. Graph. Forum​​​‌ \emph{(Symposium on Geometry Processing)}​335August 2014​‌, 13--24back to​​ text
  • 86 articleF.​​​‌ d.Fernando de Goes​, P.Pooran Memari​‌, P.Patrick Mullen​​ and M.Mathieu Desbrun​​​‌. Weighted triangulations for​ geometry processing.ACM​‌ Transactions on Graphics (TOG)​​3332014,​​​‌ 1--13back to text​
  • 87 bookE.Ernst​‌ Hairer, C.Christian​​ Lubich and G.Gerhard​​​‌ Wanner. Geometric numerical​ integration.31Springer​‌ Series in Computational Mathematics​​Structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary​​​‌ differential equationsSpringer-Verlag, Berlin​2006back to text​‌
  • 88 inproceedingsX.Xiaoling​​ Hu, F.Fuxin​​​‌ Li, D.Dimitris​ Samaras and C.Chao​‌ Chen. Topology-Preserving Deep​​ Image Segmentation.Advances​​​‌ in Neural Information Processing​ Systems (NeurIPS)322019​‌back to text
  • 89​​ inproceedingsR.Ruqi Huang​​​‌, M.-J.Marie-Julie Rakotosaona​, P.Panos Achlioptas​‌, L. J.Leonidas​​ J Guibas and M.​​​‌Maks Ovsjanikov. OperatorNet:​ Recovering 3d shapes from​‌ difference operators.Proceedings​​ of the IEEE/CVF International​​​‌ Conference on Computer Vision​2019, 8588--8597back​‌ to text
  • 90 inproceedings​​Q.Qitong Jiang,​​​‌ S.Sebastian Kurtek and​ T.Tom Needham.​‌ The Weighted Euler Curve​​ Transform for Shape and​​ Image Analysis.Proceedings​​​‌ of the IEEE/CVF Conference‌ on Computer Vision and‌​‌ Pattern Recognition Workshops2020​​, 844--845back to​​​‌ text
  • 91 articleX.‌Xiaoye Jiang, L.-H.‌​‌Lek-Heng Lim, Y.​​Yuan Yao and Y.​​​‌Yinyu Ye. Statistical‌ ranking and combinatorial Hodge‌​‌ theory.Mathematical Programming​​1272011, 203--244​​​‌back to text
  • 92‌ bookV.Volker John‌​‌. Large eddy simulation​​ of turbulent incompressible flows:​​​‌ analytical and numerical results‌ for a class of‌​‌ LES models.34​​Springer Science & Business​​​‌ Media2003back to‌ text
  • 93 articleM.‌​‌Masaki Kashiwara and P.​​Pierre Schapira. Persistent​​​‌ homology and microlocal sheaf‌ theory.Journal of‌​‌ Applied and Computational Topology​​21-22018,​​​‌ 83--113back to text‌
  • 94 articleL.L.‌​‌ Kharevych, B.B.​​ Springborn and P.P.​​​‌ Schröder. Discrete conformal‌ mappings via circle patterns‌​‌.ACM Trans. Graph.​​2522006,​​​‌ 412--438back to text‌
  • 95 inproceedingsK.Kwangho‌​‌ Kim, J.Jisu​​ Kim, M.Manzil​​​‌ Zaheer, J.Joon‌ Kim, F.Frédéric‌​‌ Chazal and L.Larry​​ Wasserman. PLLay: Efficient​​​‌ Topological Layer based on‌ Persistence Landscapes.Advances‌​‌ in Neural Information Processing​​ Systems (NeurIPS)2020back​​​‌ to text
  • 96 article‌F.FENG LUO.‌​‌ COMBINATORIAL YAMABE FLOW ON​​ SURFACES.Communications in​​​‌ Contemporary Mathematics65‌2004, 765--780back‌​‌ to text
  • 97 article​​J.Jacob Leygonie,​​​‌ S.Steve Oudot and‌ U.Ulrike Tillmann.‌​‌ A framework for differential​​ calculus on persistence barcodes​​​‌.Foundations of Computational‌ MathematicsTo appear2021‌​‌back to text
  • 98​​ articleW.Wei Li​​​‌, Y.Yixin Chen‌, M.Mathieu Desbrun‌​‌, C.Changxi Zheng​​ and X.Xiaopei Liu​​​‌. Fast and Scalable‌ Turbulent Flow Simulation with‌​‌ Two-Way Coupling.ACM​​ Trans. Graph.394​​​‌2020, Art. 47‌back to text
  • 99‌​‌ article M.Michal Lipiński​​. back to text​​​‌
  • 100 inproceedingsO.Or‌ Litany, T.Tal‌​‌ Remez, E.Emanuele​​ Rodola, A.Alex​​​‌ Bronstein and M.Michael‌ Bronstein. Deep functional‌​‌ maps: Structured prediction for​​ dense shape correspondence.​​​‌Proceedings of the IEEE‌ International Conference on Computer‌​‌ Vision2017, 5659--5667​​back to text
  • 101​​​‌ articleB.Beibei Liu‌, Y.Yiying Tong‌​‌, F.Fernando de​​ Goes and M.Mathieu​​​‌ Desbrun. Discrete Connection‌ and Covariant Derivative for‌​‌ Vector Field Analysis and​​ Design.ACM Trans.​​​‌ Graph.3532016‌, Art. 23back‌​‌ to textback to​​ text
  • 102 miscE.​​​‌ R.Ephy R. Love‌, B.Benjamin Filippenko‌​‌, V.Vasileios Maroulas​​ and G.Gunnar Carlsson​​​‌. Topological Deep Learning‌.2021back to‌​‌ text
  • 103 inproceedingsC.​​Clément Maria, S.​​​‌Steve Oudot and E.‌Elchanan Solomon. Intrinsic‌​‌ topological transforms via the​​ distance kernel embedding.​​​‌Proc. International Symposium on‌ Computational Geometry2020back‌​‌ to text
  • 104 book​​J. E.Jerrold E.​​​‌ Marsden and T. S.‌Tudor S. Ratiu.‌​‌ Introduction to Mechanics and​​​‌ Symmetry: A Basic Exposition​ of Classical Mechanical Systems​‌.Springer2010back​​ to textback to​​​‌ text
  • 105 articleJ.​ E.J. E. Marsden​‌ and M.M. West​​. Discrete mechanics and​​​‌ variational integrators.Acta​ Numerica102001,​‌ 357--514back to text​​
  • 106 articleI.Igor​​​‌ Mezić. Analysis of​ Fluid Flows via Spectral​‌ Properties of the Koopman​​ Operator.Annual Review​​​‌ of Fluid Mechanics45​12013, 357--378​‌back to text
  • 107​​ articleT.Tomas Mikolov​​​‌, K.Kai Chen​, G.Greg Corrado​‌ and J.Jeffrey Dean​​. Efficient estimation of​​​‌ word representations in vector​ space.arXiv preprint​‌ arXiv:1301.37812013back to​​ text
  • 108 articleP.​​​‌Patrick Mullen, P.​Pooran Memari, F.​‌Fernando de Goes and​​ M.Mathieu Desbrun.​​​‌ HOT: Hodge-optimized triangulations.​ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH)​‌3042011,​​ 103:1--103:12back to text​​​‌
  • 109 bookS. Y.​Steve Y. Oudot.​‌ Persistence Theory: From Quiver​​ Representations to Data Analysis​​​‌.AMS Mathematical Surveys​ and Monographs209American​‌ Mathematical Society2015back​​ to textback to​​​‌ text
  • 110 articleS.​Steve Oudot and E.​‌Elchanan Solomon. Barcode​​ embeddings for metric graphs​​​‌.Algebraic and Geometric​ Topology2021back to​‌ text
  • 111 articleM.​​Maks Ovsjanikov, M.​​​‌Mirela Ben-Chen, J.​Justin Solomon, A.​‌Adrian Butscher and L.​​Leonidas Guibas. Functional​​​‌ maps: a flexible representation​ of maps between shapes​‌.ACM Trans. Graph.​​314July 2012​​​‌, 30:1--30:11back to​ text
  • 112 incollectionM.​‌Maks Ovsjanikov, E.​​Etienne Corman, M.​​​‌Michael Bronstein, E.​Emanuele Rodolà, M.​‌Mirela Ben-Chen, L.​​Leonidas Guibas, F.​​​‌Frederic Chazal and A.​Alex Bronstein. Computing​‌ and processing correspondences with​​ functional maps.SIGGRAPH​​​‌ 2017 Courses2017back​ to text
  • 113 article​‌M.Maks Ovsjanikov,​​ W.Wilmot Li,​​​‌ L.Leonidas Guibas and​ N. J.Niloy J.​‌ Mitra. Exploration of​​ Continuous Variability in Collections​​​‌ of 3D Shapes.​ACM Trans. Graph.30​‌42011back to​​ text
  • 114 articleJ.​​​‌ A.Jose A Perea​ and J.John Harer​‌. Sliding windows and​​ persistence: An application of​​​‌ topological methods to signal​ analysis.Foundations of​‌ Computational Mathematics153​​2015, 799--838back​​​‌ to text
  • 115 article​U.Ulrich Pinkall and​‌ K.Konrad Polthier.​​ Computing Discrete Minimal Surfaces​​​‌ and Their Conjugates.​Experimental Mathematics21993​‌, 15--36back to​​ text
  • 116 articleH.​​​‌Helmut Pottmann, J.​Johannes Wallner, Q.-X.​‌Qi-Xing Huang and Y.-L.​​Yong-Liang Yang. Integral​​​‌ invariants for robust geometry​ processing.Computer Aided​‌ Geometric Design261​​2009, 37--60back​​​‌ to text
  • 117 article​V.Vakhtang Putkaradze and​‌ F.Fraçois Gay-Balmaz.​​ Exact geometric theory for​​​‌ flexible, fluid-conducting tubes.​Comptes Rendus Mécanique342​‌22014, 79--84​​back to text
  • 118​​​‌ articleM.-J.Marie-Julie Rakotosaona​, P.Paul Guerrero​‌, N.Noam Aigerman​​, N. J.Niloy​​ J. Mitra and M.​​​‌Maks Ovsjanikov. Learning‌ Delaunay Surface Elements for‌​‌ Mesh Reconstruction.CVPR​​2021back to text​​​‌
  • 119 articleT.Tullio‌ Regge. General relativity‌​‌ without coordinates.Nuovo​​ Cim.1931961​​​‌, 558--571back to‌ text
  • 120 articleI.‌​‌Igor Rivin. Euclidean​​ structures on simplicial surfaces​​​‌ and hyperbolic volume.‌Annals of Math.139‌​‌31994back to​​ text
  • 121 articleR.​​​‌ M.Raif M. Rustamov‌, M.Maks Ovsjanikov‌​‌, O.Omri Azencot​​, M.Mirela Ben-Chen​​​‌, F.Frédéric Chazal‌ and L.Leonidas Guibas‌​‌. Map-Based Exploration of​​ Intrinsic Shape Differences and​​​‌ Variability.ACM Trans.‌ Graph.324July‌​‌ 2013back to text​​back to text
  • 122​​​‌ unpublishedB.Ben Sattelberg‌, R.Renzo Cavalieri‌​‌, M.Michael Kirby​​, C.Chris Peterson​​​‌ and J.J. Beveridge‌. Locally Linear Attributes‌​‌ of ReLU Neural Networks​​.11 2020,​​​‌ arxiv.org/abs/2012.01940back to text‌
  • 123 inproceedingsP.Pierre‌​‌ Schapira. Tomography of​​ constructible functions.International​​​‌ Symposium on Applied Algebra,‌ Algebraic Algorithms, and Error-Correcting‌​‌ CodesSpringer1995,​​ 427--435back to text​​​‌
  • 124 articleX.Xiaowen‌ Shan, X.-F.Xue-Feng‌​‌ Yuan and H.Hudong​​ Chen. Kinetic theory​​​‌ representation of hydrodynamics: a‌ way beyond the Navier--Stokes‌​‌ equation.Journal of​​ Fluid Mechanics5502006​​​‌, 413--441back to‌ text
  • 125 articleP.‌​‌ R.Philippe R Spalart​​. Detached-eddy simulation.​​​‌Annual review of fluid‌ mechanics412009,‌​‌ 181--202back to text​​
  • 126 articleB.Boris​​​‌ Springborn, P.Peter‌ Schröder and U.Ulrich‌​‌ Pinkall. Conformal equivalence​​ of triangle meshes.​​​‌ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH)‌2732008,‌​‌ 77:1--77:11back to text​​
  • 127 inproceedingsJ.Jian​​​‌ Sun, M.Maks‌ Ovsjanikov and L.Leonidas‌​‌ Guibas. A concise​​ and provably informative multi-scale​​​‌ signature based on heat‌ diffusion.Computer graphics‌​‌ forum28(5)Wiley Online​​ Library2009, 1383--1392​​​‌back to text
  • 128‌ incollectionF.Floris Takens‌​‌. Detecting strange attractors​​ in turbulence.Dynamical​​​‌ systems and turbulence, Warwick‌ 1980Springer1981,‌​‌ 366--381back to text​​
  • 129 articleJ.-M.Jean-Marc​​​‌ Thiery, P.Pooran‌ Memari and T.Tamy‌​‌ Boubekeur. Mean value​​ coordinates for quad cages​​​‌ in 3D.ACM‌ Trans. Graph.376‌​‌2018, 1--14back​​ to text
  • 130 article​​​‌J.-L.Jean-Luc Thiffeault.‌ Braids of entangled particle‌​‌ trajectories.Chaos20​​2010, 017516back​​​‌ to text
  • 131 book‌W. P.William P‌​‌ Thurston. Three-dimensional geometry​​ and topology.Princeton​​​‌ university press1997back‌ to text
  • 132 book‌​‌J.Julien Tierny.​​ Topological data analysis for​​​‌ scientific visualization.Springer‌2017back to text‌​‌
  • 133 articleS.Svetlana​​ Tokareva, M. J.​​​‌Mikhail Jurievich Shashkov and‌ A. N.Alexei N.‌​‌ Skurikhin. Machine learning​​ approach for the solution​​​‌ of the Riemann problem‌ in fluid dynamics.‌​‌Preprint2019back to​​ text
  • 134 articleM.​​​‌Melanie Weber, J.‌Jürgen Jost and E.‌​‌Emil Saucan. Forman-Ricci​​​‌ Flow for Change Detection​ in Large Dynamic Data​‌ Sets.Axioms5​​42016back to​​​‌ text
  • 135 articleC.​Chengyuan Wu and C.​‌ A.Carol Anne Hargreaves​​. Topological machine learning​​​‌ for mixed numeric and​ categorical data.arXiv​‌ preprint arXiv:2003.045842020back​​ to text
  • 136 inproceedings​​​‌Z.Zhirong Wu,​ S.Shuran Song,​‌ A.Aditya Khosla,​​ F.Fisher Yu,​​​‌ L.Linguang Zhang,​ X.Xiaoou Tang and​‌ J.Jianxiong Xiao.​​ 3d shapenets: A deep​​​‌ representation for volumetric shapes​.Proceedings of the​‌ IEEE conference on Computer​​ Vision and Pattern Recognition​​​‌2015, 1912--1920back​ to text
  • 137 article​‌M.Melissa Yeung,​​ D.David Cohen-Steiner and​​​‌ M.Mathieu Desbrun.​ Material Coherence from Trajectories​‌ via Burau Eigenanalysis of​​ Braids.Chaos: An​​​‌ Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear​ Science303Selected​‌ as \emph{Featured Article} online​​2020, 033122back​​​‌ to text
  • 138 article​W.Wei Zeng,​‌ R.Ren Guo,​​ F.Feng Luo and​​​‌ X.Xianfeng Gu.​ Discrete heat kernel determines​‌ discrete Riemannian metric.​​Graphical Models744​​​‌2012, 121-129back​ to text