Section: Research Program
Interval analysis
We are interested in realvalued system solving ($f\left(X\right)=0$, $f\left(X\right)\le 0$), in optimization problems, and in the proof of the existence of properties (for example, it exists $X$ such that $f\left(X\right)=0$ or it exist two values ${X}_{1}$, ${X}_{2}$ such that $f\left({X}_{1}\right)>0$ and $f\left({X}_{2}\right)<0$). There are few restrictions on the function $f$ as we are able to manage explicit functions using classical mathematical operators (e.g. $sin(x+y)+log(cos\left({e}^{x}\right)+{y}^{2})$ as well as implicit functions (e.g. determining if there are parameter values of a parametrized matrix such that the determinant of the matrix is negative, without calculating the analytical form of the determinant).
Solutions are searched within a finite domain (called a box) which may be either continuous or mixed (i.e. for which some variables must belong to a continuous range while other variables may only have values within a discrete set). An important point is that we aim at finding all the solutions within the domain whenever the computer arithmetic will allow it: in other words we are looking for certified solutions. For example, for 0dimensional system solving, we will provide a box that contains one, and only one, solution together with a numerical approximation of this solution. This solution may further be refined at will using multiprecision.
The core of our methods is the use of interval analysis that allows one to manipulate mathematical expressions whose unknowns have interval values. A basic component of interval analysis is the interval evaluation of an expression. Given an analytical expression $F$ in the unknowns $\{{x}_{1},{x}_{2},...,{x}_{n}\}$ and ranges $\{{X}_{1},{X}_{2},...,{X}_{n}\}$ for these unknowns we are able to compute a range $[A,B]$, called the interval evaluation, such that
$\forall \{{x}_{1},{x}_{2},...,{x}_{n}\}\in \{{X}_{1},{X}_{2},...,{X}_{n}\},A\le F({x}_{1},{x}_{2},...,{x}_{n})\le B$  (1) 
In other words the interval evaluation provides a lower bound of the minimum of $F$ and an upper bound of its maximum over the box.
For example if $F=x\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}sin(x+{x}^{2})$ and $x\in [0.5,1.6]$, then $F\left(\right[0.5,1.6\left]\right)=[1.362037441,1.6]$, meaning that for any $x$ in [0.5,1.6] we guarantee that $1.362037441\le f\left(x\right)\le 1.6$.
The interval evaluation of an expression has interesting properties:

it can be implemented in such a way that the results are guaranteed with respect to roundoff errors i.e. property 1 is still valid in spite of numerical errors induced by the use of floating point numbers

if $A>0$ or $B<0$, then no values of the unknowns in their respective ranges can cancel $F$

if $A>0$ ($B<0$), then $F$ is positive (negative) for any value of the unknowns in their respective ranges
A major drawback of the interval evaluation is that $A\left(B\right)$ may be overestimated i.e. values of ${x}_{1},{x}_{2},...,{x}_{n}$ such that $F({x}_{1},{x}_{2},...,{x}_{n})=A\left(B\right)$ may not exist. This overestimation occurs because in our calculation each occurrence of a variable is considered as an independent variable. Hence if a variable has multiple occurrences, then an overestimation may occur. Such phenomena can be observed in the previous example where $B=1.6$ while the real maximum of $F$ is approximately 0.9144. The value of $B$ is obtained because we are using in our calculation the formula $F=xsin(y+{z}^{2})$ with $y,z$ having the same interval value as $x$.
Fortunately there are methods that allow one to reduce the overestimation and the overestimation amount decreases with the width of the ranges. The latter remark leads to the use of a branchandbound strategy in which for a given box a variable range will be bisected, thereby creating two new boxes that are stored in a list and processed later on. The algorithm is complete if all boxes in the list have been processed, or if during the process a box generates an answer to the problem at hand (e.g. if we want to prove that $F\left(X\right)<0$, then the algorithm stops as soon as $F\left(\mathcal{B}\right)\ge 0$ for a certain box $\mathcal{B}$).
A generic interval analysis algorithm involves the following steps on the current box [8], [4]:

exclusion operators: these operators determine that there is no solution to the problem within a given box. An important issue here is the extensive and smart use of the monotonicity of the functions

filters: these operators may reduce the size of the box i.e. decrease the width of the allowed ranges for the variables

existence operators: they allow one to determine the existence of a unique solution within a given box and are usually associated with a numerical scheme that allows for the computation of this solution in a safe way

bisection: choose one of the variable and bisect its range for creating two new boxes
The scope of the HEPHAISTOS project is to address all these steps in order to find the most efficient procedures. Our efforts focus on mathematical developments (adapting classical theorems to interval analysis, proving interval analysis theorems), the use of symbolic computation and formal proofs (a symbolic preprocessing allows one to automatically adapt the solver to the structure of the problem), software implementation and experimental tests (for validation purposes).
Important note: We have insisted on interval analysis because this is a major component or our robotics activity. Our theoretical work in robotics is an analysis of the robotic environment in order to exhibit proofs on the behavior of the system that may be qualitative (e.g. the proof that a cabledriven parallel robot with more than 6 nondeformable cables will have at most 6 cables under tension simultaneously) or quantitative. In the quantitative case as we are dealing with realistic and not toy examples (including our own prototypes that are developed whenever no equivalent hardware is available or to very our assumptions) we have to manage problems that are so complex that analytical solutions are probably out of reach (e.g. the direct kinematics of parallel robots) and we have to resort to algorithms and numerical analysis. We are aware of different approaches in numerical analysis (e.g. some team members were previously involved in teams devoted to computational geometry and algebraic geometry) but interval analysis provides us another approach with high flexibility, the possibility of managing non algebraic problems (e.g. the kinematics of cabledriven parallel robots with sagging cables, that involves inverse hyperbolic functions) and to address various types of issues (system solving, optimization, proof of existence ...). However whenever needed we will rely as well on continuation, algebraic geometry, geometry or learning.